Changes

From DMC
Jump to: navigation, search

Shipping & Transport

20,696 bytes added, 17:09, 8 October 2018
no edit summary
[[Main Page]] - [[Admiralty]] - [[Carriage of Goods]] - [[Other Cases]] - [[Time CDMC/P Disputes]] - [[Voyage CSandT/P Disputes]]18/07
'''England''' '''Troy Maritime SA v Clearlake Shipping Pte Ltd''' '''English Commercial Court: Butcher J.: [2018] EWHC 2310 (Comm): 31 July 2018:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Troy_Maritime_v_Clearlake_Shipping]] '''DEVIATION FROM THE CONTRACT VOYAGE: WHETHER DEVIATION REASONABLE IN ALL THE CIRCUMSTANCES: FINDING OF FACT BY ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL: WHETHER COURT BOUND BY THAT FINDING'''  DMC/SandT/18/06 England '''Dera Commercial Estate v Derya Inc (The“SUR”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Carr J.: 13 July 2018: [2018] EWHC 1673 (Comm)[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dera_Commercial_Estate_v_Derya_Inc_-_The_Sur]]''' '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: HAGUE RULES: WHETHER GEOGRAPHIC DEPARTURE [‘DEVIATION’] FROM THE AGREED VOYAGE CONSTITUTED A ‘FUNDAMENTAL BREACH OF CONTRACT’: WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO RELY ON ONE-YEAR TIME LIMIT IN ARTICLE 3 RULE 6'''  DMC/SandT/18/05 England '''Agile Holdings Corporation (Claimant) v Essar Shipping Ltd (Defendant):''' '''English Commercial Court: Judge Waksman QC: [2018] EWHC 1055 (Comm): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Agile_Holdings_v_Essar_Shipping_-_The_Maria]]''' '''FOR CHARTERERS TO OBTAIN A 50/50 APPORTIONMENT FOR CARGO LIABILITY BETWEEN THEMSELVES AND THE OWNERS ON GROUNDS OF THE FIRST PROVISO TO CLAUSE 8(B) OF THE INTER- CLUB NEW YORK PRODUCE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT 1996 (THE “INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT" OR "ICA”), THE CHARTERPARTY MUST CONTAIN A PROVISION WHICH IS CLEARLY INTENDED TO PASS COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARGO HANDLING TO THE SHIPOWNERS. A PARTIAL TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY, OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR A PARTICULAR ASPECT OF CARGO HANDLING (SUCH AS STOWAGE), WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO ENGAGE THE ICA 8(B) PROVISO. '''  DMC/SandT/18/04 England '''Glencore Energy UK Ltd v OMV Supply & Trading Ltd (The “Seagrace”)'''/ '''English Commercial Court: Sir Ross Cranston: [2018] EWHC 895 (Comm): 23 April 2018: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_v_OMV_Supply_and_Trading_-_The_Seagrace]]''' '''CFR SALES CONTRACT: BP CFR SALES TERMS: BPVOY4 FORM: VESSEL WAITING OFFSHORE EN ROUTE TO PORT OF DISCHARGE AT REQUEST OF BUYERS: SELLERS CLAIM FOR DETENTION BASED ON IMPLIED CONTRACT: WHETHER CLAIM FOR WAITING OFFSHORE WAS A DEMURRAGE CLAIM: WHETHER CLAIM TIME-BARRED DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DEMURRAGE CLAIMS PRESENTATION CLAUSE DEADLINE'''  DMC/SandT/18/03 England '''Lukoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Ocean Tankers Pte Ltd (The “Ocean Neptune”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2018] EWHC 163 (Comm): 2 February 2018:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Asia_Pacific_v_Ocean_Tankers_-_The_Ocean_Neptune]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: EXXONMOBILVOY 2005 FORM: LITASCO CLAUSES: DEMURRAGE CLAIM PRESENTATION TIME-BAR REQUIRING DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF CLAIM TO BE PRESENTED TO CHARTERERS WITHIN 90 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF CARGO DISCHARGE: WHETHER CLAIM FOR TIME LOST WAITING FOR ORDERS TIME-BARRED DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DOCUMENT PRESENTATION REQUIREMENT: APPEAL FROM PARTIAL FINAL AWARD UNDER SECTION 69 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996'''    DMC/SandT/18/02 England  '''Kyokuyo Co Ltd v AP Møller-Maersk A/S, trading as “Maersk Line”'''  '''English High Court – Commercial Court: Mr Justice Andrew Baker: [2017] EWHC 654 (Comm): 29 March 2017: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kyokuyo_v_AP_Møller-Maersk_-_trading_as_Maersk_Line]] '''LIMITATION OF LIABILITY UNDER HAGUE/HAGUE-VISBY RULES: WHETHER LIMITATION APPLIED TO EACH SEPARATE PACKAGE/UNIT DAMAGED OR TO TOTAL NUMBER OF PACKAGES/UNITS'''  DMC/SandT/18/01 England '''CSSA Chartering and Shipping Services S.A. v Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd (The “Pacific Voyager”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2017] EWHC 2579 (Comm): 18 October 2017: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CSSA_Chartering_and_Shipping_Services_v_Mitsui_O.S.K._Lines_-_The_Pacific_Voyager]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: SHELLVOY 5 FORM: WHETHER OBLIGATION ON OWNER TO GET THE VESSEL TO THE LOADING PORT WITHIN A CERTAIN TIME: WHETHER SUCH AN OBLIGATION IS ABSOULTE OR ONLY ONE OF DUE DILIGENCE: WHETHER LAYCAN EQUIVALENT TO AN ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL OR READINESS TO LOAD DATE'''  DMC/SandT/17/14 England '''Glencore International AG v MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.'''  '''English Court of Appeal; Lewison and Henderson LJJ, Sir Christopher Clarke; [2017] EWCA Civ 365; 24 May 2017:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_International_v_MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company]]''' '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY OF CARGO: MEANING OF “DELIVERY ORDER": ELECTRONIC RELEASE SYSTEMS IN OPERATION AT PORT OF DISCHARGE: WHETHER A RELEASE NOTE CONTAINING PIN CODES CONSTITUTED A DELIVERY ORDER: WHETHER CONSIGNEE ESTOPPED BY PREVIOUS USE OF ERS SYSTEM'''  DMC/SandT/17/13 England '''Navalmare UK Limited v Kale Maden Hammaddeler Sanayi ve Ticart AS (The “Arundel Castle”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Knowles J: [2017] EWHC 116 (Comm): 31 January 2017: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Navalmare_UK_v_Kale_Maden_Hammaddeler_Sanayi_ve_Ticart_-_The_Arundel_Castle]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: MEANING OF “PORT LIMITS”: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''  DMC/SandT/17/12 Singapore  '''DSA Consultancy (FZC) v The “Eurohope”'''  '''Singapore High Court; Chua Lee Ming J; [2017] SGHC 218: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSA_Consultancy_(FZC)_v_The_Eurohope]] '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: ARREST TO OBTAIN SECURITY IN AID OF FOREIGN COURT PROCEEDINGS'''  DMC/SandT/17/11 Canada '''De Wolf Maritime Safety BV v Traffic-Tech International Inc. (The “Zagora”)'''  '''Federal Court, Ontario: Madam Justice St-Louis; 2017 FC 23: 11 January 2017:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/De_Wolf_Maritime_Safety_v_Traffic-Tech_International_-_The_Zagora]]''' '''HAGUE-VISBY RULES: WHETHER CARGO CARRIED ON-DECK UNDECLARED AMOUNTED TO “GOODS” AS DEFINED IN THE RULES: WHETHER A CARRIER COULD RELY ON THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO GOODS CARRIED ON-DECK WITHOUT AUTHORISATION'''  DMC/SandT/17/10 England  '''Transgrain Shipping (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Yangtze Navigation (Hong Kong) Co Ltd.''''''English Commercial Court: Teare J: (2016) EWHC 3122 (Comm): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Transgrain_Shipping_(Singapore)_v_Yangtze_Navigation_(Hong_Kong)]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY (TIME): NYPE INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996, CLAUSE 8(D): WHETHER “ACT” REQUIRES FAULT'''   DMC/SandT/17/09 Singapore '''The “Posidon” and another matter'''  '''Singapore High Court; Belinda Ang Saw Ean J; [2017] SGHC 138:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Posidon]] '''CLAIMS AGAINST SHIP SALE PROCEEDS: PRIORITIES: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH ESTABLISHED ORDER OF PRIORITIES MAY BE DEPARTED FROM: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH NECESSARIES CLAIM MAY RANK ABOVE MORTGAGEE’S CLAIM: WHETHER REQUIREMENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF NATURE AND EXTENT OF EXPENDITURE DIFFERS FOR DIFFERENT KINDS OF NECESSARIES CLAIMS'''  DMC/SandT/17/08 England '''Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The “New Flamenco”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hodge SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 43: 28 June 2017:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-_The_New_Flamenco_-_Supreme_Court_Decision]]''' '''TIME CHARTER: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM: WHETHER CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''  DMC/SandT/17/07 England '''Gard Marine & Energy Ltd v China National Chartering Co Ltd and another/China National Chartering Co Ltd v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another/Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another (The “Ocean Victory”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Hodge and Toulson SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 35: 10 May 2017:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gard_Marine_%26_Energy_v_China_National_Chartering_-_The_Ocean_Victory]] '''DEMISE CHARTERPARTY: TIME CHARTERPARTY: CONTACT WITH BREAKWATER AND GROUNDING AT PORT RESULTING IN CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS AND WRECK REMOVAL OF VESSEL: WHETHER LOSS CAUSED BY BREACH OF SAFE PORT UNDERTAKING OR BY AN ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE: WHETHER SUBROGATED RIGHTS OF HULL INSURERS AND INSURED LOSSES OF OWNERS AGAINST DEMISE CHARTERERS PRECLUDED BY DEMISE CHARTERPARTY TERMS: WHETHER TIME CHARTERERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY AGAINST HULL INSURERS AND OWNERS: BARECON 89 FORM: MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT 1995: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976  DMC/SandT/17/06 England '''Bahamas Oil Refining Company International Limited v Cape Bari Tankschiffahrts GmbH & Co KG (The “Cape Bari”)''' '''Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson SCJJ: [2016] UKPC 20: 19 July 2016:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bahamas_Oil_Refining_Company_v_Cape_Bari_Tankschiffahrts_-_The_Cape_Bari]]''' '''CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH: COLLISION BETWEEN VESSEL AND BERTH: WHETHER – UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH - VESSEL CAN CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE STATUTORY RIGHT TO LIMIT LABILITY: WHETHER UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE VESSEL DID CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE RIGHT TO LIMIT: MERCHANT SHIPPING (MARITIME CLAIMS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY) ACT 1989 OF THE BAHAMAS: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976'''  DMC/SandT/17/05 England '''Oldendorff GmbH & Co KG v Sea Powerful II Special Maritime Enterprises (The “Zagora”)'''  '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Mr Justice Teare: [2016] EWHC 3212; 15December 2016:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oldendorff_GmbH_v_Sea_Powerful_II_Special_Maritime_Enterprises_The_Zagora]]''' '''LETTER OF INDEMNITY: WHETHER THE DISCHARGE PORT AGENT WAS ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE SHIPOWNERS OR THE PERSON NAMED IN THE LETTER OF INDEMNITY AS THE PERSON TO WHOM DELIVERY OF THE CARGO WAS TO BE MADE'''  DMC/SandT/17/04 England '''MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Cottonex Anstalt''' '''Court of Appeal; Moore-Bick and Tomlinson LJJ, Keehan J.; [2016] EWCA Civ 789; 27 July 2016:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company_v_Cottonex_Anstalt]] '''CONTAINER DEMURRAGE: FRUSTRATION: REPUDIATION AND LEGITIMATE INTEREST: GOOD FAITH: PENALTIES'''  DMC/SandT/17/03 England  '''SPAR SHIPPING AS v GRAND CHINA LOGISTICS HOLDING (GROUP) CO LTD (THE “SPAR CAPELLA”, “SPAR VEGA” AND “SPAR DRACO”)''' '''Court of Appeal; Sir Terence Etherton MR, Gross and Hamblen LJJ; [2016] EWCA Civ 982; 7 October 2016:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Spar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics_Holding_Group]]''' '''NYPE 1993 FORM TIME CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ DUTY TO PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION OR AN INNOMINATE TERM: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY BREACH OF THE TIME CHARTER'''  DMC/SandT/17/02 England  '''Volcafe Ltd and Others v Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA (trading as “CSAV”)'''  '''English Court of Appeal: Gloster LJ, King LJ and Flaux J: (2016) EWCA Civ 1103: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Volcafe_&_Ors_v_Compania_Sud_Americana_de_Vapores_-_CSAV]]'''  '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: CONSIGNMENTS OF BAGGED COFFEE BEANS IN CONTAINERS CARRIED ON LCL/FCL TERMS: CARGO DAMAGED BY CONDENSATION: TEMPORAL SCOPE OF HAGUE RULES: BURDEN OF PROOF: WHETHER CARRIER FAILED PROPERLY AND CAREFULLY TO LOAD AND CARRY THE GOODS: WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO RELY ON “INHERENT VICE” EXCEPTION: WHETHER DAMAGE INEVITABLE: HAGUE RULES, ARTICLE III RULE 2 AND ARTICLE IV RULE 2(M)'''   DMC/SandT/17/01 England '''ST Shipping & Transport INC v Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA (The “Kriti Filoxenia”)''' '''High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Mr Justice Walker; [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm); 14 May 2015''' '''CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ RIGHT TO CANCEL THE CHARTERPARTY PURSUANT TO THE LAYCAN PROVISION SURIVIVES A RE-NOMINATION OF THE LOAD PORT'''  DMC/SandT/16/07 England '''FSL-9 Pte Ltd and Nordic Tankers Trading A/S v Norwegian Hull Club (The “FSL New York”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Blair J: [2016] EWHC 1091 (Comm): 10 May 2016: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/FSL-9_Pte_&_Nordic_Tankers_Trading_v_Norwegian_Hull_Club_-_The_FSL_New_York]] '''LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: P&I CLUB: WHETHER CLAIMANT OWNERS COULD APPLY TO HIGH COURT TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT P&I CLUB TO INCREASE LEVEL OF SECURITY AVAILABLE UNDER A LETTER OF UNDERTAKING ISSUED BY THE CLUB TO OWNERS: MEANING OF “LIBERTY TO APPLY” IN LETTER OF UNDERTAKING SUBJECT TO ENGLISH LAW AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF HIGH COURT IN LONDON'''  DMC/SandT/16/06 England  '''NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NY v Cargill International SA, The “Global Santosh”''' '''Court; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Toulson; [2016] UKSC 20; 11 May 2016:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-_the_Global_Santosh_Supreme_Court_Decision]''' '''OFF-HIRE CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF VESSEL: WHETHER ACTS OF RECEIVERS AND SUB-CHARTERERS WERE TO BE CONSIDERED “DEFAULT OF THE CHARTERERS OR THEIR AGENTS”'''  DMC/SandT/16/05
'''England'''
'''Sideridraulic Systems SpA PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v BBC Chartering & Logistics GmbH OW Bunker Malta Limited & Co KGING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''English Queen’s Bench (Commercial Supreme Court): Andrew Smith J: ; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Hughes, Toulson; [20112016] EWHC 3106 (Comm): 30 November 2011UKSC 23, 11 May 2016: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sideridraulic_Systems_v_BBC_Chartering_&_LogisticsPST_Energy_7__Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_-_The_Res_Cogitans]]
'''CARRIAGE RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE; GOODS BY SEA: INTERPRETATION CONTEMPLATED TO BE CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED; SALE OF MASTER’S REMARK IN BILL GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE; COMMENTS ON POSITION IF SALE OF LADING: WHETHER CARGO WAS DECK CARGO UNDER HAGUE-VISBY RULES: IF DECK CARGO, WHETHER PARTIES AGREED THAT HAGUE-VISBY RULES NEVERTHELESS APPLIED: WHETHER US COURTS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSE GOODS ACT 1979 APPLIED'''
DMC/SandT/1216/1404
'''England'''
'''Isabella Shipowner SA Crescendo Maritime Co. & Alpha Bank AE v Shagang Shipping Bank of Communications Co Ltd (The “Aquafaith”)& Ors.'''
'''English Commercial High Court: Cooke ; Teare J: ; [20122015] EWHC 1077 3364 (Comm): 26 April 2012, 25 November 2015:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Isabella_Shipowner_v_Shagang_Shipping_The_AquafaithCrescendo_Maritime_&_Alpha_Bank_v_Bank_of_Communications_&_Ors]]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYBACK-DATED SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: REFUND GUARANTEES: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEALPROCEEDINGS: AMENDED NYPE FORMACTION COMMENCED IN CHINESE COURTS BY A PARTY TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: RULE IN WHITE AND CARTER V MCGREGORBREACH OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: WHETHER OWNERS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT PREMATURE REAN ANTI-DELIVERY OF VESSEL BY CHARTERERSSUIT INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED:: WHETHER CHINESE PROCEEDINGS A COLLATERAL ATTACK ON ARBITRATION AWARD'''
DMC/SandT/1216/1303
'''Hong KongEngland'''
'''A O Smith Electrical Products SBT Star Bulk & Tankers (ChangzhouGermany) GmbH & Co Ltd KG v Blue Anchor Line & OrsCosmotrade SA (The “Wehr Trave”)'''
'''Hong Kong English Commercial Court of First Instance: Reyes Eder J: [20122016] 1 HKLRD 301EWHC 583 (Comm): 18 November 201122 March 2016:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/A_O_Smith_Electrical_Products_v_Blue_Anchor_Line_SBT_Bulk_&_Ors_Tankers_v_Cosmotrade_-_The_Wehr_Trave]]
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: WAYBILL: LETTER OF UNDERTAKINGTIME CHARTER TRIP: INTERPRETATION: GOVERNING LAW WHETHER THE PARTICULAR TERMS OF CARRIAGETHE CHARTER PERMITTED CHARTERERS TO ORDER THE VESSEL TO LOAD A FURTHER CARGO AFTER THE INITIAL CARGO HAD BEEN DISCHARGED: APPLICABLE LIMIT OF LIABILITYARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1216/1202
'''MalaysiaEngland'''
'''Sarawak Shell Berhad Fulton Shipping Inc v South Sumatra Richfield Marine Pte Ltd Globalia Business Travel SAU (The “Red Gold”“New Flamenco”)'''
'''Malaysian English Court of Appeal: Sulaiman Bin Daud JCALongmore, Syed Ahmad Helmy Bin Syed Ahmad JCA Christopher Clarke and Anantham Kasinather JCASales LLJ: 19 March 2012[2015] EWCA Civ 1299: 21 December 2015: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sarawak_Shell_v_South_Sumatra_Richfield_Marine_Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-_The_Red_Gold]the_New_Flamenco_-_Court_of_Appeal_Decision]'''
'''ADMIRALTYTIME CHARTER: COLLISION BETWEEN OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSEL AND FIXED OFFSHORE OIL PLATFORMREPUDIATION: RIGHT QUANTUM OF VESSEL OWNERS TO LIMIT LIABILITYDAMAGES: WHETHER COLLISION CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF OWNERS IN THE NAVIGATION OR MANAGEMENT OF VESSEL: WHETHER VESSEL OWNERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY DUE TO ABSENCE OF ACTUAL FAULT OR PRIVITYSOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN ITS VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: MERCHANT SHIPPING ORDINANCE 1952 ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 360 VIZ. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CONVENTION 195769 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1216/1101
'''England'''
'''Osmium Shipping Corporation Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA v Cargill International SA MT Maritime Management BV (The “Captain Stefanos”“MTM Hong Kong”)'''
'''English Commercial Court: Cooke Males J: [20122015] EWHC 571 2505 (Comm): 13 March 20121 September 2015: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Osmium_Shipping_v_Cargill_International_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities_Suisse_v_MT_Maritime_Management_-_The_Captain_Stefanos_The_MTM_Hong_Kong]]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEALQUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES FOR REPUDIATION OF VOYAGE CHARTER: AMENDED NYPE (1946) FORM INCORPORATING CONWARTIME 2004DAMAGES FOR POSITIONAL LOSS IN ADDITION TO USUAL PROFIT LOSS: WHETHER VESSEL WAS OFF-HIRE DURING DAMAGES LIMITED BY REFERENCE TO PERIOD WHEN CONTRACT VOYAGE WOULD HAVE ENDED: APPEAL UNDER SECTION 69 OF HIJACKING BY SOMALI PIRATES: WHETHER RIDER CLAUSE PROVIDING FOR OFF-HIRE DURING “CAPTURE/SEIZURE” WAS QUALIFIED BY THE PHRASE “BY ANY AUTHORITY”: WHETHER CONWARTIME 2004 CLAUSE QUALIFIED OFF-HIRE RIDER CLAUSEARBITRATION ACT 1996'''
DMC/SandT/1215/1018
'''England'''
'''Progress Bulk Carriers Limited Société de Distribution de Toutes Marchandises en Côte D’Ivoire, trading as “SDTM-CI”, and others v Tube City IMS LLC . Continental Lines N.V. and another (The “Cenk Kaptanoglu”the “Sea Miror”)'''
'''English Commercial High Court: Cooke Flaux J; 18 June 2015: [20122015] EWHC 273 1747 (Comm): 17 February 2012:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Progress_Bulk_Carriers_v_Tube_City_IMS_SDTM-CI_and_others_v_Continental_Lines_amd_another_-_The_Cenk_Kaptanoglu_the_Sea_Miror]]'''
'''VOYAGE SYNACOMEX 90 CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEALLOADING AND DISCHARGING TO BE AT THE EXPENSE AND RISK OF THE SHIPPERS/CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS/CHARTERERS RESPECTIVELY: WHETHER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT VOIDABLE OWNERS RESPONSIBLE FOR DURESS: WHETHER OWNERS’ CONDUCT, ALTHOUGH NOT ILLEGAL, AMOUNTED TO “ILLEGITIMATE PRESSURE”CARGO LOSS AND DAMAGE OCCURRING DURING LOADING AND DISCHARGE'''
DMC/SandT/1215/0917
'''England'''
'''Acergy PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v OW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”''' '''Court of Appeal; Moore-Bick, Longmore, McCombe LJJ; [2015] EWCA Civ 1058, 22 October 2015: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/PST_Energy_7_Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_-_the_RES_COGITANS''']] '''ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: SUPPLY OF BUNKERS: RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE: CONTEMPLATED THAT GOODS WOULD BE CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED: NO PASSING OF PROPERTY INTENDED: SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE'''  DMC/SandT/15/16 '''Singapore''' '''Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services Pte Ltd v. Société Bretonne De Réparation Navale SASMISC Berhad, the “BUNGA MELATI 5”'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial High Court): David Steel ; Prakash J: ; [20112015] EWHC 2490 (Comm): 5 October 2011SGHC 190, 22 July 2015: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Acergy_Shipping_v_Société_Bretonne_de_Réparation_NavaleEquatorial_Marine_Fuel_Management_Services_v_MISC_Bhd_-_The_Bunga_Melati_5]]
'''CONTRACT FOR PROVISION OF REPAIR SERVICES TO VESSELBUNKER BROKERS: FIRE CAUSING DAMAGE BEYOND REPAIR WORK UNDERTAKENAGENCY: INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACTACTUAL AUTHORITY, APPARENT AUTHORITY, AND ESTOPPEL: SCOPE OF INDEMNITY CONTAINED THEREINNO GENERAL ‘DUTY TO SPEAK’'''
DMC/SandT/1215/0815
'''England'''
'''Geofizika DD Arnold vBritton''' '''UK Supreme Court: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, Lord Hodge JJSC: [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] 2 WLR 1593: 10 June 2015:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Arnold_v_Britton]] '''LANDLORD AND TENANT: LONG RESIDENTIAL LEASES: INCREASE OF SERVICE CHARGE AT YEARLY RATE OF 10% ON COMPOUND BASIS: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: CONTROL OF PARTIES OVER LANGUAGE USED IN CONTRACT: THAT CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT WORKED OUT BADLY FOR ONE PARTY NO REASON FOR DEPARTING FROM NATURAL LANGUAGE'''   DMC/SandT/15/14 '''England''' '''Bunge SA v Nidera BV''' '''UK Supreme Court: Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson: [2015] UKSC 437: 1 July 2015:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bunge_SA_v_Nidera_BV]] '''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: DAMAGES: SALE OF GRAIN BASED ON GAFTA FORM 49: EMBARGO ON EXPORTS: PREMATURE TERMINATION OF CONTRACT BY SELLERS BEFORE EMBARGO TOOK EFFECT: ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT EFFECT OF EMBARGO: NO LOSS SUFFERED BY BUYERS'''  DMC/SandT/15/13 '''The Netherlands''' '''The Kingdom of The Netherlands v Owners of the yacht Qubio – “The Qubio”''' '''Supreme Court of the Netherlands: Vice-President F.B. Bakels as chairman and judges G. Snijders, G. de Groot, M.V. Polak and T.H. Tanja-van den Broek'; 10 July 2015, Case no. MMB International Limited ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1836:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Kingdom_of_The_Netherlands_v_Owners_of_Yacht_Qubio]]''' '''WRECK OF VESSEL: EXTENSION OF LIABILITY OF THE OWNER OF A SUNKEN VESSEL TO PAY FOR COSTS OF MARKING THE WRECK AS A TEMPORARY OR PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE'''  DMC/SandT/15/12 '''Singapore''' '''Precious Shipping Public Company Ltd & Ors v OW Bunker Far East (Singapore) Pte Ltd & Ors and Greenshields Cowie other matters''' '''Singapore High Court; Chong J; [2015] SGHC 187, 21 July 2015: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Precious_Shipping_&_Ors_v_OW_Bunker_Far_East_& Co _Ors]] '''WHETHER INTERPLEADER RELIEF AVAILABLE TO ULTIMATE PURCHASERS OF BUNKERS: WHETHER POTENTIAL CLAIMS BY PHYSICAL SUPPLIERS (WHO SOLD THOSE BUNKERS TO INTERMEDIATE BUYERS) WERE SUFFICIENT TO FOUND THE COURT’S INTERPLEADER JURISDICTION'''   DMC/SandT/15/11 '''England''' '''Glencore Energy UK Ltd v Cirrus Oil Services Ltd'''  '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Cooke J: [2014] EWHC 87 (Comm), [2014] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 24 January 2014::[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_UK_v_Cirrus_Oil_Services]] '''CONTRACT FOR SALE OF OIL BLEND: WHETHER A BINDING CONTRACT EXISTED: “The Green Island”FIRM OFFER WITH ESSENTIAL TERMS ACCEPTED: NAME OF SELLER INFERRED FROM PREVIOUS DEALINGS BETWEEN PARTIES: DAMAGES FOR NON-ACCEPTANCE UNDER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979, SECTIONS 50(2) AND (3) NOT EXCLUDED BY CLAUSE 32.1 OF BP 2007 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CFR SALES'''   DMC/SandT/15/10 '''England''' '''Maestro Bulk Ltd v Cosco Bulk Carrier Ltd, the “Great Creation”'''
'''English High Court of Appeal; Lord Neuberger, Thomas LJ, and Sir Nicholas WallCooke J; [20102014] EWCA Civ 459EWHC 3978 (Comm), [2010] 2 Lloyds Rep 1; 28 April 201015 December 2014: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Geofizika_v_MMB_International_Maestro_Bulk_v_Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_-_The_Green_Island_The_Great_Creation]]
'''INCOTERMS 2000 CIPTIME CHARTERPARTY: CARRIAGE UNTIMELY REDELIVERY NOTICES: “BELOW MARKET” FOLLOW-ON DECK: OBLIGATIONS OF FREIGHT FORWARDERFIXTURE: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATIONHOW DAMAGES TO BE CALCULATED: CAUSATIONMITIGATION'''
DMC/SandT/1215/0709
'''England'''
'''Hyundai Merchant Marine Company Limited Metall Market OOO v Trafigura Beheer BV Vitorio Shipping Co Ltd (The “Gaz Energy”“Lehmann Timber”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Arden, Patten LLJ andSir Bernard Rix: [2013] EWCA Civ 650: [2014] QB 760, [2013] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 541:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Metall_Market_v_vitorio_Shipping_the_Lehmann_Timber]]'''
'''English Commercial CourtCARRIAGE OF GOODS: Flaux JGENERAL AVERAGE: [2011] EWHC 3108 (Comm)REQUEST BY SHIPOWNER FOR SECURITY IN THE FORM OF GENERAL AVERAGE BOND SUPPORTED BY GENERAL AVERAGE GUARANTEE: 29 November 2011WHETHER TERMS OF REQUEST REASONABLE:[[httpWHETHER ACCEPTANCE OF PART SECURITY A WAIVER OF SHIPOWNER’S LIEN://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Hyundai_Merchant_Marine_v_Trafigura_-_the_Gas_Energy]]WHETHER EXPENSES OF STORING CARGO ASHORE IN EXERCISE OF LIEN RECOVERABLE'''
'''TIME CHARTER: SPEED AND PERFORMANCE WARRANTY: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF CHARTER: WHETHER SPEED AND PERFORMANCE AN “ALL WEATHERS” WARRANTY OR LIMITED TO “MAXIMUM WIND FORCE 4 ON BEAUFORT SCALE”'''
DMC/SandT/15/08
DMC/SandT/12/06'''England'''
'''The “Oriental Baltic”PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v OW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''Singapore English High Court: Tan Lee Meng ; Males J : ; [20112015] 3 SGHC 75EWHC 2022 (Comm) 14 July 2015: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Oriental_BalticPST_Energy_7_Shipping_&_Product_Shipping_and_Trading_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_the_Res_Cognitans]]
'''OWNERS ARBITRATION ACT 1996 S.69 APPEAL: BUNKER SUPPLY CONTRACT ON CREDIT TERMS: RETENTION OF VESSEL UNDER VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATIONTITLE CLAUSE: IN REM PROCEEDINGS AGAINST VESSEL COMMENCED AFTER LIQUIDATIONPARTIES CONTEMPLATED BUNKERS WOULD LIKELY BE CONSUMED BEFORE PAYMENT MADE AND TITLE PASSED: PLAINTIFF FILED CAVEAT AGAINST RELEASE AGAINST VESSEL PRIOR TO LIQUIDATION: ACTION AGAINST COMPANY UNDER LIQUIDATION ORDINARILY STAYED UNDER THE COMPANIES WHETHER SALE OF GOODS ACT1979 APPLICABLE: WHETHER LEAVE SHOULD BE GRANTED TO PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE WITH ITS ACTIONREQUIREMENTS OF S.49 MET'''
DMC/SandT/1215/0507
'''England'''
'''Thai Maparn Trading Co Ltd Spar Shipping AS v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd Grand China Logistics Holding (The “Med Salvador” and “Goa”Group)Co., Ltd'''
'''English High Court: Queen's Bench Division Commercial Court: Beatson J: [20112015] EWHC 2494 718 (Comm): 4 October 2011Popplewell J.:18 March 2015[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thai_Maparn_Trading_v_Louis_Dreyfus_CommoditiesSpar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics]]'''
'''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODSNYPE 1993 FORM TIMECHARTER: FOB CONTRACTFAILURE TO PAY HIRE ON TIME: WHETHER BUYERS IN BREACH OF CONDITION PRECEDENT IN CONTRACT BY FAILING : WHETHER BREACH OF AN INNOMINATE TERM: RIGHT TO ISSUE 7 DAY ETA CLAIM DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF VESSELBARGAIN: WHETHER SELLERS IN CHARTERER’S CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY/RENUNCIATORY BREACH BY REJECTING BUYERS’ NOTICE AND STATING THAT CARGO WOULD NOT BE READY IN TIMEOF CONTRACT'''
DMC/SandT/1215/0406
'''England'''
'''Pacific Basin IHX Limited Gard Marine & Energy Ltd (Respondents/Claimants) v Bulkhandling Handymax AS China National Chartering Co. Ltd (The “Triton Lark”Intermediate Charterers): English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2011] EWHC 2868 v China National'''Chartering Co. Ltd v Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha (CommCharterers/Appellants): 8 November 2011, - The “Ocean Victory”:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pacific_Basin_v_Bulkhandling_Handymax,_the_Triton_LarkGard_Marine_&_Energy_v_China_National_Chartering_-_The_Ocean_Victory_-_Court_of_Appeal]]'''
'''TIME CHARTEREnglish Court of Appeal: Longmore, Gloster and Underhill LJJ: PIRACY RISKS IN GULF OF ADEN IN 2008[2015] EWCA Civ 16: CONWARTIME 1993/2004 CLAUSE22 January 2015: ARBITRATION APPEAL''' '''SAFE PORT: SECTION 69 WHETHER COMBINATION OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996‘LONG WAVE’ SWELL AND A SEVERE GALE AN ‘ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE’: CORRECT TEST FOR ASSESSING RISK OF PIRACY INCIDENT OCCURING FOR PURPOSE OF 1993/2004 CLAUSESUBROGATION: WHETHER OWNERS DEVIATED BY REROUTING VESSEL VIA CAPE INSURER OF GOOD HOPE INSTEAD BOTH PARTIES TO A BARECON CHARTERPARTY MAY SUE AN ASSURED FOR BREACH OF GULF OF ADENCHARTER'''
DMC/SandT/1215/0305
'''England'''
'''Emeraldian Limited Partnership Standard Chartered Bank v Wellmix Shipping Limited and Guangzhou Iron & Steel Corporation Dorchester LNG (2) Limited (The “Vine”“Erin Schulte”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Sir Bernard Rix, Moore-Bick and Briggs LJJ: [2014] EWCA Civ 1382: 22 October 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Standard_Chartered_Bank_v_Dorchester_LNG_(2)_-_The_Erin_Schulte]]
'''English Commercial CourtBILL OF LADING: Teare JLETTER OF CREDIT: [2010] EWHC 1411 (Comm)INITIAL REJECTION OF THE PRESENTATION: 17 June 2010MEANING OF “INDORSEMENT” OF BILL OF LADING:[[httpTRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF SUIT://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Emeraldian_Limited_v_Wellmix_Shipping,_the_Vine]]CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1992 SECTIONS 2(2)(A) AND 5(2)(B)'''
'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER VESSEL’S OBLIGATION TO OBTAIN CLEARANCE BY PORT AUTHORITIES BEFORE GIVING NOTICE OF READINESS WAIVED FOR PURPOSE OF COMMENCEMENT OF LAYTIME: WHETHER CHARTERERS COULD RELY ON EXCEPTIONS TO RUNNING OF LAYTIME: WHETHER CHARTERERS IN BREACH OF SAFE PORT WARRANTY: WHETHER DEMURRAGE RECOVERABLE FOR DETENTION OF VESSEL'''
DMC/SandT/15/04
DMC/12/02'''Hong Kong'''
'''EnglandThe Alas renamed The Kombos: Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Ng J: HCAJ 241/2009: [2014] 4 HKLRD 160: 21 July 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Alas_renamed_The_Kombos]]'''
'''ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED v. ALBEMARLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and ALBEMARLE CORPORATIONADMIRALTY: WARRANT OF ARREST: SHIPOWNERS’ CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AND UNPAID HIRE: FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD NOT SATISFIED: NO BAR TO ACTION IN REM FOR CLAIM ARISING OUT OF AGREEMENT FOR USE OR HIRE OF THE SHIP'''
'''English High Court; Flaux J; [2011] EWHC 1574 (Comm); 21 June 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Astrazeneca_UK_v_Albemarle_International]]'''
'''CONTRACT: CLAUSES GRANTING THE RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL: EXCLUSION CLAUSES AND DELIBERATE BREACH'''DMC/SandT/15/03
'''Hong Kong'''
DMC/SandT/12/01'''Antwerp Diamond Bank NV v Brink’s Inc'''
'''The NetherlandsHong Kong Court of First Instance: Lam and Lunn VPP and Barman JA: CACV No.282 of 2012: [2014] 4 HKLRD 158: 17 July 2014: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Antwerp_Diamond_Bank-v-Brink's_Inc]]'''
'''Furtrans Denzilick Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS (“Furtrans”) v Augusta Due Srl (“Augusta”)CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY AIR: The "Constanza M”MISDELIVERY: GOODS RELEASED TO BUYER WITHOUT CONSENT OF PLEDGEE BANK AND WITHOUT PAYMENT: LOCUS OF PLEDGEE BANK TO SUE FOR CONVERSION: AGREEMENT BY SELLER TO PLEDGE FINISHED GOODS TO BANK: DELIVERY OF GOODS TO FREIGHT FORWARDER COMPLETED PLEDGE: CONSTRUCTIVE DELIVERY OF GOODS TO BANK'''
'''Supreme Court of the Netherlands (“SCN”) (summary proceedings): Vice-President J.B. Fleers as Chairman and the judges A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, F.B. Bakels, C.E. Drion and G. Snijders LJN:BT2708, December 9, 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Furtrans_v_Augusta,_the_Constanza_M]]'''
'''CONSTRUCTION OF ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE ARREST OF SEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2802
'''England'''
'''Rainy Sky SA E D & F Man Sugar Ltd v Kookmin Bank'''Unicargo Transportgesellschaft GmbH (Polska Zegluga Morska PP, interested party), The “Ladytramp”
'''UK Supreme Court: Lord Phillipsof Appeal; Pattern, Lord ManceTomlinson, Lord Kerr, Lord Christopher Clarke and Lord Wilson: LJJ; [20112013] UKSC 50EWCA Civ 1449, 19 November 2013: 2 November 2011''' '''[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Rainy_Sky_v_Kookmin_BankE_D_&_F_Man_v_Unicargo_Transportgesellschaft_GmbH_The_Ladytramp]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDINGSUGAR CHARTERPARTY 1999: LETTER DESTRUCTION BY FIRE OF GUARANTEE: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION BEING A UNITARY PROCESS: ROLE OF COMMERCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: WEIGHT TO BE GIVEN FACILITIES AT LOADING TERMINAL NOT WITHIN CLAUSE 28 EXCEPTION TO VIEW LAYTIME OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE“MECHANICAL BREAKDOWNS”'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2701 '''England'''  '''NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NY v Cargill International SA, The “Global Santosh”''' '''Court of Appeal; Gross LJ, Gloster LJ, Sir Burnton; [2014] EWCA Civ 403, 8 April 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Global_Santosh_-_Court_of_Appeal]]''' '''OFF-HIRE CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF VESSEL: WHETHER SUB-CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS WERE ‘AGENTS’ OF THE CHARTERERS: WHETHER THE PERSONAL ACT, OMISSION OR DEFAULT TO WHICH CLAUSE REFERRED MUST HAVE OCCURRED DURING PROVISION OF RELEVANT SERVICES'''  DMC/SandT/14/17
'''Singapore'''
'''The SahandSingapore Court of Appeal'''
Singapore High Court : Quentin Loh J : '''Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd [20112013] SGHC 27SGCA 15:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Sahand]] '''
'''ARRESTS OF VESSELS IN SINGAPORE OWNED BY IRANIAN COMPANIESSundaresh Menon CJ, Chao Hick Tin JA and Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA: 6 February 2013: ASSETS FREEZE IMPOSED BY UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS 1737, 1747, 1803 AND 1929[2013] 2 SLR 363: WHETHER SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS REQUIRE IMPOUNDMENT OR DETENTION OF VESSELS OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY DESIGNATED PERSONS OR ENTITIES OR THEIR SUBSIDIARIES[[https: EFFECT OF ASSETS FREEZE ON ARREST OF SHIPS PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION OF COURT//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Out_of_the_Box_v_Wanin_Industries]]'''
'''CONTRACT: REMOTENESS OF DAMAGE: BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTOR ENGAGING MANUFACTURER TO PRODUCE NEW SPORTS DRINK: MANUFACTURER UNAWARE OF DISTRIBUTOR’S PLAN TO PROMOTE POPULAR DEMAND FOR GENERIC DRINK THROUGH AGGRESSIVE ADVERTISING: MANUFACTURER SUPPLYING DEFECTIVE SHIPMENT OF DRINKS IN BREACH OF CONTRACT: ABANDONMENT OF PROMOTION: WHETHER WASTED ADVERTISING EXPENSES CLAIMED BY DISTRIBUTOR TOO REMOTE'''
 DMC/SandT/1114/2616
'''England'''
'''National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia Great Elephant Corporation v BP Trafigura Beheer BV v Vitol SA & Vitol Asia Pte Ltd v China Offshore Oil Supply Company(Singapore) International Pte Ltd (The “Crudesky”)'''
'''English Court of Appeal: Ward Longmore, Tomlin and Tomlinson Underhill LJJ and Sir Mark Potter: 12 October 2011: [20112013] EWCA Civ 11271547, [2014] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 25 July 2013:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NSCSA_v_BP_Oil_SupplyGreat_Elephant_Corp_v_Trafigura_Beheer_-_The_Crudesky]]'''
'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTYCHARTER: BPVOY4FOB SALE CONTRACT CHAIN: DEMURRAGE CLAIMS TO BE PRESENTED WITH FULL DOCUMENTATION WITHIN 90 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF DISCHARGE: FINAL SETTLEMENT “RESTRAINT OF CLAIMPRINCES” EXCEPTION: WHETHER MIS-DESCRIBED FURTHER DEMURRAGE CLAIM TIME-BARRED: COST OF BUNKERS CONSUMED FOR RE-BERTHINGUNFORESEEABLE FORCE MAJEURE BEYOND CONTROL OR REASONABLE CONTROL'''
DMC/11SandT/2514/15
'''England'''
'''Conarken Group Limited and Farrell Transport Limited Fulton Shipping Inc v. Network Rail Infrastructure LimitedGlobalia Business Travel SAU (The “New Flamenco”)'''
'''English Commercial Court of Appeal; Pill, Moore-Bick, and Jackson LJJ; : Popplewell J: [20112014] EWCA Civ 644, 27 EWHC 1457 (Comm): 21 May 20112014:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Conarken_v_Network_RailFulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-_The_New_Flamenco]]'''
'''TORTTIME CHARTER: DAMAGESREPUDIATION: SUMS PAYABLE UNDER VICTIM’S CONTRACTS WITH THIRD PARTIESQUANTUM: FORESEEABILITY AND REMOTENESSWHETHER CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: REASONABLENESS OF CALCULATIONSARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1114/2414
'''England'''
'''Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Limited Geden Operations Ltd v Korea Line CorporationDry Bulk Handy Holdings Inc (The “Bulk Uruguay”)'''
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Blair Popplewell J: [20112014] EWHC 1819 885 (Comm): 22 June 2011:28 March 2014[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_Korea_Line_CorporationGeden_Operations_v_Dry_Bulk_Handy_Holdings_-_the_Bulk_Uruguay]]
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYCHARTER: WRONGFUL TERMINATION BY CHARTERERSANTICIPATORY REPUDIATORY BREACH: ASSESSMENT RIGHT TO GIVE VOYAGE ORDERS TO TRANSIT GULF OF DAMAGESADEN: NO AVAILABLE MARKET FOR BALANCE OF CHARTER PERIOD AT TIME OF TERMINATION: EFFECT OF REVIVAL OF MARKET AT A LATER STAGEARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1114/2313
'''Hong KongEngland''' '''Proton Energy Group SA v Orlen Lietuva''' '''English Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): HH Judge Mackie QC: [2013] EWHC 2872 (Comm): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Proton_Energy_Group_v_Orlen_Lietuva]] '''CONTRACT: CONTRACT FOR SALE OF OIL BLEND: EXISTENCE OF BINDING CONTRACT: PARTIES REGARDED THEMSELVES AS BEING BOUND AFTER DEAL WAS CONFIRMED: SPECIFICATION OF OIL BLEND NOT FORMING PART OF SALE BY DESCRIPTION'''  DMC/SandT/14/12 '''England''' '''Falkonera Shipping Company v Arcadia Energy Pte Ltd (The “Falkonera”)'''  '''English Court of Appeal (Civil Division); Floyd and Christopher Clarke LJJ, Sir Stanley Burnton; [2014] EWCA Civ 713; 5 June 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Falkonera_Shipping_v_Arcadia_Energy_-_The_Falkonera]]''' '''SHIPPING: TANKER TRANSHIPMENT: SHIP-TO-SHIP (“STS”) TRANSFERS: CHARTERPARTY PROVIDING FOR STS TRANSFERS TO BE SUBJECT TO OWNERS’ APPROVAL WHICH NOT TO BE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD: OWNERS WITHHOLD CONSENT FOR A STS TRANSFER BETWEEN TWO VLCCs: WHETHER OWNERS’ WITHHOLDING OF APPROVAL REASONABLE'''  DMC/SandT/14/11 '''England'''
'''Birnam British American Tobacco Switzerland SA v Exel Europe Ltd ; British American Tobacco Denmark A/S v The Owners of the Ship or Vessel “Hong Ming”, The “Hong Ming”Exel Europe Ltd'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First InstanceAppeal: Reyes McFarlane L.J.; Sir Bernard Rix; Sir Timothy Lloyd: HCAJ No.105 of 2011[2013] EWCA Civ 1319: 26 August 201130 October 2013:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Birnam_v_The_"Hong_Ming"British_American_Tobacco_&_Ors_v_Exel_Europe]]'''
'''WARRANT CARRIAGE OF ARRESTGOODS BY ROAD: SETTING ASIDECMR CONVENTION: CLAIM FOR OWNERSHIP OF VESSEL PURSUANT TO A TERMINATED CONTRACT FOR SALE OF VESSELCARGO LOSS: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSUREESTABLISHING JURISDICTION AGAINST SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS: MISUSE OF THE ARREST PROCESSWHETHER CLAIMANT THAT HAS ESTABLISHED JURISDICTION UNDER ART.31.1 AGAINST ONE CARRIER CAN RELY ON THAT JURISDICTION TO JOIN SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS'''
DMC/SandT/1114/2210
'''England'''
Suek AG '''Trafigura Beheer BV v Glencore International AGNavigazione Montanari SPA [2014] EWHC 129 Comm'''
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Burton Andrew Smith J.: [2011] EWHC 1361 (Comm): 27 May 201130 January 2014:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Suek_v_Glencore_InternationalTrafigura_Beheer_v_Navigazione_Montanari_-_the_Valle_de_Cordoba]]
'''CHARTERPARTY: CARRIAGE OF GOODSBY SEA: CIF CONTRACT: CONSTRUCTIONVESSEL CARRYING CONSIGNMENT OF MOTOR OIL ATTACKED BY PIRATES: ENTITLEMENT TO GIVE NOTICE WHETHER QUANTITY OF READINESS: CONCURRENT CAUSES LEADING TO DELAY OIL TAKEN BY PIRATES CONSTITUTED "IN BERTHING: COMMENCEMENT -TRANSIT LOSS" OR "LOST CARGO" FOR PURPOSES OF LAYTIMEIN-TRANSIT LOSS CLAUSE IN CHARTERPARTY'''
DMC/SandT/1114/2109
'''England'''
'''Carboex SA Yuzhny Zavod Metall Profil LLC v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA'''Eems Beheerder B.V. (“the M/V EEMS SOLAR”):
'''English High Court: Queen's , Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial , Admiralty Court): Field JJervis K, Q.C, the Admiralty Registrar: [2011] EWHC 1165 (Comm: 12 May 20115 June 2013: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_v_Louis_Dreyfus_CommoditiesYuzhny_Zavod_Metall_Profil_v_Emms_Beheerder_-_the_M/V_Eems_Solar]]'''
'''AMWELSH CHARTERPARTYBILLS OF LADING: DEMURRAGE: EXCEPTION INCORPORATION OF STRIKESCHARTERPARTY TERMS PROVIDING THAT CHARTERERS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR STOWAGE: WHETHER DELAY IN DISCHARGE ARISING FROM CONGESTION OWNERS COULD RELY ON THAT CLAUSE AS DEFENCE TO CLAIM BY RECEIVERS FOR CARGO DAMAGE CAUSED BY STRIKES EXCEPTED FROM LAYTIMEBAD STOWAGE'''
DMC/SandT/1114/2008
'''England'''
'''Great Eastern Martrade Shipping Co Ltd v. & Transport GmbH V United Enterprises Corporation (1The “Wisdom C”) Far East Chartering Ltd (2) Binani Cement Ltd:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Martrade_Shipping_and_Transport_v_United_Entreprises_-_The_Wisdom_C]]'''
'''English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division: Judge Mackie QC: (Commercial Court); Popplewell J; [20112014] EWHC 1372 1884 (Comm); 12 June 2014 '''TIMECHARTER PROVIDING FOR ENGLISH LAW AND LONDON ARBITRATION: ARBITRATORS AWARDING PENAL RATE OF INTEREST: WHETHER “SIGNIFICANT CONNECTION” BETWEEN CHARTERPARTY AND ENGLAND: 27 May 2011WHETHER “APPLICABLE LAW” A FOREIGN LAW:[[httpLATE PAYMENT OF COMMERCIAL DEBTS (INTEREST) ACT 1998:ARTICLES 3 AND 4 – CONTRACTS (APPLICABLE LAW) ACT 1990'''  DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk14/index.php/Great_Eastern_Shipping_v_Far_East_Chartering]]07 '''Hong Kong''' '''Darby International Investment Ltd v Rong Tai International Shipping Ltd'''
'''WHETHER SHIPOWNER ENTITLED TO ENFORCE LETTER OF INDEMNITY GIVEN BY RECEIVER TO CHARTERER FOR DELIVERY OF CARGO WITHOUT PRESENTATION OF BILLS OF LADINGHong Kong Court of First Instance: CONTRACTS (RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES) ACT 1999Deputy High Court Judge B Chu: WHETHER LETTER GIVEN TO CHARTERERHCMP1438 of 2013: WHETHER CARGO “DELIVERED”2 December 2013: WHETHER LETTER OF INDEMNITY UNENFORCEABLE ON GROUNDS OF PUBLIC POLICY[[https: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO RECOVER UNDER A UNILATERAL CONTRACT//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Darby_International_Investments_v_Rong_Tai_International_Shipping]]'''
http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2013/2031.html
DMC/SandT/11/19'''MARITIME LAW: REGISTRATION OF VESSELS: VESSEL APPARENTLY REGISTERED IN MORE THAN ONE JURISDICTION: DECLARATION AS TO VALIDITY OF REGISTRATION IN HONG KONG: PURPOSE OF GRANTING DECLARATION'''
'''The Netherlands'''
DMC/SandT/14/06 '''Pianura Armatori SpA England''' '''Flame SA v Ferrari Glory Wealth Shipping Agency G.A. The "Halcyon Star”Pte Ltd'''
'''English Commercial Court of Rotterdam : Teare J: [2013] EWHC 3153 (summary proceedingsComm) : Mr A.F.L. Geerdes, LJN:BQ5031, 22 October 7, 2010 (published May 19, 2011)2013: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pianura_Armatori_v_Ferrari_ShippingFlame_SA_v_Glory_Wealth_Shipping]]'''
'''ARREST CONVENTION 1952 ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPHCONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT: ARREST REPUDIATION: QUANTUM OF VESSEL OWNED BY A VESSEL MANAGER FOR MARITIME CLAIMS AGAINST THE VESSEL MANAGER RELATING DAMAGES: COMPENSATORY PRINCIPLE: WHETHER INNOCENT PARTY MUST PROVE ABILITY TO PERFORM OBLIGATIONS, HAD CONTRACT CONTINUED, TO OTHER VESSELS NOT OWNED BY THE MANAGERRECOVER SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGES FROM CONTRACT BREAKER'''
DMC/SandT/1114/1805
'''England'''
'''Bulk Ship Union SA v Clipper Bulk Shipping Limited (The Owner of the Vessel “The Ocean Crown” and others v Five Oceans Salvage Consultants Ltd, “The Ocean Crown”"Pearl C")''' '''English High Court: Popplewell J.: 26 June 2012 [2012] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 533:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bulk_Ship_Union_v_Clipper_Bulk_Shipping_-_The_Pearl_C]] '''TIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM: SLOW STEAMING: WHETHER A BREACH OF ‘UTMOST DESPATCH’ OBLIGATION: WHETHER VESSEL OFF-HIRE BY REASON OF DEFAULT OF MASTER: WHETHER PARTIAL INTERRUPTION IN SERVICE SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER OFF-HIRE CLAUSE'''  DMC/SandT/14/04
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Admiralty Court): Gross J: [2009] EWHC 3040 (Admlty), [2010] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 468: 26 November 2009:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Ocean_Crown]]Hong Kong'''
'''SALVAGE: ASSESSMENT OF REMUNERATION: WHETHER RISK OF FUTURE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN APPLYING PRINCIPLE OF ENCOURAGEMENT: SCOPE OF THE PRINCIPLE IN THE AMERIQUEMaintek Computer (Suzhou) Co Ltd v Blue Anchor Line'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: To J: HCAJ No.106 of 2008: 2 April 013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maintek_Computer_(Suzhou)_v_Blue_Anchor_Line''']]
DMChttp:/SandT/11www.hklii.hk/17eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2013/506.html
'''The NetherlandsCARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY BY OCEAN TERMINAL: CLAIM FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST CARRIER: MEANING OF “DELIVERY” FOR PURPOSE OF TIME LIMITATION: WHETEHR EXEMPTION CLAUSE FOR ANY CAUSE OR EVENT WHICH CARRIER COULD NOT AVOID APPLICABLE: WHETHER LIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY REFERENCE TO WEIGHT OF CARGO APPLICABLE'''  DMC/SandT/14/03 '''England'''
'''HDISea-Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG et al Cargo Skips AS v APM Terminals Rotterdam B.V.The ‘Pretoria’State Bank of India'''
'''English High Court of Rotterdam: Ms P.A.M van Schouwenburg –Laan, LJNQueen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2013] EWHC 177 (Comm):BO0063, September 29, 201026 June 2013:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/HDISea-Gerling_v_APM_TerminalsCargo_Skips_AS_v_State_Bank_of_India]]'''
'''STEVEDORE DAMAGE TO VESSEL DURING LOADINGSHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: REFUND GUARANTEE: QUESTION OF CONSTRUCTION: WHETHER STEVEDORES LIABLE FOR THE DAMAGE CAUSED UNDER DUTCH LAWDEMAND WAS SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER BANK’S LIABILITY: BURDEN OF PROOFAMBIGUOUS DEMAND NOT COMPLIANT'''
DMC/SandT/1114/1602
'''United Kingdom Supreme CourtSingapore'''
'''Jones v. KaneySingapore High Court'''
'''UK Supreme Court; Lords Philips, Hope, Brown, Collins, Kerr, Dyson, Lady Hale; The “Turtle Bay” [20112013] UKSC 13; SGHC 165 : Judgment delivered by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J, 30 March 2011August 2013:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Jones_v_KaneyThe_Turtle_Bay]]
'''REMOVAL SALE OF EXPERT WITNESS IMMUNITY IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGSVESSEL UNDER ARREST: WHEN DIRECT PRIVATE SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST CONSTITUTES CONTEMPT OF COURT: PRINCIPLES AND EFFECT OF ADMIRALTY JUDICIAL SALE: WHEN COURT WILL SANCTION A DIRECT PRIVATE SALE'''
DMC/SandT/1114/1501
'''CanadaEngland'''
'''Société Telus Communications, Hydro-Québec and Bell Canada Minerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping AG; Oceana Shipping AG v Peracomo IncTransatlantica Commodities S.A., Réal Vallée and the fishing vessel RealiceThe MV “Athena”'''
'''Federal Court of Canada: Harrington J.: 2011 FC 494: 27 April 2011:Appeal; Tomlinson, Lewison and Underhill LJJ; [2013] EWCA Civ 1723; 17 July 2013[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Telus_Communications_v_Peracomo_Inc_and_Réal_ValléeMinerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-_the_Athena]]'''
'''SHIPPINGTIME CHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: SUBMARINE CABLE CUT BY SKIPPER OF FISHING VESSELOFF-HIRE CLAUSE 15: WHETHER DAMAGE CAUSED INTENTIONALLY “LOSS OF TIME” MEANS NET LOSS OF TIME IN THE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR RECKLESSLY AND WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT 'SUCH LOSS' WOULD PROBABLY RESULT: WHETHER DEFENDANTS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY UNDER IN THE 1976 LIMITATION CONVENTION, AS INCORPORATED INTO CANADIAN LAWOVERALL CHARTER SERVICE'''
DMC/SandT/1113/1417
'''The NetherlandsEngland''' '''MRI Trading AG v Erdenet Mining Corporation LLC'''
'''DSV Road BEnglish Court of Appeal: Pill, Tomlinson, McCombe LJJ: [2013] EWCA Civ 156: 08 Mar 2013:[[https://www.Vonlinedmc. and Amlin Corporate Insurance Nco.V. v Sneltransport “Heidenend” Tegelen B.Vuk/index.php/MRI_Trading_v_Erdenet_Mining_Corporation]]'''
'''Amsterdam Court of AppealSALE OF GOODS: A.S. Arnold, W.H.F.M. Cortenraad and H.M. ten Haaft, LJN BL9955, April 2, 2010CERTAINTY OF CONTRACT TERMS: [[httpWHETHER TERMS AMOUNTED TO 'AGREEMENTS TO AGREE'://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSV_Road_v_Sneltransport_Heidenend]]PROPER APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTION AND IMPLICATION OF TERMS WITHIN A CONTRACT WHICH CONTAINS TERMS LEAVING MATTERS TO BE SUBSEQUENTLY AGREED'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY ROAD: CMR CONVENTION: WHETHER SHIPPER-PACKED TRAILER CAN BE CONSIDERED ‘GOODS’ WITHIN ART.17.2'''
DMC/SandT/1113/1316
'''England'''
'''Shell Egypt West Manzala GmbH and another NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) N.V. v Dana Gas Egypt LimitedCargill International S.A., The “Global Santosh”'''  '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial English High Court): Tomlinson ; Field J: ; [20102013] EWHC 465 30 (Comm): 10 March 2010; 1 February 2013:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Shell_Egypt_v_Dana_GasNYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Global_Santosh]]'''
'''CONTRACT: JOINT VENTURE FOR GAS EXPLORATION: REPUDIATORY BREACH COMMITTED BY ONE PARTY: INNOCENT PARTY TERMINATED CONTRACT BASED ON WRONG BELIEF THAT CONTRACTUAL TERMINATION PERIOD OFF-HIRE CLAUSE WAS TRIGGEREDCOVERING DELAY ARISING FROM DETENTION OR ARREST OF VESSEL: WHETHER INNOCENT PARTY COULD JUSTIFY TERMINATION SUB-CHARTERERS OR RECEIVERS WERE AGENTS OF CONTRACTTHE CHARTERERS: WHETHER DELAY TO VESSEL “OCCASIONED BY” RECEIVERS’ FAILURE TO DISCHARGE WITHIN THE LAYTIME AND/OR TO SECURE SELLERS’ DEMURRAGE CLAIM'''
DMC/SandT/1113/1215
'''England'''
'''Choil Trading Greatship (India) Limited v Oceanografia SA v Sahara Energy Resources Limited de CV (The “Prem Mala”“Greatship Driti”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Christopher Clarke Gloster J: [20102012] EWHC 374 3468 (Comm): 26 February 20105 December 2012: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Choil_Trading_v_Sahara_EnergyGreatship_(India)_Limited_v_Oceanografia_SA_de_CV_-Resources_The_Greatship_Driti]] '''TIME CHARTER: BIMCO SUPPLYTIME 89 FORM: CLAUSE 10(E): RIGHT TO SUSPEND PERFORMANCE FOR FAILURE TO PAY HIRE PUNCTUALLY: WHETHER GRACE PERIOD (ANTI-TECHNICALITY) NOTICE REQUIRED BEFORE EXERCISING RIGHT'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEA: FOB SALE CONTRACT: CIF ON-SALE CONTRACTS: QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES FOR DELIVERY OF CONTAMINATED GOODS IN BREACH OF FOB CONTRACT: RECOVERABILITY OF HEDGING LOSSES INCURRED IN MITIGATION IN RELATION TO CIF CONTRACTS: WHETHER TRUE CONSTRUCTION OF FOB CONTRACT EXEMPTION CLAUSE EXCLUDED RECOVERY OF HEDGING AND ADDITIONAL EXPENSES/COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT'''
DMC/SandT/13/14
DMC/SandT/11/11'''England'''
'''English High CourtMinerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping AG; Oceana Shipping AG v Transatlantica Commodities S.A. The MV “Athena”'''
'''Azimut–Benetti SpA vEnglish High Court; Walker J; [2012] EWHC 3608 (Comm); 13 December 2012:[[https://www. Healey'''onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Minerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-__The_Athena]]
'''English High CourtTIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: Blair J.OFF-HIRE CLAUSE 15: [2010] EWHC 2234 (Comm): 3 September 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Azimut_Benetti_v_Healey]]WHETHER “LOSS OF TIME” MEANS NET LOSS OF TIME IN THE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR IN THE OVERALL CHARTER SERVICE'''
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: GUARANTEE: WHETHER LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CONSTITUTE A PENALTY: WHETHER A PRE-ESTIMATE OF LOSS IN THE CASE OF BREACH: WHETHER A DETERRENT: WHETHER GUARANTEE REMAINS ENFORCEABLE WHERE A PROVISION IN THE UNDERLYING CONTRACT CONSTITUTES A PENALTY: PUBLIC POLICY'''
DMC/SandT/13/13
DMC/SandT/11/10'''England'''
'''United Kingdom''' '''Oceanbulk Griffon Shipping & Trading SA LLC v TMT Asia Ltd & ORsFirodi Shipping Limited – The “MV Griffon”'''
'''United Kingdom Supreme High Court: Lord Phillipsof Justice, Lord RodgerQueen's Bench Division, Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Sir John Dyson)Commercial Court: Teare J.: [20102013] UKSC 44EWHC 593 (Comm): 27 October 201021 March 2013: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oceanbulk_Shipping_v_TMT_AsiaGriffon_Shipping_v_Firodi_Shipping_-_The_Griffon ]]'''
'''CONTRACTS: SETTLEMENT SHIPSALE AGREEMENT: INTERPRETATION: ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ COMMUNICATIONSON NORWEGIAN SALE FORM 1993: WHETHER FACTS DISCLOSED DURING ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ NEGOTIATIONS ADMISSIBLE AS AN AID TO CONSTRUCTION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTSELLER CAN RECOVER UNPAID DEPOSIT WHERE BUYER IN REPUDIATORY BREACH'''
DMC/SandT/1113/0912
'''English Court of AppealEngland'''
'''Thomas Crema Wuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Ltd & Anor v. Cenkos Securities PLCEmporiki Bank of Greece SA'''
'''English Court of Appeal (Civil Division); Hughes LJ: Longmore, Aikens LJRimer and Tomlinson, Chancellor Morritt; LJJ.: [20102012] EWCA Civ 1444, 16 December 20101629: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thomas_Crema_v_Cenkos_SecuritiesWuhan_Guoyu_Logistics_v_Emporiki_Bank]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT PARTLY WRITTEN AND PARTLY ORAL: PAYMENT GUARANTEE: WHETHER TERM SHOULD BE IMPLIED: RELEVANT PRINCIPLES: RELEVANCE OF MARKET PRACTICE: EXPERT EVIDENCE: LIMITATIONS OF EXPERT EVIDENCEPAYMENT GUARANTEE A TRUE GUARANTEE OR AN ON-DEMAND BOND'''
DMC/SandT/13/11/08
'''English Court of AppealEngland'''
'''Kookmin Bank Dalmare SpA v Rainy SA and othersUnion Maritime Ltd & Anor''''''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Commercial Court; Flaux J; [2012] EWHC 3537; 13 Dec 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dalmare_v_Union_Maritime_-_The_Union_Power]]
'''English Court of AppealSALE OF VESSEL "AS SHE WAS AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION": Thorpe and Patten LJJ and Sir Simon TuckeySTATUTORY IMPLIED TERM AS TO QUALITY UNDER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979: [2010] EWCA Civ 582, [2010] 1 CLC 829: 27 May 2010:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kookmin_Bank_v_Rainy_SA]]WHETHER SELLERS HAD EXCLUDED APPLICATION OF STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM; WHETHER SELLERS IN BREACH OF STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM'''
'''SHIPBUILDING: LETTER OF GUARANTEE: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: EXTREME CONSEQUENCES REQUIRED TO DEPART FROM MEANING OF WORDS AS CONVEYED TO REASONABLE PERSON: NO DEPARTURE SIMPLY BECAUSE COURT WOULD REACH DIFFERENT BALANCE OF PARTIES’ INTERESTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER CONTRACT'''
DMC/SandT/1113/0710
'''English Court of AppealThe Netherlands'''
'''Brink’s Global Services Inc & Ors Dana Petroleum Netherlands B.V. vVos Sympathy B.V. Igrox Ltd & Anor''''The “Vos Sympathy”''Court of Appeal: Longmore, Moore-Bick and Wilson LJJ.: [2010] EWCA Civ 1208: 27 October 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Brink's_Global_Services_v_Igrox]]
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODSCourt of Appeal of The Hague: THEFT FROM CONTAINER BY EMPLOYEE OF FUMIGATION COMPANYJudges: WHETHER COMPANY VICARIOUSLY LIABLEM.M. Olthof, A.A. Rijperman and R. van der Vlist: CLOSE CONNECTION BETWEEN THEFT AND PURPOSE OF EMPLOYMENT11 December 2012: Case no. 200.079.897/01:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dana_Petroleum_Netherlands_v_Vos_Sympathy_-_The_Vos_Sympathy]]'''
'''SUPPLYTIME 2005 CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER HIMLAYA AND KNOCK FOR KNOCK CLAUSES 'REASONABLE AND FAIR' UNDER DUTCH CIVIL CODE ART.6:248.2'''
DMC/SandT/11/06
'''English Commercial Court'''
'''Dalwood Marine v Nordana Line ADMC/S, The “Elbrus”; Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2009] EWHC 3394 (Comm), [2010] 2 All ER (Comm) 802: 21 December 2009:[[http:SandT/13/www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dalwood_Marine_v_Nordana_Line]]'''09
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: WRONGFUL EARLY TERMINATION BY CHARTERERS: DAMAGES: WHETHER HIRE EARNED BY SHIPOWNERS IN SUBSTITUTE FIXTURE WHICH EXTENDED BEYOND REMAINDER OF ORIGINAL CHARTER RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENTEngland'''
'''White Rosebay Shipping SA v Hong Kong Chain Glory Shipping Limited'''
DMC'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Commercial Court; Teare J; [2013] EWHC 1355 (Comm); 23 May 2013:[[https:/SandT/2011www.onlinedmc.co.uk/05index.php/White_Rosebay_Shipping_v_Hong_Kong_Chain_Glory_Shipping]]'''TIME-CHARTERPARTY: CHARTERERS EVINCING INTENTION NOT TO PERFORM: OWNERS AFFIRMED CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ REPUDIATORY CONDUCT CONTINUED: WHETHER OWNERS SUBSEQUENTLY ENTITLED TO TERMINATE'''
'''English Commercial Court'''
'''Glencore Energy UK Limited v Transworld Oil Limited (The “Narmada Spirit”): English Commercial Court: Blair J: [2010] EWHC 141 (Comm): 3 February 2010: [[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk13/index.php/Glencore_Energy_v_Transworld_Oil]]'''08
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEAHong Kong''' '''Kulemesin Yuriy v HKSAR - The Neftegaz67''' '''Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal: Ma CJ, Chan, Riberio and Tang PJJ and Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony NPJ: FOB CONTRACTFACV No. 6 and 7 of 2012: CORRECT QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES FOR NON22 February 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kulemesin_Yuriy_v_HKSAR_-DELIVERY OF CRUDE OIL CARGO FOR WHICH THERE WAS NO AVAILABLE MARKET: NEED TO ACCOUNT IN DAMAGES FOR REDUCED LOSS SUFFERED FOLLOWING EARLY CLOSING OUT OF HEDGED POSITION OF BUYER FOLLOWING ACCEPTANCE OF SELLER’S REPUDIATION_The_Neftegaz67]]'''
http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfa/2013/15.html
DMC/SandT/11/04'''COLLISION: OFFENCE OF ENDANGERING THE SAFETY OF OTHERS: STATE OF MIND REQUIRED FOR THE OFFENCE OF ENDANGERMENT: NARROW CHANNEL AS QUESTION OF FACT: SHIPPING AND PORT CONTROL ORDINANCE (CAP.313, LAWS OF HONG KONG)'''
'''English Court of Appeal'''
'''Röhlig (UK) Ltd v Rock Unique Ltd: Court of Appeal, Sedley, Moore-Bick and Aikens LJJ.: 20 January 2011: [2011] EWCA Civ 18:[[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk13/index.php/Röhlig_(UK)_v_Rock_Unique]]''' 07
'''INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE OF GOODS: BIFA CONDITIONS: WHETHER NO SET-OFF AND TIME BAR PROVISIONS REASONABLE UNDER UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS ACT 1977England'''
'''Bunge SA v Kyla Shipping Company Limited - The "Kyla"'''
DMC'''English High Court; Flaux J; [2012] EWHC 3522 (Comm); 10 December 2012:[[https:/SandT/11www.onlinedmc.co.uk/03index.php/Bunge_SA_v_Kyla_Shipping_Company_-_The_Athena]]
'''English Court of AppealNYPE 1946 CHARTERPARTY: H&M INSURANCE REQUIRED FOR AGREED FIGURE: CASUALTY REPAIRS EXCEED SHIP’S MARKET VALUE BUT NOT AGREED HULL VALUE: WHETHER CHARTERPARTY FRUSTRATED'''
'''KG Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft für Mineraloele mbH & Co v Petroplus Marketing AG (The “Mercini Lady”): English Court of Appeal: Maurice Kay, Rix and Patten LJJ: [2010] EWCA Civ 1145: 19 October 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/KG_Bominflot_v_Petroplus_Marketing]]'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEA: FOB ANTWERP SALE OF EU GASOIL WITH FREE DESTINATION: “SPECIAL” COMMON LAW IMPLIED TERMDMC/CONDITION: STATUTORILY IMPLIED CONDITIONS: WHETHER CARGO TO REMAIN ON-SPECIFICATION FOR A REASONABLE TIME FOLLOWING SHIPMENT: EFFECT OF EXCLUSION CLAUSE ON IMPLIED CONDITIONS: SECTION 14(2) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979'''SandT/13/06
'''England'''
DMC'''Kuwait Rocks Co v AMN Bulkcarriers Inc (The “Astra”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2013] EWHC 865 (Comm): 18 April 2013: [[https:/SandT/11www.onlinedmc.co.uk/02index.php/Kuwait_Rocks_Co_v_AMN_Bulkcarriers_The_Astra]] '''TIME CHARTER: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT REPUDIATORY: WHETHER OBLIGATION TO PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION: RIGHT TO CLAIM LOSS OF PROFIT FOR REPUDIATION OR BREACH OF HIRE PAYMENT OBLIGATION'''
'''Singapore'''
'''Singapore Court of Appeal'''DMC/SandT/13/05
'''The “Asia Star” [2010] SGCA 12: Judgment delivered by VK Rajah JA, 19 March 2010 [2010] SGCA 12[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Asia_Star]]“Decurion”'''
Kelvin Chia Partnership for the Appellant Shipowners'''Hong Kong'''
Shook Lin & Bok LLP for the Respondent Charteres'''Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Fok, Chu JJA and McWalters J: CACV No.97 of 2012: 12 May 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Decurion_on_Appeal]]'''
'''BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGOhttp: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: REQUIREMENT TO NOTIFY THE DEFAULTING PARTY OF INTENDED MEASURES IN MITIGATION'''//www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/2013/180.html
'''ADMIRALTY: IN REM JURISDICTION: CLAIM AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT: WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR IN CONTROL” OF CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 12B(4) OF HIGH COURT ORDINANCE'''
 DMC/SandT/1113/01 04
'''Germany'''
'''German Federal Supreme Court: Date of Judgement: 13 June 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CMR_Art.29_and_Contributory_Negligence]]'''
 
'''CMR TRANSPORT: APPLICATION OF ART. 29 CMR: BURDEN OF PROOF: REDUCTION OF UNLIMITED LIABILITY DUE TO CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE SENDER IF THE CARRIER IS NOT NOTIFIED OF AN UNEXPECTEDLY HIGH VALUE OF THE TRANSPORT GOODS'''
 
'''German Federal Supreme Court – Assessment of Damages under the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (‘CMR’): Date of Judgment: 30 September 2010'''[[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk13/index.php/Germany_CMR_Damages]] 03
'''CMR TRANSPORT: WILFUL MISCONDUCT: ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGESEngland'''
'''Dry Bulk Handy Holding Inc and Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Fayette International Holdings Ltd and Metinvest International SA (The “Bulk Chile”): English Commercial Court: Andrew Smith J: [2012] EWHC 2107 (Comm): 24 July 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dry_Bulk_Handling_&_CSAV_v_Fayette_International_&_Metinvest_-_The_Bulk_Chile]]'''
DMC/SandT/10/25'''CHAIN OF CHARTERPARTIES: HEAD TIME CHARTER, SUB-TIME CHARTER, TIME TRIP CHARTER AND VOYAGE CHARTER: OWNERS’ BILLS OF LADING: RIGHT TO INTERVENE IN COLLECTION OF FREIGHT: RIGHT TO LIEN SUB-FREIGHT AND SUB-HIRE: RIGHT TO HIRE OR REASONABLE REMUNERATION FOR COMPLETION OF VOYAGE FOLLOWING TERMINATION OF TIME CHARTER'''
'''England'''
'''Angara Maritime Ltd v Oceanconnect UK Ltd and Oceanconnect.com Inc (The “Fesco Angara”)[[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk13/index.php/Angara_Maritime_v_Oceanconnect_UK]]'''02
'''Queen’s Bench Division, London Mercantile Court: HHJ Mackie QC: [2010] EWHC 619 (QB): 29 March 2010England'''
'''SALE OF GOODS: BUNKERS/MARINE FUELS: S.25(1) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979: SALE OF BUNKERS TO TIME CHARTERERS: BUNKERS DELIVERED TO VESSEL: FAILURE BY TIME CHARTERERS TO PAY SUPPLIERS FOR BUNKERS: RIGHT OF SUPPLIERS TO SUE OWNERS IN CONVERSION AND/OR BAILMENT FOLLOWING PREMATURE REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY TIME CHARTERERS TO OWNERSWuhan Ocean Economic & Technical Cooperation Co Ltd v Schiffahrts-Gesellschaft “Hansa Murcia” MBH & Co KG'''
'''English Queen’s Bench (Commercial Court): Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 3104 (Comm): 6 November 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Wuhan_Ocean_v_Hansa_Murcia]]'''
DMC/SandT/10/26'''CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF VESSEL: ADDENDUM FOR SELLERS TO OBTAIN EXTENSION OF REFUND GUARANTEE: IMPLIED TERM TO OBTAIN EXTENSION WITHIN REASONABLE TIME BEFORE EXPIRY OF ORIGINAL GUARANTEE: INNOMINATE TERM: BUT BREACH OF IMPLIED TERM NOT A REPUDIATORY BREACH AS, UNDER THE TERMS OF THE GUARANTEE, BUYERS COULD MAINTAIN THE SECURITY BY COMMENCING ARBITRATION'''
'''England'''
'''Soufflet Negoce SA v Bunge SA'''DMC/SandT/13/01
'''English Germany''' '''German Federal Supreme Court of Appeal: Longmore, Wilson and Toulson LJJ: [2010] EWCA 1102: 13 October 2010[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Soufflet_Negoce_v_Bunge_SA]]'''
http'''"Und Adryatik"; Date of Judgement: 15 December 2011: [[https://www.bailiionlinedmc.orgco.uk/ewindex.php/cases/EWCA/Civ/2010/1102.htmlUnd_Adryatik]]'''
'''FOB CONTRACTCMR TRANSPORT: GAFTA 49 FORMAPPLICATION OF ART. 2 CMR: “IN READINESS TO LOAD”FIRE ON RO-RO-CARRIER: WHETHER THIS MEANS THAT VESSEL MUST BE “READY” TO LOAD IN A LAYTIME SENSEHAGUE RULES AS ‘CONDITIONS PRESCRIBED BY LAW’: RISK FIRE AS AN EVENT WHICH COULD ONLY HAVE OCCURRED BY REASON OF GOODS DAMAGED CARRIAGE BY UNCLEAN HOLDS ON BUYERSEA'''
DMC/SandT/1012/2425
'''England'''
'''Zodiac Maritime Agencies Limited E.D. & F. Man Sugar Ltd v Fortescue Metals Group LimitedUnicargo Transportgesellschaft mBh'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division English High Court (Commercial Court): David Steel Eder J: [20102012] EWHC 903 2879 (Comm): 28 April 2010'''23 October 2012:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Zodiac_Maritime_v_Fortescue_MetalsE_D_and_F_Man_v_Unicargo_Transport]]'''
'''CONSECUTIVE VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: WRONGFUL EARLY TERMINATION BY CHARTERERLAYTIME AND DEMURRAGE: DAMAGESDESTRUCTION OF CONVEYOR-BELT SYSTEM AT LOADING PORT BEFORE FIXTURE: DELAY IN BERTHING: NO OBLIGATION ON CHARTERERS TO NOMINATE A SECOND BERTH: WHETHER “AVAILABLE MARKET” WHEN CHARTERPARTY TERMINATEDDESTRUCTION DID NOT CONSTITUTE MECHANICAL BREAKDOWN: WHETHER SUBSEQUENT EMERGENCE ACT OF MARKET DURING THE BALANCE STATE-SPONSORED PORT AUTHORITY IN ORDINARY COURSE OF CHARTER PERIOD RELEVANT TO THE ASSESSMENT CARRYING OUT PORT OR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS DID NOT FALL WITHIN EXCEPTION OF DAMAGESGOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE'''
DMC/SandT/1012/2324
'''England'''
'''ENE 1 Kos Limited Carboex SA v Petroleo Brasileiro Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/ENE_1_Kos_Limited_v_Petrobas]]
'''English Court of Appeal (Civil): Longmore Lord Neuberger MR, Moore-Bick and Smith Toulson LJJ and Sir Mark Waller: [20102012] EWCA Civ 772838: 19 June 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_SA_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]] '''DEMURRAGE: CALCULATION OF LAYTIME: STRIKE EXCEPTION: STRIKE CAUSING CONGESTION AT PORT AND CHARTERED VESSELS DELAYED FROM BERTHING AS A RESULT: 6 July 2010PERIOD OF DELAY TO BE DISCOUNTED FROM CALCULATION OF LAYTIME SO LONG AS STRIKE WAS THE EFFECTIVE CAUSE OF DELAY'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SHIP WITHDRAWN FOR NON-PAYMENT OF HIRE WHILST LOADING CARGO: CARGO DISCHARGED BACK TO SHORE TWO DAYS LATER: WHETHER SHIPOWNER COULD CLAIM REMUNERATION AT MARKET RATE FOR STORING THE CARGO DURING THAT PERIOD: WHETHER REMUNERATION DUE UNDER IMPLIED TERM OR AS QUANTUM MERUIT: WHETHER DUE AS RIGHT CORRELATIVE TO DUTY OF LOOKING AFTER GOODS: WHETHER SHIPOWNER COULD RECOVER COSTS OF PROVIDING BAIL BOND'''
DMC/SandT/12/23
DMC/SandT/10/22'''Singapore'''
'''EnglandSingapore Court of Appeal''' '''The “Bunga Melati 5” [2012] SGCA 46: Judgment delivered by VK Rajah JA, 21st August 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Bunga_Melati_5]]
'''Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Sinochem Tianjin Import & Export Corp – the « Aconcagua»[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CSAV_v_Sinochem_the_Aconcagua]]''' '''English High Court: Christopher Clarke J.: [2009] EWHC 1880 (Comm); 24 July 2009''' '''BILLS OF LADING : SHIPMENT OF CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE IN CONTAINER: EXPLOSION AND FIRE: DANGEROUS GOODSADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO INDEMNITY UNDER ART.IV RULE 6 OF HAGUE RULES: STOWAGE OF CONTAINER IN PROXIMITY TO HEATED BUNKER TANK: WHETHER THIS CAUSED THE EXPLOSION: WHETHER THIS RENDERED VESSEL UNSEAWORTHY AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF A GOOD ARGUABLE CASE ON THE VOYAGEMERITS REQUIRED: WHETHER CARRIER COULD RELY ON DEFENCE OF ERROR IN MANAGEMENT OF THE SHIPVASILIY GOLOVNIN EXPLAINED'''
DMC/SandT/1012/2122
England'''Australia'''
'''Cosco Bulk Carrier Co 1. Jebsens International (Australia) Pty Ltd and Anor v Team-Up Owning Co Interfert Australia Pty Ltd – The “Saldanha”[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_v_Team-Up_Owning]]and Ors (2011) 112 SASR 297, 25 August 2011 (Anderson J)'''
'''English High Court: Gross 2. Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S v Beach Building & Civil Group Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 696, 29 June 2012 (Foster J.): 11 June 2010 [2010] EWHC 1340 [https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/_1._Jebsens_International_(CommAustralia)_v_Interfert_Australia:_2._Norden_A/S_v_Beach_Building_&_Civil_Group]]''' '''WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY A "SEA CARRIAGE DOCUMENT" FOR PURPOSES OF S.11 AUSTRALIAN CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1991'''
'''NYPE FORM CHARTERPARTY: PIRACY: WHETHER SHIP OFF-HIRE DURING DETENTION BY PIRATES: AVERAGE ACCIDENTS TO SHIP OR CARGO: DEFAULT OR DEFICIENCY OF MEN: ANY OTHER CAUSE PREVENTING THE FULL WORKING OF THE VESSEL'''
DMC/SandT/1012/2021
'''England'''
'''Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd TAOKAS NAVIGATION SA v North China Shipping Limited . KOMROWSKI BULK SHIPPING KG (M/V “North Prince”GMBH & CO)[[http://www; KENT LINE INTERNATIONAL LTD.onlinedmc.co.uk/indexv.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_North_China_Shipping]]SOLYM CARRIERS LTDTHE MV “PAIWAN WISDOM”'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial English High Court): David Steel ; Teare J: ; [20102012] EWHC 1692 1888 (Comm); 11 July 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Toakas_Navigation_v_Komrowski_Bulk_Shipping: 8 July 2010_Kent_Line_v_Solym_Carriers_-_The_Paiwan_Wisdom]]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYCONWARTIME 2004: WRONGFUL EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY SUB-CHARTERER OWNERS’ LIBERTY TO REJECT VOYAGE ORDERS: DAMAGES AS DIFFERENCE MATERIAL INCREASE IN RISK BETWEEN MARKET RATE OF HIRE CHARTERPARTY DATE AND CONTRACT RATE DATE OF HIREORDER NOT REQUIRED: DISPONENT SHIPOWNER’S EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL UNDER HEAD CHARTER IRRELEVANT UNLESS CAUSED BY SUB-CHARTERER’S REPUDIATION CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION'''
DMC/SandT/1012/1920
'''English High CourtEngland'''
'''Omak Maritime Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Co'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Omak_Maritime_v_Mamola_Challenger_Shipping]]
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial United Kingdom Supreme Court): Teare JLords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Sumption: [20102012] EWHC 2026 (Comm)UKSC 17, [2012] 2 WLR 976: 2 May 2012:[[https: 4 August 2010//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Petroleo_Brasiliero_v_ENE_Kos_1]]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: BREACH SHELLTIME 3 FORM: VESSEL WITHDRAWN FOR NON-PAYMENT OF CONTRACT BY CHARTERERHIRE WHILST LOADING: MARKET RATE LOSS OF HIRE HIGHER THAN CONTRACT RATE USE OF HIREVESSEL: EXPENSES INCURRED IN DISCHARGING CARGO BACK TO SHORE: WHETHER LOSS AND EXPENSE RECOVERABLE UNDER INDEMNITY CLAUSE: SHIPOWNER’S CLAIM FOR WASTED EXPENDITUREWHETHER RECOVERABLE AS RIGHT CORRELATIVE TO DUTY AS BAILEE TO LOOK AFTER GOODS: RELATION WITH PRINCIPLE IN ROBINSON V HARMAN'''WHETHER CHARTERERS’ ORDER TO LOAD AN EFFECTIVE CAUSE...
DMC/SandT/1012/1819
'''Hong Kong'''
'''The “Hua Tian Long”“Decurion”'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Hua_Tian_Long]]
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Stone Reyes J in Chambers: HCAJ No. 59141 of 2010: 4 May 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/2008: 23 April 2010'''index.php/The_Decurion]]
http'''ADMIRALTY://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000059_2008-70707.htmlIN REM JURISDICTION: CLAIM AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT: WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR IN CONTROL” OF CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 12B(4) OF HIGH COURT ORDINANCE'''
'''BREACH OF CONTRACT: DEFENDANT SHIPOWNER’S FAILURE TO PROVIDE VESSEL: CHINESE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT AS SHIPOWNER: CLAIM FOR SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND CROWN IMMUNITY: WAIVER AND SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION'''
DMC/SandT/12/18
DMC/SandT/10/17'''England'''
'''South AfricaEITZEN BULK A/S v. TTMI SARL - THE “BONNIE SMITHWICK”'''
'''The MV “Ioannis NK”'''English High Court; Eder J; [2012] EWHC 202 (Comm); 14 February 2012:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ioannis_N_KEitzen_Bulk_v_TTMI_-_The_Bonnie_Smithwick]]'''
'''The owner of the cargo lately laden on board the MV “Ioannis NK” v The Master and Crew & Others (AC 66SHELLTIME 4: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: “BUNKERS ON DELIVERY/2009)REDELIVERY” CLAUSE: MEANING OF ‘PRICE ACTUALLY PAID’'''
'''High Court of South Africa (Western Cape High Court, Cape Town) exercising its admiralty jurisdiction: Cleaver J.; 26 August 2009'''
'''EXAMINATION OF CREW FOR PURPOSE OF OBTAINING EVIDENCE WHERE DISPUTE SUBJECT TO FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS: EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER THE ADMIRALTY JURISIDICTION REGULATIONS ACT 1983: FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED: RIGHTS OF CREW MEMBERS FOLLOWING A CASUALTY'''DMC/SandT/12/17
'''Hong Kong'''
 
'''The “Marcatania”'''
 
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.138 of 2008: 2 December 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Marcatania]]'''
'''CONTRACT: AGREEMENT TO EXCHANGE SLOTS FOR USE: SLOTS ON VESSEL CHARTERED BY THIRD PARTY: FAILURE TO PAY HIRE: VESSEL WITHDRAWN BY SHIPOWNER: WHETHER SHIPOWNER OBLIGED TO ON-CARRY CARGO UNDER BAILMENT: WHETHER LIABLE IN CONVERSION FOR DELAY IN RELEASING CARGO'''  DMC/SandT/1012/16 '''England''' '''M.H. Progress Lines SA v Orient Shipping Rotterdam BV and other, The “Genius Star 1”''' '''English Queen’s Court (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2011] EWHC 3083 (Comm), [2012] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 222: 28 November 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/M_H_Progress_Lines_v_Orient_Shipping_-_The_Genius_Star_1]] '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SUB-CHARTER: CARGO CLAIM AGAINST SUB-CHARTERER: APPORTIONMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST CHARTERER AND SHIPOWNER UNDER INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996: DIFFERENT TIME BARS PROVIDED IN HEAD CHARTER AND INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT: APPLICABLE TIME BAR'''  DMC/SandT/12/15
'''England and Wales'''
'''Kolmar Group AG Sideridraulic Systems SpA v Traxpo Enterprises Pvt LimitedBBC Chartering & Logistics GmbH & Co KG''' [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kolmar_v_Traxpo]]
'''English High Queen’s Bench (Commercial Court): Andrew Smith J: [20102011] EWHC 113 3106 (Comm)''': 30 November 2011: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sideridraulic_Systems_v_BBC_Chartering_&_Logistics]
'''INTERNATIONAL SALE CARRIAGE OF GOODSBY SEA: FOB CONTRACTINTERPRETATION OF MASTER’S REMARK IN BILL OF LADING: ECONOMIC DURESS BY DEMANDING PAYMENT FOR LESSER AMOUNT OF GOODS AT HIGHER PRICE THAN AGREED WHETHER CARGO WAS DECK CARGO UNDER THE CONTRACTHAGUE-VISBY RULES: TORT OF INTIMIDATIONIF DECK CARGO, WHETHER PARTIES AGREED THAT HAGUE-VISBY RULES NEVERTHELESS APPLIED: DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACTWHETHER US COURTS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSE APPLIED'''
DMC/SandT/1012/1514
'''New ZealandEngland'''
'''Tasman Orient Line CV Isabella Shipowner SA v New Zealand China Clays Limited and others'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_%22Tasman_Pioneer%22]]'''Supreme Court of New Zealand Shagang Shipping Co Ltd (Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath and Wilson JJ)[2010] NZSC 37 (16 April 2010The “Aquafaith”)'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEAEnglish Commercial Court: SHIP DAMAGED BY GROUNDINGCooke J: SEAWATER ENTRY TO FORWARD COMPARTMENTS: DECK CARGO OF CONTAINERS DAMAGED BY INUNDATION: HAGUE-VISBY RULES: ART.IV RULE 2[2012] EWHC 1077 (aComm): DEFENCE OF ACT, NEGLECT OR DEFAULT OF THE MASTER… IN THE NAVIGATION OR MANAGEMENT OF THE SHIP26 April 2012: FAILURE TO NOTIFY AUTHORITIES OF CASUALTY[[https: FAILURE TO PROVIDE TIMELY AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO SHIP’S MANAGERS: CAUSE OF CASUALTY INITIALLY FABRICATED: ALL LEADING TO DELAY IN PROVISION OF SALVAGE SERVICES: WHETHER ELEMENT OF GOOD FAITH ESSENTIAL TO CARRIER’S ENTITLEMENT TO RULE 2(a) DEFENCE//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Isabella_Shipowner_v_Shagang_Shipping_The_Aquafaith]]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE FORM: RULE IN WHITE AND CARTER V MCGREGOR: WHETHER OWNERS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT PREMATURE RE-DELIVERY OF VESSEL BY CHARTERERS'''
DMC/SandT/10/14
'''English High Court'''DMC/SandT/12/13
'''Sylvia Shipping Co Limited v Progress Bulk Carriers Limited [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sylvia_Shipping_v._Progress_Bulk_Carriers]] [2010] EWHC 542 (Comm): English High Court of Justice - Commercial Court; Hamblen J.; 18 March 2010Hong Kong'''
'''ARBITRATION APPEAL: TIMECHARTERPARTY: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR OWNERS’ BREACH: WHETHER OWNERS LIABLE FOR TIMECHARTERERS’ LOSS OF PROFIT ON CANCELLED SUB-CHARTERA O Smith Electrical Products (Changzhou) Co Ltd v Blue Anchor Line & Ors'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: [2012] 1 HKLRD 301: 18 November 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/A_O_Smith_Electrical_Products_v_Blue_Anchor_Line_&_Ors]]
DMC/SandT/10/13'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: WAYBILL: LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: INTERPRETATION: GOVERNING LAW OF CARRIAGE: APPLICABLE LIMIT OF LIABILITY'''
'''Hong Kong Special Administrative Region'''
'''Maintek Computer (Suzhou) Co Ltd and others v Blue Anchor Line and others'''[[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk12/index.php/Maintek_Computer_v_ECT_Delta_Terminal]]12
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Reyes J in Chambers: HCAJ No. 106/2008: 25 February 2010[http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000106_2008-69910.html]Malaysia'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY BY OCEAN TERMINAL: SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: REAL PROSPECT OF SUCCESS: LIMITATION CLAUSE: MEANING OF ‘DELIVERY’: STAY IN FAVOUR OF ARBITRATION: APPLICABILITY OF TERMINAL CONTRACTSarawak Shell Berhad v South Sumatra Richfield Marine Pte Ltd (The “Red Gold”)'''
'''Malaysian Court of Appeal: Sulaiman Bin Daud JCA, Syed Ahmad Helmy Bin Syed Ahmad JCA and Anantham Kasinather JCA: 19 March 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sarawak_Shell_v_South_Sumatra_Richfield_Marine_-_The_Red_Gold]]'''
DMC/SandT/10/12'''ADMIRALTY: COLLISION BETWEEN OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSEL AND FIXED OFFSHORE OIL PLATFORM: RIGHT OF VESSEL OWNERS TO LIMIT LIABILITY: WHETHER COLLISION CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE OF OWNERS IN THE NAVIGATION OR MANAGEMENT OF VESSEL: WHETHER VESSEL OWNERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY DUE TO ABSENCE OF ACTUAL FAULT OR PRIVITY: MERCHANT SHIPPING ORDINANCE 1952 SECTION 360 VIZ. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CONVENTION 1957'''
'''The Netherlands'''
'''Maersk B.V., formerly “P&O Nedlloyd” and before that called Nedlloyd Lijnen B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands v. Irano European Co. Ireco S.A., Luxembourg - The “Dolphin I”[[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk12/index.php/The_Dolphin_1]]'''11
'''Court of Appeal of The Hague (The Netherlands). J.M. van der Klooster, J.E.H.M. Pickaers, J.H.J. Teunissen, 29 September 2009, Case number 105.002.543/01 (unpublished)England'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: HAGUE RULES: RECEIVED FOR SHIPMENT BILL OF LADING: CARGO DAMAGE: PERISHABLE GOODS: GROSS NEGLIGENCE: CARRIER’S KNOWLEDGE OF GOODS IN CONTAINERS: ‘BEFORE AND AFTER’ CLAUSE: LIMITATION OF APPLICABILITY OF CONTRACTUAL CLAUSES: REASONABLENESS AND FAIRNESSOsmium Shipping Corporation v Cargill International SA (The “Captain Stefanos”)'''
'''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 571 (Comm): 13 March 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Osmium_Shipping_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Captain_Stefanos]]
DMC'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE (1946) FORM INCORPORATING CONWARTIME 2004: WHETHER VESSEL WAS OFF-HIRE DURING PERIOD OF HIJACKING BY SOMALI PIRATES: WHETHER RIDER CLAUSE PROVIDING FOR OFF-HIRE DURING “CAPTURE/SandT/10/11SEIZURE” WAS QUALIFIED BY THE PHRASE “BY ANY AUTHORITY”: WHETHER CONWARTIME 2004 CLAUSE QUALIFIED OFF-HIRE RIDER CLAUSE'''
'''High Court of England and Wales'''
'''Sotrade Denizcilik Sanayi Ve Ticaret AS v Amadou LO and others (The “Duden”)[[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk12/index.php/The_Duden_2008_EWHC_2762_Comm]]'''10
'''Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court): Jonathan Hirst, Q.C.: [2008] EWHC 2762 (Comm); [2009] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 145: 19 November 2008England'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: CHARTERPARTY: LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED IN BILLS OF LADING: CONSERVATORY ARREST BY CARGO OWNER AND INSURER: JURISDICTION: ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION: WRONGFUL INDUCEMENT OR PROCUREMENT OF BREACH OF EXPRESS AND IMPLIED TERMS OF BILL OF LADING CONTRACT: REFUSAL TO ACCEPT PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY CLUB UNDERTAKINGProgress Bulk Carriers Limited v Tube City IMS LLC (The “Cenk Kaptanoglu”)'''
'''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm): 17 February 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Progress_Bulk_Carriers_v_Tube_City_IMS_-_The_Cenk_Kaptanoglu]]'''
DMC/SandT/10/10 '''Singapore High CourtVOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: WHETHER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT VOIDABLE FOR DURESS: WHETHER OWNERS’ CONDUCT, ALTHOUGH NOT ILLEGAL, AMOUNTED TO “ILLEGITIMATE PRESSURE”'''
'''The “Asia Star”''' [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Asia_Star]][2009] SGHC 91'''
'''Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 17 April 2009 '''[2009] SGHC 91'''DMC/SandT/12/09
'''BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: PLAINTIFF NOT REQUIRED TO INCUR EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSE OR TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS IN ORDER TO MITIGATE LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGOEngland'''
'''Acergy Shipping Ltd v. Société Bretonne De Réparation Navale SAS'''
DMC'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: [2011] EWHC 2490 (Comm): 5 October 2011: [[https:/SandT/10www.onlinedmc.co.uk/09index.php/Acergy_Shipping_v_Société_Bretonne_de_Réparation_Navale]]
'''English High Court''']]'''Kallang Shipping SA Panama v AXA Assurances Senegal and Comptoir Commercial Mandiaye Ndiaya (The “Kallang”)[[httpCONTRACT FOR PROVISION OF REPAIR SERVICES TO VESSEL://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Kallang]]FIRE CAUSING DAMAGE BEYOND REPAIR WORK UNDERTAKEN: INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT: SCOPE OF INDEMNITY CONTAINED THEREIN'''
'''Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court): Jonathan Hirst, Q.C.: [2008] EWHC 2761 (Comm); [2009] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 124: 19 November 2008'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: CHARTERPARTY: LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED IN BILLS OF LADING: IMPLIED TERMS: ARREST BY CARGO OWNER AND INSURER: SECURITY: JURISDICTION: WRONGFUL INDUCEMENT OR PROCUREMENT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT: PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY CLUB: LETTERS OF UNDERTAKING'''DMC/SandT/12/08
DMC/SandT/10/08'''England'''
'''SingaporeGeofizika DD v. MMB International Limited and Greenshields Cowie & Co Ltd: “The Green Island”'''
TAT SENG MACHINE MOVERS PTE LTD V. ORIX LEASING SINGAPORE LTD:'''English Court of Appeal; Lord Neuberger, Thomas LJ, and Sir Nicholas Wall; [2010] EWCA Civ 459, [20092010] SGCA 42 2 Lloyds Rep 1; 28 April 2010: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Tat_Seng_Machine_Movers_v_Orix_LeasingGeofizika_v_MMB_International_-_The_Green_Island]]
'''Singapore Court of AppealINCOTERMS 2000 CIP: Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA, Chao Hick Tin JA, V K Rajah JACARRIAGE ON DECK: 11 September 2009OBLIGATIONS OF FREIGHT FORWARDER: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: CAUSATION'''
'''BAILMENT – BAILOR’S RIGHT TO IMMEDIATE RIGHT TO POSSESSION IF BAILEE’S BEHAVIOUR REPUGNANT TO TERMS OF BAILMENT – WHETHER CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS RESTRICTED BAILOR’S RIGHTS UNDER COMMON LAW'''
'''TORT – CONVERSION – WHETHER ACT OF REMOVING MACHINE FROM PREMISES AND DELIVERING IT AS INSTRUCTED AMOUNTED TO CONVERSION OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF STORING MACHINE AT WAREHOUSE AMOUNTED TO CONVERSION OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF REDELIVERING MACHINE TO PURPORTED OWNER AMOUNTED TO CONVERSION OF MACHINE''' DMC/SandT/12/07
'''England'''
'''Hyundai Merchant Marine Company Limited v Trafigura Beheer BV (The “Gaz Energy”)'''
DMC'''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2011] EWHC 3108 (Comm): 29 November 2011:[[https:/SandT/10www.onlinedmc.co.uk/7index.php/Hyundai_Merchant_Marine_v_Trafigura_-_the_Gas_Energy]]
'''Hong KongTIME CHARTER: SPEED AND PERFORMANCE WARRANTY: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF CHARTER: WHETHER SPEED AND PERFORMANCE AN “ALL WEATHERS” WARRANTY OR LIMITED TO “MAXIMUM WIND FORCE 4 ON BEAUFORT SCALE”'''
'''The “Blue Bridge” (formerly known as The “Great Power”)''' [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Blue_Bridge]]
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Reyes J in Chambers: HCAJ No. 136DMC/1999: 1 February 2010'''SandT/12/06
http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000136_1999-69593.html'''The “Oriental Baltic”'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEASingapore High Court: SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED INTO AGAINST A SHIPOWNING COMPANY THAT HAD BEEN DISSOLVEDTan Lee Meng J : APPLICATION BY RE-INSURER TO INTERVENE[2011] 3 SGHC 75: AUTHORITY TO ACT FOR PRINCIPAL IN LITIGATION[[https: DELAY IN APPLICATION TO INTERVENE: REAL PROSPECT OF SUCCESS'''//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Oriental_Baltic]]
'''OWNERS OF VESSEL UNDER VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION: IN REM PROCEEDINGS AGAINST VESSEL COMMENCED AFTER LIQUIDATION: PLAINTIFF FILED CAVEAT AGAINST RELEASE AGAINST VESSEL PRIOR TO LIQUIDATION: ACTION AGAINST COMPANY UNDER LIQUIDATION ORDINARILY STAYED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT: WHETHER LEAVE SHOULD BE GRANTED TO PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE WITH ITS ACTION'''
DMC/SandT/10/06
'''Singapore'''DMC/SandT/12/05
'''The “Catur Samudra”England''' [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Catur_Samudra]]
'''Singapore High Court: Judgment delivered by Steven Chong JC, 15 January 2010: [2010] SGHC 18Thai Maparn Trading Co Ltd v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd (The “Med Salvador” and “Goa”)'''
'''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION English Commercial Court: WHETHER CLAIM UNDER GUARANTEE IS A CLAIM “ARISING OUT OF AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE USE OR HIRE” OF A VESSEL Beatson J: SECTION 3[2011] EWHC 2494 (1Comm)(H) HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACT: 4 October 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thai_Maparn_Trading_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]]'''
'''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: FOB CONTRACT: WHETHER BUYERS IN BREACH OF CONDITION PRECEDENT IN CONTRACT BY FAILING TO ISSUE 7 DAY ETA OF VESSEL: WHETHER SELLERS IN REPUDIATORY/RENUNCIATORY BREACH BY REJECTING BUYERS’ NOTICE AND STATING THAT CARGO WOULD NOT BE READY IN TIME'''
DMC/SandT/10/04
'''Hong Kong'''DMC/SandT/12/04
'''Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc v The Owners and/or Demise Charterers of the Ship or Vessel “Asian Atlas” ([[The “Asian Atlas”)]]England'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Pacific Basin IHX Limited v Bulkhandling Handymax AS (The “Triton Lark”): English Commercial Court of Appeal: Ma CJHC, Stone and Reyes JJTeare J: [2011] EWHC 2868 (Comm): CACV No. 257 of 20078 November 2011: 23 April 2008 ([2008] 3 HKLRD 604; [httphttps://www.hkliionlinedmc.orgco.uk/hkindex.php/jud/eng/hkca/2008/CACV000257_2007-60848.htmlPacific_Basin_v_Bulkhandling_Handymax,_the_Triton_Lark]]'''
'''ACTION TIME CHARTER: PIRACY RISKS IN GULF OF ADEN IN REM UNDER HK HIGH COURT ORDINANCE, S.12A(2)(e)2008: CONWARTIME 1993/2004 CLAUSE: WARRANT ARBITRATION APPEAL: SECTION 69 OF ARRESTARBITRATION ACT 1996: CORRECT TEST FOR “ANY CLAIM ASSESSING RISK OF PIRACY INCIDENT OCCURING FOR DAMAGE DONE PURPOSE OF 1993/2004 CLAUSE: WHETHER OWNERS DEVIATED BY A SHIP”: SETTING ASIDE: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE REROUTING VESSEL VIA CAPE OF GOOD HOPE INSTEAD OF GULF OF FACTS RELATING TO JURISDICTIONADEN'''
DMC/SandT/1012/03
'''Hong KongEngland'''
'''Cheong Yuk Fai Emeraldian Limited Partnership v Wellmix Shipping Limited and another v China International Freight Forwarders Guangzhou Iron & Steel Corporation Limited (HKThe “Vine”) Ltd'''
'''English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2010] EWHC 1411 (Comm): 17 June 2010:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cheong_Yuk_Fai_and_another_v_China_International_Freight_Forwarders_(HK)_LtdEmeraldian_Limited_v_Wellmix_Shipping,_the_Vine]]'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of Appeal'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: Cheung and Yuen JJA and A Chung JWHETHER VESSEL’S OBLIGATION TO OBTAIN CLEARANCE BY PORT AUTHORITIES BEFORE GIVING NOTICE OF READINESS WAIVED FOR PURPOSE OF COMMENCEMENT OF LAYTIME: CACV No. 463 of 2002WHETHER CHARTERERS COULD RELY ON EXCEPTIONS TO RUNNING OF LAYTIME: 26 January 2005WHETHER CHARTERERS IN BREACH OF SAFE PORT WARRANTY: [2005] 4 HKLRD 544 (English translation; judgment handed down in Chinese)WHETHER DEMURRAGE RECOVERABLE FOR DETENTION OF VESSEL'''
http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkca/2005/CACV000463X_2002-47015.html
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS: CLAIM AGAINST CARRIER FOR WRONGFUL DELIVERY OF GOODS: CONVERSION: LIMITATION UNDER HAGUE-VISBY RULES AND BILL OF LADING'''DMC/12/02
'''England'''
DMC/SandT/10/02 '''ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED v. ALBEMARLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and ALBEMARLE CORPORATION'''
'''German Federal Supreme English High Court; Flaux J; [2011] EWHC 1574 (Comm); 21 June 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Astrazeneca_UK_v_Albemarle_International]]'''
'''Date of JudgementCONTRACT: 18 June 2009CLAUSES GRANTING THE RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL: Case Reference 1ZR 140/06:[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Case_Reference:_1_ZR_140/06]EXCLUSION CLAUSES AND DELIBERATE BREACH'''
'''CARRIER’S LIABILITY: BREAKING THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: SUB-CONTRACTING'''
DMC/SandT/12/01
DMC/SandT/10/01'''The Netherlands'''
'''Furtrans Denzilick Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS (“Furtrans”) v Augusta Due Srl (“Augusta”): The Netherlands Supreme Court"Constanza M”'''
'''Nile Dutch Africa Line B.V, Rotterdam, Supreme Court of the Netherlands (“NDAL”“SCN”) v. (1summary proceedings) Delta Lloyd Schadeverzekering N: Vice-President J.VB., Rotterdam, Fleers as Chairman and the Netherlands (“Delta Lloyd”)judges A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, (2) Premium Tobacco Investments NF.VB.Bakels, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (“Tobacco”), (3) MC. Meerapfel Söhne AE.Drion and G.Snijders LJN:BT2708, BaselDecember 9, Switzerland (“Meerapfel”) and (4) CETAC, Douala, Cameroon (“Cetac”) - The “NDS Provider” ''' '''2011:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_%E2%80%9CNDS_Provider%E2%80%9DFurtrans_v_Augusta,_the_Constanza_M]]'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA UNDER BILL OF LADING: HAGUE VISBY RULES: LIABILITY FOR DEFECTIVE CONTAINERS SUPPLIED BY CARRIER: PACKAGING OR PART CONSTRUCTION OF ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE VESSEL? INTERPRETATION ARREST OF TREATIES UNDER DUTCH LAWSEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''
Retrieved from ‘https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php?title=Special:MobileDiff/686...1434’

Navigation menu