2,049
edits
Changes
From DMC
no edit summary
England '''Glencore Energy UK Ltd v OMV Supply & Trading Ltd (The “Seagrace”)'''/ English Commercial Court: Sir Ross Cranston: [2018] EWHC 895 (Comm): 23 April 2018: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_v_OMV_Supply_and_Trading_-_The_Seagrace] '''CFR SALES CONTRACT: BP CFR SALES TERMS: BPVOY4 FORM: VESSEL WAITING OFFSHORE EN ROUTE TO PORT OF DISCHARGE AT REQUEST OF BUYERS: SELLERS CLAIM FOR DETENTION BASED ON IMPLIED CONTRACT: WHETHER CLAIM FOR WAITING OFFSHORE WAS A DEMURRAGE CLAIM: WHETHER CLAIM TIME-BARRED DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DEMURRAGE CLAIMS PRESENTATION CLAUSE DEADLINE''' DMC/SandT/18/03 England '''Lukoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Ocean Tankers Pte Ltd (The “Ocean Neptune”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2018] EWHC 163 (Comm): 2 February 2018:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Asia_Pacific_v_Ocean_Tankers_-_The_Ocean_Neptune]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: EXXONMOBILVOY 2005 FORM: LITASCO CLAUSES: DEMURRAGE CLAIM PRESENTATION TIME-BAR REQUIRING DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF CLAIM TO BE PRESENTED TO CHARTERERS WITHIN 90 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF CARGO DISCHARGE: WHETHER CLAIM FOR TIME LOST WAITING FOR ORDERS TIME-BARRED DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DOCUMENT PRESENTATION REQUIREMENT: APPEAL FROM PARTIAL FINAL AWARD UNDER SECTION 69 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/18/02 England '''Kyokuyo Co Ltd v AP Møller-Maersk A/S, trading as “Maersk Line”''' '''English High Court – Commercial Court: Mr Justice Andrew Baker: [2017] EWHC 654 (Comm): 29 March 2017: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kyokuyo_v_AP_Møller-Maersk_-_trading_as_Maersk_Line]] '''LIMITATION OF LIABILITY UNDER HAGUE/HAGUE-VISBY RULES: WHETHER LIMITATION APPLIED TO EACH SEPARATE PACKAGE/UNIT DAMAGED OR TO TOTAL NUMBER OF PACKAGES/UNITS''' DMC/SandT/18/01 England '''CSSA Chartering and Shipping Services S.A. v Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd (The “Pacific Voyager”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2017] EWHC 2579 (Comm): 18 October 2017: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CSSA_Chartering_and_Shipping_Services_v_Mitsui_O.S.K._Lines_-_The_Pacific_Voyager]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: SHELLVOY 5 FORM: WHETHER OBLIGATION ON OWNER TO GET THE VESSEL TO THE LOADING PORT WITHIN A CERTAIN TIME: WHETHER SUCH AN OBLIGATION IS ABSOULTE OR ONLY ONE OF DUE DILIGENCE: WHETHER LAYCAN EQUIVALENT TO AN ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL OR READINESS TO LOAD DATE''' DMC/SandT/17/14 England '''Glencore International AG v MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.''' '''English Court of Appeal; Lewison and Henderson LJJ, Sir Christopher Clarke; [2017] EWCA Civ 365; 24 May 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_International_v_MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company]]''' '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY OF CARGO: MEANING OF “DELIVERY ORDER": ELECTRONIC RELEASE SYSTEMS IN OPERATION AT PORT OF DISCHARGE: WHETHER A RELEASE NOTE CONTAINING PIN CODES CONSTITUTED A DELIVERY ORDER: WHETHER CONSIGNEE ESTOPPED BY PREVIOUS USE OF ERS SYSTEM''' DMC/SandT/17/13 England '''Navalmare UK Limited v Kale Maden Hammaddeler Sanayi ve Ticart AS (The “Arundel Castle”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Knowles J: [2017] EWHC 116 (Comm): 31 January 2017: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Navalmare_UK_v_Kale_Maden_Hammaddeler_Sanayi_ve_Ticart_-_The_Arundel_Castle]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: MEANING OF “PORT LIMITS”: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL''' DMC/SandT/17/12 Singapore '''DSA Consultancy (FZC) v The “Eurohope”''' '''Singapore High Court; Chua Lee Ming J; [2017] SGHC 218: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSA_Consultancy_(FZC)_v_The_Eurohope]] '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: ARREST TO OBTAIN SECURITY IN AID OF FOREIGN COURT PROCEEDINGS''' DMC/SandT/17/11 Canada '''De Wolf Maritime Safety BV v Traffic-Tech International Inc. (The “Zagora”)''' '''Federal Court, Ontario: Madam Justice St-Louis; 2017 FC 23: 11January 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/28De_Wolf_Maritime_Safety_v_Traffic-Tech_International_-_The_Zagora]]''' '''HAGUE-VISBY RULES: WHETHER CARGO CARRIED ON-DECK UNDECLARED AMOUNTED TO “GOODS” AS DEFINED IN THE RULES: WHETHER A CARRIER COULD RELY ON THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO GOODS CARRIED ON-DECK WITHOUT AUTHORISATION'''
DMC/SandT/17/10 England '''TTMI Sarl Transgrain Shipping (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Statoil ASAYangtze Navigation (Hong Kong) Co Ltd.''''''English Commercial Court: Teare J: (2016) EWHC 3122 (Comm): [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Transgrain_Shipping_(Singapore)_v_Yangtze_Navigation_(Hong_Kong)]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY (TIME): NYPE INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996, CLAUSE 8(D): WHETHER “ACT” REQUIRES FAULT''' DMC/SandT/17/09 Singapore '''The “Posidon” and another matter''' '''Singapore High Court; Belinda Ang Saw Ean J; [2017] SGHC 138:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Posidon]] '''CLAIMS AGAINST SHIP SALE PROCEEDS: PRIORITIES: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH ESTABLISHED ORDER OF PRIORITIES MAY BE DEPARTED FROM: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH NECESSARIES CLAIM MAY RANK ABOVE MORTGAGEE’S CLAIM: WHETHER REQUIREMENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF NATURE AND EXTENT OF EXPENDITURE DIFFERS FOR DIFFERENT KINDS OF NECESSARIES CLAIMS''' DMC/SandT/17/08 England '''Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The “New Flamenco”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hodge SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 43: 28 June 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-_The_New_Flamenco_-_Supreme_Court_Decision]]''' '''TIME CHARTER: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM: WHETHER CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL''' DMC/SandT/17/07 England '''Gard Marine & Energy Ltd v China National Chartering Co Ltd and another/China National Chartering Co Ltd v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another/Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another (The “Ocean Victory”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Hodge and Toulson SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 35: 10 May 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gard_Marine_%26_Energy_v_China_National_Chartering_-_The_Ocean_Victory]] '''DEMISE CHARTERPARTY: TIME CHARTERPARTY: CONTACT WITH BREAKWATER AND GROUNDING AT PORT RESULTING IN CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS AND WRECK REMOVAL OF VESSEL: WHETHER LOSS CAUSED BY BREACH OF SAFE PORT UNDERTAKING OR BY AN ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE: WHETHER SUBROGATED RIGHTS OF HULL INSURERS AND INSURED LOSSES OF OWNERS AGAINST DEMISE CHARTERERS PRECLUDED BY DEMISE CHARTERPARTY TERMS: WHETHER TIME CHARTERERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY AGAINST HULL INSURERS AND OWNERS: BARECON 89 FORM: MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT 1995: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976 DMC/SandT/17/06 England '''Bahamas Oil Refining Company International Limited v Cape Bari Tankschiffahrts GmbH & Co KG (The “Cape Bari”)''' '''Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson SCJJ: [2016] UKPC 20: 19 July 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bahamas_Oil_Refining_Company_v_Cape_Bari_Tankschiffahrts_-_The_Cape_Bari]]''' '''CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH: COLLISION BETWEEN VESSEL AND BERTH: WHETHER – UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH - VESSEL CAN CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE STATUTORY RIGHT TO LIMIT LABILITY: WHETHER UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE VESSEL DID CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE RIGHT TO LIMIT: MERCHANT SHIPPING (MARITIME CLAIMS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY) ACT 1989 OF THE BAHAMAS: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976''' DMC/SandT/17/05 England '''Oldendorff GmbH & Co KG v Sea Powerful II Special Maritime Enterprises (The “Zagora”)''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Mr Justice Teare: [2016] EWHC 3212; 15 December 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oldendorff_GmbH_v_Sea_Powerful_II_Special_Maritime_Enterprises_The_Zagora]]''' '''LETTER OF INDEMNITY: WHETHER THE DISCHARGE PORT AGENT WAS ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE SHIPOWNERS OR THE PERSON NAMED IN THE LETTER OF INDEMNITY AS THE PERSON TO WHOM DELIVERY OF THE CARGO WAS TO BE MADE''' DMC/SandT/17/04 England '''MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Cottonex Anstalt''' '''Court of Appeal; Moore-Bick and Tomlinson LJJ, Keehan J.; [2016] EWCA Civ 789; 27 July 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company_v_Cottonex_Anstalt]] '''CONTAINER DEMURRAGE: FRUSTRATION: REPUDIATION AND LEGITIMATE INTEREST: GOOD FAITH: PENALTIES''' DMC/SandT/17/03 England '''SPAR SHIPPING AS v GRAND CHINA LOGISTICS HOLDING (GROUP) CO LTD (THE “SPAR CAPELLA”, “SPAR VEGA” AND “SPAR DRACO”)''' '''Court of Appeal; Sir Terence Etherton MR, Gross and Hamblen LJJ; [2016] EWCA Civ 982; 7 October 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Spar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics_Holding_Group]]''' '''NYPE 1993 FORM TIME CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ DUTY TO PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION OR AN INNOMINATE TERM: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY BREACH OF THE TIME CHARTER''' DMC/SandT/17/02 England '''Volcafe Ltd and Others v Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA (trading as “CSAV”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Gloster LJ, King LJ and Flaux J: (2016) EWCA Civ 1103: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Volcafe_&_Ors_v_Compania_Sud_Americana_de_Vapores_-_CSAV]]''' '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: CONSIGNMENTS OF BAGGED COFFEE BEANS IN CONTAINERS CARRIED ON LCL/FCL TERMS: CARGO DAMAGED BY CONDENSATION: TEMPORAL SCOPE OF HAGUE RULES: BURDEN OF PROOF: WHETHER CARRIER FAILED PROPERLY AND CAREFULLY TO LOAD AND CARRY THE GOODS: WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO RELY ON “INHERENT VICE” EXCEPTION: WHETHER DAMAGE INEVITABLE: HAGUE RULES, ARTICLE III RULE 2 AND ARTICLE IV RULE 2(M)''' DMC/SandT/17/01 England '''ST Shipping & Transport INC v Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA (The “Kriti Filoxenia”)''' '''High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Mr Justice Walker; [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm); 14 May 2015''' '''CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ RIGHT TO CANCEL THE CHARTERPARTY PURSUANT TO THE LAYCAN PROVISION SURIVIVES A RE-NOMINATION OF THE LOAD PORT''' DMC/SandT/16/07 England '''FSL-9 Pte Ltd and Nordic Tankers Trading A/S v Norwegian Hull Club (The “FSL New York”)'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division (English Commercial Court): Beatson Blair J: [20112016] EWHC 1150 1091 (Comm): 9 10 May 20112016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/TTMI_v_StatoilFSL-9_Pte_&_Nordic_Tankers_Trading_v_Norwegian_Hull_Club_-_The_FSL_New_York]]'''
'''ARBITRATIONLETTER OF UNDERTAKING: JURISDICTIONP&I CLUB: PROPER PARTY WHETHER CLAIMANT OWNERS COULD APPLY TO HIGH COURT TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT P&I CLUB TO INCREASE LEVEL OF SECURITY AVAILABLE UNDER A LETTER OF UNDERTAKING ISSUED BY THE CLUB TO CHARTERPARTYOWNERS: DISPONENT OWNER WRONGLY IDENTIFIED MEANING OF “LIBERTY TO APPLY” IN RECAP EMAILS: UNDISCLOSED PRINCIPAL: RECTIFICATION: CHARTERPARTY CREATED BY CONDUCT LETTER OF UNDERTAKING SUBJECT TO ENGLISH LAW AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE PARTIESHIGH COURT IN LONDON'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2706
'''NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NY v Cargill International SA, The Sahand“Global Santosh”'''
'''ARRESTS OFF-HIRE CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF VESSELS IN SINGAPORE OWNED BY IRANIAN COMPANIESVESSEL: ASSETS FREEZE IMPOSED BY UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS 1737, 1747, 1803 WHETHER ACTS OF RECEIVERS AND 1929: WHETHER SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS REQUIRE IMPOUNDMENT OR DETENTION SUB-CHARTERERS WERE TO BE CONSIDERED “DEFAULT OF VESSELS OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY DESIGNATED PERSONS OR ENTITIES THE CHARTERERS OR THEIR SUBSIDIARIES: EFFECT OF ASSETS FREEZE ON ARREST OF SHIPS PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION OF COURTAGENTS”'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2605
'''England'''
'''National PST Energy 7 Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v BP Oil Supply CompanyOW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''English Supreme Court of Appeal: Ward and Tomlinson LJJ and Sir Mark Potter: 12 October 2011: ; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Hughes, Toulson; [20112016] EWCA Civ 1127UKSC 23, 11 May 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NSCSA_v_BP_Oil_SupplyPST_Energy_7__Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_-_The_Res_Cogitans]]'''
'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: BPVOY4: DEMURRAGE CLAIMS RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE; GOODS CONTEMPLATED TO BE PRESENTED WITH FULL DOCUMENTATION WITHIN 90 DAYS CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED; SALE OF COMPLETION GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE; COMMENTS ON POSITION IF SALE OF DISCHARGE: FINAL SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM: WHETHER MIS-DESCRIBED FURTHER DEMURRAGE CLAIM TIME-BARRED: COST OF BUNKERS CONSUMED FOR RE-BERTHINGGOODS ACT 1979 APPLIED'''
DMC/11SandT/2516/04
'''England'''
'''Conarken Group Limited and Farrell Transport Limited Crescendo Maritime Co. & Alpha Bank AE vBank of Communications Co Ltd & Ors. Network Rail Infrastructure Limited'''
'''English High Court of Appeal; Pill, Moore-Bick, and Jackson LJJTeare J; [20112015] EWCA Civ 644EWHC 3364 (Comm), 27 May 201125 November 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Conarken_v_Network_RailCrescendo_Maritime_&_Alpha_Bank_v_Bank_of_Communications_&_Ors]]'''
'''TORTBACK-DATED SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: DAMAGESREFUND GUARANTEES: SUMS PAYABLE UNDER VICTIM’S CONTRACTS WITH THIRD PARTIESARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: FORESEEABILITY AND REMOTENESSACTION COMMENCED IN CHINESE COURTS BY A PARTY TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: REASONABLENESS BREACH OF CALCULATIONSARBITRATION AGREEMENT:WHETHER AN ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED:: WHETHER CHINESE PROCEEDINGS A COLLATERAL ATTACK ON ARBITRATION AWARD'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2403
'''England'''
'''Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Limited SBT Star Bulk & Tankers (Germany) GmbH & Co KG v Korea Line CorporationCosmotrade SA (The “Wehr Trave”)'''
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Blair Eder J: [20112016] EWHC 1819 583 (Comm): 22 June 2011March 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_Korea_Line_CorporationSBT_Bulk_&_Tankers_v_Cosmotrade_-_The_Wehr_Trave]]
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: WRONGFUL TERMINATION BY CHARTERERS: ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGESCHARTER TRIP: NO AVAILABLE MARKET FOR BALANCE WHETHER THE PARTICULAR TERMS OF THE CHARTER PERIOD AT TIME OF TERMINATIONPERMITTED CHARTERERS TO ORDER THE VESSEL TO LOAD A FURTHER CARGO AFTER THE INITIAL CARGO HAD BEEN DISCHARGED: EFFECT OF REVIVAL OF MARKET AT A LATER STAGEARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2302
'''Hong KongEngland'''
'''Birnam Ltd Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The Owners of the Ship or Vessel “Hong Ming”, The “Hong Ming”“New Flamenco”)'''
'''Hong Kong English Court of First InstanceAppeal: Reyes JLongmore, Christopher Clarke and Sales LLJ: HCAJ No.105 of 2011[2015] EWCA Civ 1299: 26 August 201121 December 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Birnam_v_The_"Hong_Ming"]Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-the_New_Flamenco_-_Court_of_Appeal_Decision]'''
'''WARRANT OF ARRESTTIME CHARTER: SETTING ASIDEREPUDIATION: CLAIM FOR OWNERSHIP QUANTUM OF VESSEL PURSUANT DAMAGES: WHETHER CREDIT TO A TERMINATED CONTRACT BE GIVEN FOR SALE CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSELSOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN ITS VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE: MISUSE OF THE ARREST PROCESSARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2201
'''England'''
'''CARRIAGE CHARTERPARTY: QUANTIFICATION OF GOODSDAMAGES FOR REPUDIATION OF VOYAGE CHARTER: CIF CONTRACT: CONSTRUCTION: ENTITLEMENT DAMAGES FOR POSITIONAL LOSS IN ADDITION TO GIVE NOTICE OF READINESSUSUAL PROFIT LOSS: CONCURRENT CAUSES LEADING WHETHER DAMAGES LIMITED BY REFERENCE TO DELAY IN BERTHINGPERIOD WHEN CONTRACT VOYAGE WOULD HAVE ENDED: COMMENCEMENT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 69 OF LAYTIMETHE ARBITRATION ACT 1996'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2118
'''England'''
'''Carboex SA Société de Distribution de Toutes Marchandises en Côte D’Ivoire, trading as “SDTM-CI”, and others v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA. Continental Lines N.V. and another (the “Sea Miror”)'''
'''English High Court: Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court): Field Flaux J.; 18 June 2015: [20112015] EWHC 1165 1747 (Comm: 12 May 2011): [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_v_Louis_Dreyfus_CommoditiesSDTM-CI_and_others_v_Continental_Lines_amd_another_-_the_Sea_Miror]]'''
'''AMWELSH SYNACOMEX 90 CHARTERPARTY: DEMURRAGE: EXCEPTION LOADING AND DISCHARGING TO BE AT THE EXPENSE AND RISK OF STRIKESTHE SHIPPERS/CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS/CHARTERERS RESPECTIVELY: WHETHER DELAY IN OWNERS RESPONSIBLE FOR CARGO LOSS AND DAMAGE OCCURRING DURING LOADING AND DISCHARGE ARISING FROM CONGESTION CAUSED BY STRIKES EXCEPTED FROM LAYTIME'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2017
'''England'''
'''Great Eastern PST Energy 7 Shipping Co Ltd LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v. (1) Far East Chartering Ltd (2) Binani Cement LtdOW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''English High Courtof Appeal; Moore-Bick, Queen’s Bench Division: Judge Mackie QC: Longmore, McCombe LJJ; [20112015] EWHC 1372 (Comm): 27 May 2011EWCA Civ 1058, 22 October 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Great_Eastern_Shipping_v_Far_East_CharteringPST_Energy_7_Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_-_the_RES_COGITANS''']] '''ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: SUPPLY OF BUNKERS: RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE: CONTEMPLATED THAT GOODS WOULD BE CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED: NO PASSING OF PROPERTY INTENDED: SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE'''
DMC/SandT/15/16
'''Singapore'''
'''Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services Pte Ltd v MISC Berhad, the “BUNGA MELATI 5”'''
'''High Court; Prakash J; [2015] SGHC 190, 22 July 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Equatorial_Marine_Fuel_Management_Services_v_MISC_Bhd_-_The_Bunga_Melati_5]]
'''BUNKER BROKERS: AGENCY: ACTUAL AUTHORITY, APPARENT AUTHORITY, AND ESTOPPEL: NO GENERAL ‘DUTY TO SPEAK’'''
DMC/SandT/15/15 '''The NetherlandsEngland'''
'''Pianura Armatori SpA Arnold v Ferrari Shipping Agency G.A. The "Halcyon Star”Britton'''
'''UK Supreme Court : Lord Neuberger of Rotterdam (summary proceedings) : Mr A.F.L. GeerdesAbbotsbury PSC, LJN:BQ5031Lord Sumption, October 7Lord Carnwath, 2010 (published May 19Lord Hughes, 2011)Lord Hodge JJSC: [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] 2 WLR 1593: 10 June 2015: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pianura_Armatori_v_Ferrari_ShippingArnold_v_Britton]]'''
'''ARREST CONVENTION 1952 ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPHLANDLORD AND TENANT: ARREST LONG RESIDENTIAL LEASES: INCREASE OF SERVICE CHARGE AT YEARLY RATE OF VESSEL OWNED BY A VESSEL MANAGER 10% ON COMPOUND BASIS: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: CONTROL OF PARTIES OVER LANGUAGE USED IN CONTRACT: THAT CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT WORKED OUT BADLY FOR ONE PARTY NO REASON FOR MARITIME CLAIMS AGAINST THE VESSEL MANAGER RELATING TO OTHER VESSELS NOT OWNED BY THE MANAGERDEPARTING FROM NATURAL LANGUAGE'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1814
'''England'''
'''The Owner of the Vessel “The Ocean Crown” and others Bunge SA v Five Oceans Salvage Consultants Ltd, “The Ocean Crown”Nidera BV'''
'''English High UK Supreme Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Admiralty Court): Gross JLords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson: [2009] EWHC 3040 (Admlty), [20102015] UKSC 437: 1 Lloyd’s Rep 468: 26 November 2009July 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Ocean_CrownBunge_SA_v_Nidera_BV]]'''
'''SALVAGEINTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: DAMAGES: SALE OF GRAIN BASED ON GAFTA FORM 49: EMBARGO ON EXPORTS: ASSESSMENT PREMATURE TERMINATION OF REMUNERATIONCONTRACT BY SELLERS BEFORE EMBARGO TOOK EFFECT: WHETHER RISK ASSESSMENT OF FUTURE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN APPLYING PRINCIPLE DAMAGES TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT EFFECT OF ENCOURAGEMENTEMBARGO: SCOPE OF THE PRINCIPLE IN THE AMERIQUENO LOSS SUFFERED BY BUYERS'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1713
'''The Netherlands'''
'''HDIThe Kingdom of The Netherlands v Owners of the yacht Qubio – “The Qubio”''' '''Supreme Court of the Netherlands: Vice-Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG et al v APM Terminals Rotterdam President F.B. Bakels as chairman and judges G. Snijders, G. de Groot, M.V.Polak and T.H. Tanja-van den Broek'; 10 July 2015, Case no. ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1836:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Kingdom_of_The_Netherlands_v_Owners_of_Yacht_Qubio]]''' '''WRECK OF VESSEL: EXTENSION OF LIABILITY OF THE OWNER OF A SUNKEN VESSEL TO PAY FOR COSTS OF MARKING THE WRECK AS A TEMPORARY OR PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE''' DMC/SandT/15/12 '''Singapore'''The ‘Pretoria’'''Precious Shipping Public Company Ltd & Ors v OW Bunker Far East (Singapore) Pte Ltd & Ors and other matters''' '''Singapore High Court of Rotterdam; Chong J; [2015] SGHC 187, 21 July 2015: [[http: Ms P//www.onlinedmc.co.Auk/index.M van Schouwenburg –Laanphp/Precious_Shipping_&_Ors_v_OW_Bunker_Far_East_&_Ors]] '''WHETHER INTERPLEADER RELIEF AVAILABLE TO ULTIMATE PURCHASERS OF BUNKERS: WHETHER POTENTIAL CLAIMS BY PHYSICAL SUPPLIERS (WHO SOLD THOSE BUNKERS TO INTERMEDIATE BUYERS) WERE SUFFICIENT TO FOUND THE COURT’S INTERPLEADER JURISDICTION''' DMC/SandT/15/11 '''England''' '''Glencore Energy UK Ltd v Cirrus Oil Services Ltd''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Cooke J: [2014] EWHC 87 (Comm), LJN[2014] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 24 January 2014:BO0063, September 29, 2010:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/HDI-Gerling_v_APM_TerminalsGlencore_Energy_UK_v_Cirrus_Oil_Services]] '''CONTRACT FOR SALE OF OIL BLEND: WHETHER A BINDING CONTRACT EXISTED: FIRM OFFER WITH ESSENTIAL TERMS ACCEPTED: NAME OF SELLER INFERRED FROM PREVIOUS DEALINGS BETWEEN PARTIES: DAMAGES FOR NON-ACCEPTANCE UNDER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979, SECTIONS 50(2) AND (3) NOT EXCLUDED BY CLAUSE 32.1 OF BP 2007 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CFR SALES'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1610
'''United Kingdom Supreme CourtEngland'''
'''Jones Maestro Bulk Ltd v. KaneyCosco Bulk Carrier Ltd, the “Great Creation”'''
'''UK Supreme English High Court; Lords Philips, Hope, Brown, Collins, Kerr, Dyson, Lady HaleCooke J; [20112014] UKSC 13; 30 March 2011EWHC 3978 (Comm), 15 December 2014:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Jones_v_KaneyMaestro_Bulk_v_Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_-_The_Great_Creation]]
'''REMOVAL OF EXPERT WITNESS IMMUNITY IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGSTIME CHARTERPARTY: UNTIMELY REDELIVERY NOTICES: “BELOW MARKET” FOLLOW-ON FIXTURE: HOW DAMAGES TO BE CALCULATED: MITIGATION'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1509
'''CanadaEngland'''
'''Société Telus Communications, Hydro-Québec and Bell Canada Metall Market OOO v Peracomo Inc., Réal Vallée and the fishing vessel RealiceVitorio Shipping Co Ltd (The “Lehmann Timber”)'''
'''Federal English Court of CanadaAppeal: Harrington J.Arden, Patten LLJ andSir Bernard Rix: 2011 FC 494[2013] EWCA Civ 650: 27 April 2011[2014] QB 760, [2013] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 541:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Telus_Communications_v_Peracomo_Inc_and_Réal_ValléeMetall_Market_v_vitorio_Shipping_the_Lehmann_Timber]]'''
'''SHIPPINGCARRIAGE OF GOODS: SUBMARINE CABLE CUT GENERAL AVERAGE: REQUEST BY SHIPOWNER FOR SECURITY IN THE FORM OF GENERAL AVERAGE BOND SUPPORTED BY SKIPPER GENERAL AVERAGE GUARANTEE: WHETHER TERMS OF FISHING VESSELREQUEST REASONABLE: WHETHER DAMAGE CAUSED INTENTIONALLY OR RECKLESSLY AND WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT 'SUCH LOSS' WOULD PROBABLY RESULTACCEPTANCE OF PART SECURITY A WAIVER OF SHIPOWNER’S LIEN: WHETHER DEFENDANTS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY UNDER THE 1976 LIMITATION CONVENTION, AS INCORPORATED INTO CANADIAN LAWEXPENSES OF STORING CARGO ASHORE IN EXERCISE OF LIEN RECOVERABLE'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1408
'''The NetherlandsEngland'''
'''DSV Road B.V. PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and Amlin Corporate Insurance N.V. Trading SA v Sneltransport “Heidenend” Tegelen B.V.OW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''Amsterdam English High Court of Appeal: A.S. Arnold, W.H.F.M. Cortenraad and H.M. ten Haaft, LJN BL9955, April 2, 2010; Males J; [2015] EWHC 2022 (Comm) 14 July 2015: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSV_Road_v_Sneltransport_HeidenendPST_Energy_7_Shipping_&_Product_Shipping_and_Trading_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_the_Res_Cognitans]]
'''CARRIAGE ARBITRATION ACT 1996 S.69 APPEAL: BUNKER SUPPLY CONTRACT ON CREDIT TERMS: RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE: PARTIES CONTEMPLATED BUNKERS WOULD LIKELY BE CONSUMED BEFORE PAYMENT MADE AND TITLE PASSED: WHETHER SALE OF GOODS BY ROAD: CMR CONVENTIONACT 1979 APPLICABLE: WHETHER SHIPPER-PACKED TRAILER CAN BE CONSIDERED ‘GOODS’ WITHIN ART.17REQUIREMENTS OF S.249 MET'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1307
'''England'''
'''Shell Egypt West Manzala GmbH and another Spar Shipping AS v Dana Gas Egypt LimitedGrand China Logistics Holding (Group) Co., Ltd''' '''English High Court: Queen'Queen’s s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Tomlinson J: [20102015] EWHC 465 718 (Comm): 10 Popplewell J.: 18 March 2010:2015[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Shell_Egypt_v_Dana_GasSpar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics]]'''
'''CONTRACTNYPE 1993 FORM TIMECHARTER: JOINT VENTURE FOR GAS EXPLORATIONFAILURE TO PAY HIRE ON TIME: WHETHER BREACH OF CONDITION: REPUDIATORY WHETHER BREACH COMMITTED BY ONE PARTYOF AN INNOMINATE TERM: INNOCENT PARTY TERMINATED CONTRACT BASED ON WRONG BELIEF THAT CONTRACTUAL TERMINATION CLAUSE WAS TRIGGEREDRIGHT TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF BARGAIN: WHETHER INNOCENT PARTY COULD JUSTIFY TERMINATION CHARTERER’S CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1206
'''England'''
'''Choil Trading SA Gard Marine & Energy Ltd (Respondents/Claimants) v Sahara Energy Resources Limited China National Chartering Co. Ltd (The “Prem Mala”Intermediate Charterers)'''v China National'''English Commercial Court: Christopher Clarke J: [2010] EWHC 374 Chartering Co. Ltd v Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha (CommCharterers/Appellants): 26 February 2010, - The “Ocean Victory”: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Choil_Trading_v_Sahara_EnergyGard_Marine_&_Energy_v_China_National_Chartering_-_The_Ocean_Victory_-Resources_Court_of_Appeal]]'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEAEnglish Court of Appeal: FOB SALE CONTRACTLongmore, Gloster and Underhill LJJ: CIF ON-SALE CONTRACTS[2015] EWCA Civ 16: QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES FOR DELIVERY OF CONTAMINATED GOODS IN BREACH OF FOB CONTRACT22 January 2015: RECOVERABILITY OF HEDGING LOSSES INCURRED IN MITIGATION IN RELATION TO CIF CONTRACTS: WHETHER TRUE CONSTRUCTION OF FOB CONTRACT EXEMPTION CLAUSE EXCLUDED RECOVERY OF HEDGING AND ADDITIONAL EXPENSES/COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT'''
'''SAFE PORT: WHETHER COMBINATION OF ‘LONG WAVE’ SWELL AND A SEVERE GALE AN ‘ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE’: SUBROGATION: WHETHER INSURER OF BOTH PARTIES TO A BARECON CHARTERPARTY MAY SUE AN ASSURED FOR BREACH OF CHARTER'''
DMC/SandT/15/05 '''English High CourtEngland'''
'''Azimut–Benetti SpA Standard Chartered Bank v. HealeyDorchester LNG (2) Limited (The “Erin Schulte”)'''
'''English High Courtof Appeal: Blair J.Sir Bernard Rix, Moore-Bick and Briggs LJJ: [20102014] EWHC 2234 (Comm)EWCA Civ 1382: 3 September 201022 October 2014: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Azimut_Benetti_v_HealeyStandard_Chartered_Bank_v_Dorchester_LNG_(2)_-_The_Erin_Schulte]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACTBILL OF LADING: LIQUIDATED DAMAGESLETTER OF CREDIT: GUARANTEEINITIAL REJECTION OF THE PRESENTATION: WHETHER LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CONSTITUTE A PENALTYMEANING OF “INDORSEMENT” OF BILL OF LADING: WHETHER A PRE-ESTIMATE TRANSFER OF LOSS IN THE CASE RIGHTS OF BREACHSUIT: WHETHER A DETERRENT: WHETHER GUARANTEE REMAINS ENFORCEABLE WHERE A PROVISION IN THE UNDERLYING CONTRACT CONSTITUTES CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1992 SECTIONS 2(2)(A PENALTY: PUBLIC POLICY) AND 5(2)(B)'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1004
'''United Kingdom''' '''Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd & ORs''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lord Phillips, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Sir John Dyson): [2010] UKSC 44: 27 October 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oceanbulk_Shipping_v_TMT_Asia]]Hong Kong'''
'''CONTRACTSThe Alas renamed The Kombos: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTHong Kong Court of First Instance: INTERPRETATIONNg J: ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ COMMUNICATIONSHCAJ 241/2009: WHETHER FACTS DISCLOSED DURING ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ NEGOTIATIONS ADMISSIBLE AS AN AID TO CONSTRUCTION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT[2014] 4 HKLRD 160: 21 July 2014:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Alas_renamed_The_Kombos]]'''
'''ADMIRALTY: WARRANT OF ARREST: SHIPOWNERS’ CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AND UNPAID HIRE: FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD NOT SATISFIED: NO BAR TO ACTION IN REM FOR CLAIM ARISING OUT OF AGREEMENT FOR USE OR HIRE OF THE SHIP'''
'''Thomas Crema v. Cenkos Securities PLCHong Kong'''
'''English Court of Appeal (Civil Division); Hughes LJ, Aikens LJ, Chancellor Morritt; [2010] EWCA Civ 1444, 16 December 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thomas_Crema_v_Cenkos_Securities]]Antwerp Diamond Bank NV v Brink’s Inc'''
'''CONTRACT PARTLY WRITTEN AND PARTLY ORALHong Kong Court of First Instance: WHETHER TERM SHOULD BE IMPLIEDLam and Lunn VPP and Barman JA: RELEVANT PRINCIPLESCACV No.282 of 2012: RELEVANCE OF MARKET PRACTICE[2014] 4 HKLRD 158: EXPERT EVIDENCE17 July 2014: LIMITATIONS OF EXPERT EVIDENCE[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Antwerp_Diamond_Bank-v-Brink's_Inc]]'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY AIR: MISDELIVERY: GOODS RELEASED TO BUYER WITHOUT CONSENT OF PLEDGEE BANK AND WITHOUT PAYMENT: LOCUS OF PLEDGEE BANK TO SUE FOR CONVERSION: AGREEMENT BY SELLER TO PLEDGE FINISHED GOODS TO BANK: DELIVERY OF GOODS TO FREIGHT FORWARDER COMPLETED PLEDGE: CONSTRUCTIVE DELIVERY OF GOODS TO BANK'''
'''English Court of Appeal: Thorpe and Patten LJJ and Sir Simon Tuckey: [2010] EWCA Civ 582, [2010] 1 CLC 829: 27 May 2010:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kookmin_Bank_v_Rainy_SA]]England'''
'''SHIPBUILDING: LETTER OF GUARANTEE: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: EXTREME CONSEQUENCES REQUIRED TO DEPART FROM MEANING OF WORDS AS CONVEYED TO REASONABLE PERSON: NO DEPARTURE SIMPLY BECAUSE COURT WOULD REACH DIFFERENT BALANCE OF PARTIES’ INTERESTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER CONTRACT'''E D & F Man Sugar Ltd v Unicargo Transportgesellschaft GmbH (Polska Zegluga Morska PP, interested party), The “Ladytramp”
'''Court of Appeal; Pattern, Tomlinson, Christopher Clarke LJJ; [2013] EWCA Civ 1449, 19 November 2013:''' '''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/E_D_&_F_Man_v_Unicargo_Transportgesellschaft_GmbH_The_Ladytramp]]'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS: THEFT FROM CONTAINER BY EMPLOYEE OF FUMIGATION COMPANY: WHETHER COMPANY VICARIOUSLY LIABLE: CLOSE CONNECTION BETWEEN THEFT AND PURPOSE OF EMPLOYMENTEngland'''
'''NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NY v Cargill International SA, The “Global Santosh”'''
'''English Commercial CourtOFF-HIRE CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF VESSEL: WHETHER SUB-CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS WERE ‘AGENTS’ OF THE CHARTERERS: WHETHER THE PERSONAL ACT, OMISSION OR DEFAULT TO WHICH CLAUSE REFERRED MUST HAVE OCCURRED DURING PROVISION OF RELEVANT SERVICES'''
'''Singapore'''
'''English Commercial CourtOut of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd [2013] SGCA 15:'''
'''Glencore Energy UK Limited v Transworld Oil Limited (The “Narmada Spirit”)Sundaresh Menon CJ, Chao Hick Tin JA and Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA: English Commercial Court: Blair J6 February 2013: [20102013] EWHC 141 (Comm): 3 February 20102 SLR 363: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_v_Transworld_OilOut_of_the_Box_v_Wanin_Industries]]'''
'''SALE CONTRACT: REMOTENESS OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEADAMAGE: FOB CONTRACTBEVERAGE DISTRIBUTOR ENGAGING MANUFACTURER TO PRODUCE NEW SPORTS DRINK: CORRECT QUANTIFICATION MANUFACTURER UNAWARE OF DAMAGES DISTRIBUTOR’S PLAN TO PROMOTE POPULAR DEMAND FOR NON-DELIVERY GENERIC DRINK THROUGH AGGRESSIVE ADVERTISING: MANUFACTURER SUPPLYING DEFECTIVE SHIPMENT OF CRUDE OIL CARGO FOR WHICH THERE WAS NO AVAILABLE MARKET: NEED TO ACCOUNT DRINKS IN DAMAGES FOR REDUCED LOSS SUFFERED FOLLOWING EARLY CLOSING OUT BREACH OF HEDGED POSITION CONTRACT: ABANDONMENT OF BUYER FOLLOWING ACCEPTANCE OF SELLER’S REPUDIATIONPROMOTION: WHETHER WASTED ADVERTISING EXPENSES CLAIMED BY DISTRIBUTOR TOO REMOTE'''
DMC/SandT/1114/0416
'''English Court of AppealEngland'''
'''Röhlig Great Elephant Corporation v Trafigura Beheer BV v Vitol SA & Vitol Asia Pte Ltd v China Offshore Oil (UKSingapore) International Pte Ltd v Rock Unique Ltd: Court of Appeal, Sedley, Moore-Bick and Aikens LJJ.: 20 January 2011: [2011] EWCA Civ 18:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Röhlig_(UKThe “Crudesky”)_v_Rock_Unique]]'''
'''INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE OF GOODSEnglish Court of Appeal: BIFA CONDITIONSLongmore, Tomlin and Underhill LJJ: WHETHER NO SET[2013] EWCA Civ 1547, [2014] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 25 July 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Great_Elephant_Corp_v_Trafigura_Beheer_-OFF AND TIME BAR PROVISIONS REASONABLE UNDER UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS ACT 1977_The_Crudesky]]'''
'''VOYAGE CHARTER: FOB SALE CONTRACT CHAIN: DEMURRAGE: “RESTRAINT OF PRINCES” EXCEPTION: UNFORESEEABLE FORCE MAJEURE BEYOND CONTROL OR REASONABLE CONTROL'''
'''KG Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft für Mineraloele mbH & Co v Petroplus Marketing AG (The “Mercini Lady”): English Court of Appeal: Maurice Kay, Rix and Patten LJJ: [2010] EWCA Civ 1145: 19 October 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/KG_Bominflot_v_Petroplus_Marketing]]England'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEA: FOB ANTWERP SALE OF EU GASOIL WITH FREE DESTINATION: “SPECIAL” COMMON LAW IMPLIED TERM/CONDITION: STATUTORILY IMPLIED CONDITIONS: WHETHER CARGO TO REMAIN ON-SPECIFICATION FOR A REASONABLE TIME FOLLOWING SHIPMENT: EFFECT OF EXCLUSION CLAUSE ON IMPLIED CONDITIONS: SECTION 14Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (2The “New Flamenco”) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979'''
'''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2014] EWHC 1457 (Comm): 21 May 2014:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-_The_New_Flamenco]]'''
'''The “Asia Star” [2010] SGCA 12: Judgment delivered by VK Rajah JA, 19 March 2010 [2010] SGCA 12[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Asia_Star]]England'''
'''TIME CHARTER: ANTICIPATORY REPUDIATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT RIGHT TO CARRY CARGO: REQUIREMENT GIVE VOYAGE ORDERS TO NOTIFY THE DEFAULTING PARTY TRANSIT GULF OF INTENDED MEASURES IN MITIGATIONADEN: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1114/01 13
'''GermanyEngland'''
'''German Federal Supreme Proton Energy Group SA v Orlen Lietuva''' '''English Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court – Assessment of Damages under the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road ): HH Judge Mackie QC: [2013] EWHC 2872 (‘CMR’Comm): Date of Judgment: 30 September 2010'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Germany_CMR_DamagesProton_Energy_Group_v_Orlen_Lietuva]]
'''CMR TRANSPORTCONTRACT: WILFUL MISCONDUCTCONTRACT FOR SALE OF OIL BLEND: ASSESSMENT EXISTENCE OF BINDING CONTRACT: PARTIES REGARDED THEMSELVES AS BEING BOUND AFTER DEAL WAS CONFIRMED: SPECIFICATION OF OIL BLEND NOT FORMING PART OF DAMAGESSALE BY DESCRIPTION'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2512
'''England'''
'''Angara Maritime Ltd Falkonera Shipping Company v Oceanconnect UK Arcadia Energy Pte Ltd and Oceanconnect.com Inc (The “Fesco Angara”“Falkonera”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Angara_Maritime_v_Oceanconnect_UK]]'''
'''Queen’s Bench English Court of Appeal (Civil Division); Floyd and Christopher Clarke LJJ, London Mercantile CourtSir Stanley Burnton; [2014] EWCA Civ 713; 5 June 2014: HHJ Mackie QC[[http: [2010//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Falkonera_Shipping_v_Arcadia_Energy_-_The_Falkonera]] EWHC 619 (QB): 29 March 2010'''
'''SALE OF GOODSSHIPPING: BUNKERS/MARINE FUELSTANKER TRANSHIPMENT: S.25SHIP-TO-SHIP (1“STS”) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979TRANSFERS: SALE OF BUNKERS CHARTERPARTY PROVIDING FOR STS TRANSFERS TO BE SUBJECT TO TIME CHARTERERS: BUNKERS DELIVERED OWNERS’ APPROVAL WHICH NOT TO VESSELBE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD: FAILURE BY TIME CHARTERERS TO PAY SUPPLIERS OWNERS WITHHOLD CONSENT FOR BUNKERSA STS TRANSFER BETWEEN TWO VLCCs: RIGHT WHETHER OWNERS’ WITHHOLDING OF SUPPLIERS TO SUE OWNERS IN CONVERSION AND/OR BAILMENT FOLLOWING PREMATURE REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY TIME CHARTERERS TO OWNERSAPPROVAL REASONABLE'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2611
'''England'''
'''Soufflet Negoce British American Tobacco Switzerland SA v Bunge SAExel Europe Ltd; British American Tobacco Denmark A/S v Exel Europe Ltd''' '''Court of Appeal: McFarlane L.J.; Sir Bernard Rix; Sir Timothy Lloyd: [2013] EWCA Civ 1319: 30 October 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/British_American_Tobacco_&_Ors_v_Exel_Europe]] '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY ROAD: CMR CONVENTION: CARGO LOSS: ESTABLISHING JURISDICTION AGAINST SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS: WHETHER CLAIMANT THAT HAS ESTABLISHED JURISDICTION UNDER ART.31.1 AGAINST ONE CARRIER CAN RELY ON THAT JURISDICTION TO JOIN SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS''' DMC/SandT/14/10 '''England'''
'''English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Wilson and Toulson LJJ: Trafigura Beheer BV v Navigazione Montanari SPA [2010] EWCA 1102: 13 October 2010[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Soufflet_Negoce_v_Bunge_SA]2014]EWHC 129 Comm'''
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Andrew Smith J.: 30 January 2014:[[http://www.bailiionlinedmc.co.orguk/ew/cases/EWCA/Civindex.php/2010/1102.htmlTrafigura_Beheer_v_Navigazione_Montanari_-_the_Valle_de_Cordoba]]
'''FOB CONTRACTCHARTERPARTY: GAFTA 49 FORMCARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: “IN READINESS TO LOAD”VESSEL CARRYING CONSIGNMENT OF MOTOR OIL ATTACKED BY PIRATES: WHETHER THIS MEANS THAT VESSEL MUST BE “READY” TO LOAD QUANTITY OF OIL TAKEN BY PIRATES CONSTITUTED "IN A LAYTIME SENSE: RISK -TRANSIT LOSS" OR "LOST CARGO" FOR PURPOSES OF GOODS DAMAGED BY UNCLEAN HOLDS ON BUYERIN-TRANSIT LOSS CLAUSE IN CHARTERPARTY'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2409
'''England'''
'''Zodiac Maritime Agencies Limited Yuzhny Zavod Metall Profil LLC v Fortescue Metals Group Limited'''Eems Beheerder B.V. (“the M/V EEMS SOLAR”):
'''English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial , Admiralty Court): David Steel JJervis K, Q.C, the Admiralty Registrar: [2010] EWHC 903 (Comm)5 June 2013: 28 April 2010'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Zodiac_Maritime_v_Fortescue_MetalsYuzhny_Zavod_Metall_Profil_v_Emms_Beheerder_-_the_M/V_Eems_Solar]]'''
'''CONSECUTIVE VOYAGE CHARTERPARTYBILLS OF LADING: WRONGFUL EARLY TERMINATION BY CHARTERER: DAMAGES: WHETHER “AVAILABLE MARKET” WHEN INCORPORATION OF CHARTERPARTY TERMINATEDTERMS PROVIDING THAT CHARTERERS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR STOWAGE: WHETHER SUBSEQUENT EMERGENCE OF MARKET DURING THE BALANCE OF CHARTER PERIOD RELEVANT OWNERS COULD RELY ON THAT CLAUSE AS DEFENCE TO THE ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGESCLAIM BY RECEIVERS FOR CARGO DAMAGE CAUSED BY BAD STOWAGE'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2308
'''England'''
'''ENE 1 Kos Limited v Petroleo Brasileiro SA'''Martrade Shipping & Transport GmbH V United Enterprises Corporation (The “Wisdom C”):[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/ENE_1_Kos_Limited_v_PetrobasMartrade_Shipping_and_Transport_v_United_Entreprises_-_The_Wisdom_C]]''' English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Popplewell J; [2014] EWHC 1884 (Comm); 12 June 2014 '''TIMECHARTER PROVIDING FOR ENGLISH LAW AND LONDON ARBITRATION: ARBITRATORS AWARDING PENAL RATE OF INTEREST: WHETHER “SIGNIFICANT CONNECTION” BETWEEN CHARTERPARTY AND ENGLAND: WHETHER “APPLICABLE LAW” A FOREIGN LAW: LATE PAYMENT OF COMMERCIAL DEBTS (INTEREST) ACT 1998: ARTICLES 3 AND 4 – CONTRACTS (APPLICABLE LAW) ACT 1990''' DMC/SandT/14/07 '''Hong Kong''' '''Darby International Investment Ltd v Rong Tai International Shipping Ltd'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Deputy High Court Judge B Chu: HCMP1438 of 2013: 2 December 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Darby_International_Investments_v_Rong_Tai_International_Shipping]]''' http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2013/2031.html '''MARITIME LAW: REGISTRATION OF VESSELS: VESSEL APPARENTLY REGISTERED IN MORE THAN ONE JURISDICTION: DECLARATION AS TO VALIDITY OF REGISTRATION IN HONG KONG: PURPOSE OF GRANTING DECLARATION''' DMC/SandT/14/06 '''England''' '''Flame SA v Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd''' '''English Commercial Court of Appeal : Teare J: [2013] EWHC 3153 (CivilComm): Longmore and Smith LJJ and Sir Mark Waller22 October 2013: [2010[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Flame_SA_v_Glory_Wealth_Shipping]] EWCA Civ 772: 6 July 2010'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SHIP WITHDRAWN FOR NON-PAYMENT CONTRACT OF HIRE WHILST LOADING CARGOAFFREIGHTMENT: CARGO DISCHARGED BACK TO SHORE TWO DAYS LATERREPUDIATION: WHETHER SHIPOWNER COULD CLAIM REMUNERATION AT MARKET RATE FOR STORING THE CARGO DURING THAT PERIODQUANTUM OF DAMAGES: WHETHER REMUNERATION DUE UNDER IMPLIED TERM OR AS QUANTUM MERUITCOMPENSATORY PRINCIPLE: WHETHER DUE AS RIGHT CORRELATIVE INNOCENT PARTY MUST PROVE ABILITY TO PERFORM OBLIGATIONS, HAD CONTRACT CONTINUED, TO DUTY OF LOOKING AFTER GOODS: WHETHER SHIPOWNER COULD RECOVER COSTS OF PROVIDING BAIL BONDSUBSTANTIAL DAMAGES FROM CONTRACT BREAKER'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2205
'''England'''
'''Compania Sud Americana de Vapores Bulk Ship Union SA v Sinochem Tianjin Import & Export Corp – the « Aconcagua»[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CSAV_v_Sinochem_the_Aconcagua]]Clipper Bulk Shipping Limited (The "Pearl C")'''
'''English High Court: Christopher Clarke Popplewell J.: 26 June 2012 [20092012] EWHC 1880 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 533:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bulk_Ship_Union_v_Clipper_Bulk_Shipping_-_The_Pearl_C]] '''TIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM: SLOW STEAMING: WHETHER A BREACH OF ‘UTMOST DESPATCH’ OBLIGATION: WHETHER VESSEL OFF-HIRE BY REASON OF DEFAULT OF MASTER: WHETHER PARTIAL INTERRUPTION IN SERVICE SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER OFF-HIRE CLAUSE''' DMC/SandT/14/04 '''Hong Kong''' '''Maintek Computer (CommSuzhou); 24 July 2009Co Ltd v Blue Anchor Line''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: To J: HCAJ No.106 of 2008: 2 April 013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maintek_Computer_(Suzhou)_v_Blue_Anchor_Line''']] http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2013/506.html '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY BY OCEAN TERMINAL: CLAIM FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST CARRIER: MEANING OF “DELIVERY” FOR PURPOSE OF TIME LIMITATION: WHETEHR EXEMPTION CLAUSE FOR ANY CAUSE OR EVENT WHICH CARRIER COULD NOT AVOID APPLICABLE: WHETHER LIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY REFERENCE TO WEIGHT OF CARGO APPLICABLE''' DMC/SandT/14/03 '''England''' '''Sea-Cargo Skips AS v State Bank of India'''
'''BILLS OF LADING English High Court: SHIPMENT OF CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE IN CONTAINERQueen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): EXPLOSION AND FIRETeare J: DANGEROUS GOODS[2013] EWHC 177 (Comm): WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO INDEMNITY UNDER ART.IV RULE 6 OF HAGUE RULES26 June 2013: STOWAGE OF CONTAINER IN PROXIMITY TO HEATED BUNKER TANK[[http: WHETHER THIS CAUSED THE EXPLOSION: WHETHER THIS RENDERED VESSEL UNSEAWORTHY AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE VOYAGE: WHETHER CARRIER COULD RELY ON DEFENCE OF ERROR IN MANAGEMENT OF THE SHIP//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sea-Cargo_Skips_AS_v_State_Bank_of_India]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: REFUND GUARANTEE: QUESTION OF CONSTRUCTION: WHETHER DEMAND WAS SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER BANK’S LIABILITY: AMBIGUOUS DEMAND NOT COMPLIANT'''
'''Cosco Bulk Carrier Co Ltd v Team-Up Owning Co Ltd – The “Saldanha”[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_v_Team-Up_Owning]]Singapore'''
'''English Singapore High Court: Gross J.: 11 June 2010 [2010] EWHC 1340 (Comm)'''
'''NYPE FORM CHARTERPARTYThe “Turtle Bay” [2013] SGHC 165 : PIRACYJudgment delivered by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J, 30 August 2013: WHETHER SHIP OFF-HIRE DURING DETENTION BY PIRATES[[http: AVERAGE ACCIDENTS TO SHIP OR CARGO: DEFAULT OR DEFICIENCY OF MEN: ANY OTHER CAUSE PREVENTING THE FULL WORKING OF THE VESSEL'''//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Turtle_Bay]]
'''SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST: WHEN DIRECT PRIVATE SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST CONSTITUTES CONTEMPT OF COURT: PRINCIPLES AND EFFECT OF ADMIRALTY JUDICIAL SALE: WHEN COURT WILL SANCTION A DIRECT PRIVATE SALE'''
'''Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd v North China Shipping Limited (M/V “North Prince”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_North_China_Shipping]]England'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: [2010] EWHC 1692 (Comm): 8 July 2010Minerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping AG; Oceana Shipping AG v Transatlantica Commodities S.A. The MV “Athena”'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYCourt of Appeal; Tomlinson, Lewison and Underhill LJJ; [2013] EWCA Civ 1723; 17 July 2013[[http: WRONGFUL EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY SUB//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Minerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-CHARTERER: DAMAGES AS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MARKET RATE OF HIRE AND CONTRACT RATE OF HIRE: DISPONENT SHIPOWNER’S EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL UNDER HEAD CHARTER IRRELEVANT UNLESS CAUSED BY SUB-CHARTERER’S REPUDIATION'''_the_Athena]]
'''TIME CHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: OFF-HIRE CLAUSE 15: WHETHER “LOSS OF TIME” MEANS NET LOSS OF TIME IN THE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR IN THE OVERALL CHARTER SERVICE'''
'''Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping CoEngland'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Omak_Maritime_v_Mamola_Challenger_Shipping]]
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2010] EWHC 2026 (Comm): 4 August 2010MRI Trading AG v Erdenet Mining Corporation LLC'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYEnglish Court of Appeal: BREACH OF CONTRACT BY CHARTERERPill, Tomlinson, McCombe LJJ: MARKET RATE OF HIRE HIGHER THAN CONTRACT RATE OF HIRE[2013] EWCA Civ 156: SHIPOWNER’S CLAIM FOR WASTED EXPENDITURE08 Mar 2013: RELATION WITH PRINCIPLE IN ROBINSON V HARMAN[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MRI_Trading_v_Erdenet_Mining_Corporation]]'''
'''SALE OF GOODS: CERTAINTY OF CONTRACT TERMS: WHETHER TERMS AMOUNTED TO 'AGREEMENTS TO AGREE': PROPER APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTION AND IMPLICATION OF TERMS WITHIN A CONTRACT WHICH CONTAINS TERMS LEAVING MATTERS TO BE SUBSEQUENTLY AGREED'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Stone J in Chambers: HCAJ No. 59/2008: 23 April 2010England'''
'''BREACH OF CONTRACTEnglish High Court; Field J; [2013] EWHC 30 (Comm); 1 February 2013: DEFENDANT SHIPOWNER’S FAILURE TO PROVIDE VESSEL[[http: CHINESE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT AS SHIPOWNER: CLAIM FOR SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND CROWN IMMUNITY: WAIVER AND SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION'''//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Global_Santosh]]
'''PERIOD OFF-HIRE CLAUSE COVERING DELAY ARISING FROM DETENTION OR ARREST OF VESSEL: WHETHER SUB-CHARTERERS OR RECEIVERS WERE AGENTS OF THE CHARTERERS: WHETHER DELAY TO VESSEL “OCCASIONED BY” RECEIVERS’ FAILURE TO DISCHARGE WITHIN THE LAYTIME AND/OR TO SECURE SELLERS’ DEMURRAGE CLAIM'''
'''The MV “Ioannis NK”England'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ioannis_N_K]]
'''The owner of the cargo lately laden on board the MV “Ioannis NK” Greatship (India) Limited v Oceanografia SA de CV (The Master and Crew & Others (AC 66/2009“Greatship Driti”)'''
'''High English Commercial Court of South Africa : Gloster J: [2012] EWHC 3468 (Western Cape High Court, Cape TownComm) exercising its admiralty jurisdiction: Cleaver J5 December 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.; 26 August 2009''' php/Greatship_(India)_Limited_v_Oceanografia_SA_de_CV_-_The_Greatship_Driti]]
'''EXAMINATION OF CREW FOR PURPOSE OF OBTAINING EVIDENCE WHERE DISPUTE SUBJECT TO FOREIGN PROCEEDINGSTIME CHARTER: BIMCO SUPPLYTIME 89 FORM: EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER THE ADMIRALTY JURISIDICTION REGULATIONS ACT 1983CLAUSE 10(E): FACTORS RIGHT TO SUSPEND PERFORMANCE FOR FAILURE TO BE CONSIDEREDPAY HIRE PUNCTUALLY: RIGHTS OF CREW MEMBERS FOLLOWING A CASUALTYWHETHER GRACE PERIOD (ANTI-TECHNICALITY) NOTICE REQUIRED BEFORE EXERCISING RIGHT'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1614
'''England and Wales'''
'''Kolmar Group Minerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping AG; Oceana Shipping AG v Traxpo Enterprises Pvt LimitedTransatlantica Commodities S.A. The MV “Athena”''' [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kolmar_v_Traxpo]]
'''English High Court: ; Walker J; [20102012] EWHC 113 3608 (Comm)'''; 13 December 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Minerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-__The_Athena]]
'''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODSTIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: FOB CONTRACTOFF-HIRE CLAUSE 15: ECONOMIC DURESS BY DEMANDING PAYMENT FOR LESSER AMOUNT WHETHER “LOSS OF TIME” MEANS NET LOSS OF GOODS AT HIGHER PRICE THAN AGREED UNDER TIME IN THE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR IN THE CONTRACT: TORT OF INTIMIDATION: DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACTOVERALL CHARTER SERVICE'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1513
'''New ZealandEngland'''
'''Tasman Orient Line CV Griffon Shipping LLC v New Zealand China Clays Firodi Shipping Limited and others– The “MV Griffon”''' '''High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court: Teare J.: [2013] EWHC 593 (Comm): 21 March 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_%22Tasman_Pioneer%22Griffon_Shipping_v_Firodi_Shipping_-_The_Griffon ]]'''Supreme Court of New Zealand (Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath and Wilson JJ)[2010] NZSC 37 (16 April 2010)'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEASHIPSALE AGREEMENT ON NORWEGIAN SALE FORM 1993: SHIP DAMAGED BY GROUNDING: SEAWATER ENTRY TO FORWARD COMPARTMENTS: DECK CARGO OF CONTAINERS DAMAGED BY INUNDATION: HAGUE-VISBY RULES: ART.IV RULE 2(a): DEFENCE OF ACT, NEGLECT OR DEFAULT OF THE MASTER… WHETHER SELLER CAN RECOVER UNPAID DEPOSIT WHERE BUYER IN THE NAVIGATION OR MANAGEMENT OF THE SHIP: FAILURE TO NOTIFY AUTHORITIES OF CASUALTY: FAILURE TO PROVIDE TIMELY AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO SHIP’S MANAGERS: CAUSE OF CASUALTY INITIALLY FABRICATED: ALL LEADING TO DELAY IN PROVISION OF SALVAGE SERVICES: WHETHER ELEMENT OF GOOD FAITH ESSENTIAL TO CARRIER’S ENTITLEMENT TO RULE 2(a) DEFENCEREPUDIATORY BREACH'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1412
'''English High CourtEngland'''
'''Sylvia Shipping Wuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Limited Ltd & Anor v Progress Bulk Carriers Limited [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sylvia_Shipping_v._Progress_Bulk_Carriers]] [2010] EWHC 542 (Comm): English High Court Emporiki Bank of Justice - Commercial Court; Hamblen J.; 18 March 2010Greece SA'''
'''ARBITRATION APPEALEnglish Court of Appeal: TIMECHARTERPARTYLongmore, Rimer and Tomlinson, LJJ.: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR OWNERS’ BREACH[2012] EWCA Civ 1629: WHETHER OWNERS LIABLE FOR TIMECHARTERERS’ LOSS OF PROFIT ON CANCELLED SUB-CHARTER[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Wuhan_Guoyu_Logistics_v_Emporiki_Bank]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: PAYMENT GUARANTEE: WHETHER PAYMENT GUARANTEE A TRUE GUARANTEE OR AN ON-DEMAND BOND'''
'''Maintek Computer (Suzhou) Co Ltd and others v Blue Anchor Line and othersEngland'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maintek_Computer_v_ECT_Delta_Terminal]]
'''Hong Kong SAR Dalmare SpA v Union Maritime Ltd & Anor''''''English High Court of First Instance: Reyes Queen’s Bench Division: Commercial Court; Flaux J in Chambers; [2012] EWHC 3537; 13 Dec 2012: HCAJ No. 106/2008: 25 February 2010[[http://www.hkliionlinedmc.co.orguk/hkindex.php/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000106_2008Dalmare_v_Union_Maritime_-69910.html_The_Union_Power]]'''
'''CARRIAGE SALE OF GOODS BY SEAVESSEL "AS SHE WAS AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION": MISDELIVERY BY OCEAN TERMINAL: SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: REAL PROSPECT STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM AS TO QUALITY UNDER SALE OF SUCCESSGOODS ACT 1979: LIMITATION CLAUSE: MEANING WHETHER SELLERS HAD EXCLUDED APPLICATION OF ‘DELIVERY’: STAY STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM; WHETHER SELLERS IN FAVOUR OF ARBITRATION: APPLICABILITY BREACH OF TERMINAL CONTRACTSTATUTORY IMPLIED TERM'''
DMC/SandT/13/10/12
'''The Netherlands'''
'''Maersk Dana Petroleum Netherlands B.V., formerly “P&O Nedlloyd” and before that called Nedlloyd Lijnen v Vos Sympathy B.V.The “Vos Sympathy”''' '''Court of Appeal of The Hague: Judges: M.M. Olthof, Rotterdam, the Netherlands vA.A. Rijperman and R. Irano European Covan der Vlist: 11 December 2012: Case no. Ireco S200.A079., Luxembourg - The “Dolphin I”897/01:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Dolphin_1Dana_Petroleum_Netherlands_v_Vos_Sympathy_-_The_Vos_Sympathy]]''' '''SUPPLYTIME 2005 CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER HIMLAYA AND KNOCK FOR KNOCK CLAUSES 'REASONABLE AND FAIR' UNDER DUTCH CIVIL CODE ART.6:248.2'''
DMC/SandT/13/09
'''High Court of England and WalesWhite Rosebay Shipping SA v Hong Kong Chain Glory Shipping Limited'''
'''Sotrade Denizcilik Sanayi Ve Ticaret AS v Amadou LO and others English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Commercial Court; Teare J; [2013] EWHC 1355 (The “Duden”Comm); 23 May 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Duden_2008_EWHC_2762_CommWhite_Rosebay_Shipping_v_Hong_Kong_Chain_Glory_Shipping]]'''TIME-CHARTERPARTY: CHARTERERS EVINCING INTENTION NOT TO PERFORM: OWNERS AFFIRMED CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ REPUDIATORY CONDUCT CONTINUED: WHETHER OWNERS SUBSEQUENTLY ENTITLED TO TERMINATE'''
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash JCOLLISION: OFFENCE OF ENDANGERING THE SAFETY OF OTHERS: STATE OF MIND REQUIRED FOR THE OFFENCE OF ENDANGERMENT: NARROW CHANNEL AS QUESTION OF FACT: SHIPPING AND PORT CONTROL ORDINANCE (CAP.313, 17 April 2009 '''[2009] SGHC 91LAWS OF HONG KONG)'''
DMC/SandT/13/07
'''English High Court''']]'''Kallang Shipping Bunge SA Panama v AXA Assurances Senegal and Comptoir Commercial Mandiaye Ndiaya (Kyla Shipping Company Limited - The “Kallang”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Kallang]]"Kyla"'''
'''Queen's Bench Division (Commercial English High Court): Jonathan Hirst, Q.C.: ; Flaux J; [20082012] EWHC 2761 3522 (Comm); 10 December 2012:[[2009http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bunge_SA_v_Kyla_Shipping_Company_-_The_Athena]] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 124: 19 November 2008'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: NYPE 1946 CHARTERPARTY: LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED IN BILLS OF LADINGH&M INSURANCE REQUIRED FOR AGREED FIGURE: IMPLIED TERMSCASUALTY REPAIRS EXCEED SHIP’S MARKET VALUE BUT NOT AGREED HULL VALUE: ARREST BY CARGO OWNER AND INSURER: SECURITY: JURISDICTION: WRONGFUL INDUCEMENT OR PROCUREMENT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT: PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY CLUB: LETTERS OF UNDERTAKINGWHETHER CHARTERPARTY FRUSTRATED'''
'''Singapore Court of Appeal: Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA, Chao Hick Tin JA, V K Rajah JA: 11 September 2009Kuwait Rocks Co v AMN Bulkcarriers Inc (The “Astra”)'''
'''BAILMENT – BAILOR’S RIGHT TO IMMEDIATE RIGHT TO POSSESSION IF BAILEE’S BEHAVIOUR REPUGNANT TO TERMS OF BAILMENT – WHETHER CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS RESTRICTED BAILOR’S RIGHTS UNDER COMMON LAW'''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2013] EWHC 865 (Comm): 18 April 2013: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kuwait_Rocks_Co_v_AMN_Bulkcarriers_The_Astra]]
'''TORT – CONVERSION – TIME CHARTER: WHETHER ACT OF REMOVING MACHINE FROM PREMISES AND DELIVERING IT AS INSTRUCTED AMOUNTED CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT REPUDIATORY: WHETHER OBLIGATION TO CONVERSION OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF STORING MACHINE AT WAREHOUSE AMOUNTED PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION: RIGHT TO CONVERSION CLAIM LOSS OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF REDELIVERING MACHINE TO PURPORTED OWNER AMOUNTED TO CONVERSION PROFIT FOR REPUDIATION OR BREACH OF MACHINEHIRE PAYMENT OBLIGATION'''
DMC/SandT/13/05
'''Hong Kong'''
'''The “Blue Bridge” Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Fok, Chu JJA and McWalters J: CACV No.97 of 2012: 12 May 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Decurion_on_Appeal]]''' http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/2013/180.html '''ADMIRALTY: IN REM JURISDICTION: CLAIM AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT: WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR IN CONTROL” OF CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 12B(formerly known as The “Great Power”4)OF HIGH COURT ORDINANCE''' DMC/SandT/13/04 '''Germany''' '''German Federal Supreme Court: Date of Judgement: 13 June 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CMR_Art.29_and_Contributory_Negligence]]''' '''CMR TRANSPORT: APPLICATION OF ART. 29 CMR: BURDEN OF PROOF: REDUCTION OF UNLIMITED LIABILITY DUE TO CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE SENDER IF THE CARRIER IS NOT NOTIFIED OF AN UNEXPECTEDLY HIGH VALUE OF THE TRANSPORT GOODS''' DMC/SandT/13/03 '''England''' '''Dry Bulk Handy Holding Inc and Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Fayette International Holdings Ltd and Metinvest International SA (The “Bulk Chile”): English Commercial Court: Andrew Smith J: [2012] EWHC 2107 (Comm): 24 July 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Blue_BridgeDry_Bulk_Handling_&_CSAV_v_Fayette_International_&_Metinvest_-_The_Bulk_Chile]]'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First InstanceCHAIN OF CHARTERPARTIES: Reyes J in ChambersHEAD TIME CHARTER, SUB-TIME CHARTER, TIME TRIP CHARTER AND VOYAGE CHARTER: HCAJ No. 136/1999OWNERS’ BILLS OF LADING: 1 February 2010RIGHT TO INTERVENE IN COLLECTION OF FREIGHT: RIGHT TO LIEN SUB-FREIGHT AND SUB-HIRE: RIGHT TO HIRE OR REASONABLE REMUNERATION FOR COMPLETION OF VOYAGE FOLLOWING TERMINATION OF TIME CHARTER'''
'''England'''
'''Wuhan Ocean Economic & Technical Cooperation Co Ltd v Schiffahrts-Gesellschaft “Hansa Murcia” MBH & Co KG''' '''English Queen’s Bench (Commercial Court): Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 3104 (Comm): 6 November 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Wuhan_Ocean_v_Hansa_Murcia]]''' '''CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF VESSEL: ADDENDUM FOR SELLERS TO OBTAIN EXTENSION OF REFUND GUARANTEE: IMPLIED TERM TO OBTAIN EXTENSION WITHIN REASONABLE TIME BEFORE EXPIRY OF ORIGINAL GUARANTEE: INNOMINATE TERM: BUT BREACH OF IMPLIED TERM NOT A REPUDIATORY BREACH AS, UNDER THE TERMS OF THE GUARANTEE, BUYERS COULD MAINTAIN THE SECURITY BY COMMENCING ARBITRATION''' DMC/SandT/13/01 '''Germany''' '''German Federal Supreme Court''' '''"Und Adryatik"; Date of Judgement: 15 December 2011: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Und_Adryatik]]''' '''CMR TRANSPORT: APPLICATION OF ART. 2 CMR: FIRE ON RO-RO-CARRIER: HAGUE RULES AS ‘CONDITIONS PRESCRIBED BY LAW’: FIRE AS AN EVENT WHICH COULD ONLY HAVE OCCURRED BY REASON OF CARRIAGE BY SEA''' DMC/SandT/12/25 '''England''' '''E.D. & F. Man Sugar Ltd v Unicargo Transportgesellschaft mBh''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Eder J: [2012] EWHC 2879 (Comm): 23 October 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/E_D_and_F_Man_v_Unicargo_Transport]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY: LAYTIME AND DEMURRAGE: DESTRUCTION OF CONVEYOR-BELT SYSTEM AT LOADING PORT BEFORE FIXTURE: DELAY IN BERTHING: NO OBLIGATION ON CHARTERERS TO NOMINATE A SECOND BERTH: DESTRUCTION DID NOT CONSTITUTE MECHANICAL BREAKDOWN: ACT OF STATE-SPONSORED PORT AUTHORITY IN ORDINARY COURSE OF CARRYING OUT PORT OR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS DID NOT FALL WITHIN EXCEPTION OF GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE''' DMC/SandT/12/24 '''England''' '''Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA''' '''English Court of Appeal: Lord Neuberger MR, Moore-Bick and Toulson LJJ: [2012] EWCA Civ 838: 19 June 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_SA_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]] '''DEMURRAGE: CALCULATION OF LAYTIME: STRIKE EXCEPTION: STRIKE CAUSING CONGESTION AT PORT AND CHARTERED VESSELS DELAYED FROM BERTHING AS A RESULT: PERIOD OF DELAY TO BE DISCOUNTED FROM CALCULATION OF LAYTIME SO LONG AS STRIKE WAS THE EFFECTIVE CAUSE OF DELAY''' DMC/SandT/1012/0623
'''Singapore'''
'''Singapore Court of Appeal''' '''The “Catur Samudra”“Bunga Melati 5” [2012] SGCA 46: Judgment delivered by VK Rajah JA, 21st August 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Bunga_Melati_5]] '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: WHETHER A GOOD ARGUABLE CASE ON THE MERITS REQUIRED: THE VASILIY GOLOVNIN EXPLAINED''' DMC/SandT/12/22 '''Australia''' '''1. Jebsens International (Australia) Pty Ltd and Anor v Interfert Australia Pty Ltd and Ors (2011) 112 SASR 297, 25 August 2011 (Anderson J)''' '''2. Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S v Beach Building & Civil Group Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 696, 29 June 2012 (Foster J):[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/_1._Jebsens_International_(Australia)_v_Interfert_Australia:_2._Norden_A/S_v_Beach_Building_&_Civil_Group]]''' '''WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY A "SEA CARRIAGE DOCUMENT" FOR PURPOSES OF S.11 AUSTRALIAN CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1991''' DMC/SandT/12/21 '''England''' ''' TAOKAS NAVIGATION SA v. KOMROWSKI BULK SHIPPING KG (GMBH & CO); KENT LINE INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. SOLYM CARRIERS LTDTHE MV “PAIWAN WISDOM”''' '''English High Court; Teare J; [2012] EWHC 1888 (Comm); 11 July 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Toakas_Navigation_v_Komrowski_Bulk_Shipping:_Kent_Line_v_Solym_Carriers_-_The_Paiwan_Wisdom]]''' '''CONWARTIME 2004: OWNERS’ LIBERTY TO REJECT VOYAGE ORDERS: MATERIAL INCREASE IN RISK BETWEEN CHARTERPARTY DATE AND DATE OF ORDER NOT REQUIRED: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION''' DMC/SandT/12/20 '''England''' '''Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Sumption: [2012] UKSC 17, [2012] 2 WLR 976: 2 May 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Catur_SamudraPetroleo_Brasiliero_v_ENE_Kos_1]]''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SHELLTIME 3 FORM: VESSEL WITHDRAWN FOR NON-PAYMENT OF HIRE WHILST LOADING: LOSS OF USE OF VESSEL: EXPENSES INCURRED IN DISCHARGING CARGO BACK TO SHORE: WHETHER LOSS AND EXPENSE RECOVERABLE UNDER INDEMNITY CLAUSE: WHETHER RECOVERABLE AS RIGHT CORRELATIVE TO DUTY AS BAILEE TO LOOK AFTER GOODS: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ ORDER TO LOAD AN EFFECTIVE CAUSE... DMC/SandT/12/19 '''Hong Kong''' '''The “Decurion”'''
'''Singapore High Hong Kong Courtof First Instance: Judgment delivered by Steven Chong JC, 15 January Reyes J: HCAJ No.141 of 2010: 4 May 2012: [[2010http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Decurion]] SGHC 18'''
'''ADMIRALTY : IN REM JURISDICTION : WHETHER CLAIM UNDER GUARANTEE IS A CLAIM “ARISING AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT OF AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE USE : WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR HIRE” IN CONTROL” OF A VESSEL : CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 312B(1)(H4) OF HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACTORDINANCE'''
DMC/SandT/1012/0418 '''England''' '''EITZEN BULK A/S v. TTMI SARL - THE “BONNIE SMITHWICK”''' '''English High Court; Eder J; [2012] EWHC 202 (Comm); 14 February 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Eitzen_Bulk_v_TTMI_-_The_Bonnie_Smithwick]]''' '''SHELLTIME 4: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: “BUNKERS ON DELIVERY/REDELIVERY” CLAUSE: MEANING OF ‘PRICE ACTUALLY PAID’''' DMC/SandT/12/17
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc v The Owners and/or Demise Charterers “Marcatania”''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.138 of the Ship or Vessel “Asian Atlas” (2008: 2 December 2011:[[The “Asian Atlas”)http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Marcatania]]'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of AppealCONTRACT: Ma CJHC, Stone and Reyes JJAGREEMENT TO EXCHANGE SLOTS FOR USE: CACV No. 257 of 2007SLOTS ON VESSEL CHARTERED BY THIRD PARTY: 23 April 2008 ([2008] 3 HKLRD 604; [httpFAILURE TO PAY HIRE://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkca/2008/CACV000257_2007VESSEL WITHDRAWN BY SHIPOWNER: WHETHER SHIPOWNER OBLIGED TO ON-60848.html]CARRY CARGO UNDER BAILMENT: WHETHER LIABLE IN CONVERSION FOR DELAY IN RELEASING CARGO'''
DMC/SandT/12/16
'''England''' '''M.H. Progress Lines SA v Orient Shipping Rotterdam BV and other, The “Genius Star 1”''' '''English Queen’s Court (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2011] EWHC 3083 (Comm), [2012] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 222: 28 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/M_H_Progress_Lines_v_Orient_Shipping_-_The_Genius_Star_1]] '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SUB-CHARTER: CARGO CLAIM AGAINST SUB-CHARTERER: APPORTIONMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST CHARTERER AND SHIPOWNER UNDER INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996: DIFFERENT TIME BARS PROVIDED IN HEAD CHARTER AND INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT: APPLICABLE TIME BAR''' DMC/SandT/12/15 '''England''' '''Sideridraulic Systems SpA v BBC Chartering & Logistics GmbH & Co KG''' '''English Queen’s Bench (Commercial Court): Andrew Smith J: [2011] EWHC 3106 (Comm): 30 November 2011: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sideridraulic_Systems_v_BBC_Chartering_&_Logistics] '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: INTERPRETATION OF MASTER’S REMARK IN BILL OF LADING: WHETHER CARGO WAS DECK CARGO UNDER HAGUE-VISBY RULES: IF DECK CARGO, WHETHER PARTIES AGREED THAT HAGUE-VISBY RULES NEVERTHELESS APPLIED: WHETHER US COURTS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSE APPLIED''' DMC/SandT/12/14 '''England''' '''Isabella Shipowner SA v Shagang Shipping Co Ltd (The “Aquafaith”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 1077 (Comm): 26 April 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Isabella_Shipowner_v_Shagang_Shipping_The_Aquafaith]]''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE FORM: RULE IN WHITE AND CARTER V MCGREGOR: WHETHER OWNERS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT PREMATURE RE-DELIVERY OF VESSEL BY CHARTERERS''' DMC/SandT/1012/0313
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Cheong Yuk Fai A O Smith Electrical Products (Changzhou) Co Ltd v Blue Anchor Line & Ors''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: [2012] 1 HKLRD 301: 18 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/A_O_Smith_Electrical_Products_v_Blue_Anchor_Line_&_Ors]] '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: WAYBILL: LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: INTERPRETATION: GOVERNING LAW OF CARRIAGE: APPLICABLE LIMIT OF LIABILITY''' DMC/SandT/12/12 '''Malaysia''' '''Sarawak Shell Berhad v South Sumatra Richfield Marine Pte Ltd (The “Red Gold”)''' '''Malaysian Court of Appeal: Sulaiman Bin Daud JCA, Syed Ahmad Helmy Bin Syed Ahmad JCA and another Anantham Kasinather JCA: 19 March 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sarawak_Shell_v_South_Sumatra_Richfield_Marine_-_The_Red_Gold]]''' '''ADMIRALTY: COLLISION BETWEEN OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSEL AND FIXED OFFSHORE OIL PLATFORM: RIGHT OF VESSEL OWNERS TO LIMIT LIABILITY: WHETHER COLLISION CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE OF OWNERS IN THE NAVIGATION OR MANAGEMENT OF VESSEL: WHETHER VESSEL OWNERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY DUE TO ABSENCE OF ACTUAL FAULT OR PRIVITY: MERCHANT SHIPPING ORDINANCE 1952 SECTION 360 VIZ. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CONVENTION 1957''' DMC/SandT/12/11 '''England''' '''Osmium Shipping Corporation v China Cargill International Freight Forwarders SA (The “Captain Stefanos”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 571 (Comm): 13 March 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Osmium_Shipping_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Captain_Stefanos]] '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE (HK1946) LtdFORM INCORPORATING CONWARTIME 2004: WHETHER VESSEL WAS OFF-HIRE DURING PERIOD OF HIJACKING BY SOMALI PIRATES: WHETHER RIDER CLAUSE PROVIDING FOR OFF-HIRE DURING “CAPTURE/SEIZURE” WAS QUALIFIED BY THE PHRASE “BY ANY AUTHORITY”: WHETHER CONWARTIME 2004 CLAUSE QUALIFIED OFF-HIRE RIDER CLAUSE'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS: CLAIM AGAINST CARRIER FOR WRONGFUL DELIVERY OF GOODS: CONVERSION: LIMITATION UNDER HAGUE-VISBY RULES AND BILL OF LADINGProgress Bulk Carriers Limited v Tube City IMS LLC (The “Cenk Kaptanoglu”)'''
'''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm): 17 February 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Progress_Bulk_Carriers_v_Tube_City_IMS_-_The_Cenk_Kaptanoglu]]'''
'''CARRIER’S LIABILITY: BREAKING THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: SUB-CONTRACTINGEngland'''
'''Acergy Shipping Ltd v. Société Bretonne De Réparation Navale SAS'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: [2011] EWHC 2490 (Comm): 5 October 2011: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Acergy_Shipping_v_Société_Bretonne_de_Réparation_Navale]] '''CONTRACT FOR PROVISION OF REPAIR SERVICES TO VESSEL: FIRE CAUSING DAMAGE BEYOND REPAIR WORK UNDERTAKEN: INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT: SCOPE OF INDEMNITY CONTAINED THEREIN''' DMC/SandT/12/08 '''England''' '''Geofizika DD v. MMB International Limited and Greenshields Cowie & Co Ltd: “The Green Island”''' '''English Court of Appeal; Lord Neuberger, Thomas LJ, and Sir Nicholas Wall; [2010] EWCA Civ 459, [2010] 2 Lloyds Rep 1; 28 April 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Geofizika_v_MMB_International_-_The_Green_Island]] '''INCOTERMS 2000 CIP: CARRIAGE ON DECK: OBLIGATIONS OF FREIGHT FORWARDER: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: CAUSATION''' DMC/SandT/12/07 '''England''' '''Hyundai Merchant Marine Company Limited v Trafigura Beheer BV (The “Gaz Energy”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2011] EWHC 3108 (Comm): 29 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Hyundai_Merchant_Marine_v_Trafigura_-_the_Gas_Energy]] '''TIME CHARTER: SPEED AND PERFORMANCE WARRANTY: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF CHARTER: WHETHER SPEED AND PERFORMANCE AN “ALL WEATHERS” WARRANTY OR LIMITED TO “MAXIMUM WIND FORCE 4 ON BEAUFORT SCALE”''' DMC/SandT/12/06 '''The “Oriental Baltic”''' '''Singapore High Court: Tan Lee Meng J : [2011] 3 SGHC 75: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Oriental_Baltic]] '''OWNERS OF VESSEL UNDER VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION: IN REM PROCEEDINGS AGAINST VESSEL COMMENCED AFTER LIQUIDATION: PLAINTIFF FILED CAVEAT AGAINST RELEASE AGAINST VESSEL PRIOR TO LIQUIDATION: ACTION AGAINST COMPANY UNDER LIQUIDATION ORDINARILY STAYED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT: WHETHER LEAVE SHOULD BE GRANTED TO PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE WITH ITS ACTION''' DMC/SandT/12/05 '''England''' '''Thai Maparn Trading Co Ltd v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd (The “Med Salvador” and “Goa”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Beatson J: [2011] EWHC 2494 (Comm): 4 October 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thai_Maparn_Trading_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]]''' '''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: FOB CONTRACT: WHETHER BUYERS IN BREACH OF CONDITION PRECEDENT IN CONTRACT BY FAILING TO ISSUE 7 DAY ETA OF VESSEL: WHETHER SELLERS IN REPUDIATORY/RENUNCIATORY BREACH BY REJECTING BUYERS’ NOTICE AND STATING THAT CARGO WOULD NOT BE READY IN TIME''' DMC/SandT/12/04 '''England''' '''Pacific Basin IHX Limited v Bulkhandling Handymax AS (The “Triton Lark”): English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2011] EWHC 2868 (Comm): 8 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pacific_Basin_v_Bulkhandling_Handymax,_the_Triton_Lark]]''' '''TIME CHARTER: PIRACY RISKS IN GULF OF ADEN IN 2008: CONWARTIME 1993/2004 CLAUSE: ARBITRATION APPEAL: SECTION 69 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996: CORRECT TEST FOR ASSESSING RISK OF PIRACY INCIDENT OCCURING FOR PURPOSE OF 1993/2004 CLAUSE: WHETHER OWNERS DEVIATED BY REROUTING VESSEL VIA CAPE OF GOOD HOPE INSTEAD OF GULF OF ADEN''' DMC/SandT/12/03 '''England''' '''Emeraldian Limited Partnership v Wellmix Shipping Limited and Guangzhou Iron & Steel Corporation Limited (The “Vine”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2010] EWHC 1411 (Comm): 17 June 2010:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Emeraldian_Limited_v_Wellmix_Shipping,_the_Vine]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER VESSEL’S OBLIGATION TO OBTAIN CLEARANCE BY PORT AUTHORITIES BEFORE GIVING NOTICE OF READINESS WAIVED FOR PURPOSE OF COMMENCEMENT OF LAYTIME: WHETHER CHARTERERS COULD RELY ON EXCEPTIONS TO RUNNING OF LAYTIME: WHETHER CHARTERERS IN BREACH OF SAFE PORT WARRANTY: WHETHER DEMURRAGE RECOVERABLE FOR DETENTION OF VESSEL''' DMC/12/02 '''England''' '''ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED v. ALBEMARLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and ALBEMARLE CORPORATION''' '''English High Court; Flaux J; [2011] EWHC 1574 (Comm); 21 June 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Astrazeneca_UK_v_Albemarle_International]]''' '''CONTRACT: CLAUSES GRANTING THE RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL: EXCLUSION CLAUSES AND DELIBERATE BREACH''' DMC/SandT/1012/01 '''The Netherlands'''
'''Furtrans Denzilick Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS (“Furtrans”) v Augusta Due Srl (“Augusta”): The Netherlands Supreme Court"Constanza M”'''
'''Nile Dutch Africa Line B.V, Rotterdam, Supreme Court of the Netherlands (“NDAL”“SCN”) v. (1summary proceedings) Delta Lloyd Schadeverzekering N: Vice-President J.VB., Rotterdam, Fleers as Chairman and the Netherlands (“Delta Lloyd”)judges A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, (2) Premium Tobacco Investments NF.VB.Bakels, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (“Tobacco”), (3) MC. Meerapfel Söhne AE.Drion and G.Snijders LJN:BT2708, BaselDecember 9, Switzerland (“Meerapfel”) and (4) CETAC, Douala, Cameroon (“Cetac”) - The “NDS Provider” ''' '''2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_%E2%80%9CNDS_Provider%E2%80%9DFurtrans_v_Augusta,_the_Constanza_M]]'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA UNDER BILL OF LADING: HAGUE VISBY RULES: LIABILITY FOR DEFECTIVE CONTAINERS SUPPLIED BY CARRIER: PACKAGING OR PART CONSTRUCTION OF ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE VESSEL? INTERPRETATION ARREST OF TREATIES UNDER DUTCH LAWSEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''
