Changes

From DMC
Jump to: navigation, search

Voyage C/P Disputes

1,619 bytes added, 10:34, 26 April 2020
no edit summary
DMC/SandT/20/12
 
'''England'''/
 
'''Tricon Energy Ltd v MTM Trading LLC (The “MTM Hong Kong”)'''
 
'''English Commercial Court: Robin Knowles J: [2020] EWHC 700 (Comm): 23 March 2020: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Tricon_Energy_v_MTM_Trading_-_The_MTM_Hong_Kong]]
 
'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: PART CARGOES: DEMURRAGE CLAIMS PRESENTATION TIME BAR CLAUSE: OWNERS OBLIGED TO PRESENT CLAIM WITH “ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS” WITHIN TIME BAR: OWNERS DID NOT PRESENT COPIES OF BILLS OF LADING RELEVANT TO PRO-RATING CALCULATION OF LAYTIME AND DEMURRAGE BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT CARGO PARCELS HANDLED AT THE SAME BERTH: WHETHER DEMURRAGE CLAIM BARRED FOR WANT OF PRESENTATION OF BILLS OF LADING IN TIME: ARBITRAITON ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/20/08
 
'''England'''
 
'''Alianca Navegacao E Logistica Ltda v Ameropa SA (The “M/V Santa Isabella”)'''
 
'''English Commercial Court: Andrew Henshaw QC (sitting as a High Court Judge): [2019] EWHC 3152 (Comm): 22 November 2019:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Alianca_Navegacao_E_Logistica_v_Ameropa_SA_-_The_Santa_Isabella]]
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2019/3152.html
 
'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY:OWNERS CLAIM FOR DEMURRAGE:CHOICE OF REASONABLE ROUTE:WHETHER OWNERS WERE IN BREACH OF ART III RULE 2 OF THE HAGUE RULES OR LIABLE FOR DEVIATION:SPEED/REASONABLE DESPATCH: WHETHER THE VESSEL FAIILED TO PROCEED TO DURBAN WITH ALL CONVENIENT SPEED AND/OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH WARRANTED SPEED: CARGO CARE: WHETHER THE CARGO WAS PROPERLY AND CAREFULLY VENTILATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SOUND SYSTEM'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/20/05

Navigation menu