Changes

From DMC
Jump to: navigation, search

Shipping & Transport

22,978 bytes added, 17:09, 8 October 2018
no edit summary
[[Main Page]] - [[Admiralty]] - [[Carriage of Goods]] - [[Other Cases]] - [[Time CDMC/P Disputes]] - [[Voyage CSandT/P Disputes]]18/07
'''England''' '''Troy Maritime SA v Clearlake Shipping Pte Ltd''' '''English Commercial Court: Butcher J.: [2018] EWHC 2310 (Comm): 31 July 2018:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Troy_Maritime_v_Clearlake_Shipping]] '''DEVIATION FROM THE CONTRACT VOYAGE: WHETHER DEVIATION REASONABLE IN ALL THE CIRCUMSTANCES: FINDING OF FACT BY ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL: WHETHER COURT BOUND BY THAT FINDING'''  DMC/SandT/18/06 England '''Dera Commercial Estate v Derya Inc (The“SUR”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Carr J.: 13 July 2018: [2018] EWHC 1673 (Comm)[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dera_Commercial_Estate_v_Derya_Inc_-_The_Sur]]''' '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: HAGUE RULES: WHETHER GEOGRAPHIC DEPARTURE [‘DEVIATION’] FROM THE AGREED VOYAGE CONSTITUTED A ‘FUNDAMENTAL BREACH OF CONTRACT’: WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO RELY ON ONE-YEAR TIME LIMIT IN ARTICLE 3 RULE 6'''  DMC/SandT/18/05 England '''Agile Holdings Corporation (Claimant) v Essar Shipping Ltd (Defendant):''' '''English Commercial Court: Judge Waksman QC: [2018] EWHC 1055 (Comm): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Agile_Holdings_v_Essar_Shipping_-_The_Maria]]''' '''FOR CHARTERERS TO OBTAIN A 50/50 APPORTIONMENT FOR CARGO LIABILITY BETWEEN THEMSELVES AND THE OWNERS ON GROUNDS OF THE FIRST PROVISO TO CLAUSE 8(B) OF THE INTER- CLUB NEW YORK PRODUCE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT 1996 (THE “INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT" OR "ICA”), THE CHARTERPARTY MUST CONTAIN A PROVISION WHICH IS CLEARLY INTENDED TO PASS COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARGO HANDLING TO THE SHIPOWNERS. A PARTIAL TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY, OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR A PARTICULAR ASPECT OF CARGO HANDLING (SUCH AS STOWAGE), WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO ENGAGE THE ICA 8(B) PROVISO. '''  DMC/SandT/18/04 England '''Glencore Energy UK Ltd v OMV Supply & Trading Ltd (The “Seagrace”)'''/ '''English Commercial Court: Sir Ross Cranston: [2018] EWHC 895 (Comm): 23 April 2018: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_v_OMV_Supply_and_Trading_-_The_Seagrace]]''' '''CFR SALES CONTRACT: BP CFR SALES TERMS: BPVOY4 FORM: VESSEL WAITING OFFSHORE EN ROUTE TO PORT OF DISCHARGE AT REQUEST OF BUYERS: SELLERS CLAIM FOR DETENTION BASED ON IMPLIED CONTRACT: WHETHER CLAIM FOR WAITING OFFSHORE WAS A DEMURRAGE CLAIM: WHETHER CLAIM TIME-BARRED DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DEMURRAGE CLAIMS PRESENTATION CLAUSE DEADLINE'''  DMC/SandT/18/03 England '''Lukoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Ocean Tankers Pte Ltd (The “Ocean Neptune”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2018] EWHC 163 (Comm): 2 February 2018:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Asia_Pacific_v_Ocean_Tankers_-_The_Ocean_Neptune]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: EXXONMOBILVOY 2005 FORM: LITASCO CLAUSES: DEMURRAGE CLAIM PRESENTATION TIME-BAR REQUIRING DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF CLAIM TO BE PRESENTED TO CHARTERERS WITHIN 90 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF CARGO DISCHARGE: WHETHER CLAIM FOR TIME LOST WAITING FOR ORDERS TIME-BARRED DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DOCUMENT PRESENTATION REQUIREMENT: APPEAL FROM PARTIAL FINAL AWARD UNDER SECTION 69 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996'''    DMC/SandT/18/02 England  '''Kyokuyo Co Ltd v AP Møller-Maersk A/S, trading as “Maersk Line”'''  '''English High Court – Commercial Court: Mr Justice Andrew Baker: [2017] EWHC 654 (Comm): 29 March 2017: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kyokuyo_v_AP_Møller-Maersk_-_trading_as_Maersk_Line]] '''LIMITATION OF LIABILITY UNDER HAGUE/HAGUE-VISBY RULES: WHETHER LIMITATION APPLIED TO EACH SEPARATE PACKAGE/UNIT DAMAGED OR TO TOTAL NUMBER OF PACKAGES/UNITS'''  DMC/SandT/18/01 England '''CSSA Chartering and Shipping Services S.A. v Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd (The “Pacific Voyager”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2017] EWHC 2579 (Comm): 18 October 2017: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CSSA_Chartering_and_Shipping_Services_v_Mitsui_O.S.K._Lines_-_The_Pacific_Voyager]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: SHELLVOY 5 FORM: WHETHER OBLIGATION ON OWNER TO GET THE VESSEL TO THE LOADING PORT WITHIN A CERTAIN TIME: WHETHER SUCH AN OBLIGATION IS ABSOULTE OR ONLY ONE OF DUE DILIGENCE: WHETHER LAYCAN EQUIVALENT TO AN ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL OR READINESS TO LOAD DATE'''  DMC/SandT/17/14 England '''Glencore International AG v MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.'''  '''English Court of Appeal; Lewison and Henderson LJJ, Sir Christopher Clarke; [2017] EWCA Civ 365; 24 May 2017:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_International_v_MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company]]''' '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY OF CARGO: MEANING OF “DELIVERY ORDER": ELECTRONIC RELEASE SYSTEMS IN OPERATION AT PORT OF DISCHARGE: WHETHER A RELEASE NOTE CONTAINING PIN CODES CONSTITUTED A DELIVERY ORDER: WHETHER CONSIGNEE ESTOPPED BY PREVIOUS USE OF ERS SYSTEM'''  DMC/SandT/17/13 England '''Navalmare UK Limited v Kale Maden Hammaddeler Sanayi ve Ticart AS (The “Arundel Castle”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Knowles J: [2017] EWHC 116 (Comm): 31 January 2017: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Navalmare_UK_v_Kale_Maden_Hammaddeler_Sanayi_ve_Ticart_-_The_Arundel_Castle]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: MEANING OF “PORT LIMITS”: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''  DMC/SandT/17/12 Singapore  '''DSA Consultancy (FZC) v The “Eurohope”'''  '''Singapore High Court; Chua Lee Ming J; [2017] SGHC 218: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSA_Consultancy_(FZC)_v_The_Eurohope]] '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: ARREST TO OBTAIN SECURITY IN AID OF FOREIGN COURT PROCEEDINGS'''  DMC/SandT/17/11 Canada '''De Wolf Maritime Safety BV v Traffic-Tech International Inc. (The “Zagora”)'''  '''Federal Court, Ontario: Madam Justice St-Louis; 2017 FC 23: 11January 2017:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/De_Wolf_Maritime_Safety_v_Traffic-Tech_International_-_The_Zagora]]''' '''HAGUE-VISBY RULES: WHETHER CARGO CARRIED ON-DECK UNDECLARED AMOUNTED TO “GOODS” AS DEFINED IN THE RULES: WHETHER A CARRIER COULD RELY ON THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO GOODS CARRIED ON-DECK WITHOUT AUTHORISATION'''  DMC/SandT/17/10 England  '''Transgrain Shipping (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Yangtze Navigation (Hong Kong) Co Ltd.''''''English Commercial Court: Teare J: (2016) EWHC 3122 (Comm): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Transgrain_Shipping_(Singapore)_v_Yangtze_Navigation_(Hong_Kong)]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY (TIME): NYPE INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996, CLAUSE 8(D): WHETHER “ACT” REQUIRES FAULT'''   DMC/SandT/17/09 Singapore '''The “Posidon” and another matter'''  '''Singapore High Court; Belinda Ang Saw Ean J; [2017] SGHC 138:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Posidon]] '''CLAIMS AGAINST SHIP SALE PROCEEDS: PRIORITIES: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH ESTABLISHED ORDER OF PRIORITIES MAY BE DEPARTED FROM: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH NECESSARIES CLAIM MAY RANK ABOVE MORTGAGEE’S CLAIM: WHETHER REQUIREMENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF NATURE AND EXTENT OF EXPENDITURE DIFFERS FOR DIFFERENT KINDS OF NECESSARIES CLAIMS'''  DMC/SandT/17/08 England '''Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The “New Flamenco”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hodge SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 43: 28 June 2017:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-_The_New_Flamenco_-_Supreme_Court_Decision]]''' '''TIME CHARTER: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM: WHETHER CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''  DMC/SandT/17/07 England '''Gard Marine & Energy Ltd v China National Chartering Co Ltd and another/China National Chartering Co Ltd v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another/Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another (The “Ocean Victory”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Hodge and Toulson SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 35: 10 May 2017:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gard_Marine_%26_Energy_v_China_National_Chartering_-_The_Ocean_Victory]] '''DEMISE CHARTERPARTY: TIME CHARTERPARTY: CONTACT WITH BREAKWATER AND GROUNDING AT PORT RESULTING IN CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS AND WRECK REMOVAL OF VESSEL: WHETHER LOSS CAUSED BY BREACH OF SAFE PORT UNDERTAKING OR BY AN ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE: WHETHER SUBROGATED RIGHTS OF HULL INSURERS AND INSURED LOSSES OF OWNERS AGAINST DEMISE CHARTERERS PRECLUDED BY DEMISE CHARTERPARTY TERMS: WHETHER TIME CHARTERERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY AGAINST HULL INSURERS AND OWNERS: BARECON 89 FORM: MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT 1995: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976  DMC/SandT/17/06 England '''Bahamas Oil Refining Company International Limited v Cape Bari Tankschiffahrts GmbH & Co KG (The “Cape Bari”)''' '''Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson SCJJ: [2016] UKPC 20: 19 July 2016:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bahamas_Oil_Refining_Company_v_Cape_Bari_Tankschiffahrts_-_The_Cape_Bari]]''' '''CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH: COLLISION BETWEEN VESSEL AND BERTH: WHETHER – UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH - VESSEL CAN CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE STATUTORY RIGHT TO LIMIT LABILITY: WHETHER UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE VESSEL DID CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE RIGHT TO LIMIT: MERCHANT SHIPPING (MARITIME CLAIMS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY) ACT 1989 OF THE BAHAMAS: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976'''  DMC/SandT/17/05 England '''Oldendorff GmbH & Co KG v Sea Powerful II Special Maritime Enterprises (The “Zagora”)'''  '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Mr Justice Teare: [2016] EWHC 3212; 15 December 2016:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oldendorff_GmbH_v_Sea_Powerful_II_Special_Maritime_Enterprises_The_Zagora]]''' '''LETTER OF INDEMNITY: WHETHER THE DISCHARGE PORT AGENT WAS ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE SHIPOWNERS OR THE PERSON NAMED IN THE LETTER OF INDEMNITY AS THE PERSON TO WHOM DELIVERY OF THE CARGO WAS TO BE MADE'''  DMC/SandT/17/04 England '''MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Cottonex Anstalt''' '''Court of Appeal; Moore-Bick and Tomlinson LJJ, Keehan J.; [2016] EWCA Civ 789; 27 July 2016:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company_v_Cottonex_Anstalt]] '''CONTAINER DEMURRAGE: FRUSTRATION: REPUDIATION AND LEGITIMATE INTEREST: GOOD FAITH: PENALTIES'''  DMC/SandT/17/03 England  '''SPAR SHIPPING AS v GRAND CHINA LOGISTICS HOLDING (GROUP) CO LTD (THE “SPAR CAPELLA”, “SPAR VEGA” AND “SPAR DRACO”)''' '''Court of Appeal; Sir Terence Etherton MR, Gross and Hamblen LJJ; [2016] EWCA Civ 982; 7 October 2016:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Spar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics_Holding_Group]]''' '''NYPE 1993 FORM TIME CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ DUTY TO PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION OR AN INNOMINATE TERM: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY BREACH OF THE TIME CHARTER'''  DMC/SandT/17/02 England  '''Volcafe Ltd and Others v Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA (trading as “CSAV”)'''  '''English Court of Appeal: Gloster LJ, King LJ and Flaux J: (2016) EWCA Civ 1103: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Volcafe_&_Ors_v_Compania_Sud_Americana_de_Vapores_-_CSAV]]'''  '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: CONSIGNMENTS OF BAGGED COFFEE BEANS IN CONTAINERS CARRIED ON LCL/FCL TERMS: CARGO DAMAGED BY CONDENSATION: TEMPORAL SCOPE OF HAGUE RULES: BURDEN OF PROOF: WHETHER CARRIER FAILED PROPERLY AND CAREFULLY TO LOAD AND CARRY THE GOODS: WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO RELY ON “INHERENT VICE” EXCEPTION: WHETHER DAMAGE INEVITABLE: HAGUE RULES, ARTICLE III RULE 2 AND ARTICLE IV RULE 2(M)'''   DMC/SandT/17/01 England '''ST Shipping & Transport INC v Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA (The “Kriti Filoxenia”)''' '''High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Mr Justice Walker; [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm); 14 May 2015''' '''CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ RIGHT TO CANCEL THE CHARTERPARTY PURSUANT TO THE LAYCAN PROVISION SURIVIVES A RE-NOMINATION OF THE LOAD PORT'''  DMC/SandT/16/07 England '''FSL-9 Pte Ltd and Nordic Tankers Trading A/S v Norwegian Hull Club (The “FSL New York”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Blair J: [2016] EWHC 1091 (Comm): 10 May 2016: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/FSL-9_Pte_&_Nordic_Tankers_Trading_v_Norwegian_Hull_Club_-_The_FSL_New_York]] '''LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: P&I CLUB: WHETHER CLAIMANT OWNERS COULD APPLY TO HIGH COURT TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT P&I CLUB TO INCREASE LEVEL OF SECURITY AVAILABLE UNDER A LETTER OF UNDERTAKING ISSUED BY THE CLUB TO OWNERS: MEANING OF “LIBERTY TO APPLY” IN LETTER OF UNDERTAKING SUBJECT TO ENGLISH LAW AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF HIGH COURT IN LONDON'''  DMC/SandT/16/06
'''England'''
'''Osmium Shipping Corporation NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NY v Cargill International SA (, The “Captain Stefanos”)“Global Santosh”'''
'''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: ; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Toulson; [20122016] EWHC 571 (Comm): 13 March 2012UKSC 20; 11 May 2016: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Osmium_Shipping_v_Cargill_International_NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Captain_Stefanos]_the_Global_Santosh_Supreme_Court_Decision]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE (1946) FORM INCORPORATING CONWARTIME 2004: WHETHER VESSEL WAS OFF-HIRE DURING PERIOD CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF HIJACKING BY SOMALI PIRATESVESSEL: WHETHER RIDER CLAUSE PROVIDING FOR OFFACTS OF RECEIVERS AND SUB-HIRE DURING “CAPTURE/SEIZURE” WAS QUALIFIED BY CHARTERERS WERE TO BE CONSIDERED “DEFAULT OF THE PHRASE “BY ANY AUTHORITY”: WHETHER CONWARTIME 2004 CLAUSE QUALIFIED OFF-HIRE RIDER CLAUSECHARTERERS OR THEIR AGENTS”'''
DMC/SandT/1216/1005
'''England'''
'''Progress Bulk Carriers PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v OW Bunker Malta Limited v Tube City IMS LLC (The “Cenk Kaptanoglu”)& ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''English Commercial Supreme Court: Cooke J: ; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Hughes, Toulson; [20122016] EWHC 273 (Comm): 17 February 2012UKSC 23, 11 May 2016:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Progress_Bulk_Carriers_v_Tube_City_IMS_PST_Energy_7__Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_-_The_Cenk_Kaptanoglu_The_Res_Cogitans]]'''
'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE; GOODS CONTEMPLATED TO BE CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED; SALE OF GOODS ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: WHETHER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT VOIDABLE FOR DURESS: WHETHER OWNERS’ CONDUCT, ALTHOUGH NOT ILLEGAL, AMOUNTED TO “ILLEGITIMATE PRESSURE”1979 INAPPLICABLE; COMMENTS ON POSITION IF SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 APPLIED'''
DMC/SandT/1216/0904
'''England'''
'''Acergy Shipping Crescendo Maritime Co. & Alpha Bank AE v Bank of Communications Co Ltd v& Ors. Société Bretonne De Réparation Navale SAS'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial English High Court): David Steel ; Teare J: ; [20112015] EWHC 2490 3364 (Comm): 5 October 2011, 25 November 2015: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Acergy_Shipping_v_Société_Bretonne_de_Réparation_NavaleCrescendo_Maritime_&_Alpha_Bank_v_Bank_of_Communications_&_Ors]]'''
'''BACK-DATED SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT FOR PROVISION : REFUND GUARANTEES: ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: ACTION COMMENCED IN CHINESE COURTS BY A PARTY TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: BREACH OF REPAIR SERVICES TO VESSELARBITRATION AGREEMENT: FIRE CAUSING DAMAGE BEYOND REPAIR WORK UNDERTAKENWHETHER AN ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED: INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT: SCOPE OF INDEMNITY CONTAINED THEREINWHETHER CHINESE PROCEEDINGS A COLLATERAL ATTACK ON ARBITRATION AWARD'''
DMC/SandT/1216/0803
'''England'''
'''Geofizika DD v. MMB International Limited and Greenshields Cowie SBT Star Bulk & Tankers (Germany) GmbH & Co Ltd: “The Green Island”KG v Cosmotrade SA (The “Wehr Trave”)'''
'''English Commercial Court of Appeal; Lord Neuberger, Thomas LJ, and Sir Nicholas Wall; : Eder J: [20102016] EWCA Civ 459, [2010] 2 Lloyds Rep 1; 28 April 2010EWHC 583 (Comm): 22 March 2016: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Geofizika_v_MMB_International_SBT_Bulk_&_Tankers_v_Cosmotrade_-_The_Green_Island_The_Wehr_Trave]]
'''INCOTERMS 2000 CIPTIME CHARTER TRIP: CARRIAGE ON DECK: OBLIGATIONS WHETHER THE PARTICULAR TERMS OF FREIGHT FORWARDER: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATIONTHE CHARTER PERMITTED CHARTERERS TO ORDER THE VESSEL TO LOAD A FURTHER CARGO AFTER THE INITIAL CARGO HAD BEEN DISCHARGED: CAUSATIONARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1216/0702
'''England'''
'''Hyundai Merchant Marine Company Limited Fulton Shipping Inc v Trafigura Beheer BV Globalia Business Travel SAU (The “Gaz Energy”“New Flamenco”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Christopher Clarke and Sales LLJ: [2015] EWCA Civ 1299: 21 December 2015:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-the_New_Flamenco_-_Court_of_Appeal_Decision]
'''English Commercial CourtTIME CHARTER: Flaux JREPUDIATION: [2011] EWHC 3108 (Comm)QUANTUM OF DAMAGES: 29 November 2011WHETHER CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN ITS VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Hyundai_Merchant_Marine_v_Trafigura_-_the_Gas_Energy]]ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
'''TIME CHARTER: SPEED AND PERFORMANCE WARRANTY: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF CHARTER: WHETHER SPEED AND PERFORMANCE AN “ALL WEATHERS” WARRANTY OR LIMITED TO “MAXIMUM WIND FORCE 4 ON BEAUFORT SCALE”'''
DMC/SandT/16/01
DMC/SandT/12/06'''England'''
'''Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA v MT Maritime Management BV (The “Oriental Baltic”“MTM Hong Kong”)'''
'''Singapore High English Commercial Court: Tan Lee Meng Males J : [20112015] 3 SGHC 75EWHC 2505 (Comm): 1 September 2015: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Oriental_BalticLouis_Dreyfus_Commodities_Suisse_v_MT_Maritime_Management_-_The_MTM_Hong_Kong]]'''
'''OWNERS CHARTERPARTY: QUANTIFICATION OF VESSEL UNDER VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATIONDAMAGES FOR REPUDIATION OF VOYAGE CHARTER: DAMAGES FOR POSITIONAL LOSS IN REM PROCEEDINGS AGAINST VESSEL COMMENCED AFTER LIQUIDATIONADDITION TO USUAL PROFIT LOSS: PLAINTIFF FILED CAVEAT AGAINST RELEASE AGAINST VESSEL PRIOR WHETHER DAMAGES LIMITED BY REFERENCE TO LIQUIDATIONPERIOD WHEN CONTRACT VOYAGE WOULD HAVE ENDED: ACTION AGAINST COMPANY UNDER LIQUIDATION ORDINARILY STAYED APPEAL UNDER SECTION 69 OF THE COMPANIES ARBITRATION ACT: WHETHER LEAVE SHOULD BE GRANTED TO PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE WITH ITS ACTION1996'''
DMC/SandT/1215/0518
'''England'''
'''Thai Maparn Trading Co Ltd Société de Distribution de Toutes Marchandises en Côte D’Ivoire, trading as “SDTM-CI”, and others v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd . Continental Lines N.V. and another (The “Med Salvador” and “Goa”the “Sea Miror”)'''
'''English Commercial High Court: Beatson Flaux J; 18 June 2015: [20112015] EWHC 2494 1747 (Comm): 4 October 2011:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thai_Maparn_Trading_v_Louis_Dreyfus_CommoditiesSDTM-CI_and_others_v_Continental_Lines_amd_another_-_the_Sea_Miror]]'''
'''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODSSYNACOMEX 90 CHARTERPARTY: FOB CONTRACT: WHETHER BUYERS IN BREACH OF CONDITION PRECEDENT IN CONTRACT BY FAILING LOADING AND DISCHARGING TO ISSUE 7 DAY ETA BE AT THE EXPENSE AND RISK OF VESSELTHE SHIPPERS/CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS/CHARTERERS RESPECTIVELY: WHETHER SELLERS IN REPUDIATORY/RENUNCIATORY BREACH BY REJECTING BUYERS’ NOTICE OWNERS RESPONSIBLE FOR CARGO LOSS AND DAMAGE OCCURRING DURING LOADING AND STATING THAT CARGO WOULD NOT BE READY IN TIMEDISCHARGE'''
DMC/SandT/1215/0417
'''England'''
'''Pacific Basin IHX PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v OW Bunker Malta Limited v Bulkhandling Handymax AS (The “Triton Lark”): English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2011] EWHC 2868 (Comm): 8 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pacific_Basin_v_Bulkhandling_Handymax& ING Bank NV,_the_Triton_Lark]]the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''TIME CHARTERCourt of Appeal; Moore-Bick, Longmore, McCombe LJJ; [2015] EWCA Civ 1058, 22 October 2015: PIRACY RISKS IN GULF OF ADEN IN 2008[[https: CONWARTIME 1993/2004 CLAUSE: ARBITRATION APPEAL: SECTION 69 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996: CORRECT TEST FOR ASSESSING RISK OF PIRACY INCIDENT OCCURING FOR PURPOSE OF 1993/2004 CLAUSE: WHETHER OWNERS DEVIATED BY REROUTING VESSEL VIA CAPE OF GOOD HOPE INSTEAD OF GULF OF ADENwww.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/PST_Energy_7_Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_-_the_RES_COGITANS''']]
'''ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: SUPPLY OF BUNKERS: RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE: CONTEMPLATED THAT GOODS WOULD BE CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED: NO PASSING OF PROPERTY INTENDED: SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE'''
DMC/SandT/1215/0316
'''EnglandSingapore'''
'''Emeraldian Limited Partnership Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services Pte Ltd v Wellmix Shipping Limited and Guangzhou Iron & Steel Corporation Limited (The “Vine”)MISC Berhad, the “BUNGA MELATI 5”'''
'''English Commercial High Court: Teare ; Prakash J: ; [20102015] EWHC 1411 (Comm): 17 June 2010SGHC 190, 22 July 2015:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Emeraldian_Limited_v_Wellmix_Shipping,_the_VineEquatorial_Marine_Fuel_Management_Services_v_MISC_Bhd_-_The_Bunga_Melati_5]]'''
'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTYBUNKER BROKERS: WHETHER VESSEL’S OBLIGATION TO OBTAIN CLEARANCE BY PORT AUTHORITIES BEFORE GIVING NOTICE OF READINESS WAIVED FOR PURPOSE OF COMMENCEMENT OF LAYTIMEAGENCY: ACTUAL AUTHORITY, APPARENT AUTHORITY, AND ESTOPPEL: WHETHER CHARTERERS COULD RELY ON EXCEPTIONS NO GENERAL ‘DUTY TO RUNNING OF LAYTIME: WHETHER CHARTERERS IN BREACH OF SAFE PORT WARRANTY: WHETHER DEMURRAGE RECOVERABLE FOR DETENTION OF VESSELSPEAK’'''
DMC/12SandT/0215/15
'''England'''
'''ASTRAZENECA Arnold v Britton''' '''UK LIMITED Supreme Court: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, Lord Hodge JJSC: [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] 2 WLR 1593: 10 June 2015:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Arnold_v_Britton]] '''LANDLORD AND TENANT: LONG RESIDENTIAL LEASES: INCREASE OF SERVICE CHARGE AT YEARLY RATE OF 10% ON COMPOUND BASIS: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: CONTROL OF PARTIES OVER LANGUAGE USED IN CONTRACT: THAT CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT WORKED OUT BADLY FOR ONE PARTY NO REASON FOR DEPARTING FROM NATURAL LANGUAGE'''   DMC/SandT/15/14 '''England''' '''Bunge SA v. ALBEMARLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and ALBEMARLE CORPORATIONNidera BV'''
'''English High UK Supreme Court; Flaux J; : Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson: [20112015] EWHC 1574 (Comm); 21 June 2011UKSC 437: 1 July 2015:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Astrazeneca_UK_v_Albemarle_InternationalBunge_SA_v_Nidera_BV]]'''
'''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: DAMAGES: SALE OF GRAIN BASED ON GAFTA FORM 49: EMBARGO ON EXPORTS: PREMATURE TERMINATION OF CONTRACTBY SELLERS BEFORE EMBARGO TOOK EFFECT: CLAUSES GRANTING THE RIGHT ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT EFFECT OF FIRST REFUSALEMBARGO: EXCLUSION CLAUSES AND DELIBERATE BREACHNO LOSS SUFFERED BY BUYERS'''
DMC/SandT/1215/0113
'''The Netherlands'''
'''Furtrans Denzilick Ticaret Ve Sanayi The Kingdom of The Netherlands v Owners of the yacht Qubio – “The Qubio”''' '''Supreme Court of the Netherlands: Vice-President F.B. Bakels as chairman and judges G. Snijders, G. de Groot, M.V. Polak and T.H. Tanja-van den Broek'; 10 July 2015, Case no. ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1836:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Kingdom_of_The_Netherlands_v_Owners_of_Yacht_Qubio]]''' '''WRECK OF VESSEL: EXTENSION OF LIABILITY OF THE OWNER OF A SUNKEN VESSEL TO PAY FOR COSTS OF MARKING THE WRECK AS A TEMPORARY OR PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE'''  DMC/SandT/15/12 '''Singapore''' '''Precious Shipping Public Company Ltd & Ors v OW Bunker Far East (“Furtrans”Singapore) Pte Ltd & Ors and other matters''' '''Singapore High Court; Chong J; [2015] SGHC 187, 21 July 2015: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Precious_Shipping_&_Ors_v_OW_Bunker_Far_East_&_Ors]] '''WHETHER INTERPLEADER RELIEF AVAILABLE TO ULTIMATE PURCHASERS OF BUNKERS: WHETHER POTENTIAL CLAIMS BY PHYSICAL SUPPLIERS (WHO SOLD THOSE BUNKERS TO INTERMEDIATE BUYERS) WERE SUFFICIENT TO FOUND THE COURT’S INTERPLEADER JURISDICTION'''   DMC/SandT/15/11 '''England''' '''Glencore Energy UK Ltd v Augusta Due Srl Cirrus Oil Services Ltd'''  '''English High Court (“Augusta”Commercial Court): The "Constanza M”Cooke J: [2014] EWHC 87 (Comm), [2014] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 24 January 2014::[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_UK_v_Cirrus_Oil_Services]] '''CONTRACT FOR SALE OF OIL BLEND: WHETHER A BINDING CONTRACT EXISTED: FIRM OFFER WITH ESSENTIAL TERMS ACCEPTED: NAME OF SELLER INFERRED FROM PREVIOUS DEALINGS BETWEEN PARTIES: DAMAGES FOR NON-ACCEPTANCE UNDER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979, SECTIONS 50(2) AND (3) NOT EXCLUDED BY CLAUSE 32.1 OF BP 2007 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CFR SALES'''   DMC/SandT/15/10 '''England''' '''Maestro Bulk Ltd v Cosco Bulk Carrier Ltd, the “Great Creation”''' ''' English High Court; Cooke J; [2014] EWHC 3978 (Comm), 15 December 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maestro_Bulk_v_Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_-_The_Great_Creation]]
'''Supreme Court of the Netherlands (“SCN”) (summary proceedings)TIME CHARTERPARTY: ViceUNTIMELY REDELIVERY NOTICES: “BELOW MARKET” FOLLOW-President J.B. Fleers as Chairman and the judges A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, F.B. Bakels, C.E. Drion and G. Snijders LJN:BT2708, December 9, 2011ON FIXTURE:[[httpHOW DAMAGES TO BE CALCULATED://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Furtrans_v_Augusta,_the_Constanza_M]]MITIGATION'''
'''CONSTRUCTION OF ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE ARREST OF SEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2809
'''England'''
'''Rainy Sky SA Metall Market OOO v Kookmin BankVitorio Shipping Co Ltd (The “Lehmann Timber”)'''
'''UK Supreme English Courtof Appeal: Lord PhillipsArden, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and Lord WilsonPatten LLJ andSir Bernard Rix: [20112013] UKSC 50EWCA Civ 650: [2014] QB 760, [2013] 2 November 2011Lloyd’s Rep 541:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Rainy_Sky_v_Kookmin_BankMetall_Market_v_vitorio_Shipping_the_Lehmann_Timber]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDINGCARRIAGE OF GOODS: GENERAL AVERAGE: LETTER REQUEST BY SHIPOWNER FOR SECURITY IN THE FORM OF GENERAL AVERAGE BOND SUPPORTED BY GENERAL AVERAGE GUARANTEE: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION BEING WHETHER TERMS OF REQUEST REASONABLE: WHETHER ACCEPTANCE OF PART SECURITY A UNITARY PROCESSWAIVER OF SHIPOWNER’S LIEN: ROLE WHETHER EXPENSES OF COMMERCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: WEIGHT TO BE GIVEN TO VIEW STORING CARGO ASHORE IN EXERCISE OF COMMERCIAL JUDGELIEN RECOVERABLE'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2708
'''SingaporeEngland'''
'''The SahandPST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v OW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
Singapore '''English High Court : Quentin Loh ; Males J : ; [20112015] SGHC 27EWHC 2022 (Comm) 14 July 2015:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_SahandPST_Energy_7_Shipping_&_Product_Shipping_and_Trading_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_the_Res_Cognitans]]
'''ARRESTS ARBITRATION ACT 1996 S.69 APPEAL: BUNKER SUPPLY CONTRACT ON CREDIT TERMS: RETENTION OF VESSELS IN SINGAPORE OWNED BY IRANIAN COMPANIESTITLE CLAUSE: ASSETS FREEZE IMPOSED BY UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS 1737, 1747, 1803 PARTIES CONTEMPLATED BUNKERS WOULD LIKELY BE CONSUMED BEFORE PAYMENT MADE AND 1929TITLE PASSED: WHETHER SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS REQUIRE IMPOUNDMENT OR DETENTION SALE OF VESSELS OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY DESIGNATED PERSONS OR ENTITIES OR THEIR SUBSIDIARIESGOODS ACT 1979 APPLICABLE: EFFECT OF ASSETS FREEZE ON ARREST OF SHIPS PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION WHETHER REQUIREMENTS OF COURTS.49 MET'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2607
'''England'''
'''National Spar Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia AS v BP Oil Supply CompanyGrand China Logistics Holding (Group) Co., Ltd'''
'''English High Court of Appeal: Ward and Tomlinson LJJ and Sir Mark Potter: 12 October 2011Queen's Bench Division Commercial Court: [20112015] EWCA Civ 1127EWHC 718 (Comm): Popplewell J.:18 March 2015[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NSCSA_v_BP_Oil_SupplySpar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics]]'''
'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTYNYPE 1993 FORM TIMECHARTER: BPVOY4FAILURE TO PAY HIRE ON TIME: DEMURRAGE CLAIMS TO BE PRESENTED WITH FULL DOCUMENTATION WITHIN 90 DAYS WHETHER BREACH OF COMPLETION CONDITION: WHETHER BREACH OF DISCHARGEAN INNOMINATE TERM: FINAL SETTLEMENT RIGHT TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF CLAIMBARGAIN: WHETHER MIS-DESCRIBED FURTHER DEMURRAGE CLAIM TIME-BARRED: COST CHARTERER’S CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY BREACH OF BUNKERS CONSUMED FOR RE-BERTHINGCONTRACT'''
DMC/11SandT/2515/06
'''England'''
'''Conarken Group Limited and Farrell Transport Limited Gard Marine & Energy Ltd (Respondents/Claimants) vChina National Chartering Co. Network Rail Infrastructure LimitedLtd (Intermediate Charterers) v China National'''Chartering Co. Ltd v Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha (Charterers/Appellants), - The “Ocean Victory”: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gard_Marine_&_Energy_v_China_National_Chartering_-_The_Ocean_Victory_-_Court_of_Appeal]]'''
'''English Court of Appeal; Pill, Moore-Bick: Longmore, Gloster and Jackson Underhill LJJ; : [20112015] EWCA Civ 644, 27 May 201116:[[http22 January 2015://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Conarken_v_Network_Rail]]'''
'''TORTSAFE PORT: DAMAGESWHETHER COMBINATION OF ‘LONG WAVE’ SWELL AND A SEVERE GALE AN ‘ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE’: SUBROGATION: SUMS PAYABLE UNDER VICTIM’S CONTRACTS WITH THIRD WHETHER INSURER OF BOTH PARTIES: FORESEEABILITY AND REMOTENESS: REASONABLENESS TO A BARECON CHARTERPARTY MAY SUE AN ASSURED FOR BREACH OF CALCULATIONSCHARTER'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2405
'''England'''
'''Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Standard Chartered Bank v Dorchester LNG (2) Limited v Korea Line Corporation(The “Erin Schulte”)'''
'''English High Courtof Appeal: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Blair JSir Bernard Rix, Moore-Bick and Briggs LJJ: [20112014] EWHC 1819 (Comm)EWCA Civ 1382: 22 June 2011October 2014:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_Korea_Line_CorporationStandard_Chartered_Bank_v_Dorchester_LNG_(2)_-_The_Erin_Schulte]]
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYBILL OF LADING: WRONGFUL TERMINATION BY CHARTERERSLETTER OF CREDIT: ASSESSMENT INITIAL REJECTION OF DAMAGESTHE PRESENTATION: NO AVAILABLE MARKET FOR BALANCE MEANING OF CHARTER PERIOD AT TIME “INDORSEMENT” OF TERMINATIONBILL OF LADING: EFFECT TRANSFER OF REVIVAL RIGHTS OF MARKET AT SUIT: CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1992 SECTIONS 2(2)(A LATER STAGE) AND 5(2)(B)'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2304
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Birnam Ltd v The Owners Alas renamed The Kombos: Hong Kong Court of the Ship or Vessel “Hong Ming”, The “Hong Ming”First Instance: Ng J: HCAJ 241/2009: [2014] 4 HKLRD 160: 21 July 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Alas_renamed_The_Kombos]]''' '''ADMIRALTY: WARRANT OF ARREST: SHIPOWNERS’ CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AND UNPAID HIRE: FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD NOT SATISFIED: NO BAR TO ACTION IN REM FOR CLAIM ARISING OUT OF AGREEMENT FOR USE OR HIRE OF THE SHIP'''  DMC/SandT/15/03
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.105 of 2011: 26 August 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Birnam_v_The_"Hong_Ming"]]'''
'''WARRANT OF ARREST: SETTING ASIDE: CLAIM FOR OWNERSHIP OF VESSEL PURSUANT TO A TERMINATED CONTRACT FOR SALE OF VESSEL: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE: MISUSE OF THE ARREST PROCESSAntwerp Diamond Bank NV v Brink’s Inc'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Lam and Lunn VPP and Barman JA: CACV No.282 of 2012: [2014] 4 HKLRD 158: 17 July 2014: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Antwerp_Diamond_Bank-v-Brink's_Inc]]'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY AIR: MISDELIVERY: GOODS RELEASED TO BUYER WITHOUT CONSENT OF PLEDGEE BANK AND WITHOUT PAYMENT: LOCUS OF PLEDGEE BANK TO SUE FOR CONVERSION: AGREEMENT BY SELLER TO PLEDGE FINISHED GOODS TO BANK: DELIVERY OF GOODS TO FREIGHT FORWARDER COMPLETED PLEDGE: CONSTRUCTIVE DELIVERY OF GOODS TO BANK'''   DMC/SandT/1115/2202
'''England'''
Suek AG '''E D & F Man Sugar Ltd v Glencore International AGUnicargo Transportgesellschaft GmbH (Polska Zegluga Morska PP, interested party), The “Ladytramp”
Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial '''Court): Burton J: of Appeal; Pattern, Tomlinson, Christopher Clarke LJJ; [20112013] EWHC 1361 (Comm): 27 May 2011EWCA Civ 1449, 19 November 2013:''' '''[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Suek_v_Glencore_InternationalE_D_&_F_Man_v_Unicargo_Transportgesellschaft_GmbH_The_Ladytramp]]'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS: CIF CONTRACT: CONSTRUCTIONSUGAR CHARTERPARTY 1999: ENTITLEMENT TO GIVE NOTICE DESTRUCTION BY FIRE OF READINESS: CONCURRENT CAUSES LEADING FACILITIES AT LOADING TERMINAL NOT WITHIN CLAUSE 28 EXCEPTION TO DELAY IN BERTHING: COMMENCEMENT LAYTIME OF LAYTIME“MECHANICAL BREAKDOWNS”'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2101
'''England'''  '''NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NY v Cargill International SA, The “Global Santosh”''' '''Court of Appeal; Gross LJ, Gloster LJ, Sir Burnton; [2014] EWCA Civ 403, 8 April 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Global_Santosh_-_Court_of_Appeal]]''' '''OFF-HIRE CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF VESSEL: WHETHER SUB-CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS WERE ‘AGENTS’ OF THE CHARTERERS: WHETHER THE PERSONAL ACT, OMISSION OR DEFAULT TO WHICH CLAUSE REFERRED MUST HAVE OCCURRED DURING PROVISION OF RELEVANT SERVICES'''  DMC/SandT/14/17 '''Singapore''' '''Singapore Court of Appeal'''
'''Carboex SA Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SAWanin Industries Pte Ltd [2013] SGCA 15:'''
'''English High CourtSundaresh Menon CJ, Chao Hick Tin JA and Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA: Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court): Field J.6 February 2013: [20112013] EWHC 1165 (Comm: 12 May 20112 SLR 363: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_v_Louis_Dreyfus_CommoditiesOut_of_the_Box_v_Wanin_Industries]]'''
'''AMWELSH CHARTERPARTYCONTRACT: DEMURRAGEREMOTENESS OF DAMAGE: EXCEPTION BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTOR ENGAGING MANUFACTURER TO PRODUCE NEW SPORTS DRINK: MANUFACTURER UNAWARE OF STRIKESDISTRIBUTOR’S PLAN TO PROMOTE POPULAR DEMAND FOR GENERIC DRINK THROUGH AGGRESSIVE ADVERTISING: MANUFACTURER SUPPLYING DEFECTIVE SHIPMENT OF DRINKS IN BREACH OF CONTRACT: ABANDONMENT OF PROMOTION: WHETHER DELAY IN DISCHARGE ARISING FROM CONGESTION CAUSED WASTED ADVERTISING EXPENSES CLAIMED BY STRIKES EXCEPTED FROM LAYTIMEDISTRIBUTOR TOO REMOTE'''
DMC/SandT/1114/2016
'''England'''
'''Great Eastern Shipping Co Elephant Corporation v Trafigura Beheer BV v Vitol SA & Vitol Asia Pte Ltd v. China Offshore Oil (1Singapore) Far East Chartering International Pte Ltd (2The “Crudesky”) Binani Cement Ltd'''
'''English High Courtof Appeal: Longmore, Queen’s Bench Division: Judge Mackie QCTomlin and Underhill LJJ: [20112013] EWCA Civ 1547, [2014] EWHC 1372 (Comm)1 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 27 May 201125 July 2013:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Great_Eastern_Shipping_v_Far_East_CharteringGreat_Elephant_Corp_v_Trafigura_Beheer_-_The_Crudesky]]''' '''WHETHER SHIPOWNER ENTITLED TO ENFORCE LETTER OF INDEMNITY GIVEN BY RECEIVER TO CHARTERER FOR DELIVERY OF CARGO WITHOUT PRESENTATION OF BILLS OF LADINGVOYAGE CHARTER: CONTRACTS (RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES) ACT 1999FOB SALE CONTRACT CHAIN: WHETHER LETTER GIVEN TO CHARTERERDEMURRAGE: WHETHER CARGO “DELIVERED”: WHETHER LETTER “RESTRAINT OF INDEMNITY UNENFORCEABLE ON GROUNDS OF PUBLIC POLICYPRINCES” EXCEPTION: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO RECOVER UNDER A UNILATERAL CONTRACTUNFORESEEABLE FORCE MAJEURE BEYOND CONTROL OR REASONABLE CONTROL'''
DMC/SandT/1114/1915
'''The NetherlandsEngland'''
'''Pianura Armatori SpA Fulton Shipping Inc v Ferrari Shipping Agency G.A. Globalia Business Travel SAU (The "Halcyon Star”“New Flamenco”)'''
'''English Commercial Court of Rotterdam : Popplewell J: [2014] EWHC 1457 (summary proceedingsComm) : Mr A.F.L. Geerdes, LJN:BQ5031, October 7, 2010 (published 21 May 19, 2011)2014: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pianura_Armatori_v_Ferrari_ShippingFulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-_The_New_Flamenco]]'''
'''ARREST CONVENTION 1952 ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPHTIME CHARTER: ARREST REPUDIATION: QUANTUM: WHETHER CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL OWNED BY SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A VESSEL MANAGER FOR MARITIME CLAIMS AGAINST THE VESSEL MANAGER RELATING TO OTHER VESSELS NOT OWNED BY THE MANAGERGREATER SUM THAN VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1114/1814
'''England'''
'''Geden Operations Ltd v Dry Bulk Handy Holdings Inc (The Owner of the Vessel “The Ocean Crown” and others v Five Oceans Salvage Consultants Ltd, “The Ocean Crown”“Bulk Uruguay”)'''
'''English High Commercial Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Admiralty Court): Gross Popplewell J: [20092014] EWHC 3040 885 (AdmltyComm), [2010] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 468: 26 November 2009:28 March 2014[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Ocean_CrownGeden_Operations_v_Dry_Bulk_Handy_Holdings_-_the_Bulk_Uruguay]]'''
'''SALVAGETIME CHARTER: ASSESSMENT OF REMUNERATIONANTICIPATORY REPUDIATORY BREACH: WHETHER RISK RIGHT TO GIVE VOYAGE ORDERS TO TRANSIT GULF OF FUTURE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN APPLYING PRINCIPLE OF ENCOURAGEMENTADEN: SCOPE OF THE PRINCIPLE IN THE AMERIQUEARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1114/1713
'''The NetherlandsEngland'''
'''HDI-Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG et al Proton Energy Group SA v APM Terminals Rotterdam B.V.The ‘Pretoria’Orlen Lietuva'''
'''English Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court of Rotterdam): Ms P.A.M van Schouwenburg –Laan, LJNHH Judge Mackie QC:BO0063, September 29, 2010[2013] EWHC 2872 (Comm):[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/HDI-Gerling_v_APM_TerminalsProton_Energy_Group_v_Orlen_Lietuva]]'''
'''STEVEDORE DAMAGE TO VESSEL DURING LOADINGCONTRACT: WHETHER STEVEDORES LIABLE CONTRACT FOR THE DAMAGE CAUSED UNDER DUTCH LAWSALE OF OIL BLEND: BURDEN EXISTENCE OF BINDING CONTRACT: PARTIES REGARDED THEMSELVES AS BEING BOUND AFTER DEAL WAS CONFIRMED: SPECIFICATION OF OIL BLEND NOT FORMING PART OF PROOFSALE BY DESCRIPTION'''
DMC/SandT/1114/1612
'''United Kingdom Supreme CourtEngland'''
'''Jones Falkonera Shipping Company v. KaneyArcadia Energy Pte Ltd (The “Falkonera”)'''
'''UK Supreme English Courtof Appeal (Civil Division); Lords PhilipsFloyd and Christopher Clarke LJJ, Hope, Brown, Collins, Kerr, Dyson, Lady HaleSir Stanley Burnton; [20112014] UKSC 13EWCA Civ 713; 30 March 20115 June 2014:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Jones_v_KaneyFalkonera_Shipping_v_Arcadia_Energy_-_The_Falkonera]]'''
'''REMOVAL SHIPPING: TANKER TRANSHIPMENT: SHIP-TO-SHIP (“STS”) TRANSFERS: CHARTERPARTY PROVIDING FOR STS TRANSFERS TO BE SUBJECT TO OWNERS’ APPROVAL WHICH NOT TO BE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD: OWNERS WITHHOLD CONSENT FOR A STS TRANSFER BETWEEN TWO VLCCs: WHETHER OWNERS’ WITHHOLDING OF EXPERT WITNESS IMMUNITY IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGSAPPROVAL REASONABLE'''
DMC/SandT/14/11/15
'''CanadaEngland'''
'''Société Telus Communications, Hydro-Québec and Bell Canada British American Tobacco Switzerland SA v Peracomo Inc., Réal Vallée and the fishing vessel RealiceExel Europe Ltd; British American Tobacco Denmark A/S v Exel Europe Ltd'''
'''Federal Court of CanadaAppeal: Harrington McFarlane L.J.; Sir Bernard Rix; Sir Timothy Lloyd: 2011 FC 494[2013] EWCA Civ 1319: 27 April 201130 October 2013:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Telus_Communications_v_Peracomo_Inc_and_Réal_ValléeBritish_American_Tobacco_&_Ors_v_Exel_Europe]]'''
'''SHIPPINGCARRIAGE OF GOODS BY ROAD: SUBMARINE CABLE CUT BY SKIPPER OF FISHING VESSELCMR CONVENTION: WHETHER DAMAGE CAUSED INTENTIONALLY OR RECKLESSLY AND WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT 'SUCH CARGO LOSS' WOULD PROBABLY RESULT: ESTABLISHING JURISDICTION AGAINST SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS: WHETHER DEFENDANTS ENTITLED CLAIMANT THAT HAS ESTABLISHED JURISDICTION UNDER ART.31.1 AGAINST ONE CARRIER CAN RELY ON THAT JURISDICTION TO LIMIT LIABILITY UNDER THE 1976 LIMITATION CONVENTION, AS INCORPORATED INTO CANADIAN LAWJOIN SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS'''
DMC/SandT/1114/1410
'''The NetherlandsEngland'''
'''DSV Road B.V. and Amlin Corporate Insurance N.V. Trafigura Beheer BV v Sneltransport “Heidenend” Tegelen B.V.Navigazione Montanari SPA [2014] EWHC 129 Comm'''
'''Amsterdam English High Court of Appeal: AQueen’s Bench Division: Andrew Smith J.S. Arnold, W.H.F.M. Cortenraad and H.M. ten Haaft, LJN BL9955, April 2, 2010: 30 January 2014: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSV_Road_v_Sneltransport_HeidenendTrafigura_Beheer_v_Navigazione_Montanari_-_the_Valle_de_Cordoba]]
'''CHARTERPARTY: CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY ROADSEA: CMR CONVENTIONVESSEL CARRYING CONSIGNMENT OF MOTOR OIL ATTACKED BY PIRATES: WHETHER SHIPPERQUANTITY OF OIL TAKEN BY PIRATES CONSTITUTED "IN-TRANSIT LOSS" OR "LOST CARGO" FOR PURPOSES OF IN-PACKED TRAILER CAN BE CONSIDERED ‘GOODS’ WITHIN ART.17.2TRANSIT LOSS CLAUSE IN CHARTERPARTY'''
DMC/SandT/1114/1309
'''England'''
'''Shell Egypt West Manzala GmbH and another Yuzhny Zavod Metall Profil LLC v Dana Gas Egypt Limited''' Eems Beheerder B.V. (“the M/V EEMS SOLAR”):  '''English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial , Admiralty Court): Tomlinson JJervis K, Q.C, the Admiralty Registrar: [2010] EWHC 465 (Comm): 10 March 20105 June 2013:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Shell_Egypt_v_Dana_GasYuzhny_Zavod_Metall_Profil_v_Emms_Beheerder_-_the_M/V_Eems_Solar]]'''
'''CONTRACTBILLS OF LADING: JOINT VENTURE INCORPORATION OF CHARTERPARTY TERMS PROVIDING THAT CHARTERERS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR GAS EXPLORATIONSTOWAGE: REPUDIATORY BREACH COMMITTED BY ONE PARTY: INNOCENT PARTY TERMINATED CONTRACT BASED WHETHER OWNERS COULD RELY ON WRONG BELIEF THAT CONTRACTUAL TERMINATION CLAUSE WAS TRIGGERED: WHETHER INNOCENT PARTY COULD JUSTIFY TERMINATION OF CONTRACTAS DEFENCE TO CLAIM BY RECEIVERS FOR CARGO DAMAGE CAUSED BY BAD STOWAGE'''
DMC/SandT/1114/1208
'''England'''
'''Choil Trading SA v Sahara Energy Resources Limited Martrade Shipping & Transport GmbH V United Enterprises Corporation (The “Prem Mala”“Wisdom C”)''''''English Commercial Court: Christopher Clarke J: [2010] EWHC 374 (Comm): 26 February 2010: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Choil_Trading_v_Sahara_EnergyMartrade_Shipping_and_Transport_v_United_Entreprises_-Resources_The_Wisdom_C]]'''  English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Popplewell J; [2014] EWHC 1884 (Comm); 12 June 2014 '''TIMECHARTER PROVIDING FOR ENGLISH LAW AND LONDON ARBITRATION: ARBITRATORS AWARDING PENAL RATE OF INTEREST: WHETHER “SIGNIFICANT CONNECTION” BETWEEN CHARTERPARTY AND ENGLAND: WHETHER “APPLICABLE LAW” A FOREIGN LAW: LATE PAYMENT OF COMMERCIAL DEBTS (INTEREST) ACT 1998: ARTICLES 3 AND 4 – CONTRACTS (APPLICABLE LAW) ACT 1990'''  DMC/SandT/14/07
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEA: FOB SALE CONTRACT: CIF ON-SALE CONTRACTS: QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES FOR DELIVERY OF CONTAMINATED GOODS IN BREACH OF FOB CONTRACT: RECOVERABILITY OF HEDGING LOSSES INCURRED IN MITIGATION IN RELATION TO CIF CONTRACTS: WHETHER TRUE CONSTRUCTION OF FOB CONTRACT EXEMPTION CLAUSE EXCLUDED RECOVERY OF HEDGING AND ADDITIONAL EXPENSES/COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF BREACH OF CONTRACTHong Kong'''
'''Darby International Investment Ltd v Rong Tai International Shipping Ltd'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Deputy High Court Judge B Chu: HCMP1438 of 2013: 2 December 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Darby_International_Investments_v_Rong_Tai_International_Shipping]]'''
DMChttp:/SandT/11www.hklii.hk/11eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2013/2031.html
'''English High CourtMARITIME LAW: REGISTRATION OF VESSELS: VESSEL APPARENTLY REGISTERED IN MORE THAN ONE JURISDICTION: DECLARATION AS TO VALIDITY OF REGISTRATION IN HONG KONG: PURPOSE OF GRANTING DECLARATION'''
'''Azimut–Benetti SpA v. Healey'''
'''English High Court: Blair J.: [2010] EWHC 2234 (Comm): 3 September 2010: [[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk14/index.php/Azimut_Benetti_v_Healey]]''' 06
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: GUARANTEE: WHETHER LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CONSTITUTE A PENALTY: WHETHER A PRE-ESTIMATE OF LOSS IN THE CASE OF BREACH: WHETHER A DETERRENT: WHETHER GUARANTEE REMAINS ENFORCEABLE WHERE A PROVISION IN THE UNDERLYING CONTRACT CONSTITUTES A PENALTY: PUBLIC POLICYEngland'''
'''Flame SA v Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd'''
DMC'''English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2013] EWHC 3153 (Comm): 22 October 2013:[[https:/SandT/11www.onlinedmc.co.uk/10index.php/Flame_SA_v_Glory_Wealth_Shipping]]'''
'''United KingdomCONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM OF DAMAGES: COMPENSATORY PRINCIPLE: WHETHER INNOCENT PARTY MUST PROVE ABILITY TO PERFORM OBLIGATIONS, HAD CONTRACT CONTINUED, TO RECOVER SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGES FROM CONTRACT BREAKER'''  DMC/SandT/14/05 '''England''' '''Bulk Ship Union SA v Clipper Bulk Shipping Limited (The "Pearl C")'''
'''Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd & ORs''' '''United Kingdom Supreme English High Court: Lord Phillips, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Sir John Dyson)Popplewell J.: 26 June 2012 [20102012] UKSC 44: 27 October 20102 Lloyd’s Rep. 533: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oceanbulk_Shipping_v_TMT_AsiaBulk_Ship_Union_v_Clipper_Bulk_Shipping_-_The_Pearl_C]] '''TIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM: SLOW STEAMING: WHETHER A BREACH OF ‘UTMOST DESPATCH’ OBLIGATION: WHETHER VESSEL OFF-HIRE BY REASON OF DEFAULT OF MASTER: WHETHER PARTIAL INTERRUPTION IN SERVICE SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER OFF-HIRE CLAUSE'''   DMC/SandT/14/04 '''Hong Kong'''
'''CONTRACTS: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT: INTERPRETATION: ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ COMMUNICATIONS: WHETHER FACTS DISCLOSED DURING ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ NEGOTIATIONS ADMISSIBLE AS AN AID TO CONSTRUCTION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTMaintek Computer (Suzhou) Co Ltd v Blue Anchor Line'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: To J: HCAJ No.106 of 2008: 2 April 013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maintek_Computer_(Suzhou)_v_Blue_Anchor_Line''']]
DMChttp:/SandT/11www.hklii.hk/09eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2013/506.html
'''English Court of AppealCARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY BY OCEAN TERMINAL: CLAIM FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST CARRIER: MEANING OF “DELIVERY” FOR PURPOSE OF TIME LIMITATION: WHETEHR EXEMPTION CLAUSE FOR ANY CAUSE OR EVENT WHICH CARRIER COULD NOT AVOID APPLICABLE: WHETHER LIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY REFERENCE TO WEIGHT OF CARGO APPLICABLE'''
'''Thomas Crema v. Cenkos Securities PLC'''
'''English Court of Appeal (Civil Division); Hughes LJ, Aikens LJ, Chancellor Morritt; [2010] EWCA Civ 1444, 16 December 2010: [[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk14/index.php/Thomas_Crema_v_Cenkos_Securities]]03
'''CONTRACT PARTLY WRITTEN AND PARTLY ORAL: WHETHER TERM SHOULD BE IMPLIED: RELEVANT PRINCIPLES: RELEVANCE OF MARKET PRACTICE: EXPERT EVIDENCE: LIMITATIONS OF EXPERT EVIDENCEEngland'''
'''Sea-Cargo Skips AS v State Bank of India'''
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2013] EWHC 177 (Comm): 26 June 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sea-Cargo_Skips_AS_v_State_Bank_of_India]]'''
DMC/SandT/11/08'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: REFUND GUARANTEE: QUESTION OF CONSTRUCTION: WHETHER DEMAND WAS SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER BANK’S LIABILITY: AMBIGUOUS DEMAND NOT COMPLIANT'''
'''English Court of Appeal'''
'''Kookmin Bank v Rainy SA and others'''DMC/SandT/14/02
'''English Court of Appeal: Thorpe and Patten LJJ and Sir Simon Tuckey: [2010] EWCA Civ 582, [2010] 1 CLC 829: 27 May 2010:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kookmin_Bank_v_Rainy_SA]]Singapore'''
'''SHIPBUILDING: LETTER OF GUARANTEE: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: EXTREME CONSEQUENCES REQUIRED TO DEPART FROM MEANING OF WORDS AS CONVEYED TO REASONABLE PERSON: NO DEPARTURE SIMPLY BECAUSE COURT WOULD REACH DIFFERENT BALANCE OF PARTIES’ INTERESTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER CONTRACTSingapore High Court'''
'''The “Turtle Bay” [2013] SGHC 165 : Judgment delivered by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J, 30 August 2013: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Turtle_Bay]]
DMC/SandT/11/07'''SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST: WHEN DIRECT PRIVATE SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST CONSTITUTES CONTEMPT OF COURT: PRINCIPLES AND EFFECT OF ADMIRALTY JUDICIAL SALE: WHEN COURT WILL SANCTION A DIRECT PRIVATE SALE'''
'''English Court of Appeal'''
'''Brink’s Global Services Inc & Ors v. Igrox Ltd & Anor''''''Court of Appeal: Longmore, Moore-Bick and Wilson LJJ.: [2010] EWCA Civ 1208: 27 October 2010: [[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk14/index.php/Brink's_Global_Services_v_Igrox]]01
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS: THEFT FROM CONTAINER BY EMPLOYEE OF FUMIGATION COMPANY: WHETHER COMPANY VICARIOUSLY LIABLE: CLOSE CONNECTION BETWEEN THEFT AND PURPOSE OF EMPLOYMENTEngland'''
'''Minerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping AG; Oceana Shipping AG v Transatlantica Commodities S.A. The MV “Athena”'''
DMC'''Court of Appeal; Tomlinson, Lewison and Underhill LJJ; [2013] EWCA Civ 1723; 17 July 2013[[https:/SandT/11www.onlinedmc.co.uk/06index.php/Minerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-_the_Athena]]
'''English Commercial CourtTIME CHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: OFF-HIRE CLAUSE 15: WHETHER “LOSS OF TIME” MEANS NET LOSS OF TIME IN THE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR IN THE OVERALL CHARTER SERVICE'''
'''Dalwood Marine v Nordana Line A/S, The “Elbrus”; Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2009] EWHC 3394 (Comm), [2010] 2 All ER (Comm) 802: 21 December 2009:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dalwood_Marine_v_Nordana_Line]]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: WRONGFUL EARLY TERMINATION BY CHARTERERS: DAMAGES: WHETHER HIRE EARNED BY SHIPOWNERS IN SUBSTITUTE FIXTURE WHICH EXTENDED BEYOND REMAINDER OF ORIGINAL CHARTER RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT'''DMC/SandT/13/17
'''England'''
DMC/SandT/2011/05'''MRI Trading AG v Erdenet Mining Corporation LLC'''
'''English Commercial Courtof Appeal: Pill, Tomlinson, McCombe LJJ: [2013] EWCA Civ 156: 08 Mar 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MRI_Trading_v_Erdenet_Mining_Corporation]]'''
'''Glencore Energy UK Limited v Transworld Oil Limited (The “Narmada Spirit”)SALE OF GOODS: English Commercial CourtCERTAINTY OF CONTRACT TERMS: Blair JWHETHER TERMS AMOUNTED TO 'AGREEMENTS TO AGREE': [2010] EWHC 141 (Comm): 3 February 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_v_Transworld_Oil]]PROPER APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTION AND IMPLICATION OF TERMS WITHIN A CONTRACT WHICH CONTAINS TERMS LEAVING MATTERS TO BE SUBSEQUENTLY AGREED'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEA: FOB CONTRACT: CORRECT QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES FOR NON-DELIVERY OF CRUDE OIL CARGO FOR WHICH THERE WAS NO AVAILABLE MARKET: NEED TO ACCOUNT IN DAMAGES FOR REDUCED LOSS SUFFERED FOLLOWING EARLY CLOSING OUT OF HEDGED POSITION OF BUYER FOLLOWING ACCEPTANCE OF SELLER’S REPUDIATION'''
DMC/SandT/1113/0416
'''English Court of AppealEngland'''
'''Röhlig NYK Bulkship (UKAtlantic) Ltd v Rock Unique Ltd: Court of Appeal, Sedley, Moore-Bick and Aikens LJJN.: 20 January 2011: [2011] EWCA Civ 18:[[http://wwwV.onlinedmcv Cargill International S.coA.uk/index.php/Röhlig_(UK)_v_Rock_Unique]], The “Global Santosh”'''
'''INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE OF GOODSEnglish High Court; Field J; [2013] EWHC 30 (Comm); 1 February 2013: BIFA CONDITIONS[[https: WHETHER NO SET//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-OFF AND TIME BAR PROVISIONS REASONABLE UNDER UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS ACT 1977'''_The_Global_Santosh]]
'''PERIOD OFF-HIRE CLAUSE COVERING DELAY ARISING FROM DETENTION OR ARREST OF VESSEL: WHETHER SUB-CHARTERERS OR RECEIVERS WERE AGENTS OF THE CHARTERERS: WHETHER DELAY TO VESSEL “OCCASIONED BY” RECEIVERS’ FAILURE TO DISCHARGE WITHIN THE LAYTIME AND/OR TO SECURE SELLERS’ DEMURRAGE CLAIM'''
DMC/SandT/11/03
'''English Court of Appeal''' DMC/SandT/13/15
'''KG Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft für Mineraloele mbH & Co v Petroplus Marketing AG (The “Mercini Lady”): English Court of Appeal: Maurice Kay, Rix and Patten LJJ: [2010] EWCA Civ 1145: 19 October 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/KG_Bominflot_v_Petroplus_Marketing]]England'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEA: FOB ANTWERP SALE OF EU GASOIL WITH FREE DESTINATION: “SPECIAL” COMMON LAW IMPLIED TERM/CONDITION: STATUTORILY IMPLIED CONDITIONS: WHETHER CARGO TO REMAIN ON-SPECIFICATION FOR A REASONABLE TIME FOLLOWING SHIPMENT: EFFECT OF EXCLUSION CLAUSE ON IMPLIED CONDITIONS: SECTION 14Greatship (2India) Limited v Oceanografia SA de CV (The “Greatship Driti”) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979'''
'''English Commercial Court: Gloster J: [2012] EWHC 3468 (Comm): 5 December 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Greatship_(India)_Limited_v_Oceanografia_SA_de_CV_-_The_Greatship_Driti]]
DMC/SandT/11/02'''TIME CHARTER: BIMCO SUPPLYTIME 89 FORM: CLAUSE 10(E): RIGHT TO SUSPEND PERFORMANCE FOR FAILURE TO PAY HIRE PUNCTUALLY: WHETHER GRACE PERIOD (ANTI-TECHNICALITY) NOTICE REQUIRED BEFORE EXERCISING RIGHT'''
'''Singapore'''
'''Singapore Court of Appeal'''DMC/SandT/13/14
'''The “Asia Star” [2010] SGCA 12: Judgment delivered by VK Rajah JA, 19 March 2010 [2010] SGCA 12[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Asia_Star]]England'''
Kelvin Chia Partnership for the Appellant Shipowners'''Minerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping AG; Oceana Shipping AG v Transatlantica Commodities S.A. The MV “Athena”'''
Shook Lin & Bok LLP for the Respondent Charteres'''English High Court; Walker J; [2012] EWHC 3608 (Comm); 13 December 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Minerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-__The_Athena]]
'''BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGOTIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: OFF-HIRE CLAUSE 15: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION “LOSS OF TIME” MEANS NET LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: REQUIREMENT TO NOTIFY TIME IN THE DEFAULTING PARTY OF INTENDED MEASURES SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR IN MITIGATIONTHE OVERALL CHARTER SERVICE'''
DMC/SandT/1113/01 13
'''GermanyEngland'''
'''German Federal Supreme Griffon Shipping LLC v Firodi Shipping Limited – The “MV Griffon”''' '''High Court – Assessment of Damages under the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court: Teare J.: [2013] EWHC 593 (‘CMR’Comm): Date of Judgment21 March 2013: 30 September 2010'''[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Germany_CMR_DamagesGriffon_Shipping_v_Firodi_Shipping_-_The_Griffon ]]
'''CMR TRANSPORTSHIPSALE AGREEMENT ON NORWEGIAN SALE FORM 1993: WILFUL MISCONDUCT: ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGESWHETHER SELLER CAN RECOVER UNPAID DEPOSIT WHERE BUYER IN REPUDIATORY BREACH'''
DMC/SandT/1013/2512
'''England'''
'''Angara Maritime Wuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Ltd & Anor v Oceanconnect UK Ltd and Oceanconnect.com Inc (The “Fesco Angara”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Angara_Maritime_v_Oceanconnect_UK]]Emporiki Bank of Greece SA'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division, London Mercantile English Courtof Appeal: HHJ Mackie QCLongmore, Rimer and Tomlinson, LJJ.: [20102012] EWHC 619 (QB)EWCA Civ 1629:[[https: 29 March 2010//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Wuhan_Guoyu_Logistics_v_Emporiki_Bank]]'''
'''SALE OF GOODSSHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: BUNKERS/MARINE FUELSPAYMENT GUARANTEE: S.25(1) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979: SALE OF BUNKERS TO TIME CHARTERERS: BUNKERS DELIVERED TO VESSEL: FAILURE BY TIME CHARTERERS TO PAY SUPPLIERS FOR BUNKERS: RIGHT OF SUPPLIERS TO SUE OWNERS IN CONVERSION AND/WHETHER PAYMENT GUARANTEE A TRUE GUARANTEE OR BAILMENT FOLLOWING PREMATURE REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY TIME CHARTERERS TO OWNERSAN ON-DEMAND BOND'''
DMC/SandT/1013/2611
'''England'''
'''Soufflet Negoce SA Dalmare SpA v Bunge SAUnion Maritime Ltd & Anor''''''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Commercial Court; Flaux J; [2012] EWHC 3537; 13 Dec 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dalmare_v_Union_Maritime_-_The_Union_Power]] '''SALE OF VESSEL "AS SHE WAS AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION": STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM AS TO QUALITY UNDER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979: WHETHER SELLERS HAD EXCLUDED APPLICATION OF STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM; WHETHER SELLERS IN BREACH OF STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM'''
'''English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Wilson and Toulson LJJ: [2010] EWCA 1102: 13 October 2010[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Soufflet_Negoce_v_Bunge_SA]]'''
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2010/1102.html
'''FOB CONTRACT: GAFTA 49 FORM: “IN READINESS TO LOAD”: WHETHER THIS MEANS THAT VESSEL MUST BE “READY” TO LOAD IN A LAYTIME SENSE: RISK OF GOODS DAMAGED BY UNCLEAN HOLDS ON BUYERDMC/SandT/13/10
'''The Netherlands'''
'''Dana Petroleum Netherlands B.V. v Vos Sympathy B.V. The “Vos Sympathy”'''  '''Court of Appeal of The Hague: Judges: M.M. Olthof, A.A. Rijperman and R. van der Vlist: 11 December 2012: Case no. 200.079.897/01:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dana_Petroleum_Netherlands_v_Vos_Sympathy_-_The_Vos_Sympathy]]''' '''SUPPLYTIME 2005 CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER HIMLAYA AND KNOCK FOR KNOCK CLAUSES 'REASONABLE AND FAIR' UNDER DUTCH CIVIL CODE ART.6:248.2'''   DMC/SandT/1013/2409
'''England'''
'''Zodiac Maritime Agencies Limited White Rosebay Shipping SA v Fortescue Metals Group Hong Kong Chain Glory Shipping Limited''' '''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Commercial Court; Teare J; [2013] EWHC 1355 (Comm); 23 May 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/White_Rosebay_Shipping_v_Hong_Kong_Chain_Glory_Shipping]]'''TIME-CHARTERPARTY: CHARTERERS EVINCING INTENTION NOT TO PERFORM: OWNERS AFFIRMED CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ REPUDIATORY CONDUCT CONTINUED: WHETHER OWNERS SUBSEQUENTLY ENTITLED TO TERMINATE'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: [2010] EWHC 903 (Comm): 28 April 2010'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Zodiac_Maritime_v_Fortescue_Metals]]
'''CONSECUTIVE VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: WRONGFUL EARLY TERMINATION BY CHARTERER: DAMAGES: WHETHER “AVAILABLE MARKET” WHEN CHARTERPARTY TERMINATED: WHETHER SUBSEQUENT EMERGENCE OF MARKET DURING THE BALANCE OF CHARTER PERIOD RELEVANT TO THE ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES'''DMC/SandT/13/08
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Kulemesin Yuriy v HKSAR - The Neftegaz67''' '''Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal: Ma CJ, Chan, Riberio and Tang PJJ and Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony NPJ: FACV No. 6 and 7 of 2012: 22 February 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kulemesin_Yuriy_v_HKSAR_-_The_Neftegaz67]]''' http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfa/2013/15.html '''COLLISION: OFFENCE OF ENDANGERING THE SAFETY OF OTHERS: STATE OF MIND REQUIRED FOR THE OFFENCE OF ENDANGERMENT: NARROW CHANNEL AS QUESTION OF FACT: SHIPPING AND PORT CONTROL ORDINANCE (CAP.313, LAWS OF HONG KONG)'''  DMC/SandT/13/07 '''England'''  '''Bunge SA v Kyla Shipping Company Limited - The "Kyla"''' '''English High Court; Flaux J; [2012] EWHC 3522 (Comm); 10December 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bunge_SA_v_Kyla_Shipping_Company_-_The_Athena]] '''NYPE 1946 CHARTERPARTY: H&M INSURANCE REQUIRED FOR AGREED FIGURE: CASUALTY REPAIRS EXCEED SHIP’S MARKET VALUE BUT NOT AGREED HULL VALUE: WHETHER CHARTERPARTY FRUSTRATED'''  DMC/SandT/13/2306
'''England'''
'''ENE 1 Kos Limited Kuwait Rocks Co v Petroleo Brasileiro SAAMN Bulkcarriers Inc (The “Astra”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2013] EWHC 865 (Comm): 18 April 2013: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kuwait_Rocks_Co_v_AMN_Bulkcarriers_The_Astra]] '''TIME CHARTER: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT REPUDIATORY: WHETHER OBLIGATION TO PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION: RIGHT TO CLAIM LOSS OF PROFIT FOR REPUDIATION OR BREACH OF HIRE PAYMENT OBLIGATION'''  DMC/SandT/13/05 '''The “Decurion”'''  '''Hong Kong''' '''Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Fok, Chu JJA and McWalters J: CACV No.97 of 2012: 12 May 2012:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/ENE_1_Kos_Limited_v_PetrobasThe_Decurion_on_Appeal]]''' http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/2013/180.html '''ADMIRALTY: IN REM JURISDICTION: CLAIM AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT: WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR IN CONTROL” OF CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 12B(4) OF HIGH COURT ORDINANCE'''  DMC/SandT/13/04 '''Germany'''
'''English German Federal Supreme Court : Date of Appeal (Civil)Judgement: Longmore and Smith LJJ and Sir Mark Waller13 June 2012: [2010[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CMR_Art.29_and_Contributory_Negligence]] EWCA Civ 772: 6 July 2010'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYCMR TRANSPORT: SHIP WITHDRAWN FOR NON-PAYMENT APPLICATION OF HIRE WHILST LOADING CARGOART. 29 CMR: CARGO DISCHARGED BACK TO SHORE TWO DAYS LATERBURDEN OF PROOF: WHETHER SHIPOWNER COULD CLAIM REMUNERATION AT MARKET RATE FOR STORING THE CARGO DURING THAT PERIOD: WHETHER REMUNERATION DUE UNDER IMPLIED TERM OR AS QUANTUM MERUIT: WHETHER REDUCTION OF UNLIMITED LIABILITY DUE AS RIGHT CORRELATIVE TO DUTY CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF LOOKING AFTER THE SENDER IF THE CARRIER IS NOT NOTIFIED OF AN UNEXPECTEDLY HIGH VALUE OF THE TRANSPORT GOODS: WHETHER SHIPOWNER COULD RECOVER COSTS OF PROVIDING BAIL BOND'''
DMC/SandT/1013/2203 '''England'''  '''Dry Bulk Handy Holding Inc and Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Fayette International Holdings Ltd and Metinvest International SA (The “Bulk Chile”): English Commercial Court: Andrew Smith J: [2012] EWHC 2107 (Comm): 24 July 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dry_Bulk_Handling_&_CSAV_v_Fayette_International_&_Metinvest_-_The_Bulk_Chile]]''' '''CHAIN OF CHARTERPARTIES: HEAD TIME CHARTER, SUB-TIME CHARTER, TIME TRIP CHARTER AND VOYAGE CHARTER: OWNERS’ BILLS OF LADING: RIGHT TO INTERVENE IN COLLECTION OF FREIGHT: RIGHT TO LIEN SUB-FREIGHT AND SUB-HIRE: RIGHT TO HIRE OR REASONABLE REMUNERATION FOR COMPLETION OF VOYAGE FOLLOWING TERMINATION OF TIME CHARTER'''  DMC/SandT/13/02
'''England'''
'''Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA Wuhan Ocean Economic & Technical Cooperation Co Ltd v Sinochem Tianjin Import Schiffahrts-Gesellschaft “Hansa Murcia” MBH & Export Corp – the « Aconcagua»Co KG''' '''English Queen’s Bench (Commercial Court): Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 3104 (Comm): 6 November 2012:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CSAV_v_Sinochem_the_AconcaguaWuhan_Ocean_v_Hansa_Murcia]]''' '''CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF VESSEL: ADDENDUM FOR SELLERS TO OBTAIN EXTENSION OF REFUND GUARANTEE: IMPLIED TERM TO OBTAIN EXTENSION WITHIN REASONABLE TIME BEFORE EXPIRY OF ORIGINAL GUARANTEE: INNOMINATE TERM: BUT BREACH OF IMPLIED TERM NOT A REPUDIATORY BREACH AS, UNDER THE TERMS OF THE GUARANTEE, BUYERS COULD MAINTAIN THE SECURITY BY COMMENCING ARBITRATION'''  DMC/SandT/13/01 '''Germany'''
'''German Federal Supreme Court''' '''"Und Adryatik"; Date of Judgement: 15 December 2011: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Und_Adryatik]]''' '''CMR TRANSPORT: APPLICATION OF ART. 2 CMR: FIRE ON RO-RO-CARRIER: HAGUE RULES AS ‘CONDITIONS PRESCRIBED BY LAW’: FIRE AS AN EVENT WHICH COULD ONLY HAVE OCCURRED BY REASON OF CARRIAGE BY SEA'''  DMC/SandT/12/25 '''England''' '''E.D. & F. Man Sugar Ltd v Unicargo Transportgesellschaft mBh''' '''English High Court(Commercial Court): Christopher Clarke Eder J.: [20092012] EWHC 1880 2879 (Comm); : 23 October 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/E_D_and_F_Man_v_Unicargo_Transport]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY: LAYTIME AND DEMURRAGE: DESTRUCTION OF CONVEYOR-BELT SYSTEM AT LOADING PORT BEFORE FIXTURE: DELAY IN BERTHING: NO OBLIGATION ON CHARTERERS TO NOMINATE A SECOND BERTH: DESTRUCTION DID NOT CONSTITUTE MECHANICAL BREAKDOWN: ACT OF STATE-SPONSORED PORT AUTHORITY IN ORDINARY COURSE OF CARRYING OUT PORT OR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS DID NOT FALL WITHIN EXCEPTION OF GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE'''   DMC/SandT/12/24 July 2009 '''England''' '''Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA'''
'''BILLS OF LADING English Court of Appeal: SHIPMENT OF CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE IN CONTAINERLord Neuberger MR, Moore-Bick and Toulson LJJ: EXPLOSION AND FIRE[2012] EWCA Civ 838: DANGEROUS GOODS19 June 2011: WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO INDEMNITY UNDER ART[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.IV RULE 6 OF HAGUE RULES: STOWAGE OF CONTAINER IN PROXIMITY TO HEATED BUNKER TANK: WHETHER THIS CAUSED THE EXPLOSION: WHETHER THIS RENDERED VESSEL UNSEAWORTHY AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE VOYAGE: WHETHER CARRIER COULD RELY ON DEFENCE OF ERROR IN MANAGEMENT OF THE SHIP'''php/Carboex_SA_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]]
'''DEMURRAGE: CALCULATION OF LAYTIME: STRIKE EXCEPTION: STRIKE CAUSING CONGESTION AT PORT AND CHARTERED VESSELS DELAYED FROM BERTHING AS A RESULT: PERIOD OF DELAY TO BE DISCOUNTED FROM CALCULATION OF LAYTIME SO LONG AS STRIKE WAS THE EFFECTIVE CAUSE OF DELAY'''
DMC/SandT/10/21
EnglandDMC/SandT/12/23 '''Singapore''' '''Singapore Court of Appeal''' '''The “Bunga Melati 5” [2012] SGCA 46: Judgment delivered by VK Rajah JA, 21st August 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Bunga_Melati_5]] '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: WHETHER A GOOD ARGUABLE CASE ON THE MERITS REQUIRED: THE VASILIY GOLOVNIN EXPLAINED'''  DMC/SandT/12/22 '''Australia'''
'''Cosco Bulk Carrier Co 1. Jebsens International (Australia) Pty Ltd and Anor v Team-Up Owning Co Interfert Australia Pty Ltd – The “Saldanha”[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_v_Team-Up_Owning]]and Ors (2011) 112 SASR 297, 25 August 2011 (Anderson J)'''
'''English High Court: Gross 2. Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S v Beach Building & Civil Group Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 696, 29 June 2012 (Foster J.): 11 June 2010 [2010] EWHC 1340 [https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/_1._Jebsens_International_(CommAustralia)_v_Interfert_Australia:_2._Norden_A/S_v_Beach_Building_&_Civil_Group]]''' '''WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY A "SEA CARRIAGE DOCUMENT" FOR PURPOSES OF S.11 AUSTRALIAN CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1991'''
'''NYPE FORM CHARTERPARTY: PIRACY: WHETHER SHIP OFF-HIRE DURING DETENTION BY PIRATES: AVERAGE ACCIDENTS TO SHIP OR CARGO: DEFAULT OR DEFICIENCY OF MEN: ANY OTHER CAUSE PREVENTING THE FULL WORKING OF THE VESSEL'''
DMC/SandT/1012/2021
'''England'''
'''Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd TAOKAS NAVIGATION SA v North China Shipping Limited . KOMROWSKI BULK SHIPPING KG (M/V “North Prince”GMBH & CO)[[http://www; KENT LINE INTERNATIONAL LTD.onlinedmc.co.uk/indexv.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_North_China_Shipping]]SOLYM CARRIERS LTDTHE MV “PAIWAN WISDOM”'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial English High Court): David Steel ; Teare J: ; [20102012] EWHC 1692 1888 (Comm); 11 July 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Toakas_Navigation_v_Komrowski_Bulk_Shipping: 8 July 2010_Kent_Line_v_Solym_Carriers_-_The_Paiwan_Wisdom]]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYCONWARTIME 2004: WRONGFUL EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY SUB-CHARTERER OWNERS’ LIBERTY TO REJECT VOYAGE ORDERS: DAMAGES AS DIFFERENCE MATERIAL INCREASE IN RISK BETWEEN MARKET RATE OF HIRE CHARTERPARTY DATE AND CONTRACT RATE DATE OF HIREORDER NOT REQUIRED: DISPONENT SHIPOWNER’S EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL UNDER HEAD CHARTER IRRELEVANT UNLESS CAUSED BY SUB-CHARTERER’S REPUDIATION CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION'''
DMC/SandT/1012/1920
'''English High CourtEngland'''
'''Omak Maritime Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Co'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Omak_Maritime_v_Mamola_Challenger_Shipping]]
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial United Kingdom Supreme Court): Teare JLords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Sumption: [20102012] EWHC 2026 (Comm)UKSC 17, [2012] 2 WLR 976: 2 May 2012:[[https: 4 August 2010//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Petroleo_Brasiliero_v_ENE_Kos_1]]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: BREACH SHELLTIME 3 FORM: VESSEL WITHDRAWN FOR NON-PAYMENT OF CONTRACT BY CHARTERERHIRE WHILST LOADING: MARKET RATE LOSS OF HIRE HIGHER THAN CONTRACT RATE USE OF HIREVESSEL: EXPENSES INCURRED IN DISCHARGING CARGO BACK TO SHORE: WHETHER LOSS AND EXPENSE RECOVERABLE UNDER INDEMNITY CLAUSE: SHIPOWNER’S CLAIM FOR WASTED EXPENDITUREWHETHER RECOVERABLE AS RIGHT CORRELATIVE TO DUTY AS BAILEE TO LOOK AFTER GOODS: RELATION WITH PRINCIPLE IN ROBINSON V HARMAN'''WHETHER CHARTERERS’ ORDER TO LOAD AN EFFECTIVE CAUSE...
DMC/SandT/1012/1819
'''Hong Kong'''
'''The “Hua Tian Long”“Decurion”''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.141 of 2010: 4 May 2012: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Hua_Tian_LongThe_Decurion]]  '''ADMIRALTY: IN REM JURISDICTION: CLAIM AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT: WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR IN CONTROL” OF CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 12B(4) OF HIGH COURT ORDINANCE'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Stone J in Chambers: HCAJ No. 59/2008: 23 April 2010'''
http:DMC/SandT/www.hklii.org12/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000059_2008-70707.html18
'''BREACH OF CONTRACT: DEFENDANT SHIPOWNER’S FAILURE TO PROVIDE VESSEL: CHINESE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT AS SHIPOWNER: CLAIM FOR SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND CROWN IMMUNITY: WAIVER AND SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTIONEngland'''
'''EITZEN BULK A/S v. TTMI SARL - THE “BONNIE SMITHWICK”'''
DMC'''English High Court; Eder J; [2012] EWHC 202 (Comm); 14 February 2012:[[https:/SandT/10www.onlinedmc.co.uk/17index.php/Eitzen_Bulk_v_TTMI_-_The_Bonnie_Smithwick]]'''
'''South AfricaSHELLTIME 4: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: “BUNKERS ON DELIVERY/REDELIVERY” CLAUSE: MEANING OF ‘PRICE ACTUALLY PAID’'''
'''The MV “Ioannis NK”'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ioannis_N_K]]
'''The owner of the cargo lately laden on board the MV “Ioannis NK” v The Master and Crew & Others (AC 66DMC/2009)'''SandT/12/17
'''High Court of South Africa (Western Cape High Court, Cape Town) exercising its admiralty jurisdiction: Cleaver J.; 26 August 2009Hong Kong'''
'''EXAMINATION OF CREW FOR PURPOSE OF OBTAINING EVIDENCE WHERE DISPUTE SUBJECT TO FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS: EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER THE ADMIRALTY JURISIDICTION REGULATIONS ACT 1983: FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED: RIGHTS OF CREW MEMBERS FOLLOWING A CASUALTYThe “Marcatania”'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.138 of 2008: 2 December 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Marcatania]]'''
DMC/SandT/10/16'''CONTRACT: AGREEMENT TO EXCHANGE SLOTS FOR USE: SLOTS ON VESSEL CHARTERED BY THIRD PARTY: FAILURE TO PAY HIRE: VESSEL WITHDRAWN BY SHIPOWNER: WHETHER SHIPOWNER OBLIGED TO ON-CARRY CARGO UNDER BAILMENT: WHETHER LIABLE IN CONVERSION FOR DELAY IN RELEASING CARGO'''
'''England and Wales'''
'''Kolmar Group AG v Traxpo Enterprises Pvt Limited''' [[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk12/index.php/Kolmar_v_Traxpo]]16
'''English High Court: [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm)England'''
'''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: FOB CONTRACT: ECONOMIC DURESS BY DEMANDING PAYMENT FOR LESSER AMOUNT OF GOODS AT HIGHER PRICE THAN AGREED UNDER THE CONTRACT: TORT OF INTIMIDATION: DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACTM.H. Progress Lines SA v Orient Shipping Rotterdam BV and other, The “Genius Star 1”'''
'''English Queen’s Court (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2011] EWHC 3083 (Comm), [2012] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 222: 28 November 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/M_H_Progress_Lines_v_Orient_Shipping_-_The_Genius_Star_1]]
DMC/SandT/10/15'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SUB-CHARTER: CARGO CLAIM AGAINST SUB-CHARTERER: APPORTIONMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST CHARTERER AND SHIPOWNER UNDER INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996: DIFFERENT TIME BARS PROVIDED IN HEAD CHARTER AND INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT: APPLICABLE TIME BAR'''
'''New Zealand'''
'''Tasman Orient Line CV v New Zealand China Clays Limited and others'''[[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk12/index.php/The_%22Tasman_Pioneer%22]]'''Supreme Court of New Zealand (Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath and Wilson JJ)[2010] NZSC 37 (16 April 2010)'''15
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: SHIP DAMAGED BY GROUNDING: SEAWATER ENTRY TO FORWARD COMPARTMENTS: DECK CARGO OF CONTAINERS DAMAGED BY INUNDATION: HAGUE-VISBY RULES: ART.IV RULE 2(a): DEFENCE OF ACT, NEGLECT OR DEFAULT OF THE MASTER… IN THE NAVIGATION OR MANAGEMENT OF THE SHIP: FAILURE TO NOTIFY AUTHORITIES OF CASUALTY: FAILURE TO PROVIDE TIMELY AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO SHIP’S MANAGERS: CAUSE OF CASUALTY INITIALLY FABRICATED: ALL LEADING TO DELAY IN PROVISION OF SALVAGE SERVICES: WHETHER ELEMENT OF GOOD FAITH ESSENTIAL TO CARRIER’S ENTITLEMENT TO RULE 2(a) DEFENCEEngland'''
'''Sideridraulic Systems SpA v BBC Chartering & Logistics GmbH & Co KG'''
DMC'''English Queen’s Bench (Commercial Court): Andrew Smith J: [2011] EWHC 3106 (Comm): 30 November 2011: [[https:/SandT/10www.onlinedmc.co.uk/14index.php/Sideridraulic_Systems_v_BBC_Chartering_&_Logistics]
'''English High CourtCARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: INTERPRETATION OF MASTER’S REMARK IN BILL OF LADING: WHETHER CARGO WAS DECK CARGO UNDER HAGUE-VISBY RULES: IF DECK CARGO, WHETHER PARTIES AGREED THAT HAGUE-VISBY RULES NEVERTHELESS APPLIED: WHETHER US COURTS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSE APPLIED'''
'''Sylvia Shipping Co Limited v Progress Bulk Carriers Limited [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sylvia_Shipping_v._Progress_Bulk_Carriers]]
[2010] EWHC 542 (Comm): English High Court of Justice - Commercial Court; Hamblen J.; 18 March 2010'''
DMC/SandT/12/14 '''England''' '''Isabella Shipowner SA v Shagang Shipping Co Ltd (The “Aquafaith”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 1077 (Comm): 26 April 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Isabella_Shipowner_v_Shagang_Shipping_The_Aquafaith]]''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: TIMECHARTERPARTYAMENDED NYPE FORM: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR OWNERS’ BREACHRULE IN WHITE AND CARTER V MCGREGOR: WHETHER OWNERS LIABLE FOR TIMECHARTERERS’ LOSS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT PREMATURE RE-DELIVERY OF PROFIT ON CANCELLED SUB-CHARTERVESSEL BY CHARTERERS'''  DMC/SandT/12/13 '''Hong Kong''' '''A O Smith Electrical Products (Changzhou) Co Ltd v Blue Anchor Line & Ors'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: [2012] 1 HKLRD 301: 18 November 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/A_O_Smith_Electrical_Products_v_Blue_Anchor_Line_&_Ors]]
DMC/SandT/10/13'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: WAYBILL: LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: INTERPRETATION: GOVERNING LAW OF CARRIAGE: APPLICABLE LIMIT OF LIABILITY'''
'''Hong Kong Special Administrative Region'''
'''Maintek Computer (Suzhou) Co Ltd and others v Blue Anchor Line and others'''[[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk12/index.php/Maintek_Computer_v_ECT_Delta_Terminal]]12
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Reyes J in Chambers: HCAJ No. 106/2008: 25 February 2010[http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000106_2008-69910.html]Malaysia'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY BY OCEAN TERMINAL: SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: REAL PROSPECT OF SUCCESS: LIMITATION CLAUSE: MEANING OF ‘DELIVERY’: STAY IN FAVOUR OF ARBITRATION: APPLICABILITY OF TERMINAL CONTRACTSarawak Shell Berhad v South Sumatra Richfield Marine Pte Ltd (The “Red Gold”)'''
'''Malaysian Court of Appeal: Sulaiman Bin Daud JCA, Syed Ahmad Helmy Bin Syed Ahmad JCA and Anantham Kasinather JCA: 19 March 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sarawak_Shell_v_South_Sumatra_Richfield_Marine_-_The_Red_Gold]]'''
DMC/SandT/10/12'''ADMIRALTY: COLLISION BETWEEN OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSEL AND FIXED OFFSHORE OIL PLATFORM: RIGHT OF VESSEL OWNERS TO LIMIT LIABILITY: WHETHER COLLISION CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE OF OWNERS IN THE NAVIGATION OR MANAGEMENT OF VESSEL: WHETHER VESSEL OWNERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY DUE TO ABSENCE OF ACTUAL FAULT OR PRIVITY: MERCHANT SHIPPING ORDINANCE 1952 SECTION 360 VIZ. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CONVENTION 1957'''
'''The Netherlands'''
'''Maersk B.V., formerly “P&O Nedlloyd” and before that called Nedlloyd Lijnen B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands v. Irano European Co. Ireco S.A., Luxembourg - The “Dolphin I”[[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk12/index.php/The_Dolphin_1]]'''11
'''Court of Appeal of The Hague (The Netherlands). J.M. van der Klooster, J.E.H.M. Pickaers, J.H.J. Teunissen, 29 September 2009, Case number 105.002.543/01 (unpublished)England'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: HAGUE RULES: RECEIVED FOR SHIPMENT BILL OF LADING: CARGO DAMAGE: PERISHABLE GOODS: GROSS NEGLIGENCE: CARRIER’S KNOWLEDGE OF GOODS IN CONTAINERS: ‘BEFORE AND AFTER’ CLAUSE: LIMITATION OF APPLICABILITY OF CONTRACTUAL CLAUSES: REASONABLENESS AND FAIRNESSOsmium Shipping Corporation v Cargill International SA (The “Captain Stefanos”)'''
'''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 571 (Comm): 13 March 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Osmium_Shipping_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Captain_Stefanos]]
DMC'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE (1946) FORM INCORPORATING CONWARTIME 2004: WHETHER VESSEL WAS OFF-HIRE DURING PERIOD OF HIJACKING BY SOMALI PIRATES: WHETHER RIDER CLAUSE PROVIDING FOR OFF-HIRE DURING “CAPTURE/SandT/10/11SEIZURE” WAS QUALIFIED BY THE PHRASE “BY ANY AUTHORITY”: WHETHER CONWARTIME 2004 CLAUSE QUALIFIED OFF-HIRE RIDER CLAUSE'''
'''High Court of England and Wales'''
'''Sotrade Denizcilik Sanayi Ve Ticaret AS v Amadou LO and others (The “Duden”)[[http:DMC/SandT/www.onlinedmc.co.uk12/index.php/The_Duden_2008_EWHC_2762_Comm]]'''10
'''Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court): Jonathan Hirst, Q.C.: [2008] EWHC 2762 (Comm); [2009] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 145: 19 November 2008England'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: CHARTERPARTY: LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED IN BILLS OF LADING: CONSERVATORY ARREST BY CARGO OWNER AND INSURER: JURISDICTION: ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION: WRONGFUL INDUCEMENT OR PROCUREMENT OF BREACH OF EXPRESS AND IMPLIED TERMS OF BILL OF LADING CONTRACT: REFUSAL TO ACCEPT PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY CLUB UNDERTAKINGProgress Bulk Carriers Limited v Tube City IMS LLC (The “Cenk Kaptanoglu”)'''
'''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm): 17 February 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Progress_Bulk_Carriers_v_Tube_City_IMS_-_The_Cenk_Kaptanoglu]]'''
DMC/SandT/10/10 '''Singapore High CourtVOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: WHETHER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT VOIDABLE FOR DURESS: WHETHER OWNERS’ CONDUCT, ALTHOUGH NOT ILLEGAL, AMOUNTED TO “ILLEGITIMATE PRESSURE”'''
'''The “Asia Star”''' [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Asia_Star]][2009] SGHC 91'''
'''Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 17 April 2009 '''[2009] SGHC 91'''DMC/SandT/12/09
'''BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: PLAINTIFF NOT REQUIRED TO INCUR EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSE OR TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS IN ORDER TO MITIGATE LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGOEngland'''
'''Acergy Shipping Ltd v. Société Bretonne De Réparation Navale SAS'''
DMC'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: [2011] EWHC 2490 (Comm): 5 October 2011: [[https:/SandT/10www.onlinedmc.co.uk/09index.php/Acergy_Shipping_v_Société_Bretonne_de_Réparation_Navale]]
'''English High Court''']]'''Kallang Shipping SA Panama v AXA Assurances Senegal and Comptoir Commercial Mandiaye Ndiaya (The “Kallang”)[[httpCONTRACT FOR PROVISION OF REPAIR SERVICES TO VESSEL://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Kallang]]FIRE CAUSING DAMAGE BEYOND REPAIR WORK UNDERTAKEN: INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT: SCOPE OF INDEMNITY CONTAINED THEREIN'''
'''Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court): Jonathan Hirst, Q.C.: [2008] EWHC 2761 (Comm); [2009] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 124: 19 November 2008'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: CHARTERPARTY: LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED IN BILLS OF LADING: IMPLIED TERMS: ARREST BY CARGO OWNER AND INSURER: SECURITY: JURISDICTION: WRONGFUL INDUCEMENT OR PROCUREMENT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT: PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY CLUB: LETTERS OF UNDERTAKING'''DMC/SandT/12/08
DMC/SandT/10/08'''England'''
'''SingaporeGeofizika DD v. MMB International Limited and Greenshields Cowie & Co Ltd: “The Green Island”'''
TAT SENG MACHINE MOVERS PTE LTD V. ORIX LEASING SINGAPORE LTD:'''English Court of Appeal; Lord Neuberger, Thomas LJ, and Sir Nicholas Wall; [2010] EWCA Civ 459, [20092010] SGCA 42 2 Lloyds Rep 1; 28 April 2010: [[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Tat_Seng_Machine_Movers_v_Orix_LeasingGeofizika_v_MMB_International_-_The_Green_Island]]
'''Singapore Court of AppealINCOTERMS 2000 CIP: Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA, Chao Hick Tin JA, V K Rajah JACARRIAGE ON DECK: 11 September 2009OBLIGATIONS OF FREIGHT FORWARDER: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: CAUSATION'''
'''BAILMENT – BAILOR’S RIGHT TO IMMEDIATE RIGHT TO POSSESSION IF BAILEE’S BEHAVIOUR REPUGNANT TO TERMS OF BAILMENT – WHETHER CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS RESTRICTED BAILOR’S RIGHTS UNDER COMMON LAW'''
'''TORT – CONVERSION – WHETHER ACT OF REMOVING MACHINE FROM PREMISES AND DELIVERING IT AS INSTRUCTED AMOUNTED TO CONVERSION OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF STORING MACHINE AT WAREHOUSE AMOUNTED TO CONVERSION OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF REDELIVERING MACHINE TO PURPORTED OWNER AMOUNTED TO CONVERSION OF MACHINE''' DMC/SandT/12/07
'''England'''
'''Hyundai Merchant Marine Company Limited v Trafigura Beheer BV (The “Gaz Energy”)'''
DMC'''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2011] EWHC 3108 (Comm): 29 November 2011:[[https:/SandT/10www.onlinedmc.co.uk/7index.php/Hyundai_Merchant_Marine_v_Trafigura_-_the_Gas_Energy]]
'''Hong KongTIME CHARTER: SPEED AND PERFORMANCE WARRANTY: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF CHARTER: WHETHER SPEED AND PERFORMANCE AN “ALL WEATHERS” WARRANTY OR LIMITED TO “MAXIMUM WIND FORCE 4 ON BEAUFORT SCALE”'''
'''The “Blue Bridge” (formerly known as The “Great Power”)''' [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Blue_Bridge]]
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Reyes J in Chambers: HCAJ No. 136DMC/1999: 1 February 2010'''SandT/12/06
http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000136_1999-69593.html'''The “Oriental Baltic”'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEASingapore High Court: SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED INTO AGAINST A SHIPOWNING COMPANY THAT HAD BEEN DISSOLVEDTan Lee Meng J : APPLICATION BY RE-INSURER TO INTERVENE[2011] 3 SGHC 75: AUTHORITY TO ACT FOR PRINCIPAL IN LITIGATION[[https: DELAY IN APPLICATION TO INTERVENE: REAL PROSPECT OF SUCCESS'''//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Oriental_Baltic]]
'''OWNERS OF VESSEL UNDER VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION: IN REM PROCEEDINGS AGAINST VESSEL COMMENCED AFTER LIQUIDATION: PLAINTIFF FILED CAVEAT AGAINST RELEASE AGAINST VESSEL PRIOR TO LIQUIDATION: ACTION AGAINST COMPANY UNDER LIQUIDATION ORDINARILY STAYED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT: WHETHER LEAVE SHOULD BE GRANTED TO PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE WITH ITS ACTION'''
DMC/SandT/10/06
'''Singapore'''DMC/SandT/12/05
'''The “Catur Samudra”England''' [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Catur_Samudra]]
'''Singapore High Court: Judgment delivered by Steven Chong JC, 15 January 2010: [2010] SGHC 18Thai Maparn Trading Co Ltd v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd (The “Med Salvador” and “Goa”)'''
'''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION English Commercial Court: WHETHER CLAIM UNDER GUARANTEE IS A CLAIM “ARISING OUT OF AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE USE OR HIRE” OF A VESSEL Beatson J: SECTION 3[2011] EWHC 2494 (1Comm)(H) HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACT: 4 October 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thai_Maparn_Trading_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]]'''
'''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: FOB CONTRACT: WHETHER BUYERS IN BREACH OF CONDITION PRECEDENT IN CONTRACT BY FAILING TO ISSUE 7 DAY ETA OF VESSEL: WHETHER SELLERS IN REPUDIATORY/RENUNCIATORY BREACH BY REJECTING BUYERS’ NOTICE AND STATING THAT CARGO WOULD NOT BE READY IN TIME'''
DMC/SandT/10/04
'''Hong Kong'''DMC/SandT/12/04
'''Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc v The Owners and/or Demise Charterers of the Ship or Vessel “Asian Atlas” ([[The “Asian Atlas”)]]England'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Pacific Basin IHX Limited v Bulkhandling Handymax AS (The “Triton Lark”): English Commercial Court of Appeal: Ma CJHC, Stone and Reyes JJTeare J: [2011] EWHC 2868 (Comm): CACV No. 257 of 20078 November 2011: 23 April 2008 ([2008] 3 HKLRD 604; [httphttps://www.hkliionlinedmc.orgco.uk/hkindex.php/jud/eng/hkca/2008/CACV000257_2007-60848.htmlPacific_Basin_v_Bulkhandling_Handymax,_the_Triton_Lark]]'''
'''ACTION TIME CHARTER: PIRACY RISKS IN GULF OF ADEN IN REM UNDER HK HIGH COURT ORDINANCE, S.12A(2)(e)2008: CONWARTIME 1993/2004 CLAUSE: WARRANT ARBITRATION APPEAL: SECTION 69 OF ARRESTARBITRATION ACT 1996: CORRECT TEST FOR “ANY CLAIM ASSESSING RISK OF PIRACY INCIDENT OCCURING FOR DAMAGE DONE PURPOSE OF 1993/2004 CLAUSE: WHETHER OWNERS DEVIATED BY A SHIP”: SETTING ASIDE: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE REROUTING VESSEL VIA CAPE OF GOOD HOPE INSTEAD OF GULF OF FACTS RELATING TO JURISDICTIONADEN'''
DMC/SandT/1012/03
'''Hong KongEngland'''
'''Cheong Yuk Fai Emeraldian Limited Partnership v Wellmix Shipping Limited and another v China International Freight Forwarders Guangzhou Iron & Steel Corporation Limited (HKThe “Vine”) Ltd'''
'''English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2010] EWHC 1411 (Comm): 17 June 2010:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cheong_Yuk_Fai_and_another_v_China_International_Freight_Forwarders_(HK)_LtdEmeraldian_Limited_v_Wellmix_Shipping,_the_Vine]]'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of Appeal'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: Cheung and Yuen JJA and A Chung JWHETHER VESSEL’S OBLIGATION TO OBTAIN CLEARANCE BY PORT AUTHORITIES BEFORE GIVING NOTICE OF READINESS WAIVED FOR PURPOSE OF COMMENCEMENT OF LAYTIME: CACV No. 463 of 2002WHETHER CHARTERERS COULD RELY ON EXCEPTIONS TO RUNNING OF LAYTIME: 26 January 2005WHETHER CHARTERERS IN BREACH OF SAFE PORT WARRANTY: [2005] 4 HKLRD 544 (English translation; judgment handed down in Chinese)WHETHER DEMURRAGE RECOVERABLE FOR DETENTION OF VESSEL'''
http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkca/2005/CACV000463X_2002-47015.html
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS: CLAIM AGAINST CARRIER FOR WRONGFUL DELIVERY OF GOODS: CONVERSION: LIMITATION UNDER HAGUE-VISBY RULES AND BILL OF LADING'''DMC/12/02
'''England'''
DMC/SandT/10/02 '''ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED v. ALBEMARLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and ALBEMARLE CORPORATION'''
'''German Federal Supreme English High Court; Flaux J; [2011] EWHC 1574 (Comm); 21 June 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Astrazeneca_UK_v_Albemarle_International]]'''
'''Date of JudgementCONTRACT: 18 June 2009CLAUSES GRANTING THE RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL: Case Reference 1ZR 140/06:[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Case_Reference:_1_ZR_140/06]EXCLUSION CLAUSES AND DELIBERATE BREACH'''
'''CARRIER’S LIABILITY: BREAKING THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: SUB-CONTRACTING'''
DMC/SandT/12/01
DMC/SandT/10/01'''The Netherlands'''
'''Furtrans Denzilick Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS (“Furtrans”) v Augusta Due Srl (“Augusta”): The Netherlands Supreme Court"Constanza M”'''
'''Nile Dutch Africa Line B.V, Rotterdam, Supreme Court of the Netherlands (“NDAL”“SCN”) v. (1summary proceedings) Delta Lloyd Schadeverzekering N: Vice-President J.VB., Rotterdam, Fleers as Chairman and the Netherlands (“Delta Lloyd”)judges A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, (2) Premium Tobacco Investments NF.VB.Bakels, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (“Tobacco”), (3) MC. Meerapfel Söhne AE.Drion and G.Snijders LJN:BT2708, BaselDecember 9, Switzerland (“Meerapfel”) and (4) CETAC, Douala, Cameroon (“Cetac”) - The “NDS Provider” ''' '''2011:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_%E2%80%9CNDS_Provider%E2%80%9DFurtrans_v_Augusta,_the_Constanza_M]]'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA UNDER BILL OF LADING: HAGUE VISBY RULES: LIABILITY FOR DEFECTIVE CONTAINERS SUPPLIED BY CARRIER: PACKAGING OR PART CONSTRUCTION OF ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE VESSEL? INTERPRETATION ARREST OF TREATIES UNDER DUTCH LAWSEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''
Retrieved from ‘https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php?title=Special:MobileDiff/668...1434’

Navigation menu