Difference between revisions of "Voyage C/P Disputes"
From DMC
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Singapore High Court''' | '''Singapore High Court''' | ||
| − | '''The “Asia Star”[2009] SGHC 91''' | + | '''The “Asia Star”[2009] SGHC 91''' [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Asia_Star]] |
'''Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 17 April 2009 [2009] SGHC 91''' | '''Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 17 April 2009 [2009] SGHC 91''' | ||
'''BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: PLAINTIFF NOT REQUIRED TO INCUR EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSE OR TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS IN ORDER TO MITIGATE LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO''' | '''BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: PLAINTIFF NOT REQUIRED TO INCUR EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSE OR TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS IN ORDER TO MITIGATE LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO''' | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 1 April 2010
DMC/SandT/10/10
Singapore High Court
The “Asia Star”[2009] SGHC 91 [[1]]
Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 17 April 2009 [2009] SGHC 91
BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: PLAINTIFF NOT REQUIRED TO INCUR EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSE OR TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS IN ORDER TO MITIGATE LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO
