Changes

From DMC
Jump to: navigation, search

Glory Wealth Shipping v Korea Line Corporation

5 bytes removed, 21:02, 13 October 2011
no edit summary
'''Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Limited v Korea Line Corporation'''
 
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Blair J: [2011] EWHC 1819 (Comm): 22 June 2011'''
Mr Charles Priday, instructed by Win'er Winter Scott LLP, for the Claimant charterers
Mr David Lewis, instructed by DLA Piper UK LLP, for the Respondent owners
'''Summary'''
'''The Commercial Court held that while the usual measure of damages for the premature wrongful termination of a time charterparty was the difference between the contract rate and the market rate for the balance of the charter period at the time of termination, this rule did not and could not apply in cases where there was no available market at the time of termination. In such cases, damages should be assessed on the basis of actual losses suffered by the innocent party, subject to the usual rules on mitigation of losses. The revival of an available market at a later stage would not in itself provide a correct measure of damages. It was only a factor to be taken into account in the assessment, and might be relevant to the question of mitigation.'''
This note has been contributed by Ken To-ching Lee, LLB(Hons), PCLL (University of Hong Kong), BCL(Oxon) and barrister-at-law in Hong Kong.
'''Background'''
 
The present case concerned a time charterparty on an amended NYPE form entered into between Korea Line Corporation, the Shipowners, and Glory Wealth Shipping, the Charterers in February 2008. The charter was for a minimum of 36 months to maximum 38 months. The Vessel was delivered to the Charterers in June 2008 and was therefore due for redelivery between June and August 2011.

Navigation menu