2,051
edits
Changes
From DMC
no edit summary
DMC/SandT/09/01
'''The "Duden"'''
see also [[The "Duden" C of A]]
'''Singapore High Court: Andrew Ang, J.: 9 September 2008: [2008] SGHC 149'''
Leong Marnyi Wendy (AsiaLegal LLC) for the Appellant shipowners
Tan Poh Ling Wendy and Fu Simin Charmaine (KhattarWong) for the Respondent Cargo interests
'''''Summary: In this case, the court upheld the decision of the Assistant Registrar to the effect that, in granting a stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration under the Singapore International Arbitration Act, the court could impose conditions'''''
DMC Category Rating: ''Confirmed''
This note has been contributed by Chan Leng Sun of [[Ang & Partners]], Singapore. Ang & Partners are the International Contributors to this website for Singapore
The Defendant shipowners appealed to the Judge-in-Chambers.
'''Judgment'''
The judge dismissed the appeal, on the following grounds.
## There appearing to be no bona fide intention by the Defendants to have the Plaintiffs’ claim arbitrated. Rather, by their conduct in the case, the Defendants appeared to be trying all ways and means to avoid an adjudication of the matter.
'''Comment'''
The wording of section 6(2) of the Singapore International Arbitration Act is different from that in the comparable provision in section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (UK). As the English statute does not expressly empower the court to impose conditions upon a stay, the view has been expressed that in England, if the criteria for a stay of court proceedings in favour of arbitration are made out, the court is obliged to stay proceedings for arbitration without conditions.
