Difference between revisions of "Voyage C/P Disputes"

From DMC
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'DMC/SandT/10/10 '''Singapore High Court''' '''The “Asia Star”[2009] SGHC 91''' '''Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 17 April 2009 [2009] SGHC 91;;; '''BREACH OF…')
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
'''The “Asia Star”[2009] SGHC 91'''  
 
'''The “Asia Star”[2009] SGHC 91'''  
  
'''Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 17 April 2009 [2009] SGHC 91;;;
+
'''Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 17 April 2009 [2009] SGHC 91'''
  
 
'''BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: PLAINTIFF NOT REQUIRED TO INCUR EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSE OR TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS IN ORDER TO MITIGATE LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO'''
 
'''BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: PLAINTIFF NOT REQUIRED TO INCUR EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSE OR TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS IN ORDER TO MITIGATE LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO'''

Revision as of 21:13, 1 April 2010

DMC/SandT/10/10

Singapore High Court

The “Asia Star”[2009] SGHC 91

Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 17 April 2009 [2009] SGHC 91

BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: PLAINTIFF NOT REQUIRED TO INCUR EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSE OR TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS IN ORDER TO MITIGATE LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO