Difference between revisions of "Time C/P Disputes"
From DMC
(Created page with 'DMC/SandT/10/14 '''English High Court''' '''Sylvia Shipping Co Limited v Progress Bulk Carriers Limited [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sylvia_Shipping_v._Progress_…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | DMC/SandT/10/19 | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''English High Court''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Co'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Omak_Maritime_v_Mamola_Challenger_Shipping]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2010] EWHC 2026 (Comm): 4 August 2010''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: BREACH OF CONTRACT BY CHARTERER: MARKET RATE OF HIRE HIGHER THAN CONTRACT RATE OF HIRE: SHIPOWNER’S CLAIM FOR WASTED EXPENDITURE: RELATION WITH PRINCIPLE IN ROBINSON V HARMAN''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
DMC/SandT/10/14 | DMC/SandT/10/14 | ||
Revision as of 21:32, 29 August 2010
DMC/SandT/10/19
English High Court
Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Co[[1]]
Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2010] EWHC 2026 (Comm): 4 August 2010
TIME CHARTERPARTY: BREACH OF CONTRACT BY CHARTERER: MARKET RATE OF HIRE HIGHER THAN CONTRACT RATE OF HIRE: SHIPOWNER’S CLAIM FOR WASTED EXPENDITURE: RELATION WITH PRINCIPLE IN ROBINSON V HARMAN
DMC/SandT/10/14
English High Court
Sylvia Shipping Co Limited v Progress Bulk Carriers Limited [[2]]
[2010] EWHC 542 (Comm): English High Court of Justice - Commercial Court; Hamblen J.; 18 March 2010
ARBITRATION APPEAL: TIMECHARTERPARTY: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR OWNERS’ BREACH: WHETHER OWNERS LIABLE FOR TIMECHARTERERS’ LOSS OF PROFIT ON CANCELLED SUB-CHARTER
