2,049
edits
Changes
From DMC
no edit summary
England '''Glencore Energy UK Ltd v OMV Supply & Trading Ltd (The “Seagrace”)'''/ English Commercial Court: Sir Ross Cranston: [2018] EWHC 895 (Comm): 23 April 2018: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_v_OMV_Supply_and_Trading_-_The_Seagrace] '''CFR SALES CONTRACT: BP CFR SALES TERMS: BPVOY4 FORM: VESSEL WAITING OFFSHORE EN ROUTE TO PORT OF DISCHARGE AT REQUEST OF BUYERS: SELLERS CLAIM FOR DETENTION BASED ON IMPLIED CONTRACT: WHETHER CLAIM FOR WAITING OFFSHORE WAS A DEMURRAGE CLAIM: WHETHER CLAIM TIME-BARRED DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DEMURRAGE CLAIMS PRESENTATION CLAUSE DEADLINE''' DMC/SandT/18/03 England '''Lukoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Ocean Tankers Pte Ltd (The “Ocean Neptune”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2018] EWHC 163 (Comm): 2 February 2018:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Asia_Pacific_v_Ocean_Tankers_-_The_Ocean_Neptune]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: EXXONMOBILVOY 2005 FORM: LITASCO CLAUSES: DEMURRAGE CLAIM PRESENTATION TIME-BAR REQUIRING DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF CLAIM TO BE PRESENTED TO CHARTERERS WITHIN 90 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF CARGO DISCHARGE: WHETHER CLAIM FOR TIME LOST WAITING FOR ORDERS TIME-BARRED DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DOCUMENT PRESENTATION REQUIREMENT: APPEAL FROM PARTIAL FINAL AWARD UNDER SECTION 69 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/18/02 England '''Kyokuyo Co Ltd v AP Møller-Maersk A/S, trading as “Maersk Line”''' '''English High Court – Commercial Court: Mr Justice Andrew Baker: [2017] EWHC 654 (Comm): 29 March 2017: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kyokuyo_v_AP_Møller-Maersk_-_trading_as_Maersk_Line]] '''LIMITATION OF LIABILITY UNDER HAGUE/HAGUE-VISBY RULES: WHETHER LIMITATION APPLIED TO EACH SEPARATE PACKAGE/UNIT DAMAGED OR TO TOTAL NUMBER OF PACKAGES/UNITS''' DMC/SandT/18/01 England '''CSSA Chartering and Shipping Services S.A. v Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd (The “Pacific Voyager”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2017] EWHC 2579 (Comm): 18 October 2017: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CSSA_Chartering_and_Shipping_Services_v_Mitsui_O.S.K._Lines_-_The_Pacific_Voyager]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: SHELLVOY 5 FORM: WHETHER OBLIGATION ON OWNER TO GET THE VESSEL TO THE LOADING PORT WITHIN A CERTAIN TIME: WHETHER SUCH AN OBLIGATION IS ABSOULTE OR ONLY ONE OF DUE DILIGENCE: WHETHER LAYCAN EQUIVALENT TO AN ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL OR READINESS TO LOAD DATE''' DMC/SandT/17/14 England '''Glencore International AG v MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.''' '''English Court of Appeal; Lewison and Henderson LJJ, Sir Christopher Clarke; [2017] EWCA Civ 365; 24 May 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_International_v_MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company]]''' '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY OF CARGO: MEANING OF “DELIVERY ORDER": ELECTRONIC RELEASE SYSTEMS IN OPERATION AT PORT OF DISCHARGE: WHETHER A RELEASE NOTE CONTAINING PIN CODES CONSTITUTED A DELIVERY ORDER: WHETHER CONSIGNEE ESTOPPED BY PREVIOUS USE OF ERS SYSTEM''' DMC/SandT/17/13 England '''Navalmare UK Limited v Kale Maden Hammaddeler Sanayi ve Ticart AS (The “Arundel Castle”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Knowles J: [2017] EWHC 116 (Comm): 31 January 2017: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Navalmare_UK_v_Kale_Maden_Hammaddeler_Sanayi_ve_Ticart_-_The_Arundel_Castle]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: MEANING OF “PORT LIMITS”: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL''' DMC/SandT/17/12 Singapore '''DSA Consultancy (FZC) v The “Eurohope”''' '''Singapore High Court; Chua Lee Ming J; [2017] SGHC 218: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSA_Consultancy_(FZC)_v_The_Eurohope]] '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: ARREST TO OBTAIN SECURITY IN AID OF FOREIGN COURT PROCEEDINGS''' DMC/SandT/17/11 Canada '''De Wolf Maritime Safety BV v Traffic-Tech International Inc. (The “Zagora”)''' '''Federal Court, Ontario: Madam Justice St-Louis; 2017 FC 23: 11 January 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/De_Wolf_Maritime_Safety_v_Traffic-Tech_International_-_The_Zagora]]''' '''HAGUE-VISBY RULES: WHETHER CARGO CARRIED ON-DECK UNDECLARED AMOUNTED TO “GOODS” AS DEFINED IN THE RULES: WHETHER A CARRIER COULD RELY ON THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO GOODS CARRIED ON-DECK WITHOUT AUTHORISATION''' DMC/SandT/0217/10 England '''Transgrain Shipping (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Yangtze Navigation (Hong Kong) Co Ltd.''''''English Commercial Court: Teare J: (2016) EWHC 3122 (Comm): [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Transgrain_Shipping_(Singapore)_v_Yangtze_Navigation_(Hong_Kong)]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY (TIME): NYPE INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996, CLAUSE 8(D): WHETHER “ACT” REQUIRES FAULT''' DMC/SandT/17/09 Singapore '''The “Posidon” and another matter''' '''Singapore High Court; Belinda Ang Saw Ean J; [2017] SGHC 138:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Posidon]] '''CLAIMS AGAINST SHIP SALE PROCEEDS: PRIORITIES: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH ESTABLISHED ORDER OF PRIORITIES MAY BE DEPARTED FROM: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH NECESSARIES CLAIM MAY RANK ABOVE MORTGAGEE’S CLAIM: WHETHER REQUIREMENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF NATURE AND EXTENT OF EXPENDITURE DIFFERS FOR DIFFERENT KINDS OF NECESSARIES CLAIMS''' DMC/SandT/17/08 England '''Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The “New Flamenco”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hodge SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 43: 28 June 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-_The_New_Flamenco_-_Supreme_Court_Decision]]''' '''TIME CHARTER: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM: WHETHER CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL''' DMC/SandT/17/07 England '''Gard Marine & Energy Ltd v China National Chartering Co Ltd and another/China National Chartering Co Ltd v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another/Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another (The “Ocean Victory”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Hodge and Toulson SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 35: 10 May 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gard_Marine_%26_Energy_v_China_National_Chartering_-_The_Ocean_Victory]] '''DEMISE CHARTERPARTY: TIME CHARTERPARTY: CONTACT WITH BREAKWATER AND GROUNDING AT PORT RESULTING IN CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS AND WRECK REMOVAL OF VESSEL: WHETHER LOSS CAUSED BY BREACH OF SAFE PORT UNDERTAKING OR BY AN ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE: WHETHER SUBROGATED RIGHTS OF HULL INSURERS AND INSURED LOSSES OF OWNERS AGAINST DEMISE CHARTERERS PRECLUDED BY DEMISE CHARTERPARTY TERMS: WHETHER TIME CHARTERERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY AGAINST HULL INSURERS AND OWNERS: BARECON 89 FORM: MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT 1995: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976 DMC/SandT/17/06 England '''Bahamas Oil Refining Company International Limited v Cape Bari Tankschiffahrts GmbH & Co KG (The “Cape Bari”)''' '''Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson SCJJ: [2016] UKPC 20: 19 July 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bahamas_Oil_Refining_Company_v_Cape_Bari_Tankschiffahrts_-_The_Cape_Bari]]''' '''CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH: COLLISION BETWEEN VESSEL AND BERTH: WHETHER – UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH - VESSEL CAN CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE STATUTORY RIGHT TO LIMIT LABILITY: WHETHER UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE VESSEL DID CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE RIGHT TO LIMIT: MERCHANT SHIPPING (MARITIME CLAIMS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY) ACT 1989 OF THE BAHAMAS: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976''' DMC/SandT/17/05 England '''Oldendorff GmbH & Co KG v Sea Powerful II Special Maritime Enterprises (The “Zagora”)''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Mr Justice Teare: [2016] EWHC 3212; 15 December 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oldendorff_GmbH_v_Sea_Powerful_II_Special_Maritime_Enterprises_The_Zagora]]''' '''LETTER OF INDEMNITY: WHETHER THE DISCHARGE PORT AGENT WAS ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE SHIPOWNERS OR THE PERSON NAMED IN THE LETTER OF INDEMNITY AS THE PERSON TO WHOM DELIVERY OF THE CARGO WAS TO BE MADE''' DMC/SandT/17/04 England '''MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Cottonex Anstalt''' '''Court of Appeal; Moore-Bick and Tomlinson LJJ, Keehan J.; [2016] EWCA Civ 789; 27 July 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company_v_Cottonex_Anstalt]] '''CONTAINER DEMURRAGE: FRUSTRATION: REPUDIATION AND LEGITIMATE INTEREST: GOOD FAITH: PENALTIES''' DMC/SandT/17/03 England '''SPAR SHIPPING AS v GRAND CHINA LOGISTICS HOLDING (GROUP) CO LTD (THE “SPAR CAPELLA”, “SPAR VEGA” AND “SPAR DRACO”)''' '''Court of Appeal; Sir Terence Etherton MR, Gross and Hamblen LJJ; [2016] EWCA Civ 982; 7 October 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Spar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics_Holding_Group]]'''
'''EnglandNYPE 1993 FORM TIME CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ DUTY TO PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION OR AN INNOMINATE TERM: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY BREACH OF THE TIME CHARTER'''
'''Volcafe Ltd and Others v Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA (trading as “CSAV”)'''
'''The NetherlandsCARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: CONSIGNMENTS OF BAGGED COFFEE BEANS IN CONTAINERS CARRIED ON LCL/FCL TERMS: CARGO DAMAGED BY CONDENSATION: TEMPORAL SCOPE OF HAGUE RULES: BURDEN OF PROOF: WHETHER CARRIER FAILED PROPERLY AND CAREFULLY TO LOAD AND CARRY THE GOODS: WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO RELY ON “INHERENT VICE” EXCEPTION: WHETHER DAMAGE INEVITABLE: HAGUE RULES, ARTICLE III RULE 2 AND ARTICLE IV RULE 2(M)'''
England '''CONSTRUCTION OF ART. 3ST Shipping & Transport INC v Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA (4The “Kriti Filoxenia”) SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE ARREST OF SEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''
'''High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Mr Justice Walker; [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm); 14 May 2015'''
'''CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ RIGHT TO CANCEL THE CHARTERPARTY PURSUANT TO THE LAYCAN PROVISION SURIVIVES A RE-NOMINATION OF THE LOAD PORT'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2807
'''Rainy Sky SA FSL-9 Pte Ltd and Nordic Tankers Trading A/S v Kookmin BankNorwegian Hull Club (The “FSL New York”)'''
'''UK Supreme English Commercial Court: Lord Phillips, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and Lord WilsonBlair J: [20112016] UKSC 50EWHC 1091 (Comm): 10 May 2016: 2 November 2011[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Rainy_Sky_v_Kookmin_BankFSL-9_Pte_&_Nordic_Tankers_Trading_v_Norwegian_Hull_Club_-_The_FSL_New_York]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING: LETTER OF GUARANTEEUNDERTAKING: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION BEING P&I CLUB: WHETHER CLAIMANT OWNERS COULD APPLY TO HIGH COURT TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT P&I CLUB TO INCREASE LEVEL OF SECURITY AVAILABLE UNDER A UNITARY PROCESSLETTER OF UNDERTAKING ISSUED BY THE CLUB TO OWNERS: ROLE MEANING OF COMMERCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: WEIGHT “LIBERTY TO BE GIVEN APPLY” IN LETTER OF UNDERTAKING SUBJECT TO VIEW ENGLISH LAW AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF COMMERCIAL JUDGEHIGH COURT IN LONDON'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2706
'''NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NY v Cargill International SA, The Sahand“Global Santosh”'''
'''ARRESTS OFF-HIRE CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF VESSELS IN SINGAPORE OWNED BY IRANIAN COMPANIESVESSEL: ASSETS FREEZE IMPOSED BY UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS 1737, 1747, 1803 WHETHER ACTS OF RECEIVERS AND 1929: WHETHER SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS REQUIRE IMPOUNDMENT OR DETENTION SUB-CHARTERERS WERE TO BE CONSIDERED “DEFAULT OF VESSELS OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY DESIGNATED PERSONS OR ENTITIES THE CHARTERERS OR THEIR SUBSIDIARIES: EFFECT OF ASSETS FREEZE ON ARREST OF SHIPS PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION OF COURTAGENTS”'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2605
'''England'''
'''National PST Energy 7 Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v BP Oil Supply CompanyOW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''English Supreme Court of Appeal: Ward and Tomlinson LJJ and Sir Mark Potter: 12 October 2011: ; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Hughes, Toulson; [20112016] EWCA Civ 1127UKSC 23, 11 May 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NSCSA_v_BP_Oil_SupplyPST_Energy_7__Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_-_The_Res_Cogitans]]'''
'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: BPVOY4: DEMURRAGE CLAIMS RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE; GOODS CONTEMPLATED TO BE PRESENTED WITH FULL DOCUMENTATION WITHIN 90 DAYS CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED; SALE OF COMPLETION GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE; COMMENTS ON POSITION IF SALE OF DISCHARGE: FINAL SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM: WHETHER MIS-DESCRIBED FURTHER DEMURRAGE CLAIM TIME-BARRED: COST OF BUNKERS CONSUMED FOR RE-BERTHINGGOODS ACT 1979 APPLIED'''
DMC/11SandT/2516/04
'''England'''
'''Conarken Group Limited and Farrell Transport Limited Crescendo Maritime Co. & Alpha Bank AE vBank of Communications Co Ltd & Ors. Network Rail Infrastructure Limited'''
'''English High Court of Appeal; Pill, Moore-Bick, and Jackson LJJTeare J; [20112015] EWCA Civ 644EWHC 3364 (Comm), 27 May 201125 November 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Conarken_v_Network_RailCrescendo_Maritime_&_Alpha_Bank_v_Bank_of_Communications_&_Ors]]'''
'''TORTBACK-DATED SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: DAMAGESREFUND GUARANTEES: SUMS PAYABLE UNDER VICTIM’S CONTRACTS WITH THIRD PARTIESARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: FORESEEABILITY AND REMOTENESSACTION COMMENCED IN CHINESE COURTS BY A PARTY TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: REASONABLENESS BREACH OF CALCULATIONSARBITRATION AGREEMENT:WHETHER AN ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED:: WHETHER CHINESE PROCEEDINGS A COLLATERAL ATTACK ON ARBITRATION AWARD'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2403
'''England'''
'''Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Limited SBT Star Bulk & Tankers (Germany) GmbH & Co KG v Korea Line CorporationCosmotrade SA (The “Wehr Trave”)'''
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Blair Eder J: [20112016] EWHC 1819 583 (Comm): 22 June 2011March 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_Korea_Line_CorporationSBT_Bulk_&_Tankers_v_Cosmotrade_-_The_Wehr_Trave]]
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: WRONGFUL TERMINATION BY CHARTERERS: ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGESCHARTER TRIP: NO AVAILABLE MARKET FOR BALANCE WHETHER THE PARTICULAR TERMS OF THE CHARTER PERIOD AT TIME OF TERMINATIONPERMITTED CHARTERERS TO ORDER THE VESSEL TO LOAD A FURTHER CARGO AFTER THE INITIAL CARGO HAD BEEN DISCHARGED: EFFECT OF REVIVAL OF MARKET AT A LATER STAGEARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2302
'''Hong KongEngland'''
'''Birnam Ltd Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The Owners of the Ship or Vessel “Hong Ming”, The “Hong Ming”“New Flamenco”)'''
'''Hong Kong English Court of First InstanceAppeal: Reyes JLongmore, Christopher Clarke and Sales LLJ: HCAJ No.105 of 2011[2015] EWCA Civ 1299: 26 August 201121 December 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Birnam_v_The_"Hong_Ming"]Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-the_New_Flamenco_-_Court_of_Appeal_Decision]'''
'''WARRANT OF ARRESTTIME CHARTER: SETTING ASIDEREPUDIATION: CLAIM FOR OWNERSHIP QUANTUM OF VESSEL PURSUANT DAMAGES: WHETHER CREDIT TO A TERMINATED CONTRACT BE GIVEN FOR SALE CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSELSOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN ITS VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE: MISUSE OF THE ARREST PROCESSARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2201
'''England'''
'''CARRIAGE CHARTERPARTY: QUANTIFICATION OF GOODSDAMAGES FOR REPUDIATION OF VOYAGE CHARTER: CIF CONTRACT: CONSTRUCTION: ENTITLEMENT DAMAGES FOR POSITIONAL LOSS IN ADDITION TO GIVE NOTICE OF READINESSUSUAL PROFIT LOSS: CONCURRENT CAUSES LEADING WHETHER DAMAGES LIMITED BY REFERENCE TO DELAY IN BERTHINGPERIOD WHEN CONTRACT VOYAGE WOULD HAVE ENDED: COMMENCEMENT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 69 OF LAYTIMETHE ARBITRATION ACT 1996'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2118
'''England'''
'''Carboex SA Société de Distribution de Toutes Marchandises en Côte D’Ivoire, trading as “SDTM-CI”, and others v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA. Continental Lines N.V. and another (the “Sea Miror”)'''
'''English High Court: Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court): Field Flaux J.; 18 June 2015: [20112015] EWHC 1165 1747 (Comm: 12 May 2011): [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_v_Louis_Dreyfus_CommoditiesSDTM-CI_and_others_v_Continental_Lines_amd_another_-_the_Sea_Miror]]'''
'''AMWELSH SYNACOMEX 90 CHARTERPARTY: DEMURRAGE: EXCEPTION LOADING AND DISCHARGING TO BE AT THE EXPENSE AND RISK OF STRIKESTHE SHIPPERS/CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS/CHARTERERS RESPECTIVELY: WHETHER DELAY IN OWNERS RESPONSIBLE FOR CARGO LOSS AND DAMAGE OCCURRING DURING LOADING AND DISCHARGE ARISING FROM CONGESTION CAUSED BY STRIKES EXCEPTED FROM LAYTIME'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2017
'''England'''
'''Great Eastern PST Energy 7 Shipping Co Ltd LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v. (1) Far East Chartering Ltd (2) Binani Cement LtdOW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''English High Courtof Appeal; Moore-Bick, Queen’s Bench Division: Judge Mackie QC: Longmore, McCombe LJJ; [20112015] EWHC 1372 (Comm): 27 May 2011EWCA Civ 1058, 22 October 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Great_Eastern_Shipping_v_Far_East_CharteringPST_Energy_7_Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_-_the_RES_COGITANS''']] '''ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: SUPPLY OF BUNKERS: RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE: CONTEMPLATED THAT GOODS WOULD BE CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED: NO PASSING OF PROPERTY INTENDED: SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE'''
DMC/SandT/15/16
'''Singapore'''
'''Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services Pte Ltd v MISC Berhad, the “BUNGA MELATI 5”'''
'''The NetherlandsBUNKER BROKERS: AGENCY: ACTUAL AUTHORITY, APPARENT AUTHORITY, AND ESTOPPEL: NO GENERAL ‘DUTY TO SPEAK’''' DMC/SandT/15/15 '''England'''
'''Pianura Armatori SpA Arnold v Ferrari Shipping Agency G.A. The "Halcyon Star”Britton'''
'''UK Supreme Court : Lord Neuberger of Rotterdam (summary proceedings) : Mr A.F.L. GeerdesAbbotsbury PSC, LJN:BQ5031Lord Sumption, October 7Lord Carnwath, 2010 (published May 19Lord Hughes, 2011)Lord Hodge JJSC: [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] 2 WLR 1593: 10 June 2015: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pianura_Armatori_v_Ferrari_ShippingArnold_v_Britton]]'''
'''ARREST CONVENTION 1952 ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPHLANDLORD AND TENANT: ARREST LONG RESIDENTIAL LEASES: INCREASE OF SERVICE CHARGE AT YEARLY RATE OF VESSEL OWNED BY A VESSEL MANAGER 10% ON COMPOUND BASIS: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: CONTROL OF PARTIES OVER LANGUAGE USED IN CONTRACT: THAT CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT WORKED OUT BADLY FOR ONE PARTY NO REASON FOR MARITIME CLAIMS AGAINST THE VESSEL MANAGER RELATING TO OTHER VESSELS NOT OWNED BY THE MANAGERDEPARTING FROM NATURAL LANGUAGE'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1814
'''England'''
'''The Owner of the Vessel “The Ocean Crown” and others Bunge SA v Five Oceans Salvage Consultants Ltd, “The Ocean Crown”Nidera BV'''
'''English High UK Supreme Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Admiralty Court): Gross JLords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson: [2009] EWHC 3040 (Admlty), [20102015] UKSC 437: 1 Lloyd’s Rep 468: 26 November 2009July 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Ocean_CrownBunge_SA_v_Nidera_BV]]'''
'''SALVAGEINTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: DAMAGES: SALE OF GRAIN BASED ON GAFTA FORM 49: EMBARGO ON EXPORTS: ASSESSMENT PREMATURE TERMINATION OF REMUNERATIONCONTRACT BY SELLERS BEFORE EMBARGO TOOK EFFECT: WHETHER RISK ASSESSMENT OF FUTURE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN APPLYING PRINCIPLE DAMAGES TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT EFFECT OF ENCOURAGEMENTEMBARGO: SCOPE OF THE PRINCIPLE IN THE AMERIQUENO LOSS SUFFERED BY BUYERS'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1713
'''The Netherlands'''
'''HDI-Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG et al The Kingdom of The Netherlands v APM Terminals Rotterdam B.V.The ‘Pretoria’Owners of the yacht Qubio – “The Qubio”''' '''Supreme Court of Rotterdamthe Netherlands: Ms PVice-President F.B. Bakels as chairman and judges G.ASnijders, G.de Groot, M .V. Polak and T.H. Tanja-van Schouwenburg –Laanden Broek'; 10 July 2015, LJNCase no. ECLI:NL:HR:2015:BO00631836:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Kingdom_of_The_Netherlands_v_Owners_of_Yacht_Qubio]]''' '''WRECK OF VESSEL: EXTENSION OF LIABILITY OF THE OWNER OF A SUNKEN VESSEL TO PAY FOR COSTS OF MARKING THE WRECK AS A TEMPORARY OR PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE''' DMC/SandT/15/12 '''Singapore''' '''Precious Shipping Public Company Ltd & Ors v OW Bunker Far East (Singapore) Pte Ltd & Ors and other matters''' '''Singapore High Court; Chong J; [2015] SGHC 187, September 29, 201021 July 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/HDI-Gerling_v_APM_TerminalsPrecious_Shipping_&_Ors_v_OW_Bunker_Far_East_&_Ors]] '''WHETHER INTERPLEADER RELIEF AVAILABLE TO ULTIMATE PURCHASERS OF BUNKERS: WHETHER POTENTIAL CLAIMS BY PHYSICAL SUPPLIERS (WHO SOLD THOSE BUNKERS TO INTERMEDIATE BUYERS) WERE SUFFICIENT TO FOUND THE COURT’S INTERPLEADER JURISDICTION'''
DMC/SandT/15/11
'''United Kingdom Supreme CourtGlencore Energy UK Ltd v Cirrus Oil Services Ltd'''
'''Jones vEnglish High Court (Commercial Court): Cooke J: [2014] EWHC 87 (Comm), [2014] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 24 January 2014::[[http://www. Kaney'''onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_UK_v_Cirrus_Oil_Services]]
'''UK Supreme Court; Lords Philips, Hope, Brown, Collins, Kerr, Dyson, Lady Hale; [2011] UKSC 13; 30 March 2011CONTRACT FOR SALE OF OIL BLEND: WHETHER A BINDING CONTRACT EXISTED: FIRM OFFER WITH ESSENTIAL TERMS ACCEPTED:[[httpNAME OF SELLER INFERRED FROM PREVIOUS DEALINGS BETWEEN PARTIES://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/indexDAMAGES FOR NON-ACCEPTANCE UNDER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979, SECTIONS 50(2) AND (3) NOT EXCLUDED BY CLAUSE 32.php/Jones_v_Kaney]]1 OF BP 2007 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CFR SALES'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1510
'''CanadaEngland'''
'''Société Telus Communications, Hydro-Québec and Bell Canada Maestro Bulk Ltd v Peracomo Inc.Cosco Bulk Carrier Ltd, Réal Vallée and the fishing vessel Realice“Great Creation”'''
'''Federal English High Court of Canada: Harrington ; Cooke J.: 2011 FC 494: 27 April 2011; [2014] EWHC 3978 (Comm), 15 December 2014:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Telus_Communications_v_Peracomo_Inc_and_Réal_ValléeMaestro_Bulk_v_Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_-_The_Great_Creation]]'''
'''SHIPPINGTIME CHARTERPARTY: SUBMARINE CABLE CUT BY SKIPPER OF FISHING VESSELUNTIMELY REDELIVERY NOTICES: WHETHER DAMAGE CAUSED INTENTIONALLY OR RECKLESSLY AND WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT 'SUCH LOSS' WOULD PROBABLY RESULT“BELOW MARKET” FOLLOW-ON FIXTURE: WHETHER DEFENDANTS ENTITLED HOW DAMAGES TO LIMIT LIABILITY UNDER THE 1976 LIMITATION CONVENTION, AS INCORPORATED INTO CANADIAN LAWBE CALCULATED: MITIGATION'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1409
'''The NetherlandsEngland'''
'''DSV Road B.V. and Amlin Corporate Insurance N.V. Metall Market OOO v Sneltransport “Heidenend” Tegelen B.V.Vitorio Shipping Co Ltd (The “Lehmann Timber”)'''
'''Amsterdam English Court of Appeal: A.S. ArnoldArden, W.H.F.M. Cortenraad and H.M. ten HaaftPatten LLJ andSir Bernard Rix: [2013] EWCA Civ 650: [2014] QB 760, LJN BL9955, April [2013] 2, 2010Lloyd’s Rep 541: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSV_Road_v_Sneltransport_HeidenendMetall_Market_v_vitorio_Shipping_the_Lehmann_Timber]]'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS : GENERAL AVERAGE: REQUEST BY SHIPOWNER FOR SECURITY IN THE FORM OF GENERAL AVERAGE BOND SUPPORTED BY ROADGENERAL AVERAGE GUARANTEE: WHETHER TERMS OF REQUEST REASONABLE: CMR CONVENTIONWHETHER ACCEPTANCE OF PART SECURITY A WAIVER OF SHIPOWNER’S LIEN: WHETHER SHIPPER-PACKED TRAILER CAN BE CONSIDERED ‘GOODS’ WITHIN ART.17.2EXPENSES OF STORING CARGO ASHORE IN EXERCISE OF LIEN RECOVERABLE'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1308
'''England'''
'''Shell Egypt West Manzala GmbH PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and another Trading SA v Dana Gas Egypt OW Bunker Malta Limited& ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”''' '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial English High Court): Tomlinson ; Males J: ; [20102015] EWHC 465 2022 (Comm): 10 March 201014 July 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Shell_Egypt_v_Dana_GasPST_Energy_7_Shipping_&_Product_Shipping_and_Trading_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_the_Res_Cognitans]]'''
'''ARBITRATION ACT 1996 S.69 APPEAL: BUNKER SUPPLY CONTRACTON CREDIT TERMS: JOINT VENTURE FOR GAS EXPLORATIONRETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE: REPUDIATORY BREACH COMMITTED BY ONE PARTYPARTIES CONTEMPLATED BUNKERS WOULD LIKELY BE CONSUMED BEFORE PAYMENT MADE AND TITLE PASSED: INNOCENT PARTY TERMINATED CONTRACT BASED ON WRONG BELIEF THAT CONTRACTUAL TERMINATION CLAUSE WAS TRIGGEREDWHETHER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 APPLICABLE: WHETHER INNOCENT PARTY COULD JUSTIFY TERMINATION REQUIREMENTS OF CONTRACTS.49 MET'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1207
'''England'''
'''Choil Trading SA Spar Shipping AS v Sahara Energy Resources Limited Grand China Logistics Holding (The “Prem Mala”Group)Co., Ltd''' '''English High Court: Queen's Bench Division Commercial Court: Christopher Clarke J: [20102015] EWHC 374 718 (Comm): 26 February 2010Popplewell J.: 18 March 2015[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Choil_Trading_v_Sahara_Energy-ResourcesSpar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics]]''' '''NYPE 1993 FORM TIMECHARTER: FAILURE TO PAY HIRE ON TIME: WHETHER BREACH OF CONDITION: WHETHER BREACH OF AN INNOMINATE TERM: RIGHT TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF BARGAIN: WHETHER CHARTERER’S CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT'''
'''England'''
'''English High Courtof Appeal: Longmore, Gloster and Underhill LJJ: [2015] EWCA Civ 16: 22 January 2015:'''
'''Azimut–Benetti SpA v. HealeySAFE PORT: WHETHER COMBINATION OF ‘LONG WAVE’ SWELL AND A SEVERE GALE AN ‘ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE’: SUBROGATION: WHETHER INSURER OF BOTH PARTIES TO A BARECON CHARTERPARTY MAY SUE AN ASSURED FOR BREACH OF CHARTER'''
'''England'''
'''United Kingdom''' '''Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd & ORs''' '''United Kingdom Supreme English Courtof Appeal: Lord PhillipsSir Bernard Rix, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Sir John Dyson)Moore-Bick and Briggs LJJ: [20102014] UKSC 44EWCA Civ 1382: 27 22 October 20102014: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oceanbulk_Shipping_v_TMT_AsiaStandard_Chartered_Bank_v_Dorchester_LNG_(2)_-_The_Erin_Schulte]] '''BILL OF LADING: LETTER OF CREDIT: INITIAL REJECTION OF THE PRESENTATION: MEANING OF “INDORSEMENT” OF BILL OF LADING: TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF SUIT: CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1992 SECTIONS 2(2)(A) AND 5(2)(B)'''
DMC/SandT/15/04
'''English The Alas renamed The Kombos: Hong Kong Court of AppealFirst Instance: Ng J: HCAJ 241/2009: [2014] 4 HKLRD 160: 21 July 2014:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Alas_renamed_The_Kombos]]'''
'''Thomas Crema v. Cenkos Securities PLCADMIRALTY: WARRANT OF ARREST: SHIPOWNERS’ CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AND UNPAID HIRE: FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD NOT SATISFIED: NO BAR TO ACTION IN REM FOR CLAIM ARISING OUT OF AGREEMENT FOR USE OR HIRE OF THE SHIP'''
'''Hong Kong'''
'''English Hong Kong Court of AppealFirst Instance: Lam and Lunn VPP and Barman JA: CACV No.282 of 2012: [2014] 4 HKLRD 158: 17 July 2014: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Antwerp_Diamond_Bank-v-Brink's_Inc]]'''
'''Kookmin Bank v Rainy SA and othersCARRIAGE OF GOODS BY AIR: MISDELIVERY: GOODS RELEASED TO BUYER WITHOUT CONSENT OF PLEDGEE BANK AND WITHOUT PAYMENT: LOCUS OF PLEDGEE BANK TO SUE FOR CONVERSION: AGREEMENT BY SELLER TO PLEDGE FINISHED GOODS TO BANK: DELIVERY OF GOODS TO FREIGHT FORWARDER COMPLETED PLEDGE: CONSTRUCTIVE DELIVERY OF GOODS TO BANK'''
DMC/SandT/15/02
'''English Court of Appeal'''E D & F Man Sugar Ltd v Unicargo Transportgesellschaft GmbH (Polska Zegluga Morska PP, interested party), The “Ladytramp”
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODSSUGAR CHARTERPARTY 1999: THEFT FROM CONTAINER DESTRUCTION BY EMPLOYEE FIRE OF FUMIGATION COMPANY: WHETHER COMPANY VICARIOUSLY LIABLE: CLOSE CONNECTION BETWEEN THEFT AND PURPOSE FACILITIES AT LOADING TERMINAL NOT WITHIN CLAUSE 28 EXCEPTION TO LAYTIME OF EMPLOYMENT“MECHANICAL BREAKDOWNS”'''
DMC/SandT/1115/0601
'''English Commercial CourtEngland'''
'''Dalwood Marine NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NY v Nordana Line A/SCargill International SA, The “Elbrus”; Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2009] EWHC 3394 (Comm), [2010] 2 All ER (Comm) 802: 21 December 2009:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dalwood_Marine_v_Nordana_Line]]“Global Santosh”'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYCourt of Appeal; Gross LJ, Gloster LJ, Sir Burnton; [2014] EWCA Civ 403, 8 April 2014: WRONGFUL EARLY TERMINATION BY CHARTERERS[[http: DAMAGES: WHETHER HIRE EARNED BY SHIPOWNERS IN SUBSTITUTE FIXTURE WHICH EXTENDED BEYOND REMAINDER OF ORIGINAL CHARTER RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Global_Santosh_-_Court_of_Appeal]]'''
'''OFF-HIRE CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF VESSEL: WHETHER SUB-CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS WERE ‘AGENTS’ OF THE CHARTERERS: WHETHER THE PERSONAL ACT, OMISSION OR DEFAULT TO WHICH CLAUSE REFERRED MUST HAVE OCCURRED DURING PROVISION OF RELEVANT SERVICES'''
'''Glencore Energy UK Limited v Transworld Oil Limited (The “Narmada Spirit”): English Commercial Court: Blair J: [2010] EWHC 141 (Comm): 3 February 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_v_Transworld_Oil]]Singapore'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEASingapore Court of Appeal''' '''Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd [2013] SGCA 15: FOB CONTRACT''' '''Sundaresh Menon CJ, Chao Hick Tin JA and Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA: CORRECT QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES FOR NON-DELIVERY OF CRUDE OIL CARGO FOR WHICH THERE WAS NO AVAILABLE MARKET6 February 2013: NEED TO ACCOUNT IN DAMAGES FOR REDUCED LOSS SUFFERED FOLLOWING EARLY CLOSING OUT OF HEDGED POSITION OF BUYER FOLLOWING ACCEPTANCE OF SELLER’S REPUDIATION[2013] 2 SLR 363:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Out_of_the_Box_v_Wanin_Industries]]'''
'''CONTRACT: REMOTENESS OF DAMAGE: BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTOR ENGAGING MANUFACTURER TO PRODUCE NEW SPORTS DRINK: MANUFACTURER UNAWARE OF DISTRIBUTOR’S PLAN TO PROMOTE POPULAR DEMAND FOR GENERIC DRINK THROUGH AGGRESSIVE ADVERTISING: MANUFACTURER SUPPLYING DEFECTIVE SHIPMENT OF DRINKS IN BREACH OF CONTRACT: ABANDONMENT OF PROMOTION: WHETHER WASTED ADVERTISING EXPENSES CLAIMED BY DISTRIBUTOR TOO REMOTE'''
'''Röhlig (UK) Ltd v Rock Unique Ltd: Court of Appeal, Sedley, Moore-Bick and Aikens LJJ.: 20 January 2011: [2011] EWCA Civ 18:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Röhlig_(UK)_v_Rock_Unique]]England'''
'''INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE OF GOODS: BIFA CONDITIONS: WHETHER NO SET-OFF AND TIME BAR PROVISIONS REASONABLE UNDER UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS ACT 1977Great Elephant Corporation v Trafigura Beheer BV v Vitol SA & Vitol Asia Pte Ltd v China Offshore Oil (Singapore) International Pte Ltd (The “Crudesky”)'''
'''English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Tomlin and Underhill LJJ: [2013] EWCA Civ 1547, [2014] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 25 July 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Great_Elephant_Corp_v_Trafigura_Beheer_-_The_Crudesky]]'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEA: FOB ANTWERP SALE OF EU GASOIL WITH FREE DESTINATION: “SPECIAL” COMMON LAW IMPLIED TERM/CONDITION: STATUTORILY IMPLIED CONDITIONS: WHETHER CARGO TO REMAIN ON-SPECIFICATION FOR A REASONABLE TIME FOLLOWING SHIPMENT: EFFECT OF EXCLUSION CLAUSE ON IMPLIED CONDITIONS: SECTION 14(2) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979England'''
'''Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The “New Flamenco”)'''
'''The “Asia Star” [2010] SGCA 12: Judgment delivered by VK Rajah JA, 19 March 2010 [2010] SGCA 12[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Asia_Star]]England'''
'''TIME CHARTER: ANTICIPATORY REPUDIATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT RIGHT TO CARRY CARGO: REQUIREMENT GIVE VOYAGE ORDERS TO NOTIFY THE DEFAULTING PARTY TRANSIT GULF OF INTENDED MEASURES IN MITIGATIONADEN: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1114/01 13
'''GermanyEngland'''
'''German Federal Supreme Proton Energy Group SA v Orlen Lietuva''' '''English Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court – Assessment of Damages under the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road ): HH Judge Mackie QC: [2013] EWHC 2872 (‘CMR’Comm): Date of Judgment: 30 September 2010'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Germany_CMR_DamagesProton_Energy_Group_v_Orlen_Lietuva]]
'''CMR TRANSPORTCONTRACT: WILFUL MISCONDUCTCONTRACT FOR SALE OF OIL BLEND: ASSESSMENT EXISTENCE OF BINDING CONTRACT: PARTIES REGARDED THEMSELVES AS BEING BOUND AFTER DEAL WAS CONFIRMED: SPECIFICATION OF OIL BLEND NOT FORMING PART OF DAMAGESSALE BY DESCRIPTION'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2512
'''England'''
'''Angara Maritime Ltd Falkonera Shipping Company v Oceanconnect UK Arcadia Energy Pte Ltd and Oceanconnect.com Inc (The “Fesco Angara”“Falkonera”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Angara_Maritime_v_Oceanconnect_UK]]'''
'''Queen’s Bench English Court of Appeal (Civil Division); Floyd and Christopher Clarke LJJ, London Mercantile CourtSir Stanley Burnton; [2014] EWCA Civ 713; 5 June 2014: HHJ Mackie QC[[http: [2010//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Falkonera_Shipping_v_Arcadia_Energy_-_The_Falkonera]] EWHC 619 (QB): 29 March 2010'''
'''SALE OF GOODSSHIPPING: BUNKERS/MARINE FUELSTANKER TRANSHIPMENT: S.25SHIP-TO-SHIP (1“STS”) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979TRANSFERS: SALE OF BUNKERS CHARTERPARTY PROVIDING FOR STS TRANSFERS TO BE SUBJECT TO TIME CHARTERERS: BUNKERS DELIVERED OWNERS’ APPROVAL WHICH NOT TO VESSELBE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD: FAILURE BY TIME CHARTERERS TO PAY SUPPLIERS OWNERS WITHHOLD CONSENT FOR BUNKERSA STS TRANSFER BETWEEN TWO VLCCs: RIGHT WHETHER OWNERS’ WITHHOLDING OF SUPPLIERS TO SUE OWNERS IN CONVERSION AND/OR BAILMENT FOLLOWING PREMATURE REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY TIME CHARTERERS TO OWNERSAPPROVAL REASONABLE'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2611
'''England'''
'''Soufflet Negoce British American Tobacco Switzerland SA v Bunge SAExel Europe Ltd; British American Tobacco Denmark A/S v Exel Europe Ltd''' '''Court of Appeal: McFarlane L.J.; Sir Bernard Rix; Sir Timothy Lloyd: [2013] EWCA Civ 1319: 30 October 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/British_American_Tobacco_&_Ors_v_Exel_Europe]] '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY ROAD: CMR CONVENTION: CARGO LOSS: ESTABLISHING JURISDICTION AGAINST SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS: WHETHER CLAIMANT THAT HAS ESTABLISHED JURISDICTION UNDER ART.31.1 AGAINST ONE CARRIER CAN RELY ON THAT JURISDICTION TO JOIN SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS''' DMC/SandT/14/10 '''England'''
'''English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Wilson and Toulson LJJ: Trafigura Beheer BV v Navigazione Montanari SPA [2010] EWCA 1102: 13 October 2010[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Soufflet_Negoce_v_Bunge_SA]2014]EWHC 129 Comm'''
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Andrew Smith J.: 30 January 2014:[[http://www.bailiionlinedmc.co.orguk/ew/cases/EWCA/Civindex.php/2010/1102.htmlTrafigura_Beheer_v_Navigazione_Montanari_-_the_Valle_de_Cordoba]]
'''FOB CONTRACTCHARTERPARTY: GAFTA 49 FORMCARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: “IN READINESS TO LOAD”VESSEL CARRYING CONSIGNMENT OF MOTOR OIL ATTACKED BY PIRATES: WHETHER THIS MEANS THAT VESSEL MUST BE “READY” TO LOAD QUANTITY OF OIL TAKEN BY PIRATES CONSTITUTED "IN A LAYTIME SENSE: RISK -TRANSIT LOSS" OR "LOST CARGO" FOR PURPOSES OF GOODS DAMAGED BY UNCLEAN HOLDS ON BUYERIN-TRANSIT LOSS CLAUSE IN CHARTERPARTY'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2409
'''England'''
'''Zodiac Maritime Agencies Limited Yuzhny Zavod Metall Profil LLC v Fortescue Metals Group Limited'''Eems Beheerder B.V. (“the M/V EEMS SOLAR”):
'''English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial , Admiralty Court): David Steel JJervis K, Q.C, the Admiralty Registrar: [2010] EWHC 903 (Comm)5 June 2013: 28 April 2010'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Zodiac_Maritime_v_Fortescue_MetalsYuzhny_Zavod_Metall_Profil_v_Emms_Beheerder_-_the_M/V_Eems_Solar]]'''
'''CONSECUTIVE VOYAGE CHARTERPARTYBILLS OF LADING: WRONGFUL EARLY TERMINATION BY CHARTERER: DAMAGES: WHETHER “AVAILABLE MARKET” WHEN INCORPORATION OF CHARTERPARTY TERMINATEDTERMS PROVIDING THAT CHARTERERS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR STOWAGE: WHETHER SUBSEQUENT EMERGENCE OF MARKET DURING THE BALANCE OF CHARTER PERIOD RELEVANT OWNERS COULD RELY ON THAT CLAUSE AS DEFENCE TO THE ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGESCLAIM BY RECEIVERS FOR CARGO DAMAGE CAUSED BY BAD STOWAGE'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2308
'''England'''
'''ENE 1 Kos Limited v Petroleo Brasileiro SA'''Martrade Shipping & Transport GmbH V United Enterprises Corporation (The “Wisdom C”):[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/ENE_1_Kos_Limited_v_PetrobasMartrade_Shipping_and_Transport_v_United_Entreprises_-_The_Wisdom_C]]''' English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Popplewell J; [2014] EWHC 1884 (Comm); 12 June 2014 '''TIMECHARTER PROVIDING FOR ENGLISH LAW AND LONDON ARBITRATION: ARBITRATORS AWARDING PENAL RATE OF INTEREST: WHETHER “SIGNIFICANT CONNECTION” BETWEEN CHARTERPARTY AND ENGLAND: WHETHER “APPLICABLE LAW” A FOREIGN LAW: LATE PAYMENT OF COMMERCIAL DEBTS (INTEREST) ACT 1998: ARTICLES 3 AND 4 – CONTRACTS (APPLICABLE LAW) ACT 1990''' DMC/SandT/14/07 '''Hong Kong''' '''Darby International Investment Ltd v Rong Tai International Shipping Ltd'''
'''English Hong Kong Court of Appeal (Civil)First Instance: Longmore and Smith LJJ and Sir Mark WallerDeputy High Court Judge B Chu: HCMP1438 of 2013: 2 December 2013: [2010[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Darby_International_Investments_v_Rong_Tai_International_Shipping]] EWCA Civ 772: 6 July 2010'''
'''MARITIME LAW: REGISTRATION OF VESSELS: VESSEL APPARENTLY REGISTERED IN MORE THAN ONE JURISDICTION: DECLARATION AS TO VALIDITY OF REGISTRATION IN HONG KONG: PURPOSE OF GRANTING DECLARATION'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2206
'''England'''
'''Compania Sud Americana de Vapores Flame SA v Sinochem Tianjin Import & Export Corp – the « Aconcagua»Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd''' '''English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2013] EWHC 3153 (Comm): 22 October 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CSAV_v_Sinochem_the_AconcaguaFlame_SA_v_Glory_Wealth_Shipping]]''' '''CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM OF DAMAGES: COMPENSATORY PRINCIPLE: WHETHER INNOCENT PARTY MUST PROVE ABILITY TO PERFORM OBLIGATIONS, HAD CONTRACT CONTINUED, TO RECOVER SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGES FROM CONTRACT BREAKER''' DMC/SandT/14/05 '''England''' '''Bulk Ship Union SA v Clipper Bulk Shipping Limited (The "Pearl C")'''
'''English High Court: Christopher Clarke Popplewell J.: 26 June 2012 [20092012] EWHC 1880 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 533:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bulk_Ship_Union_v_Clipper_Bulk_Shipping_-_The_Pearl_C]] '''TIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM: SLOW STEAMING: WHETHER A BREACH OF ‘UTMOST DESPATCH’ OBLIGATION: WHETHER VESSEL OFF-HIRE BY REASON OF DEFAULT OF MASTER: WHETHER PARTIAL INTERRUPTION IN SERVICE SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER OFF-HIRE CLAUSE''' DMC/SandT/14/04 '''Hong Kong''' '''Maintek Computer (CommSuzhou); 24 July 2009Co Ltd v Blue Anchor Line''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: To J: HCAJ No.106 of 2008: 2 April 013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maintek_Computer_(Suzhou)_v_Blue_Anchor_Line''']] http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2013/506.html '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY BY OCEAN TERMINAL: CLAIM FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST CARRIER: MEANING OF “DELIVERY” FOR PURPOSE OF TIME LIMITATION: WHETEHR EXEMPTION CLAUSE FOR ANY CAUSE OR EVENT WHICH CARRIER COULD NOT AVOID APPLICABLE: WHETHER LIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY REFERENCE TO WEIGHT OF CARGO APPLICABLE''' DMC/SandT/14/03 '''England''' '''Sea-Cargo Skips AS v State Bank of India'''
'''BILLS OF LADING English High Court: SHIPMENT OF CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE IN CONTAINERQueen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): EXPLOSION AND FIRETeare J: DANGEROUS GOODS[2013] EWHC 177 (Comm): WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO INDEMNITY UNDER ART.IV RULE 6 OF HAGUE RULES26 June 2013: STOWAGE OF CONTAINER IN PROXIMITY TO HEATED BUNKER TANK[[http: WHETHER THIS CAUSED THE EXPLOSION: WHETHER THIS RENDERED VESSEL UNSEAWORTHY AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE VOYAGE: WHETHER CARRIER COULD RELY ON DEFENCE OF ERROR IN MANAGEMENT OF THE SHIP//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sea-Cargo_Skips_AS_v_State_Bank_of_India]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: REFUND GUARANTEE: QUESTION OF CONSTRUCTION: WHETHER DEMAND WAS SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER BANK’S LIABILITY: AMBIGUOUS DEMAND NOT COMPLIANT'''
'''Cosco Bulk Carrier Co Ltd v Team-Up Owning Co Ltd – The “Saldanha”[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_v_Team-Up_Owning]]Singapore'''
'''English Singapore High Court: Gross J.: 11 June 2010 [2010] EWHC 1340 (Comm)'''
'''NYPE FORM CHARTERPARTYThe “Turtle Bay” [2013] SGHC 165 : PIRACYJudgment delivered by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J, 30 August 2013: WHETHER SHIP OFF-HIRE DURING DETENTION BY PIRATES[[http: AVERAGE ACCIDENTS TO SHIP OR CARGO: DEFAULT OR DEFICIENCY OF MEN: ANY OTHER CAUSE PREVENTING THE FULL WORKING OF THE VESSEL'''//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Turtle_Bay]]
'''SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST: WHEN DIRECT PRIVATE SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST CONSTITUTES CONTEMPT OF COURT: PRINCIPLES AND EFFECT OF ADMIRALTY JUDICIAL SALE: WHEN COURT WILL SANCTION A DIRECT PRIVATE SALE'''
DMC/SandT/14/01 '''England'''
'''Glory Wealth Minerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping Pte Ltd AG; Oceana Shipping AG v North China Shipping Limited (M/V “North Prince”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.coTransatlantica Commodities S.uk/indexA.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_North_China_Shipping]]The MV “Athena”'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: of Appeal; Tomlinson, Lewison and Underhill LJJ; [20102013] EWHC 1692 (Comm)EWCA Civ 1723; 17 July 2013[[http: 8 July 2010'''//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Minerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-_the_Athena]]
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYCHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: WRONGFUL EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY SUBOFF-CHARTERERHIRE CLAUSE 15: DAMAGES AS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MARKET RATE OF HIRE AND CONTRACT RATE WHETHER “LOSS OF HIRE: DISPONENT SHIPOWNER’S EARLY REDELIVERY TIME” MEANS NET LOSS OF VESSEL UNDER HEAD TIME IN THE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR IN THE OVERALL CHARTER IRRELEVANT UNLESS CAUSED BY SUB-CHARTERER’S REPUDIATIONSERVICE'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1917
'''English High CourtEngland'''
'''Omak Maritime Ltd MRI Trading AG v Mamola Challenger Shipping CoErdenet Mining Corporation LLC'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Omak_Maritime_v_Mamola_Challenger_Shipping]]
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial English Court)of Appeal: Teare JPill, Tomlinson, McCombe LJJ: [20102013] EWHC 2026 (Comm)EWCA Civ 156: 4 August 201008 Mar 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MRI_Trading_v_Erdenet_Mining_Corporation]]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYSALE OF GOODS: BREACH CERTAINTY OF CONTRACT BY CHARTERERTERMS: MARKET RATE WHETHER TERMS AMOUNTED TO 'AGREEMENTS TO AGREE': PROPER APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTION AND IMPLICATION OF HIRE HIGHER THAN TERMS WITHIN A CONTRACT RATE OF HIRE: SHIPOWNER’S CLAIM FOR WASTED EXPENDITURE: RELATION WITH PRINCIPLE IN ROBINSON V HARMANWHICH CONTAINS TERMS LEAVING MATTERS TO BE SUBSEQUENTLY AGREED'''
'''The “Hua Tian Long”England'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Hua_Tian_Long]]
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Stone J in Chambers: HCAJ NoNYK Bulkship (Atlantic) N. 59/2008: 23 April 2010V. v Cargill International S.A., The “Global Santosh”'''
'''English High Court; Field J; [2013] EWHC 30 (Comm); 1 February 2013:[[http://www.hkliionlinedmc.co.orguk/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010index.php/HCAJ000059_2008NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-70707.html_The_Global_Santosh]]
'''BREACH PERIOD OFF-HIRE CLAUSE COVERING DELAY ARISING FROM DETENTION OR ARREST OF CONTRACTVESSEL: WHETHER SUB-CHARTERERS OR RECEIVERS WERE AGENTS OF THE CHARTERERS: DEFENDANT SHIPOWNER’S WHETHER DELAY TO VESSEL “OCCASIONED BY” RECEIVERS’ FAILURE TO PROVIDE VESSEL: CHINESE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT AS SHIPOWNER: CLAIM FOR SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND CROWN IMMUNITY: WAIVER DISCHARGE WITHIN THE LAYTIME AND SUBMISSION /OR TO JURISDICTIONSECURE SELLERS’ DEMURRAGE CLAIM'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1715
'''South AfricaEngland'''
'''Greatship (India) Limited v Oceanografia SA de CV (The MV “Ioannis NK”“Greatship Driti”)'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ioannis_N_K]]
'''The owner of the cargo lately laden on board the MV “Ioannis NK” v The Master and Crew & Others English Commercial Court: Gloster J: [2012] EWHC 3468 (AC 66Comm): 5 December 2012:[[http:/2009/www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Greatship_(India)'''_Limited_v_Oceanografia_SA_de_CV_-_The_Greatship_Driti]]
'''High Court of South Africa TIME CHARTER: BIMCO SUPPLYTIME 89 FORM: CLAUSE 10(Western Cape High Court, Cape TownE) exercising its admiralty jurisdiction: Cleaver J.; 26 August 2009RIGHT TO SUSPEND PERFORMANCE FOR FAILURE TO PAY HIRE PUNCTUALLY: WHETHER GRACE PERIOD (ANTI-TECHNICALITY) NOTICE REQUIRED BEFORE EXERCISING RIGHT'''
DMC/SandT/13/14
'''England and WalesMinerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping AG; Oceana Shipping AG v Transatlantica Commodities S.A. The MV “Athena”'''
'''Kolmar Group AG v Traxpo Enterprises Pvt Limited''' English High Court; Walker J; [2012] EWHC 3608 (Comm); 13 December 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kolmar_v_TraxpoMinerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-__The_Athena]]
'''English High CourtTIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm)OFF-HIRE CLAUSE 15: WHETHER “LOSS OF TIME” MEANS NET LOSS OF TIME IN THE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR IN THE OVERALL CHARTER SERVICE'''
DMC/SandT/13/13
'''New ZealandGriffon Shipping LLC v Firodi Shipping Limited – The “MV Griffon”''' '''High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court: Teare J.: [2013] EWHC 593 (Comm): 21 March 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Griffon_Shipping_v_Firodi_Shipping_-_The_Griffon ]]
'''Tasman Orient Line CV v New Zealand China Clays Limited and others'''[[httpSHIPSALE AGREEMENT ON NORWEGIAN SALE FORM 1993://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_%22Tasman_Pioneer%22]]'''Supreme Court of New Zealand (Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath and Wilson JJ)[2010] NZSC 37 (16 April 2010)WHETHER SELLER CAN RECOVER UNPAID DEPOSIT WHERE BUYER IN REPUDIATORY BREACH'''
DMC/SandT/13/12
'''English High CourtWuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Ltd & Anor v Emporiki Bank of Greece SA'''
'''Sylvia Shipping Co Limited v Progress Bulk Carriers Limited English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Rimer and Tomlinson, LJJ.: [2012] EWCA Civ 1629:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sylvia_Shipping_v._Progress_Bulk_CarriersWuhan_Guoyu_Logistics_v_Emporiki_Bank]] [2010] EWHC 542 (Comm): English High Court of Justice - Commercial Court; Hamblen J.; 18 March 2010'''
'''ARBITRATION APPEALSHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: TIMECHARTERPARTY: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR OWNERS’ BREACHPAYMENT GUARANTEE: WHETHER OWNERS LIABLE FOR TIMECHARTERERS’ LOSS OF PROFIT PAYMENT GUARANTEE A TRUE GUARANTEE OR AN ON CANCELLED SUB-CHARTERDEMAND BOND'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1311
'''Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionEngland'''
'''Maintek Computer (Suzhou) Co Dalmare SpA v Union Maritime Ltd and others v Blue Anchor Line and others& Anor''''''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Commercial Court; Flaux J; [2012] EWHC 3537; 13 Dec 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maintek_Computer_v_ECT_Delta_TerminalDalmare_v_Union_Maritime_-_The_Union_Power]]
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First InstanceSALE OF VESSEL "AS SHE WAS AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION": Reyes J in ChambersSTATUTORY IMPLIED TERM AS TO QUALITY UNDER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979: HCAJ No. 106/2008: 25 February 2010[http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000106_2008-69910.html]WHETHER SELLERS HAD EXCLUDED APPLICATION OF STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM; WHETHER SELLERS IN BREACH OF STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM'''
DMC/SandT/13/10/12
'''The Netherlands'''
'''Maersk Dana Petroleum Netherlands B.V., formerly “P&O Nedlloyd” and before that called Nedlloyd Lijnen v Vos Sympathy B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands v. Irano European Co. Ireco S.A., Luxembourg - The “Dolphin I”[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Dolphin_1]]“Vos Sympathy”'''
'''Court of Appeal of The Hague (The Netherlands). J: Judges: M.M. van der KloosterOlthof, JA.EA.HRijperman and R.Mvan der Vlist: 11 December 2012: Case no. Pickaers, J200.H079.J897/01:[[http://www. Teunissen, 29 September 2009, Case number 105onlinedmc.co.002uk/index.543php/01 (unpublished)Dana_Petroleum_Netherlands_v_Vos_Sympathy_-_The_Vos_Sympathy]]'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEASUPPLYTIME 2005 CHARTERPARTY: HAGUE RULES: RECEIVED WHETHER HIMLAYA AND KNOCK FOR SHIPMENT BILL OF LADING: CARGO DAMAGE: PERISHABLE GOODS: GROSS NEGLIGENCE: CARRIER’S KNOWLEDGE OF GOODS IN CONTAINERS: ‘BEFORE KNOCK CLAUSES 'REASONABLE AND AFTER’ CLAUSEFAIR' UNDER DUTCH CIVIL CODE ART.6: LIMITATION OF APPLICABILITY OF CONTRACTUAL CLAUSES: REASONABLENESS AND FAIRNESS248.2'''
'''Sotrade Denizcilik Sanayi Ve Ticaret AS England''' '''White Rosebay Shipping SA v Amadou LO and others Hong Kong Chain Glory Shipping Limited''' '''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Commercial Court; Teare J; [2013] EWHC 1355 (The “Duden”Comm); 23 May 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Duden_2008_EWHC_2762_CommWhite_Rosebay_Shipping_v_Hong_Kong_Chain_Glory_Shipping]]'''TIME-CHARTERPARTY: CHARTERERS EVINCING INTENTION NOT TO PERFORM: OWNERS AFFIRMED CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ REPUDIATORY CONDUCT CONTINUED: WHETHER OWNERS SUBSEQUENTLY ENTITLED TO TERMINATE'''
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash JCOLLISION: OFFENCE OF ENDANGERING THE SAFETY OF OTHERS: STATE OF MIND REQUIRED FOR THE OFFENCE OF ENDANGERMENT: NARROW CHANNEL AS QUESTION OF FACT: SHIPPING AND PORT CONTROL ORDINANCE (CAP.313, 17 April 2009 '''[2009] SGHC 91LAWS OF HONG KONG)'''
DMC/SandT/13/07
'''English High Court''']]'''Kallang Shipping Bunge SA Panama v AXA Assurances Senegal and Comptoir Commercial Mandiaye Ndiaya (Kyla Shipping Company Limited - The “Kallang”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Kallang]]"Kyla"'''
'''Queen's Bench Division (Commercial English High Court): Jonathan Hirst, Q.C.: ; Flaux J; [20082012] EWHC 2761 3522 (Comm); 10 December 2012:[[2009http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bunge_SA_v_Kyla_Shipping_Company_-_The_Athena]] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 124: 19 November 2008'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: NYPE 1946 CHARTERPARTY: LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED IN BILLS OF LADINGH&M INSURANCE REQUIRED FOR AGREED FIGURE: IMPLIED TERMSCASUALTY REPAIRS EXCEED SHIP’S MARKET VALUE BUT NOT AGREED HULL VALUE: ARREST BY CARGO OWNER AND INSURER: SECURITY: JURISDICTION: WRONGFUL INDUCEMENT OR PROCUREMENT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT: PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY CLUB: LETTERS OF UNDERTAKINGWHETHER CHARTERPARTY FRUSTRATED'''
'''Singapore Court of Appeal: Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA, Chao Hick Tin JA, V K Rajah JA: 11 September 2009Kuwait Rocks Co v AMN Bulkcarriers Inc (The “Astra”)'''
'''BAILMENT – BAILOR’S RIGHT TO IMMEDIATE RIGHT TO POSSESSION IF BAILEE’S BEHAVIOUR REPUGNANT TO TERMS OF BAILMENT – WHETHER CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS RESTRICTED BAILOR’S RIGHTS UNDER COMMON LAW'''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2013] EWHC 865 (Comm): 18 April 2013: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kuwait_Rocks_Co_v_AMN_Bulkcarriers_The_Astra]]
'''TORT – CONVERSION – TIME CHARTER: WHETHER ACT OF REMOVING MACHINE FROM PREMISES AND DELIVERING IT AS INSTRUCTED AMOUNTED CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT REPUDIATORY: WHETHER OBLIGATION TO CONVERSION OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF STORING MACHINE AT WAREHOUSE AMOUNTED PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION: RIGHT TO CONVERSION CLAIM LOSS OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF REDELIVERING MACHINE TO PURPORTED OWNER AMOUNTED TO CONVERSION PROFIT FOR REPUDIATION OR BREACH OF MACHINEHIRE PAYMENT OBLIGATION'''
DMC/SandT/13/05
'''Hong Kong'''
'''The “Blue Bridge” (formerly known as The “Great Power”)''' Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Fok, Chu JJA and McWalters J: CACV No.97 of 2012: 12 May 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Blue_BridgeThe_Decurion_on_Appeal]]'''
DMC/SandT/13/04
'''Germany''' '''German Federal Supreme Court: Date of Judgement: 13 June 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CMR_Art.29_and_Contributory_Negligence]]''' '''CMR TRANSPORT: APPLICATION OF ART. 29 CMR: BURDEN OF PROOF: REDUCTION OF UNLIMITED LIABILITY DUE TO CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE SENDER IF THE CARRIER IS NOT NOTIFIED OF AN UNEXPECTEDLY HIGH VALUE OF THE TRANSPORT GOODS''' DMC/SandT/13/03 '''England''' '''Dry Bulk Handy Holding Inc and Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Fayette International Holdings Ltd and Metinvest International SA (The “Bulk Chile”): English Commercial Court: Andrew Smith J: [2012] EWHC 2107 (Comm): 24 July 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dry_Bulk_Handling_&_CSAV_v_Fayette_International_&_Metinvest_-_The_Bulk_Chile]]''' '''CHAIN OF CHARTERPARTIES: HEAD TIME CHARTER, SUB-TIME CHARTER, TIME TRIP CHARTER AND VOYAGE CHARTER: OWNERS’ BILLS OF LADING: RIGHT TO INTERVENE IN COLLECTION OF FREIGHT: RIGHT TO LIEN SUB-FREIGHT AND SUB-HIRE: RIGHT TO HIRE OR REASONABLE REMUNERATION FOR COMPLETION OF VOYAGE FOLLOWING TERMINATION OF TIME CHARTER''' DMC/SandT/13/02 '''England''' '''Wuhan Ocean Economic & Technical Cooperation Co Ltd v Schiffahrts-Gesellschaft “Hansa Murcia” MBH & Co KG''' '''English Queen’s Bench (Commercial Court): Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 3104 (Comm): 6 November 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Wuhan_Ocean_v_Hansa_Murcia]]''' '''CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF VESSEL: ADDENDUM FOR SELLERS TO OBTAIN EXTENSION OF REFUND GUARANTEE: IMPLIED TERM TO OBTAIN EXTENSION WITHIN REASONABLE TIME BEFORE EXPIRY OF ORIGINAL GUARANTEE: INNOMINATE TERM: BUT BREACH OF IMPLIED TERM NOT A REPUDIATORY BREACH AS, UNDER THE TERMS OF THE GUARANTEE, BUYERS COULD MAINTAIN THE SECURITY BY COMMENCING ARBITRATION''' DMC/SandT/13/01 '''Germany''' '''German Federal Supreme Court''' '''"Und Adryatik"; Date of Judgement: 15 December 2011: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Und_Adryatik]]''' '''CMR TRANSPORT: APPLICATION OF ART. 2 CMR: FIRE ON RO-RO-CARRIER: HAGUE RULES AS ‘CONDITIONS PRESCRIBED BY LAW’: FIRE AS AN EVENT WHICH COULD ONLY HAVE OCCURRED BY REASON OF CARRIAGE BY SEA''' DMC/SandT/12/25 '''England''' '''E.D. & F. Man Sugar Ltd v Unicargo Transportgesellschaft mBh''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Eder J: [2012] EWHC 2879 (Comm): 23 October 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/E_D_and_F_Man_v_Unicargo_Transport]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY: LAYTIME AND DEMURRAGE: DESTRUCTION OF CONVEYOR-BELT SYSTEM AT LOADING PORT BEFORE FIXTURE: DELAY IN BERTHING: NO OBLIGATION ON CHARTERERS TO NOMINATE A SECOND BERTH: DESTRUCTION DID NOT CONSTITUTE MECHANICAL BREAKDOWN: ACT OF STATE-SPONSORED PORT AUTHORITY IN ORDINARY COURSE OF CARRYING OUT PORT OR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS DID NOT FALL WITHIN EXCEPTION OF GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE''' DMC/SandT/12/24 '''England''' '''Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA''' '''English Court of Appeal: Lord Neuberger MR, Moore-Bick and Toulson LJJ: [2012] EWCA Civ 838: 19 June 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_SA_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]] '''DEMURRAGE: CALCULATION OF LAYTIME: STRIKE EXCEPTION: STRIKE CAUSING CONGESTION AT PORT AND CHARTERED VESSELS DELAYED FROM BERTHING AS A RESULT: PERIOD OF DELAY TO BE DISCOUNTED FROM CALCULATION OF LAYTIME SO LONG AS STRIKE WAS THE EFFECTIVE CAUSE OF DELAY''' DMC/SandT/1012/0623
'''Singapore'''
'''Singapore Court of Appeal''' '''The “Catur Samudra”“Bunga Melati 5” [2012] SGCA 46: Judgment delivered by VK Rajah JA, 21st August 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Bunga_Melati_5]] '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: WHETHER A GOOD ARGUABLE CASE ON THE MERITS REQUIRED: THE VASILIY GOLOVNIN EXPLAINED''' DMC/SandT/12/22 '''Australia''' '''1. Jebsens International (Australia) Pty Ltd and Anor v Interfert Australia Pty Ltd and Ors (2011) 112 SASR 297, 25 August 2011 (Anderson J)''' '''2. Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S v Beach Building & Civil Group Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 696, 29 June 2012 (Foster J):[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/_1._Jebsens_International_(Australia)_v_Interfert_Australia:_2._Norden_A/S_v_Beach_Building_&_Civil_Group]]''' '''WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY A "SEA CARRIAGE DOCUMENT" FOR PURPOSES OF S.11 AUSTRALIAN CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1991''' DMC/SandT/12/21 '''England''' '''TAOKAS NAVIGATION SA v. KOMROWSKI BULK SHIPPING KG (GMBH & CO); KENT LINE INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. SOLYM CARRIERS LTDTHE MV “PAIWAN WISDOM”''' '''English High Court; Teare J; [2012] EWHC 1888 (Comm); 11 July 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Toakas_Navigation_v_Komrowski_Bulk_Shipping:_Kent_Line_v_Solym_Carriers_-_The_Paiwan_Wisdom]]''' '''CONWARTIME 2004: OWNERS’ LIBERTY TO REJECT VOYAGE ORDERS: MATERIAL INCREASE IN RISK BETWEEN CHARTERPARTY DATE AND DATE OF ORDER NOT REQUIRED: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION''' DMC/SandT/12/20 '''England''' '''Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Sumption: [2012] UKSC 17, [2012] 2 WLR 976: 2 May 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Petroleo_Brasiliero_v_ENE_Kos_1]]''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SHELLTIME 3 FORM: VESSEL WITHDRAWN FOR NON-PAYMENT OF HIRE WHILST LOADING: LOSS OF USE OF VESSEL: EXPENSES INCURRED IN DISCHARGING CARGO BACK TO SHORE: WHETHER LOSS AND EXPENSE RECOVERABLE UNDER INDEMNITY CLAUSE: WHETHER RECOVERABLE AS RIGHT CORRELATIVE TO DUTY AS BAILEE TO LOOK AFTER GOODS: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ ORDER TO LOAD AN EFFECTIVE CAUSE... DMC/SandT/12/19 '''Hong Kong''' '''The “Decurion”''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.141 of 2010: 4 May 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Catur_SamudraThe_Decurion]] '''ADMIRALTY: IN REM JURISDICTION: CLAIM AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT: WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR IN CONTROL” OF CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 12B(4) OF HIGH COURT ORDINANCE''' DMC/SandT/12/18 '''England''' '''EITZEN BULK A/S v. TTMI SARL - THE “BONNIE SMITHWICK”'''
'''Singapore English High Court; Eder J; [2012] EWHC 202 (Comm); 14 February 2012: Judgment delivered by Steven Chong JC, 15 January 2010[[http: [2010//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Eitzen_Bulk_v_TTMI_-_The_Bonnie_Smithwick]] SGHC 18'''
'''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION SHELLTIME 4: WHETHER CLAIM UNDER GUARANTEE IS A CLAIM “ARISING OUT OF AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE USE OR HIRE” CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: “BUNKERS ON DELIVERY/REDELIVERY” CLAUSE: MEANING OF A VESSEL : SECTION 3(1)(H) HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACT‘PRICE ACTUALLY PAID’'''
DMC/SandT/1012/0417
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc v The Owners and/or Demise Charterers “Marcatania”''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.138 of the Ship or Vessel “Asian Atlas” (2008: 2 December 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Marcatania]]''' '''CONTRACT: AGREEMENT TO EXCHANGE SLOTS FOR USE: SLOTS ON VESSEL CHARTERED BY THIRD PARTY: FAILURE TO PAY HIRE: VESSEL WITHDRAWN BY SHIPOWNER: WHETHER SHIPOWNER OBLIGED TO ON-CARRY CARGO UNDER BAILMENT: WHETHER LIABLE IN CONVERSION FOR DELAY IN RELEASING CARGO''' DMC/SandT/12/16 '''England''' '''M.H. Progress Lines SA v Orient Shipping Rotterdam BV and other, The “Asian Atlas”“Genius Star 1”''' '''English Queen’s Court (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2011]EWHC 3083 (Comm), [2012]1 Lloyd’s Rep 222: 28 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/M_H_Progress_Lines_v_Orient_Shipping_-_The_Genius_Star_1]] '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SUB-CHARTER: CARGO CLAIM AGAINST SUB-CHARTERER: APPORTIONMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST CHARTERER AND SHIPOWNER UNDER INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996: DIFFERENT TIME BARS PROVIDED IN HEAD CHARTER AND INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT: APPLICABLE TIME BAR''' DMC/SandT/12/15 '''England'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of Appeal: Ma CJHC, Stone and Reyes JJ: CACV No. 257 of 2007: 23 April 2008 ([2008] 3 HKLRD 604; [http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkca/2008/CACV000257_2007-60848.html]Sideridraulic Systems SpA v BBC Chartering & Logistics GmbH & Co KG'''
'''ACTION IN REM UNDER HK HIGH COURT ORDINANCE, S.12AEnglish Queen’s Bench (2Commercial Court): Andrew Smith J: [2011] EWHC 3106 (eComm): WARRANT OF ARREST30 November 2011: FOR “ANY CLAIM FOR DAMAGE DONE BY A SHIP”[[http: SETTING ASIDE: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE OF FACTS RELATING TO JURISDICTION'''//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sideridraulic_Systems_v_BBC_Chartering_&_Logistics]
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: INTERPRETATION OF MASTER’S REMARK IN BILL OF LADING: WHETHER CARGO WAS DECK CARGO UNDER HAGUE-VISBY RULES: IF DECK CARGO, WHETHER PARTIES AGREED THAT HAGUE-VISBY RULES NEVERTHELESS APPLIED: WHETHER US COURTS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSE APPLIED'''
DMC/SandT/1012/0314 '''England''' '''Isabella Shipowner SA v Shagang Shipping Co Ltd (The “Aquafaith”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 1077 (Comm): 26 April 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Isabella_Shipowner_v_Shagang_Shipping_The_Aquafaith]]''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE FORM: RULE IN WHITE AND CARTER V MCGREGOR: WHETHER OWNERS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT PREMATURE RE-DELIVERY OF VESSEL BY CHARTERERS''' DMC/SandT/12/13
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Cheong Yuk Fai and another v China International Freight Forwarders A O Smith Electrical Products (HKChangzhou) Co Ltdv Blue Anchor Line & Ors'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: [2012] 1 HKLRD 301: 18 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cheong_Yuk_Fai_and_another_v_China_International_Freight_Forwarders_(HK)_LtdA_O_Smith_Electrical_Products_v_Blue_Anchor_Line_&_Ors]]
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of Appeal'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: WAYBILL: Cheung and Yuen JJA and A Chung JLETTER OF UNDERTAKING: CACV No. 463 of 2002INTERPRETATION: 26 January 2005GOVERNING LAW OF CARRIAGE: [2005] 4 HKLRD 544 (English translation; judgment handed down in Chinese)APPLICABLE LIMIT OF LIABILITY'''
'''Malaysia'''
'''German Federal Supreme Malaysian Courtof Appeal: Sulaiman Bin Daud JCA, Syed Ahmad Helmy Bin Syed Ahmad JCA and Anantham Kasinather JCA: 19 March 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sarawak_Shell_v_South_Sumatra_Richfield_Marine_-_The_Red_Gold]]'''
'''Date of JudgementADMIRALTY: 18 June 2009COLLISION BETWEEN OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSEL AND FIXED OFFSHORE OIL PLATFORM: Case Reference 1ZR 140/06RIGHT OF VESSEL OWNERS TO LIMIT LIABILITY:[httpWHETHER COLLISION CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE OF OWNERS IN THE NAVIGATION OR MANAGEMENT OF VESSEL://wwwWHETHER VESSEL OWNERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY DUE TO ABSENCE OF ACTUAL FAULT OR PRIVITY: MERCHANT SHIPPING ORDINANCE 1952 SECTION 360 VIZ.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Case_Reference:_1_ZR_140/06]LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CONVENTION 1957'''
DMC/SandT/12/11
'''Osmium Shipping Corporation v Cargill International SA (The Netherlands Supreme Court“Captain Stefanos”)'''
'''Nile Dutch Africa Line B.V, Rotterdam, the Netherlands English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 571 (“NDAL”Comm) v. (1) Delta Lloyd Schadeverzekering N.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands (“Delta Lloyd”), (2) Premium Tobacco Investments N.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands (“Tobacco”), (3) M. Meerapfel Söhne A.G., Basel, Switzerland (“Meerapfel”) and (4) CETAC, Douala, Cameroon (“Cetac”) - The “NDS Provider” ''' ''': 13 March 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_%E2%80%9CNDS_Provider%E2%80%9DOsmium_Shipping_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Captain_Stefanos]]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE (1946) FORM INCORPORATING CONWARTIME 2004: WHETHER VESSEL WAS OFF-HIRE DURING PERIOD OF HIJACKING BY SOMALI PIRATES: WHETHER RIDER CLAUSE PROVIDING FOR OFF-HIRE DURING “CAPTURE/SEIZURE” WAS QUALIFIED BY THE PHRASE “BY ANY AUTHORITY”: WHETHER CONWARTIME 2004 CLAUSE QUALIFIED OFF-HIRE RIDER CLAUSE''' DMC/SandT/12/10 '''England''' '''Progress Bulk Carriers Limited v Tube City IMS LLC (The “Cenk Kaptanoglu”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm): 17 February 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Progress_Bulk_Carriers_v_Tube_City_IMS_-_The_Cenk_Kaptanoglu]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: WHETHER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT VOIDABLE FOR DURESS: WHETHER OWNERS’ CONDUCT, ALTHOUGH NOT ILLEGAL, AMOUNTED TO “ILLEGITIMATE PRESSURE”''' DMC/SandT/12/09 '''England''' '''Acergy Shipping Ltd v. Société Bretonne De Réparation Navale SAS''' '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: [2011] EWHC 2490 (Comm): 5 October 2011: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Acergy_Shipping_v_Société_Bretonne_de_Réparation_Navale]] '''CONTRACT FOR PROVISION OF REPAIR SERVICES TO VESSEL: FIRE CAUSING DAMAGE BEYOND REPAIR WORK UNDERTAKEN: INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT: SCOPE OF INDEMNITY CONTAINED THEREIN''' DMC/SandT/12/08 '''England''' '''Geofizika DD v. MMB International Limited and Greenshields Cowie & Co Ltd: “The Green Island”''' '''English Court of Appeal; Lord Neuberger, Thomas LJ, and Sir Nicholas Wall; [2010] EWCA Civ 459, [2010] 2 Lloyds Rep 1; 28 April 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Geofizika_v_MMB_International_-_The_Green_Island]] '''INCOTERMS 2000 CIP: CARRIAGE ON DECK: OBLIGATIONS OF FREIGHT FORWARDER: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: CAUSATION''' DMC/SandT/12/07 '''England''' '''Hyundai Merchant Marine Company Limited v Trafigura Beheer BV (The “Gaz Energy”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2011] EWHC 3108 (Comm): 29 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Hyundai_Merchant_Marine_v_Trafigura_-_the_Gas_Energy]] '''TIME CHARTER: SPEED AND PERFORMANCE WARRANTY: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF CHARTER: WHETHER SPEED AND PERFORMANCE AN “ALL WEATHERS” WARRANTY OR LIMITED TO “MAXIMUM WIND FORCE 4 ON BEAUFORT SCALE”''' DMC/SandT/12/06 '''The “Oriental Baltic”''' '''Singapore High Court: Tan Lee Meng J : [2011] 3 SGHC 75: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Oriental_Baltic]] '''OWNERS OF VESSEL UNDER VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION: IN REM PROCEEDINGS AGAINST VESSEL COMMENCED AFTER LIQUIDATION: PLAINTIFF FILED CAVEAT AGAINST RELEASE AGAINST VESSEL PRIOR TO LIQUIDATION: ACTION AGAINST COMPANY UNDER LIQUIDATION ORDINARILY STAYED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT: WHETHER LEAVE SHOULD BE GRANTED TO PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE WITH ITS ACTION''' DMC/SandT/12/05 '''England''' '''Thai Maparn Trading Co Ltd v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd (The “Med Salvador” and “Goa”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Beatson J: [2011] EWHC 2494 (Comm): 4 October 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thai_Maparn_Trading_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]]''' '''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS : FOB CONTRACT: WHETHER BUYERS IN BREACH OF CONDITION PRECEDENT IN CONTRACT BY SEA UNDER BILL FAILING TO ISSUE 7 DAY ETA OF VESSEL: WHETHER SELLERS IN REPUDIATORY/RENUNCIATORY BREACH BY REJECTING BUYERS’ NOTICE AND STATING THAT CARGO WOULD NOT BE READY IN TIME''' DMC/SandT/12/04 '''England''' '''Pacific Basin IHX Limited v Bulkhandling Handymax AS (The “Triton Lark”): English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2011] EWHC 2868 (Comm): 8 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pacific_Basin_v_Bulkhandling_Handymax,_the_Triton_Lark]]''' '''TIME CHARTER: PIRACY RISKS IN GULF OF LADINGADEN IN 2008: HAGUE VISBY RULESCONWARTIME 1993/2004 CLAUSE: LIABILITY ARBITRATION APPEAL: SECTION 69 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996: CORRECT TEST FOR DEFECTIVE CONTAINERS SUPPLIED ASSESSING RISK OF PIRACY INCIDENT OCCURING FOR PURPOSE OF 1993/2004 CLAUSE: WHETHER OWNERS DEVIATED BY CARRIERREROUTING VESSEL VIA CAPE OF GOOD HOPE INSTEAD OF GULF OF ADEN''' DMC/SandT/12/03 '''England''' '''Emeraldian Limited Partnership v Wellmix Shipping Limited and Guangzhou Iron & Steel Corporation Limited (The “Vine”)''' '''English Commercial Court: PACKAGING OR PART Teare J: [2010] EWHC 1411 (Comm): 17 June 2010:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Emeraldian_Limited_v_Wellmix_Shipping,_the_Vine]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER VESSEL’S OBLIGATION TO OBTAIN CLEARANCE BY PORT AUTHORITIES BEFORE GIVING NOTICE OF READINESS WAIVED FOR PURPOSE OF COMMENCEMENT OF LAYTIME: WHETHER CHARTERERS COULD RELY ON EXCEPTIONS TO RUNNING OF LAYTIME: WHETHER CHARTERERS IN BREACH OF SAFE PORT WARRANTY: WHETHER DEMURRAGE RECOVERABLE FOR DETENTION OF VESSEL''' DMC/12/02 '''England''' '''ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED v. ALBEMARLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and ALBEMARLE CORPORATION''' '''English High Court; Flaux J; [2011] EWHC 1574 (Comm); 21 June 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Astrazeneca_UK_v_Albemarle_International]]''' '''CONTRACT: CLAUSES GRANTING THE RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL: EXCLUSION CLAUSES AND DELIBERATE BREACH''' DMC/SandT/12/01 '''The Netherlands''' '''Furtrans Denzilick Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS (“Furtrans”) v Augusta Due Srl (“Augusta”): The "Constanza M”''' '''Supreme Court of the Netherlands (“SCN”) (summary proceedings): Vice-President J.B. Fleers as Chairman and the judges A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, F.B. Bakels, C.E. Drion and G. Snijders LJN:BT2708, December 9, 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Furtrans_v_Augusta,_the_Constanza_M]]''' '''CONSTRUCTION OF ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE VESSEL? INTERPRETATION ARREST OF TREATIES UNDER DUTCH LAWSEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''
