Difference between revisions of "Time C/P Disputes"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | DMC/SandT/10/20 | ||
+ | |||
+ | England | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd v North China Shipping Limited (M/V “North Prince”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_North_China_Shipping]]''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: [2010] EWHC 1692 (Comm): 8 July 2010''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: WRONGFUL EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY SUB-CHARTERER: DAMAGES AS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MARKET RATE OF HIRE AND CONTRACT RATE OF HIRE: DISPONENT SHIPOWNER’S EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL UNDER HEAD CHARTER IRRELEVANT UNLESS CAUSED BY SUB-CHARTERER’S REPUDIATION''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
DMC/SandT/10/19 | DMC/SandT/10/19 | ||
Revision as of 20:53, 6 September 2010
DMC/SandT/10/20
England
Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd v North China Shipping Limited (M/V “North Prince”)[[1]]
Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: [2010] EWHC 1692 (Comm): 8 July 2010
TIME CHARTERPARTY: WRONGFUL EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY SUB-CHARTERER: DAMAGES AS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MARKET RATE OF HIRE AND CONTRACT RATE OF HIRE: DISPONENT SHIPOWNER’S EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL UNDER HEAD CHARTER IRRELEVANT UNLESS CAUSED BY SUB-CHARTERER’S REPUDIATION
DMC/SandT/10/19
English High Court
Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Co[[2]]
Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2010] EWHC 2026 (Comm): 4 August 2010
TIME CHARTERPARTY: BREACH OF CONTRACT BY CHARTERER: MARKET RATE OF HIRE HIGHER THAN CONTRACT RATE OF HIRE: SHIPOWNER’S CLAIM FOR WASTED EXPENDITURE: RELATION WITH PRINCIPLE IN ROBINSON V HARMAN
DMC/SandT/10/14
English High Court
Sylvia Shipping Co Limited v Progress Bulk Carriers Limited [[3]]
[2010] EWHC 542 (Comm): English High Court of Justice - Commercial Court; Hamblen J.; 18 March 2010
ARBITRATION APPEAL: TIMECHARTERPARTY: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR OWNERS’ BREACH: WHETHER OWNERS LIABLE FOR TIMECHARTERERS’ LOSS OF PROFIT ON CANCELLED SUB-CHARTER