2,049
edits
Changes
From DMC
no edit summary
England '''Agile Holdings Corporation (Claimant) v Essar Shipping Ltd (Defendant):''' '''English Commercial Court: Judge Waksman QC: [2018] EWHC 1055 (Comm): [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Agile_Holdings_v_Essar_Shipping_-_The_Maria]]''' '''FOR CHARTERERS TO OBTAIN A 50/50 APPORTIONMENT FOR CARGO LIABILITY BETWEEN THEMSELVES AND THE OWNERS ON GROUNDS OF THE FIRST PROVISO TO CLAUSE 8(B) OF THE INTER- CLUB NEW YORK PRODUCE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT 1996 (THE “INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT" OR "ICA”), THE CHARTERPARTY MUST CONTAIN A PROVISION WHICH IS CLEARLY INTENDED TO PASS COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARGO HANDLING TO THE SHIPOWNERS. A PARTIAL TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY, OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR A PARTICULAR ASPECT OF CARGO HANDLING (SUCH AS STOWAGE), WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO ENGAGE THE ICA 8(B) PROVISO. ''' DMC/SandT/18/04 England '''Glencore Energy UK Ltd v OMV Supply & Trading Ltd (The “Seagrace”)'''/ '''English Commercial Court: Sir Ross Cranston: [2018] EWHC 895 (Comm): 23 April 2018: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_v_OMV_Supply_and_Trading_-_The_Seagrace]]''' '''CFR SALES CONTRACT: BP CFR SALES TERMS: BPVOY4 FORM: VESSEL WAITING OFFSHORE EN ROUTE TO PORT OF DISCHARGE AT REQUEST OF BUYERS: SELLERS CLAIM FOR DETENTION BASED ON IMPLIED CONTRACT: WHETHER CLAIM FOR WAITING OFFSHORE WAS A DEMURRAGE CLAIM: WHETHER CLAIM TIME-BARRED DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DEMURRAGE CLAIMS PRESENTATION CLAUSE DEADLINE''' DMC/SandT/18/03 England '''Lukoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Ocean Tankers Pte Ltd (The “Ocean Neptune”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2018] EWHC 163 (Comm): 2 February 2018:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Asia_Pacific_v_Ocean_Tankers_-_The_Ocean_Neptune]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: EXXONMOBILVOY 2005 FORM: LITASCO CLAUSES: DEMURRAGE CLAIM PRESENTATION TIME-BAR REQUIRING DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF CLAIM TO BE PRESENTED TO CHARTERERS WITHIN 90 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF CARGO DISCHARGE: WHETHER CLAIM FOR TIME LOST WAITING FOR ORDERS TIME-BARRED DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DOCUMENT PRESENTATION REQUIREMENT: APPEAL FROM PARTIAL FINAL AWARD UNDER SECTION 69 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/SandT/18/02 England '''Kyokuyo Co Ltd v AP Møller-Maersk A/S, trading as “Maersk Line”''' '''English High Court – Commercial Court: Mr Justice Andrew Baker: [2017] EWHC 654 (Comm): 29 March 2017: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kyokuyo_v_AP_Møller-Maersk_-_trading_as_Maersk_Line]] '''LIMITATION OF LIABILITY UNDER HAGUE/HAGUE-VISBY RULES: WHETHER LIMITATION APPLIED TO EACH SEPARATE PACKAGE/UNIT DAMAGED OR TO TOTAL NUMBER OF PACKAGES/UNITS''' DMC/SandT/18/01 England '''CSSA Chartering and Shipping Services S.A. v Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd (The “Pacific Voyager”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2017] EWHC 2579 (Comm): 18 October 2017: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CSSA_Chartering_and_Shipping_Services_v_Mitsui_O.S.K._Lines_-_The_Pacific_Voyager]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: SHELLVOY 5 FORM: WHETHER OBLIGATION ON OWNER TO GET THE VESSEL TO THE LOADING PORT WITHIN A CERTAIN TIME: WHETHER SUCH AN OBLIGATION IS ABSOULTE OR ONLY ONE OF DUE DILIGENCE: WHETHER LAYCAN EQUIVALENT TO AN ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL OR READINESS TO LOAD DATE''' DMC/SandT/17/14 England '''Glencore International AG v MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.''' '''English Court of Appeal; Lewison and Henderson LJJ, Sir Christopher Clarke; [2017] EWCA Civ 365; 24 May 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_International_v_MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company]]''' '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY OF CARGO: MEANING OF “DELIVERY ORDER": ELECTRONIC RELEASE SYSTEMS IN OPERATION AT PORT OF DISCHARGE: WHETHER A RELEASE NOTE CONTAINING PIN CODES CONSTITUTED A DELIVERY ORDER: WHETHER CONSIGNEE ESTOPPED BY PREVIOUS USE OF ERS SYSTEM''' DMC/SandT/17/13 England '''Navalmare UK Limited v Kale Maden Hammaddeler Sanayi ve Ticart AS (The “Arundel Castle”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Knowles J: [2017] EWHC 116 (Comm): 31 January 2017: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Navalmare_UK_v_Kale_Maden_Hammaddeler_Sanayi_ve_Ticart_-_The_Arundel_Castle]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: MEANING OF “PORT LIMITS”: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL''' DMC/SandT/17/12 Singapore '''DSA Consultancy (FZC) v The “Eurohope”''' '''Singapore High Court; Chua Lee Ming J; [2017] SGHC 218: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSA_Consultancy_(FZC)_v_The_Eurohope]] '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: ARREST TO OBTAIN SECURITY IN AID OF FOREIGN COURT PROCEEDINGS''' DMC/SandT/17/11 Canada '''De Wolf Maritime Safety BV v Traffic-Tech International Inc. (The “Zagora”)''' '''Federal Court, Ontario: Madam Justice St-Louis; 2017 FC 23: 11 January 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/De_Wolf_Maritime_Safety_v_Traffic-Tech_International_-_The_Zagora]]''' '''HAGUE-VISBY RULES: WHETHER CARGO CARRIED ON-DECK UNDECLARED AMOUNTED TO “GOODS” AS DEFINED IN THE RULES: WHETHER A CARRIER COULD RELY ON THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO GOODS CARRIED ON-DECK WITHOUT AUTHORISATION''' DMC/SandT/17/10 England '''Transgrain Shipping (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Yangtze Navigation (Hong Kong) Co Ltd.''''''English Commercial Court: Teare J: (2016) EWHC 3122 (Comm): [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Transgrain_Shipping_(Singapore)_v_Yangtze_Navigation_(Hong_Kong)]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY (TIME): NYPE INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996, CLAUSE 8(D): WHETHER “ACT” REQUIRES FAULT''' DMC/SandT/17/09 Singapore '''The “Posidon” and another matter''' '''Singapore High Court; Belinda Ang Saw Ean J; [2017] SGHC 138:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Posidon]] '''CLAIMS AGAINST SHIP SALE PROCEEDS: PRIORITIES: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH ESTABLISHED ORDER OF PRIORITIES MAY BE DEPARTED FROM: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH NECESSARIES CLAIM MAY RANK ABOVE MORTGAGEE’S CLAIM: WHETHER REQUIREMENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF NATURE AND EXTENT OF EXPENDITURE DIFFERS FOR DIFFERENT KINDS OF NECESSARIES CLAIMS''' DMC/SandT/17/08 England '''Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The “New Flamenco”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hodge SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 43: 28 June 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-_The_New_Flamenco_-_Supreme_Court_Decision]]''' '''TIME CHARTER: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM: WHETHER CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL''' DMC/SandT/17/07 England '''Gard Marine & Energy Ltd v China National Chartering Co Ltd and another/China National Chartering Co Ltd v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another/Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another (The “Ocean Victory”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Hodge and Toulson SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 35: 10 May 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gard_Marine_%26_Energy_v_China_National_Chartering_-_The_Ocean_Victory]] '''DEMISE CHARTERPARTY: TIME CHARTERPARTY: CONTACT WITH BREAKWATER AND GROUNDING AT PORT RESULTING IN CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS AND WRECK REMOVAL OF VESSEL: WHETHER LOSS CAUSED BY BREACH OF SAFE PORT UNDERTAKING OR BY AN ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE: WHETHER SUBROGATED RIGHTS OF HULL INSURERS AND INSURED LOSSES OF OWNERS AGAINST DEMISE CHARTERERS PRECLUDED BY DEMISE CHARTERPARTY TERMS: WHETHER TIME CHARTERERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY AGAINST HULL INSURERS AND OWNERS: BARECON 89 FORM: MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT 1995: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976 DMC/SandT/17/06 England '''Bahamas Oil Refining Company International Limited v Cape Bari Tankschiffahrts GmbH & Co KG (The “Cape Bari”)''' '''Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson SCJJ: [2016] UKPC 20: 19 July 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bahamas_Oil_Refining_Company_v_Cape_Bari_Tankschiffahrts_-_The_Cape_Bari]]''' '''CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH: COLLISION BETWEEN VESSEL AND BERTH: WHETHER – UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH - VESSEL CAN CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE STATUTORY RIGHT TO LIMIT LABILITY: WHETHER UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE VESSEL DID CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE RIGHT TO LIMIT: MERCHANT SHIPPING (MARITIME CLAIMS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY) ACT 1989 OF THE BAHAMAS: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976''' DMC/SandT/17/05 England '''Oldendorff GmbH & Co KG v Sea Powerful II Special Maritime Enterprises (The “Zagora”)''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Mr Justice Teare: [2016] EWHC 3212; 15 December 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oldendorff_GmbH_v_Sea_Powerful_II_Special_Maritime_Enterprises_The_Zagora]]''' '''LETTER OF INDEMNITY: WHETHER THE DISCHARGE PORT AGENT WAS ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE SHIPOWNERS OR THE PERSON NAMED IN THE LETTER OF INDEMNITY AS THE PERSON TO WHOM DELIVERY OF THE CARGO WAS TO BE MADE''' DMC/SandT/17/04 England '''MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Cottonex Anstalt''' '''Court of Appeal; Moore-Bick and Tomlinson LJJ, Keehan J.; [2016] EWCA Civ 789; 27 July 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company_v_Cottonex_Anstalt]] '''CONTAINER DEMURRAGE: FRUSTRATION: REPUDIATION AND LEGITIMATE INTEREST: GOOD FAITH: PENALTIES''' DMC/SandT/17/03 England '''SPAR SHIPPING AS v GRAND CHINA LOGISTICS HOLDING (GROUP) CO LTD (THE “SPAR CAPELLA”, “SPAR VEGA” AND “SPAR DRACO”)''' '''Court of Appeal; Sir Terence Etherton MR, Gross and Hamblen LJJ; [2016] EWCA Civ 982; 7 October 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Spar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics_Holding_Group]]''' '''NYPE 1993 FORM TIME CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ DUTY TO PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION OR AN INNOMINATE TERM: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY BREACH OF THE TIME CHARTER''' DMC/SandT/17/02 England '''Volcafe Ltd and Others v Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA (trading as “CSAV”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Gloster LJ, King LJ and Flaux J: (2016) EWCA Civ 1103: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Volcafe_&_Ors_v_Compania_Sud_Americana_de_Vapores_-_CSAV]]''' '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: CONSIGNMENTS OF BAGGED COFFEE BEANS IN CONTAINERS CARRIED ON LCL/FCL TERMS: CARGO DAMAGED BY CONDENSATION: TEMPORAL SCOPE OF HAGUE RULES: BURDEN OF PROOF: WHETHER CARRIER FAILED PROPERLY AND CAREFULLY TO LOAD AND CARRY THE GOODS: WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO RELY ON “INHERENT VICE” EXCEPTION: WHETHER DAMAGE INEVITABLE: HAGUE RULES, ARTICLE III RULE 2 AND ARTICLE IV RULE 2(M)''' DMC/SandT/17/01 England '''ST Shipping & Transport INC v Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA (The “Kriti Filoxenia”)''' '''High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Mr Justice Walker; [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm); 14 May 2015''' '''CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ RIGHT TO CANCEL THE CHARTERPARTY PURSUANT TO THE LAYCAN PROVISION SURIVIVES A RE-NOMINATION OF THE LOAD PORT''' DMC/SandT/16/07 England '''FSL-9 Pte Ltd and Nordic Tankers Trading A/S v Norwegian Hull Club (The “FSL New York”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Blair J: [2016] EWHC 1091 (Comm): 10 May 2016: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/FSL-9_Pte_&_Nordic_Tankers_Trading_v_Norwegian_Hull_Club_-_The_FSL_New_York]] '''LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: P&I CLUB: WHETHER CLAIMANT OWNERS COULD APPLY TO HIGH COURT TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT P&I CLUB TO INCREASE LEVEL OF SECURITY AVAILABLE UNDER A LETTER OF UNDERTAKING ISSUED BY THE CLUB TO OWNERS: MEANING OF “LIBERTY TO APPLY” IN LETTER OF UNDERTAKING SUBJECT TO ENGLISH LAW AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF HIGH COURT IN LONDON''' DMC/SandT/16/06 England '''NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NY v Cargill International SA, The “Global Santosh”''' '''Court; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Toulson; [2016] UKSC 20; 11May 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-_the_Global_Santosh_Supreme_Court_Decision]''' '''OFF-HIRE CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF VESSEL: WHETHER ACTS OF RECEIVERS AND SUB-CHARTERERS WERE TO BE CONSIDERED “DEFAULT OF THE CHARTERERS OR THEIR AGENTS”''' DMC/SandT/2416/05
'''England'''
'''Glory Wealth PST Energy 7 Shipping Pte LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v OW Bunker Malta Limited v Korea Line Corporation& ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''English High Supreme Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Blair J: ; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Hughes, Toulson; [20112016] EWHC 1819 (Comm): 22 June 2011UKSC 23, 11 May 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php?/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_Korea_Line_CorporationPST_Energy_7__Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_-_The_Res_Cogitans]]
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: WRONGFUL TERMINATION BY CHARTERERS: ASSESSMENT RETENTION OF DAMAGES: NO AVAILABLE MARKET FOR BALANCE TITLE CLAUSE; GOODS CONTEMPLATED TO BE CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED; SALE OF CHARTER PERIOD AT TIME GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE; COMMENTS ON POSITION IF SALE OF TERMINATION: EFFECT OF REVIVAL OF MARKET AT A LATER STAGEGOODS ACT 1979 APPLIED'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2304
'''Hong KongEngland'''
'''Birnam Ltd Crescendo Maritime Co. & Alpha Bank AE v The Owners Bank of the Ship or Vessel “Hong Ming”, The “Hong Ming”Communications Co Ltd & Ors.'''
'''Hong Kong English High Court of First Instance: Reyes ; Teare J: HCAJ No.105 of 2011: 26 August 2011; [2015] EWHC 3364 (Comm), 25 November 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Birnam_v_The_"Hong_Ming"Crescendo_Maritime_&_Alpha_Bank_v_Bank_of_Communications_&_Ors]]'''
'''WARRANT OF ARRESTBACK-DATED SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: REFUND GUARANTEES: SETTING ASIDEARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: CLAIM FOR OWNERSHIP OF VESSEL PURSUANT ACTION COMMENCED IN CHINESE COURTS BY A PARTY TO A TERMINATED CONTRACT FOR SALE THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: BREACH OF VESSELARBITRATION AGREEMENT: MATERIAL NONWHETHER AN ANTI-DISCLOSURESUIT INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED: MISUSE OF THE ARREST PROCESS: WHETHER CHINESE PROCEEDINGS A COLLATERAL ATTACK ON ARBITRATION AWARD'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2203
'''England'''
'''CARRIAGE TIME CHARTER TRIP: WHETHER THE PARTICULAR TERMS OF GOODS: CIF CONTRACT: CONSTRUCTION: ENTITLEMENT THE CHARTER PERMITTED CHARTERERS TO GIVE NOTICE OF READINESS: CONCURRENT CAUSES LEADING ORDER THE VESSEL TO DELAY IN BERTHINGLOAD A FURTHER CARGO AFTER THE INITIAL CARGO HAD BEEN DISCHARGED: COMMENCEMENT OF LAYTIMEARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2102
'''England'''
'''Carboex SA Fulton Shipping Inc v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SAGlobalia Business Travel SAU (The “New Flamenco”)'''
'''English High Courtof Appeal: Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court): Field J.Longmore, Christopher Clarke and Sales LLJ: [20112015] EWHC 1165 (CommEWCA Civ 1299: 12 May 201121 December 2015: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-the_New_Flamenco_-_Court_of_Appeal_Decision]
'''AMWELSH CHARTERPARTYTIME CHARTER: DEMURRAGEREPUDIATION: EXCEPTION QUANTUM OF STRIKESDAMAGES: WHETHER DELAY IN DISCHARGE ARISING FROM CONGESTION CAUSED BY STRIKES EXCEPTED FROM LAYTIMECREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN ITS VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2001
'''England'''
'''Great Eastern Shipping Co Ltd Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA v. MT Maritime Management BV (1The “MTM Hong Kong”) Far East Chartering Ltd ''' '''English Commercial Court: Males J: [2015] EWHC 2505 (2Comm) Binani Cement Ltd: 1 September 2015: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities_Suisse_v_MT_Maritime_Management_-_The_MTM_Hong_Kong]]'''
'''English High Court, Queen’s Bench DivisionCHARTERPARTY: Judge Mackie QC: [2011] EWHC 1372 (Comm): 27 May 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Great_Eastern_Shipping_v_Far_East_Chartering]]''' '''WHETHER SHIPOWNER ENTITLED TO ENFORCE LETTER QUANTIFICATION OF INDEMNITY GIVEN BY RECEIVER TO CHARTERER DAMAGES FOR DELIVERY OF CARGO WITHOUT PRESENTATION OF BILLS REPUDIATION OF LADINGVOYAGE CHARTER: CONTRACTS (RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES) ACT 1999DAMAGES FOR POSITIONAL LOSS IN ADDITION TO USUAL PROFIT LOSS: WHETHER LETTER GIVEN DAMAGES LIMITED BY REFERENCE TO CHARTERERPERIOD WHEN CONTRACT VOYAGE WOULD HAVE ENDED: WHETHER CARGO “DELIVERED”: WHETHER LETTER APPEAL UNDER SECTION 69 OF INDEMNITY UNENFORCEABLE ON GROUNDS OF PUBLIC POLICY: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO RECOVER UNDER A UNILATERAL CONTRACTTHE ARBITRATION ACT 1996'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1918
'''The NetherlandsEngland'''
'''Pianura Armatori SpA Société de Distribution de Toutes Marchandises en Côte D’Ivoire, trading as “SDTM-CI”, and others v Ferrari Shipping Agency G.AContinental Lines N. The "Halcyon Star”V. and another (the “Sea Miror”)'''
'''English High Court of Rotterdam (summary proceedings) : Mr A.F.L. Geerdes, LJNFlaux J; 18 June 2015:BQ5031, October 7, 2010 [2015] EWHC 1747 (published May 19, 2011Comm): [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pianura_Armatori_v_Ferrari_ShippingSDTM-CI_and_others_v_Continental_Lines_amd_another_-_the_Sea_Miror]]'''
'''ARREST CONVENTION 1952 ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPHSYNACOMEX 90 CHARTERPARTY: ARREST LOADING AND DISCHARGING TO BE AT THE EXPENSE AND RISK OF VESSEL OWNED BY A VESSEL MANAGER THE SHIPPERS/CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS/CHARTERERS RESPECTIVELY: WHETHER OWNERS RESPONSIBLE FOR MARITIME CLAIMS AGAINST THE VESSEL MANAGER RELATING TO OTHER VESSELS NOT OWNED BY THE MANAGERCARGO LOSS AND DAMAGE OCCURRING DURING LOADING AND DISCHARGE'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1817
'''England'''
'''The Owner of the Vessel “The Ocean Crown” PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and others Trading SA v Five Oceans Salvage Consultants LtdOW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, “The Ocean Crown”the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Admiralty Court): Gross J: of Appeal; Moore-Bick, Longmore, McCombe LJJ; [20092015] EWHC 3040 (Admlty)EWCA Civ 1058, [2010] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 468: 26 November 200922 October 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Ocean_Crown]]PST_Energy_7_Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_-_the_RES_COGITANS''']]
'''SALVAGEARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: ASSESSMENT SUPPLY OF REMUNERATIONBUNKERS: WHETHER RISK RETENTION OF FUTURE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN SHOULD TITLE CLAUSE: CONTEMPLATED THAT GOODS WOULD BE CONSIDERED IN APPLYING PRINCIPLE CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED: NO PASSING OF ENCOURAGEMENTPROPERTY INTENDED: SCOPE SALE OF THE PRINCIPLE IN THE AMERIQUEGOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE'''
DMC/SandT/15/16
'''The NetherlandsEquatorial Marine Fuel Management Services Pte Ltd v MISC Berhad, the “BUNGA MELATI 5”'''
'''HDI-Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG et al v APM Terminals Rotterdam B.V.The ‘Pretoria’''' '''High Court of Rotterdam: Ms P.A.M van Schouwenburg –Laan, LJN:BO0063, September 29; Prakash J; [2015] SGHC 190, 201022 July 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/HDIEquatorial_Marine_Fuel_Management_Services_v_MISC_Bhd_-Gerling_v_APM_Terminals_The_Bunga_Melati_5]]'''
'''STEVEDORE DAMAGE TO VESSEL DURING LOADINGBUNKER BROKERS: AGENCY: WHETHER STEVEDORES LIABLE FOR THE DAMAGE CAUSED UNDER DUTCH LAWACTUAL AUTHORITY, APPARENT AUTHORITY, AND ESTOPPEL: BURDEN OF PROOFNO GENERAL ‘DUTY TO SPEAK’'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1615
'''United Kingdom Supreme CourtEngland'''
'''Jones Arnold v. KaneyBritton'''
'''UK Supreme Court; Lords Philips: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC, HopeLord Sumption, BrownLord Carnwath, CollinsLord Hughes, Kerr, DysonLord Hodge JJSC: [2015] UKSC 36, Lady Hale; [20112015] UKSC 13; 30 March 20112 WLR 1593: 10 June 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Jones_v_KaneyArnold_v_Britton]]
'''REMOVAL LANDLORD AND TENANT: LONG RESIDENTIAL LEASES: INCREASE OF EXPERT WITNESS IMMUNITY SERVICE CHARGE AT YEARLY RATE OF 10% ON COMPOUND BASIS: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: CONTROL OF PARTIES OVER LANGUAGE USED IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGSCONTRACT: THAT CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT WORKED OUT BADLY FOR ONE PARTY NO REASON FOR DEPARTING FROM NATURAL LANGUAGE'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1514
'''CanadaEngland'''
'''Société Telus Communications, Hydro-Québec and Bell Canada Bunge SA v Peracomo Inc., Réal Vallée and the fishing vessel RealiceNidera BV'''
'''Federal UK Supreme Court of Canada: Harrington J.Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson: 2011 FC 494[2015] UKSC 437: 27 April 20111 July 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Telus_Communications_v_Peracomo_Inc_and_Réal_ValléeBunge_SA_v_Nidera_BV]]'''
'''SHIPPINGINTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: SUBMARINE CABLE CUT BY SKIPPER DAMAGES: SALE OF FISHING VESSELGRAIN BASED ON GAFTA FORM 49: EMBARGO ON EXPORTS: WHETHER DAMAGE CAUSED INTENTIONALLY OR RECKLESSLY AND WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT 'SUCH LOSS' WOULD PROBABLY RESULTPREMATURE TERMINATION OF CONTRACT BY SELLERS BEFORE EMBARGO TOOK EFFECT: WHETHER DEFENDANTS ENTITLED ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES TO LIMIT LIABILITY UNDER THE 1976 LIMITATION CONVENTION, AS INCORPORATED TAKE INTO CANADIAN LAWACCOUNT EFFECT OF EMBARGO: NO LOSS SUFFERED BY BUYERS'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1413
'''The Netherlands'''
'''DSV Road The Kingdom of The Netherlands v Owners of the yacht Qubio – “The Qubio”''' '''Supreme Court of the Netherlands: Vice-President F.B. Bakels as chairman and judges G. Snijders, G. de Groot, M.V. Polak and Amlin Corporate Insurance NT.H.VTanja-van den Broek'; 10 July 2015, Case no. ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1836:[[http://www.onlinedmc. v Sneltransport “Heidenend” Tegelen Bco.Vuk/index.php/The_Kingdom_of_The_Netherlands_v_Owners_of_Yacht_Qubio]]''' '''WRECK OF VESSEL: EXTENSION OF LIABILITY OF THE OWNER OF A SUNKEN VESSEL TO PAY FOR COSTS OF MARKING THE WRECK AS A TEMPORARY OR PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE''' DMC/SandT/15/12 '''Singapore''' '''Precious Shipping Public Company Ltd & Ors v OW Bunker Far East (Singapore) Pte Ltd & Ors and other matters'''
'''Amsterdam Singapore High Court of Appeal: A.S. Arnold, W.H.F.M. Cortenraad and H.M. ten Haaft, LJN BL9955, April 2; Chong J; [2015] SGHC 187, 201021 July 2015: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSV_Road_v_Sneltransport_HeidenendPrecious_Shipping_&_Ors_v_OW_Bunker_Far_East_&_Ors]]
'''CARRIAGE WHETHER INTERPLEADER RELIEF AVAILABLE TO ULTIMATE PURCHASERS OF GOODS BY ROAD: CMR CONVENTIONBUNKERS: WHETHER SHIPPER-PACKED TRAILER CAN BE CONSIDERED ‘GOODS’ WITHIN ART.17.2POTENTIAL CLAIMS BY PHYSICAL SUPPLIERS (WHO SOLD THOSE BUNKERS TO INTERMEDIATE BUYERS) WERE SUFFICIENT TO FOUND THE COURT’S INTERPLEADER JURISDICTION'''
DMC/SandT/15/11/13
'''England'''
'''Shell Egypt West Manzala GmbH and another Glencore Energy UK Ltd v Dana Gas Egypt LimitedCirrus Oil Services Ltd''' '''Queen’s Bench Division English High Court (Commercial Court): Tomlinson Cooke J: [20102014] EWHC 465 87 (Comm), [2014] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 24 January 2014: 10 March 2010:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Shell_Egypt_v_Dana_GasGlencore_Energy_UK_v_Cirrus_Oil_Services]] '''CONTRACT FOR SALE OF OIL BLEND: WHETHER A BINDING CONTRACT EXISTED: FIRM OFFER WITH ESSENTIAL TERMS ACCEPTED: NAME OF SELLER INFERRED FROM PREVIOUS DEALINGS BETWEEN PARTIES: DAMAGES FOR NON-ACCEPTANCE UNDER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979, SECTIONS 50(2) AND (3) NOT EXCLUDED BY CLAUSE 32.1 OF BP 2007 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CFR SALES'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1210
'''England'''
'''Choil Trading SA Maestro Bulk Ltd v Sahara Energy Resources Limited (The “Prem Mala”)Cosco Bulk Carrier Ltd, the “Great Creation”''' '''English Commercial High Court: Christopher Clarke ; Cooke J: ; [20102014] EWHC 374 3978 (Comm): 26 February 2010, 15 December 2014: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Choil_Trading_v_Sahara_EnergyMaestro_Bulk_v_Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_-Resources_The_Great_Creation]]'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEATIME CHARTERPARTY: FOB SALE CONTRACTUNTIMELY REDELIVERY NOTICES: CIF “BELOW MARKET” FOLLOW-ON-SALE CONTRACTSFIXTURE: QUANTIFICATION OF HOW DAMAGES FOR DELIVERY OF CONTAMINATED GOODS IN BREACH OF FOB CONTRACTTO BE CALCULATED: RECOVERABILITY OF HEDGING LOSSES INCURRED IN MITIGATION IN RELATION TO CIF CONTRACTS: WHETHER TRUE CONSTRUCTION OF FOB CONTRACT EXEMPTION CLAUSE EXCLUDED RECOVERY OF HEDGING AND ADDITIONAL EXPENSES/COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1109
'''English High CourtEngland'''
'''Azimut–Benetti SpA Metall Market OOO v. HealeyVitorio Shipping Co Ltd (The “Lehmann Timber”)'''
'''English High Courtof Appeal: Blair J.Arden, Patten LLJ andSir Bernard Rix: [20102013] EWHC 2234 (Comm)EWCA Civ 650: 3 September 2010[2014] QB 760, [2013] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 541: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Azimut_Benetti_v_HealeyMetall_Market_v_vitorio_Shipping_the_Lehmann_Timber]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACTCARRIAGE OF GOODS: LIQUIDATED DAMAGESGENERAL AVERAGE: REQUEST BY SHIPOWNER FOR SECURITY IN THE FORM OF GENERAL AVERAGE BOND SUPPORTED BY GENERAL AVERAGE GUARANTEE: WHETHER LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CONSTITUTE A PENALTYTERMS OF REQUEST REASONABLE: WHETHER ACCEPTANCE OF PART SECURITY A PRE-ESTIMATE OF LOSS IN THE CASE WAIVER OF BREACHSHIPOWNER’S LIEN: WHETHER A DETERRENT: WHETHER GUARANTEE REMAINS ENFORCEABLE WHERE A PROVISION EXPENSES OF STORING CARGO ASHORE IN THE UNDERLYING CONTRACT CONSTITUTES A PENALTY: PUBLIC POLICYEXERCISE OF LIEN RECOVERABLE'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1008 '''England''' '''PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v OW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”''' '''English High Court; Males J; [2015] EWHC 2022 (Comm) 14 July 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/PST_Energy_7_Shipping_&_Product_Shipping_and_Trading_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_the_Res_Cognitans]] '''ARBITRATION ACT 1996 S.69 APPEAL: BUNKER SUPPLY CONTRACT ON CREDIT TERMS: RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE: PARTIES CONTEMPLATED BUNKERS WOULD LIKELY BE CONSUMED BEFORE PAYMENT MADE AND TITLE PASSED: WHETHER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 APPLICABLE: WHETHER REQUIREMENTS OF S.49 MET''' DMC/SandT/15/07 '''England'''
'''United Kingdom''' '''Oceanbulk Spar Shipping & Trading SA AS v TMT Asia Ltd & ORs''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lord Phillips, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Sir John DysonGrand China Logistics Holding (Group): [2010] UKSC 44: 27 October 2010: [[http://wwwCo.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oceanbulk_Shipping_v_TMT_Asia]], Ltd'''
'''CONTRACTSEnglish High Court: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTQueen's Bench Division Commercial Court: INTERPRETATION[2015] EWHC 718 (Comm): ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ COMMUNICATIONSPopplewell J.: WHETHER FACTS DISCLOSED DURING ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ NEGOTIATIONS ADMISSIBLE AS AN AID TO CONSTRUCTION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT18 March 2015[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Spar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics]]'''
'''NYPE 1993 FORM TIMECHARTER: FAILURE TO PAY HIRE ON TIME: WHETHER BREACH OF CONDITION: WHETHER BREACH OF AN INNOMINATE TERM: RIGHT TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF BARGAIN: WHETHER CHARTERER’S CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT'''
'''Thomas Crema v. Cenkos Securities PLCEngland'''
'''English Court of Appeal Gard Marine & Energy Ltd (Civil DivisionRespondents/Claimants) v China National Chartering Co. Ltd (Intermediate Charterers) v China National'''Chartering Co. Ltd v Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha (Charterers/Appellants); Hughes LJ, Aikens LJ, Chancellor Morritt; [2010] EWCA Civ 1444, 16 December 2010- The “Ocean Victory”: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thomas_Crema_v_Cenkos_SecuritiesGard_Marine_&_Energy_v_China_National_Chartering_-_The_Ocean_Victory_-_Court_of_Appeal]]'''
'''CONTRACT PARTLY WRITTEN AND PARTLY ORALEnglish Court of Appeal: WHETHER TERM SHOULD BE IMPLIEDLongmore, Gloster and Underhill LJJ: RELEVANT PRINCIPLES[2015] EWCA Civ 16: RELEVANCE OF MARKET PRACTICE22 January 2015: EXPERT EVIDENCE: LIMITATIONS OF EXPERT EVIDENCE'''
'''SAFE PORT: WHETHER COMBINATION OF ‘LONG WAVE’ SWELL AND A SEVERE GALE AN ‘ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE’: SUBROGATION: WHETHER INSURER OF BOTH PARTIES TO A BARECON CHARTERPARTY MAY SUE AN ASSURED FOR BREACH OF CHARTER'''
'''Kookmin Bank v Rainy SA and othersEngland'''
'''English Court of Appeal: Thorpe and Patten LJJ and Sir Simon Tuckey: [2010] EWCA Civ 582, [2010] 1 CLC 829: 27 May 2010:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kookmin_Bank_v_Rainy_SA]]Standard Chartered Bank v Dorchester LNG (2) Limited (The “Erin Schulte”)'''
'''SHIPBUILDINGEnglish Court of Appeal: LETTER OF GUARANTEESir Bernard Rix, Moore-Bick and Briggs LJJ: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION[2014] EWCA Civ 1382: EXTREME CONSEQUENCES REQUIRED TO DEPART FROM MEANING OF WORDS AS CONVEYED TO REASONABLE PERSON22 October 2014: NO DEPARTURE SIMPLY BECAUSE COURT WOULD REACH DIFFERENT BALANCE OF PARTIES’ INTERESTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER CONTRACT'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Standard_Chartered_Bank_v_Dorchester_LNG_(2)_-_The_Erin_Schulte]]
'''BILL OF LADING: LETTER OF CREDIT: INITIAL REJECTION OF THE PRESENTATION: MEANING OF “INDORSEMENT” OF BILL OF LADING: TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF SUIT: CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1992 SECTIONS 2(2)(A) AND 5(2)(B)'''
'''Brink’s Global Services Inc & Ors v. Igrox Ltd & AnorHong Kong''''''Court of Appeal: Longmore, Moore-Bick and Wilson LJJ.: [2010] EWCA Civ 1208: 27 October 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Brink's_Global_Services_v_Igrox]]
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODSThe Alas renamed The Kombos: THEFT FROM CONTAINER BY EMPLOYEE OF FUMIGATION COMPANYHong Kong Court of First Instance: WHETHER COMPANY VICARIOUSLY LIABLENg J: CLOSE CONNECTION BETWEEN THEFT AND PURPOSE OF EMPLOYMENTHCAJ 241/2009: [2014] 4 HKLRD 160: 21 July 2014:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Alas_renamed_The_Kombos]]'''
'''ADMIRALTY: WARRANT OF ARREST: SHIPOWNERS’ CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AND UNPAID HIRE: FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD NOT SATISFIED: NO BAR TO ACTION IN REM FOR CLAIM ARISING OUT OF AGREEMENT FOR USE OR HIRE OF THE SHIP'''
'''Dalwood Marine v Nordana Line A/S, The “Elbrus”; Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2009] EWHC 3394 (Comm), [2010] 2 All ER (Comm) 802: 21 December 2009:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dalwood_Marine_v_Nordana_Line]]Hong Kong'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: WRONGFUL EARLY TERMINATION BY CHARTERERS: DAMAGES: WHETHER HIRE EARNED BY SHIPOWNERS IN SUBSTITUTE FIXTURE WHICH EXTENDED BEYOND REMAINDER OF ORIGINAL CHARTER RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENTAntwerp Diamond Bank NV v Brink’s Inc'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Lam and Lunn VPP and Barman JA: CACV No.282 of 2012: [2014] 4 HKLRD 158: 17 July 2014: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Antwerp_Diamond_Bank-v-Brink's_Inc]]'''
'''England'''
'''English Court of Appeal; Pattern, Tomlinson, Christopher Clarke LJJ; [2013] EWCA Civ 1449, 19 November 2013:''' '''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/E_D_&_F_Man_v_Unicargo_Transportgesellschaft_GmbH_The_Ladytramp]]'''
'''Röhlig (UK) Ltd v Rock Unique LtdSUGAR CHARTERPARTY 1999: Court of Appeal, Sedley, Moore-Bick and Aikens LJJ.: 20 January 2011: [2011] EWCA Civ 18:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Röhlig_(UK)_v_Rock_Unique]]DESTRUCTION BY FIRE OF FACILITIES AT LOADING TERMINAL NOT WITHIN CLAUSE 28 EXCEPTION TO LAYTIME OF “MECHANICAL BREAKDOWNS”'''
DMC/SandT/15/01
'''English Court of AppealNYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NY v Cargill International SA, The “Global Santosh”'''
'''KG Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft für Mineraloele mbH & Co v Petroplus Marketing AG (The “Mercini Lady”): English Court of Appeal: Maurice Kay; Gross LJ, Gloster LJ, Rix and Patten LJJ: Sir Burnton; [20102014] EWCA Civ 1145: 19 October 2010403, 8 April 2014: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/KG_Bominflot_v_Petroplus_MarketingNYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Global_Santosh_-_Court_of_Appeal]]'''
'''SALE OFF-HIRE CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEAVESSEL: FOB ANTWERP SALE WHETHER SUB-CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS WERE ‘AGENTS’ OF EU GASOIL WITH FREE DESTINATION: “SPECIAL” COMMON LAW IMPLIED TERM/CONDITION: STATUTORILY IMPLIED CONDITIONSTHE CHARTERERS: WHETHER CARGO THE PERSONAL ACT, OMISSION OR DEFAULT TO REMAIN ON-SPECIFICATION FOR A REASONABLE TIME FOLLOWING SHIPMENT: EFFECT OF EXCLUSION WHICH CLAUSE ON IMPLIED CONDITIONS: SECTION 14(2) OF THE SALE REFERRED MUST HAVE OCCURRED DURING PROVISION OF GOODS ACT 1979RELEVANT SERVICES'''
DMC/SandT/1114/0217
'''Singapore'''
'''Singapore Court of Appeal'''
'''The “Asia Star” Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd [20102013] SGCA 1215: Judgment delivered by VK Rajah ''' '''Sundaresh Menon CJ, Chao Hick Tin JA and Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA: 6 February 2013: [2013] 2 SLR 363:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Out_of_the_Box_v_Wanin_Industries]]''' '''CONTRACT: REMOTENESS OF DAMAGE: BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTOR ENGAGING MANUFACTURER TO PRODUCE NEW SPORTS DRINK: MANUFACTURER UNAWARE OF DISTRIBUTOR’S PLAN TO PROMOTE POPULAR DEMAND FOR GENERIC DRINK THROUGH AGGRESSIVE ADVERTISING: MANUFACTURER SUPPLYING DEFECTIVE SHIPMENT OF DRINKS IN BREACH OF CONTRACT: ABANDONMENT OF PROMOTION: WHETHER WASTED ADVERTISING EXPENSES CLAIMED BY DISTRIBUTOR TOO REMOTE''' DMC/SandT/14/16 '''England''' '''Great Elephant Corporation v Trafigura Beheer BV v Vitol SA & Vitol Asia Pte Ltd v China Offshore Oil (Singapore) International Pte Ltd (The “Crudesky”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Longmore, 19 March 2010 Tomlin and Underhill LJJ: [20102013] SGCA 12EWCA Civ 1547, [2014] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 25 July 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Great_Elephant_Corp_v_Trafigura_Beheer_-_The_Crudesky]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: FOB SALE CONTRACT CHAIN: DEMURRAGE: “RESTRAINT OF PRINCES” EXCEPTION: UNFORESEEABLE FORCE MAJEURE BEYOND CONTROL OR REASONABLE CONTROL''' DMC/SandT/14/15 '''England''' '''Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The “New Flamenco”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J: [2014] EWHC 1457 (Comm): 21 May 2014:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Asia_StarFulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-_The_New_Flamenco]]''' '''TIME CHARTER: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM: WHETHER CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL''' DMC/SandT/14/14 '''England'''
'''TIME CHARTER: ANTICIPATORY REPUDIATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT RIGHT TO CARRY CARGO: REQUIREMENT GIVE VOYAGE ORDERS TO NOTIFY THE DEFAULTING PARTY TRANSIT GULF OF INTENDED MEASURES IN MITIGATIONADEN: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1114/01 13
'''GermanyEngland'''
'''German Federal Supreme Proton Energy Group SA v Orlen Lietuva''' '''English Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court – Assessment of Damages under the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road ): HH Judge Mackie QC: [2013] EWHC 2872 (‘CMR’Comm): Date of Judgment: 30 September 2010'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Germany_CMR_DamagesProton_Energy_Group_v_Orlen_Lietuva]]
'''CMR TRANSPORTCONTRACT: WILFUL MISCONDUCTCONTRACT FOR SALE OF OIL BLEND: ASSESSMENT EXISTENCE OF BINDING CONTRACT: PARTIES REGARDED THEMSELVES AS BEING BOUND AFTER DEAL WAS CONFIRMED: SPECIFICATION OF OIL BLEND NOT FORMING PART OF DAMAGESSALE BY DESCRIPTION'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2512
'''England'''
'''Angara Maritime Ltd Falkonera Shipping Company v Oceanconnect UK Arcadia Energy Pte Ltd and Oceanconnect.com Inc (The “Fesco Angara”“Falkonera”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Angara_Maritime_v_Oceanconnect_UK]]'''
'''Queen’s Bench English Court of Appeal (Civil Division); Floyd and Christopher Clarke LJJ, London Mercantile CourtSir Stanley Burnton; [2014] EWCA Civ 713; 5 June 2014: HHJ Mackie QC[[http: [2010//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Falkonera_Shipping_v_Arcadia_Energy_-_The_Falkonera]] EWHC 619 (QB): 29 March 2010'''
'''SALE OF GOODSSHIPPING: BUNKERS/MARINE FUELSTANKER TRANSHIPMENT: S.25SHIP-TO-SHIP (1“STS”) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979TRANSFERS: SALE OF BUNKERS CHARTERPARTY PROVIDING FOR STS TRANSFERS TO BE SUBJECT TO TIME CHARTERERS: BUNKERS DELIVERED OWNERS’ APPROVAL WHICH NOT TO VESSELBE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD: FAILURE BY TIME CHARTERERS TO PAY SUPPLIERS OWNERS WITHHOLD CONSENT FOR BUNKERSA STS TRANSFER BETWEEN TWO VLCCs: RIGHT WHETHER OWNERS’ WITHHOLDING OF SUPPLIERS TO SUE OWNERS IN CONVERSION AND/OR BAILMENT FOLLOWING PREMATURE REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY TIME CHARTERERS TO OWNERSAPPROVAL REASONABLE'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2611
'''England'''
'''Soufflet Negoce British American Tobacco Switzerland SA v Bunge SAExel Europe Ltd; British American Tobacco Denmark A/S v Exel Europe Ltd'''
'''English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Wilson and Toulson LJJMcFarlane L.J.; Sir Bernard Rix; Sir Timothy Lloyd: [20102013] EWCA 1102Civ 1319: 13 30 October 20102013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Soufflet_Negoce_v_Bunge_SABritish_American_Tobacco_&_Ors_v_Exel_Europe]]'''
DMC/SandT/14/10
'''England''' '''Trafigura Beheer BV v Navigazione Montanari SPA [2014] EWHC 129 Comm''' '''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Andrew Smith J.: 30 January 2014:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Trafigura_Beheer_v_Navigazione_Montanari_-_the_Valle_de_Cordoba]] '''CHARTERPARTY: CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: VESSEL CARRYING CONSIGNMENT OF MOTOR OIL ATTACKED BY PIRATES: WHETHER QUANTITY OF OIL TAKEN BY PIRATES CONSTITUTED "IN-TRANSIT LOSS" OR "LOST CARGO" FOR PURPOSES OF IN-TRANSIT LOSS CLAUSE IN CHARTERPARTY''' DMC/SandT/1014/2409
'''England'''
'''Zodiac Maritime Agencies Limited Yuzhny Zavod Metall Profil LLC v Fortescue Metals Group Limited'''Eems Beheerder B.V. (“the M/V EEMS SOLAR”):
'''English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial , Admiralty Court): David Steel JJervis K, Q.C, the Admiralty Registrar: [2010] EWHC 903 (Comm)5 June 2013: 28 April 2010'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Zodiac_Maritime_v_Fortescue_MetalsYuzhny_Zavod_Metall_Profil_v_Emms_Beheerder_-_the_M/V_Eems_Solar]]'''
'''CONSECUTIVE VOYAGE CHARTERPARTYBILLS OF LADING: WRONGFUL EARLY TERMINATION BY CHARTERER: DAMAGES: WHETHER “AVAILABLE MARKET” WHEN INCORPORATION OF CHARTERPARTY TERMINATEDTERMS PROVIDING THAT CHARTERERS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR STOWAGE: WHETHER SUBSEQUENT EMERGENCE OF MARKET DURING THE BALANCE OF CHARTER PERIOD RELEVANT OWNERS COULD RELY ON THAT CLAUSE AS DEFENCE TO THE ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGESCLAIM BY RECEIVERS FOR CARGO DAMAGE CAUSED BY BAD STOWAGE'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2308
'''England'''
'''ENE 1 Kos Limited v Petroleo Brasileiro SA'''Martrade Shipping & Transport GmbH V United Enterprises Corporation (The “Wisdom C”):[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/ENE_1_Kos_Limited_v_PetrobasMartrade_Shipping_and_Transport_v_United_Entreprises_-_The_Wisdom_C]]''' English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Popplewell J; [2014] EWHC 1884 (Comm); 12 June 2014 '''TIMECHARTER PROVIDING FOR ENGLISH LAW AND LONDON ARBITRATION: ARBITRATORS AWARDING PENAL RATE OF INTEREST: WHETHER “SIGNIFICANT CONNECTION” BETWEEN CHARTERPARTY AND ENGLAND: WHETHER “APPLICABLE LAW” A FOREIGN LAW: LATE PAYMENT OF COMMERCIAL DEBTS (INTEREST) ACT 1998: ARTICLES 3 AND 4 – CONTRACTS (APPLICABLE LAW) ACT 1990''' DMC/SandT/14/07 '''Hong Kong''' '''Darby International Investment Ltd v Rong Tai International Shipping Ltd'''
'''English Hong Kong Court of Appeal (Civil)First Instance: Longmore and Smith LJJ and Sir Mark WallerDeputy High Court Judge B Chu: HCMP1438 of 2013: 2 December 2013: [2010[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Darby_International_Investments_v_Rong_Tai_International_Shipping] EWCA Civ 772]''' http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2013/2031.html '''MARITIME LAW: REGISTRATION OF VESSELS: VESSEL APPARENTLY REGISTERED IN MORE THAN ONE JURISDICTION: DECLARATION AS TO VALIDITY OF REGISTRATION IN HONG KONG: 6 July 2010PURPOSE OF GRANTING DECLARATION''' DMC/SandT/14/06 '''England'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SHIP WITHDRAWN FOR NON-PAYMENT OF HIRE WHILST LOADING CARGO: CARGO DISCHARGED BACK TO SHORE TWO DAYS LATER: WHETHER SHIPOWNER COULD CLAIM REMUNERATION AT MARKET RATE FOR STORING THE CARGO DURING THAT PERIOD: WHETHER REMUNERATION DUE UNDER IMPLIED TERM OR AS QUANTUM MERUIT: WHETHER DUE AS RIGHT CORRELATIVE TO DUTY OF LOOKING AFTER GOODS: WHETHER SHIPOWNER COULD RECOVER COSTS OF PROVIDING BAIL BONDFlame SA v Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd'''
'''English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2013] EWHC 3153 (Comm): 22 October 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Flame_SA_v_Glory_Wealth_Shipping]]'''
'''CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM OF DAMAGES: COMPENSATORY PRINCIPLE: WHETHER INNOCENT PARTY MUST PROVE ABILITY TO PERFORM OBLIGATIONS, HAD CONTRACT CONTINUED, TO RECOVER SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGES FROM CONTRACT BREAKER''' DMC/SandT/1014/2205
'''England'''
'''Compania Sud Americana de Vapores Bulk Ship Union SA v Sinochem Tianjin Import & Export Corp – the « Aconcagua»[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CSAV_v_Sinochem_the_Aconcagua]]Clipper Bulk Shipping Limited (The "Pearl C")'''
'''English High Court: Christopher Clarke Popplewell J.: 26 June 2012 [20092012] EWHC 1880 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 533:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bulk_Ship_Union_v_Clipper_Bulk_Shipping_-_The_Pearl_C]] '''TIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM: SLOW STEAMING: WHETHER A BREACH OF ‘UTMOST DESPATCH’ OBLIGATION: WHETHER VESSEL OFF-HIRE BY REASON OF DEFAULT OF MASTER: WHETHER PARTIAL INTERRUPTION IN SERVICE SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER OFF-HIRE CLAUSE''' DMC/SandT/14/04 '''Hong Kong''' '''Maintek Computer (CommSuzhou); 24 July 2009Co Ltd v Blue Anchor Line''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: To J: HCAJ No.106 of 2008: 2 April 013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maintek_Computer_(Suzhou)_v_Blue_Anchor_Line''']] http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2013/506.html '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY BY OCEAN TERMINAL: CLAIM FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST CARRIER: MEANING OF “DELIVERY” FOR PURPOSE OF TIME LIMITATION: WHETEHR EXEMPTION CLAUSE FOR ANY CAUSE OR EVENT WHICH CARRIER COULD NOT AVOID APPLICABLE: WHETHER LIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY REFERENCE TO WEIGHT OF CARGO APPLICABLE''' DMC/SandT/14/03 '''England''' '''Sea-Cargo Skips AS v State Bank of India'''
'''BILLS OF LADING English High Court: SHIPMENT OF CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE IN CONTAINERQueen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): EXPLOSION AND FIRETeare J: DANGEROUS GOODS[2013] EWHC 177 (Comm): WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO INDEMNITY UNDER ART.IV RULE 6 OF HAGUE RULES26 June 2013: STOWAGE OF CONTAINER IN PROXIMITY TO HEATED BUNKER TANK[[http: WHETHER THIS CAUSED THE EXPLOSION: WHETHER THIS RENDERED VESSEL UNSEAWORTHY AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE VOYAGE: WHETHER CARRIER COULD RELY ON DEFENCE OF ERROR IN MANAGEMENT OF THE SHIP//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sea-Cargo_Skips_AS_v_State_Bank_of_India]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: REFUND GUARANTEE: QUESTION OF CONSTRUCTION: WHETHER DEMAND WAS SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER BANK’S LIABILITY: AMBIGUOUS DEMAND NOT COMPLIANT'''
'''Cosco Bulk Carrier Co Ltd v Team-Up Owning Co Ltd – The “Saldanha”[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_v_Team-Up_Owning]]Singapore High Court'''
'''English High CourtThe “Turtle Bay” [2013] SGHC 165 : Gross Judgment delivered by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J., 30 August 2013: 11 June 2010 [2010[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Turtle_Bay]] EWHC 1340 (Comm)'''
'''NYPE FORM CHARTERPARTYSALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST: PIRACYWHEN DIRECT PRIVATE SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST CONSTITUTES CONTEMPT OF COURT: WHETHER SHIP OFF-HIRE DURING DETENTION BY PIRATES: AVERAGE ACCIDENTS TO SHIP OR CARGO: DEFAULT OR DEFICIENCY PRINCIPLES AND EFFECT OF MENADMIRALTY JUDICIAL SALE: ANY OTHER CAUSE PREVENTING THE FULL WORKING OF THE VESSELWHEN COURT WILL SANCTION A DIRECT PRIVATE SALE'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2001
'''England'''
'''Glory Wealth Minerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping Pte Ltd AG; Oceana Shipping AG v North China Shipping Limited (M/V “North Prince”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.coTransatlantica Commodities S.uk/indexA.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_North_China_Shipping]]The MV “Athena”'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: of Appeal; Tomlinson, Lewison and Underhill LJJ; [20102013] EWHC 1692 (Comm)EWCA Civ 1723; 17 July 2013[[http: 8 July 2010'''//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Minerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-_the_Athena]]
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYCHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: WRONGFUL EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY SUBOFF-CHARTERERHIRE CLAUSE 15: DAMAGES AS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MARKET RATE OF HIRE AND CONTRACT RATE WHETHER “LOSS OF HIRE: DISPONENT SHIPOWNER’S EARLY REDELIVERY TIME” MEANS NET LOSS OF VESSEL UNDER HEAD TIME IN THE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR IN THE OVERALL CHARTER IRRELEVANT UNLESS CAUSED BY SUB-CHARTERER’S REPUDIATIONSERVICE'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1917
'''English High CourtEngland'''
'''Omak Maritime Ltd MRI Trading AG v Mamola Challenger Shipping CoErdenet Mining Corporation LLC'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Omak_Maritime_v_Mamola_Challenger_Shipping]]
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial English Court)of Appeal: Teare JPill, Tomlinson, McCombe LJJ: [20102013] EWHC 2026 (Comm)EWCA Civ 156: 4 August 201008 Mar 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MRI_Trading_v_Erdenet_Mining_Corporation]]'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYSALE OF GOODS: BREACH CERTAINTY OF CONTRACT BY CHARTERERTERMS: MARKET RATE WHETHER TERMS AMOUNTED TO 'AGREEMENTS TO AGREE': PROPER APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTION AND IMPLICATION OF HIRE HIGHER THAN TERMS WITHIN A CONTRACT RATE OF HIRE: SHIPOWNER’S CLAIM FOR WASTED EXPENDITURE: RELATION WITH PRINCIPLE IN ROBINSON V HARMANWHICH CONTAINS TERMS LEAVING MATTERS TO BE SUBSEQUENTLY AGREED'''
'''The “Hua Tian Long”England'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Hua_Tian_Long]]
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Stone J in Chambers: HCAJ NoNYK Bulkship (Atlantic) N. 59/2008: 23 April 2010V. v Cargill International S.A., The “Global Santosh”'''
'''English High Court; Field J; [2013] EWHC 30 (Comm); 1 February 2013:[[http://www.hkliionlinedmc.co.orguk/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010index.php/HCAJ000059_2008NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-70707.html_The_Global_Santosh]]
'''BREACH PERIOD OFF-HIRE CLAUSE COVERING DELAY ARISING FROM DETENTION OR ARREST OF CONTRACTVESSEL: WHETHER SUB-CHARTERERS OR RECEIVERS WERE AGENTS OF THE CHARTERERS: DEFENDANT SHIPOWNER’S WHETHER DELAY TO VESSEL “OCCASIONED BY” RECEIVERS’ FAILURE TO PROVIDE VESSEL: CHINESE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT AS SHIPOWNER: CLAIM FOR SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND CROWN IMMUNITY: WAIVER DISCHARGE WITHIN THE LAYTIME AND SUBMISSION /OR TO JURISDICTIONSECURE SELLERS’ DEMURRAGE CLAIM'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1715
'''South AfricaEngland'''
'''Greatship (India) Limited v Oceanografia SA de CV (The MV “Ioannis NK”“Greatship Driti”)'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ioannis_N_K]]
'''The owner of the cargo lately laden on board the MV “Ioannis NK” v The Master and Crew & Others English Commercial Court: Gloster J: [2012] EWHC 3468 (AC 66Comm): 5 December 2012:[[http:/2009/www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Greatship_(India)'''_Limited_v_Oceanografia_SA_de_CV_-_The_Greatship_Driti]]
'''High Court of South Africa TIME CHARTER: BIMCO SUPPLYTIME 89 FORM: CLAUSE 10(Western Cape High Court, Cape TownE) exercising its admiralty jurisdiction: Cleaver J.; 26 August 2009RIGHT TO SUSPEND PERFORMANCE FOR FAILURE TO PAY HIRE PUNCTUALLY: WHETHER GRACE PERIOD (ANTI-TECHNICALITY) NOTICE REQUIRED BEFORE EXERCISING RIGHT'''
DMC/SandT/13/14
'''England and WalesMinerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping AG; Oceana Shipping AG v Transatlantica Commodities S.A. The MV “Athena”'''
'''Kolmar Group AG v Traxpo Enterprises Pvt Limited''' English High Court; Walker J; [2012] EWHC 3608 (Comm); 13 December 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kolmar_v_TraxpoMinerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-__The_Athena]]
'''English High CourtTIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm)OFF-HIRE CLAUSE 15: WHETHER “LOSS OF TIME” MEANS NET LOSS OF TIME IN THE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR IN THE OVERALL CHARTER SERVICE'''
DMC/SandT/13/13
'''New ZealandGriffon Shipping LLC v Firodi Shipping Limited – The “MV Griffon”''' '''High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court: Teare J.: [2013] EWHC 593 (Comm): 21 March 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Griffon_Shipping_v_Firodi_Shipping_-_The_Griffon ]]
'''Tasman Orient Line CV v New Zealand China Clays Limited and others'''[[httpSHIPSALE AGREEMENT ON NORWEGIAN SALE FORM 1993://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_%22Tasman_Pioneer%22]]'''Supreme Court of New Zealand (Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath and Wilson JJ)[2010] NZSC 37 (16 April 2010)WHETHER SELLER CAN RECOVER UNPAID DEPOSIT WHERE BUYER IN REPUDIATORY BREACH'''
DMC/SandT/13/12
'''English High CourtWuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Ltd & Anor v Emporiki Bank of Greece SA'''
'''Sylvia Shipping Co Limited v Progress Bulk Carriers Limited English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Rimer and Tomlinson, LJJ.: [2012] EWCA Civ 1629:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sylvia_Shipping_v._Progress_Bulk_CarriersWuhan_Guoyu_Logistics_v_Emporiki_Bank]] [2010] EWHC 542 (Comm): English High Court of Justice - Commercial Court; Hamblen J.; 18 March 2010'''
'''ARBITRATION APPEALSHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: TIMECHARTERPARTY: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR OWNERS’ BREACHPAYMENT GUARANTEE: WHETHER OWNERS LIABLE FOR TIMECHARTERERS’ LOSS OF PROFIT PAYMENT GUARANTEE A TRUE GUARANTEE OR AN ON CANCELLED SUB-CHARTERDEMAND BOND'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1311
'''Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionEngland'''
'''Maintek Computer (Suzhou) Co Dalmare SpA v Union Maritime Ltd and others v Blue Anchor Line and others& Anor''''''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Commercial Court; Flaux J; [2012] EWHC 3537; 13 Dec 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maintek_Computer_v_ECT_Delta_TerminalDalmare_v_Union_Maritime_-_The_Union_Power]]
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First InstanceSALE OF VESSEL "AS SHE WAS AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION": Reyes J in ChambersSTATUTORY IMPLIED TERM AS TO QUALITY UNDER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979: HCAJ No. 106/2008: 25 February 2010[http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000106_2008-69910.html]WHETHER SELLERS HAD EXCLUDED APPLICATION OF STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM; WHETHER SELLERS IN BREACH OF STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM'''
DMC/SandT/13/10/12
'''The Netherlands'''
'''Maersk Dana Petroleum Netherlands B.V., formerly “P&O Nedlloyd” and before that called Nedlloyd Lijnen v Vos Sympathy B.V.The “Vos Sympathy”''' '''Court of Appeal of The Hague: Judges: M.M. Olthof, Rotterdam, the Netherlands vA.A. Rijperman and R. Irano European Covan der Vlist: 11 December 2012: Case no. Ireco S200.A079., Luxembourg - The “Dolphin I”897/01:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Dolphin_1Dana_Petroleum_Netherlands_v_Vos_Sympathy_-_The_Vos_Sympathy]]'''
'''Court of Appeal of The Hague (The Netherlands)SUPPLYTIME 2005 CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER HIMLAYA AND KNOCK FOR KNOCK CLAUSES 'REASONABLE AND FAIR' UNDER DUTCH CIVIL CODE ART. J6:248.M. van der Klooster, J.E.H.M. Pickaers, J.H.J. Teunissen, 29 September 2009, Case number 105.002.543/01 (unpublished)2'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1109
'''High Court of England and Wales'''
'''Sotrade Denizcilik Sanayi Ve Ticaret AS White Rosebay Shipping SA v Amadou LO and others (The “Duden”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Duden_2008_EWHC_2762_Comm]]Hong Kong Chain Glory Shipping Limited'''
'''Queen's English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (: Commercial Court): Jonathan Hirst, Q.C.: ; Teare J; [20082013] EWHC 2762 1355 (Comm); 23 May 2013:[[2009http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/White_Rosebay_Shipping_v_Hong_Kong_Chain_Glory_Shipping] 1 Lloyd]'s Rep. 145''TIME-CHARTERPARTY: CHARTERERS EVINCING INTENTION NOT TO PERFORM: OWNERS AFFIRMED CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ REPUDIATORY CONDUCT CONTINUED: 19 November 2008WHETHER OWNERS SUBSEQUENTLY ENTITLED TO TERMINATE'''
DMC/SandT/13/08
'''Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash JCOLLISION: OFFENCE OF ENDANGERING THE SAFETY OF OTHERS: STATE OF MIND REQUIRED FOR THE OFFENCE OF ENDANGERMENT: NARROW CHANNEL AS QUESTION OF FACT: SHIPPING AND PORT CONTROL ORDINANCE (CAP.313, 17 April 2009 '''[2009] SGHC 91LAWS OF HONG KONG)'''
DMC/SandT/13/07
'''English High Court''']]'''Kallang Shipping Bunge SA Panama v AXA Assurances Senegal and Comptoir Commercial Mandiaye Ndiaya (Kyla Shipping Company Limited - The “Kallang”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Kallang]]"Kyla"'''
'''Queen's Bench Division (Commercial English High Court): Jonathan Hirst, Q.C.: ; Flaux J; [20082012] EWHC 2761 3522 (Comm); 10 December 2012:[[2009http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bunge_SA_v_Kyla_Shipping_Company_-_The_Athena]] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 124: 19 November 2008'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: NYPE 1946 CHARTERPARTY: LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED IN BILLS OF LADINGH&M INSURANCE REQUIRED FOR AGREED FIGURE: IMPLIED TERMSCASUALTY REPAIRS EXCEED SHIP’S MARKET VALUE BUT NOT AGREED HULL VALUE: ARREST BY CARGO OWNER AND INSURER: SECURITY: JURISDICTION: WRONGFUL INDUCEMENT OR PROCUREMENT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT: PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY CLUB: LETTERS OF UNDERTAKINGWHETHER CHARTERPARTY FRUSTRATED'''
'''Singapore Court of Appeal: Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA, Chao Hick Tin JA, V K Rajah JA: 11 September 2009Kuwait Rocks Co v AMN Bulkcarriers Inc (The “Astra”)'''
'''BAILMENT – BAILOR’S RIGHT TO IMMEDIATE RIGHT TO POSSESSION IF BAILEE’S BEHAVIOUR REPUGNANT TO TERMS OF BAILMENT – WHETHER CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS RESTRICTED BAILOR’S RIGHTS UNDER COMMON LAW'''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2013] EWHC 865 (Comm): 18 April 2013: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kuwait_Rocks_Co_v_AMN_Bulkcarriers_The_Astra]]
'''TORT – CONVERSION – TIME CHARTER: WHETHER ACT OF REMOVING MACHINE FROM PREMISES AND DELIVERING IT AS INSTRUCTED AMOUNTED CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT REPUDIATORY: WHETHER OBLIGATION TO CONVERSION OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF STORING MACHINE AT WAREHOUSE AMOUNTED PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION: RIGHT TO CONVERSION CLAIM LOSS OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF REDELIVERING MACHINE TO PURPORTED OWNER AMOUNTED TO CONVERSION PROFIT FOR REPUDIATION OR BREACH OF MACHINEHIRE PAYMENT OBLIGATION'''
DMC/SandT/13/05
'''Hong Kong'''
'''The “Blue Bridge” (formerly known as The “Great Power”)''' Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Fok, Chu JJA and McWalters J: CACV No.97 of 2012: 12 May 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Blue_BridgeThe_Decurion_on_Appeal]]'''
DMC/SandT/13/04
'''Germany''' '''German Federal Supreme Court: Date of Judgement: 13 June 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CMR_Art.29_and_Contributory_Negligence]]''' '''CMR TRANSPORT: APPLICATION OF ART. 29 CMR: BURDEN OF PROOF: REDUCTION OF UNLIMITED LIABILITY DUE TO CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE SENDER IF THE CARRIER IS NOT NOTIFIED OF AN UNEXPECTEDLY HIGH VALUE OF THE TRANSPORT GOODS''' DMC/SandT/13/03 '''England''' '''Dry Bulk Handy Holding Inc and Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Fayette International Holdings Ltd and Metinvest International SA (The “Bulk Chile”): English Commercial Court: Andrew Smith J: [2012] EWHC 2107 (Comm): 24 July 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dry_Bulk_Handling_&_CSAV_v_Fayette_International_&_Metinvest_-_The_Bulk_Chile]]''' '''CHAIN OF CHARTERPARTIES: HEAD TIME CHARTER, SUB-TIME CHARTER, TIME TRIP CHARTER AND VOYAGE CHARTER: OWNERS’ BILLS OF LADING: RIGHT TO INTERVENE IN COLLECTION OF FREIGHT: RIGHT TO LIEN SUB-FREIGHT AND SUB-HIRE: RIGHT TO HIRE OR REASONABLE REMUNERATION FOR COMPLETION OF VOYAGE FOLLOWING TERMINATION OF TIME CHARTER''' DMC/SandT/13/02 '''England''' '''Wuhan Ocean Economic & Technical Cooperation Co Ltd v Schiffahrts-Gesellschaft “Hansa Murcia” MBH & Co KG''' '''English Queen’s Bench (Commercial Court): Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 3104 (Comm): 6 November 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Wuhan_Ocean_v_Hansa_Murcia]]''' '''CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF VESSEL: ADDENDUM FOR SELLERS TO OBTAIN EXTENSION OF REFUND GUARANTEE: IMPLIED TERM TO OBTAIN EXTENSION WITHIN REASONABLE TIME BEFORE EXPIRY OF ORIGINAL GUARANTEE: INNOMINATE TERM: BUT BREACH OF IMPLIED TERM NOT A REPUDIATORY BREACH AS, UNDER THE TERMS OF THE GUARANTEE, BUYERS COULD MAINTAIN THE SECURITY BY COMMENCING ARBITRATION''' DMC/SandT/13/01 '''Germany''' '''German Federal Supreme Court''' '''"Und Adryatik"; Date of Judgement: 15 December 2011: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Und_Adryatik]]''' '''CMR TRANSPORT: APPLICATION OF ART. 2 CMR: FIRE ON RO-RO-CARRIER: HAGUE RULES AS ‘CONDITIONS PRESCRIBED BY LAW’: FIRE AS AN EVENT WHICH COULD ONLY HAVE OCCURRED BY REASON OF CARRIAGE BY SEA''' DMC/SandT/12/25 '''England''' '''E.D. & F. Man Sugar Ltd v Unicargo Transportgesellschaft mBh''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Eder J: [2012] EWHC 2879 (Comm): 23 October 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/E_D_and_F_Man_v_Unicargo_Transport]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY: LAYTIME AND DEMURRAGE: DESTRUCTION OF CONVEYOR-BELT SYSTEM AT LOADING PORT BEFORE FIXTURE: DELAY IN BERTHING: NO OBLIGATION ON CHARTERERS TO NOMINATE A SECOND BERTH: DESTRUCTION DID NOT CONSTITUTE MECHANICAL BREAKDOWN: ACT OF STATE-SPONSORED PORT AUTHORITY IN ORDINARY COURSE OF CARRYING OUT PORT OR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS DID NOT FALL WITHIN EXCEPTION OF GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE''' DMC/SandT/12/24 '''England''' '''Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA''' '''English Court of Appeal: Lord Neuberger MR, Moore-Bick and Toulson LJJ: [2012] EWCA Civ 838: 19 June 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_SA_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]] '''DEMURRAGE: CALCULATION OF LAYTIME: STRIKE EXCEPTION: STRIKE CAUSING CONGESTION AT PORT AND CHARTERED VESSELS DELAYED FROM BERTHING AS A RESULT: PERIOD OF DELAY TO BE DISCOUNTED FROM CALCULATION OF LAYTIME SO LONG AS STRIKE WAS THE EFFECTIVE CAUSE OF DELAY''' DMC/SandT/1012/0623
'''Singapore'''
'''The “Catur Samudra”Singapore Court of Appeal''' ''' The “Bunga Melati 5” [2012] SGCA 46: Judgment delivered by VK Rajah JA, 21st August 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Catur_SamudraThe_Bunga_Melati_5]] '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: WHETHER A GOOD ARGUABLE CASE ON THE MERITS REQUIRED: THE VASILIY GOLOVNIN EXPLAINED''' DMC/SandT/12/22 '''Australia'''
'''Singapore High Court: Judgment delivered by Steven Chong JC1. Jebsens International (Australia) Pty Ltd and Anor v Interfert Australia Pty Ltd and Ors (2011) 112 SASR 297, 15 January 2010: [2010] SGHC 1825 August 2011 (Anderson J)'''
'''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION 2. Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S v Beach Building & Civil Group Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 696, 29 June 2012 (Foster J):[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/_1._Jebsens_International_(Australia)_v_Interfert_Australia: _2._Norden_A/S_v_Beach_Building_&_Civil_Group]]''' '''WHETHER CLAIM UNDER GUARANTEE IS VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY A CLAIM “ARISING OUT "SEA CARRIAGE DOCUMENT" FOR PURPOSES OF AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE USE OR HIRE” S.11 AUSTRALIAN CARRIAGE OF A VESSEL : SECTION 3(1)(H) HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) GOODS BY SEA ACT1991'''
DMC/SandT/1012/0421 '''England''' '''TAOKAS NAVIGATION SA v. KOMROWSKI BULK SHIPPING KG (GMBH & CO); KENT LINE INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. SOLYM CARRIERS LTDTHE MV “PAIWAN WISDOM”''' '''English High Court; Teare J; [2012] EWHC 1888 (Comm); 11 July 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Toakas_Navigation_v_Komrowski_Bulk_Shipping:_Kent_Line_v_Solym_Carriers_-_The_Paiwan_Wisdom]]''' '''CONWARTIME 2004: OWNERS’ LIBERTY TO REJECT VOYAGE ORDERS: MATERIAL INCREASE IN RISK BETWEEN CHARTERPARTY DATE AND DATE OF ORDER NOT REQUIRED: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION''' DMC/SandT/12/20 '''England''' '''Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Sumption: [2012] UKSC 17, [2012] 2 WLR 976: 2 May 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Petroleo_Brasiliero_v_ENE_Kos_1]]''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SHELLTIME 3 FORM: VESSEL WITHDRAWN FOR NON-PAYMENT OF HIRE WHILST LOADING: LOSS OF USE OF VESSEL: EXPENSES INCURRED IN DISCHARGING CARGO BACK TO SHORE: WHETHER LOSS AND EXPENSE RECOVERABLE UNDER INDEMNITY CLAUSE: WHETHER RECOVERABLE AS RIGHT CORRELATIVE TO DUTY AS BAILEE TO LOOK AFTER GOODS: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ ORDER TO LOAD AN EFFECTIVE CAUSE... DMC/SandT/12/19 '''Hong Kong''' '''The “Decurion”''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.141 of 2010: 4 May 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Decurion]] '''ADMIRALTY: IN REM JURISDICTION: CLAIM AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT: WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR IN CONTROL” OF CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 12B(4) OF HIGH COURT ORDINANCE''' DMC/SandT/12/18 '''England''' '''EITZEN BULK A/S v. TTMI SARL - THE “BONNIE SMITHWICK”''' '''English High Court; Eder J; [2012] EWHC 202 (Comm); 14 February 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Eitzen_Bulk_v_TTMI_-_The_Bonnie_Smithwick]]''' '''SHELLTIME 4: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: “BUNKERS ON DELIVERY/REDELIVERY” CLAUSE: MEANING OF ‘PRICE ACTUALLY PAID’''' DMC/SandT/12/17
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc v The Owners and/or Demise Charterers “Marcatania”''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.138 of the Ship or Vessel “Asian Atlas” (2008: 2 December 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Marcatania]]''' '''CONTRACT: AGREEMENT TO EXCHANGE SLOTS FOR USE: SLOTS ON VESSEL CHARTERED BY THIRD PARTY: FAILURE TO PAY HIRE: VESSEL WITHDRAWN BY SHIPOWNER: WHETHER SHIPOWNER OBLIGED TO ON-CARRY CARGO UNDER BAILMENT: WHETHER LIABLE IN CONVERSION FOR DELAY IN RELEASING CARGO''' DMC/SandT/12/16 '''England''' '''M.H. Progress Lines SA v Orient Shipping Rotterdam BV and other, The “Asian Atlas”“Genius Star 1”''' '''English Queen’s Court (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2011]EWHC 3083 (Comm), [2012]1 Lloyd’s Rep 222: 28 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/M_H_Progress_Lines_v_Orient_Shipping_-_The_Genius_Star_1]] '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SUB-CHARTER: CARGO CLAIM AGAINST SUB-CHARTERER: APPORTIONMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST CHARTERER AND SHIPOWNER UNDER INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996: DIFFERENT TIME BARS PROVIDED IN HEAD CHARTER AND INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT: APPLICABLE TIME BAR''' DMC/SandT/12/15 '''England'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of Appeal: Ma CJHC, Stone and Reyes JJ: CACV No. 257 of 2007: 23 April 2008 ([2008] 3 HKLRD 604; [http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkca/2008/CACV000257_2007-60848.html]Sideridraulic Systems SpA v BBC Chartering & Logistics GmbH & Co KG'''
'''ACTION IN REM UNDER HK HIGH COURT ORDINANCE, S.12AEnglish Queen’s Bench (2Commercial Court): Andrew Smith J: [2011] EWHC 3106 (eComm): WARRANT OF ARREST30 November 2011: FOR “ANY CLAIM FOR DAMAGE DONE BY A SHIP”[[http: SETTING ASIDE: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE OF FACTS RELATING TO JURISDICTION'''//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sideridraulic_Systems_v_BBC_Chartering_&_Logistics]
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: INTERPRETATION OF MASTER’S REMARK IN BILL OF LADING: WHETHER CARGO WAS DECK CARGO UNDER HAGUE-VISBY RULES: IF DECK CARGO, WHETHER PARTIES AGREED THAT HAGUE-VISBY RULES NEVERTHELESS APPLIED: WHETHER US COURTS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSE APPLIED'''
DMC/SandT/1012/0314 '''England''' '''Isabella Shipowner SA v Shagang Shipping Co Ltd (The “Aquafaith”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 1077 (Comm): 26 April 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Isabella_Shipowner_v_Shagang_Shipping_The_Aquafaith]]''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE FORM: RULE IN WHITE AND CARTER V MCGREGOR: WHETHER OWNERS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT PREMATURE RE-DELIVERY OF VESSEL BY CHARTERERS''' DMC/SandT/12/13
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Cheong Yuk Fai A O Smith Electrical Products (Changzhou) Co Ltd v Blue Anchor Line & Ors''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: [2012] 1 HKLRD 301: 18 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/A_O_Smith_Electrical_Products_v_Blue_Anchor_Line_&_Ors]] '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: WAYBILL: LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: INTERPRETATION: GOVERNING LAW OF CARRIAGE: APPLICABLE LIMIT OF LIABILITY''' DMC/SandT/12/12 '''Malaysia''' '''Sarawak Shell Berhad v South Sumatra Richfield Marine Pte Ltd (The “Red Gold”)''' '''Malaysian Court of Appeal: Sulaiman Bin Daud JCA, Syed Ahmad Helmy Bin Syed Ahmad JCA and another Anantham Kasinather JCA: 19 March 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sarawak_Shell_v_South_Sumatra_Richfield_Marine_-_The_Red_Gold]]''' '''ADMIRALTY: COLLISION BETWEEN OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSEL AND FIXED OFFSHORE OIL PLATFORM: RIGHT OF VESSEL OWNERS TO LIMIT LIABILITY: WHETHER COLLISION CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE OF OWNERS IN THE NAVIGATION OR MANAGEMENT OF VESSEL: WHETHER VESSEL OWNERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY DUE TO ABSENCE OF ACTUAL FAULT OR PRIVITY: MERCHANT SHIPPING ORDINANCE 1952 SECTION 360 VIZ. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CONVENTION 1957''' DMC/SandT/12/11 '''England''' '''Osmium Shipping Corporation v Cargill International SA (The “Captain Stefanos”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 571 (Comm): 13 March 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Osmium_Shipping_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Captain_Stefanos]] '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE (1946) FORM INCORPORATING CONWARTIME 2004: WHETHER VESSEL WAS OFF-HIRE DURING PERIOD OF HIJACKING BY SOMALI PIRATES: WHETHER RIDER CLAUSE PROVIDING FOR OFF-HIRE DURING “CAPTURE/SEIZURE” WAS QUALIFIED BY THE PHRASE “BY ANY AUTHORITY”: WHETHER CONWARTIME 2004 CLAUSE QUALIFIED OFF-HIRE RIDER CLAUSE''' DMC/SandT/12/10 '''England''' '''Progress Bulk Carriers Limited v Tube City IMS LLC (The “Cenk Kaptanoglu”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm): 17 February 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Progress_Bulk_Carriers_v_Tube_City_IMS_-_The_Cenk_Kaptanoglu]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: WHETHER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT VOIDABLE FOR DURESS: WHETHER OWNERS’ CONDUCT, ALTHOUGH NOT ILLEGAL, AMOUNTED TO “ILLEGITIMATE PRESSURE”''' DMC/SandT/12/09 '''England''' '''Acergy Shipping Ltd v. Société Bretonne De Réparation Navale SAS''' '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: [2011] EWHC 2490 (Comm): 5 October 2011: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Acergy_Shipping_v_Société_Bretonne_de_Réparation_Navale]] '''CONTRACT FOR PROVISION OF REPAIR SERVICES TO VESSEL: FIRE CAUSING DAMAGE BEYOND REPAIR WORK UNDERTAKEN: INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT: SCOPE OF INDEMNITY CONTAINED THEREIN''' DMC/SandT/12/08 '''England''' '''Geofizika DD v China . MMB International Freight Forwarders Limited and Greenshields Cowie & Co Ltd: “The Green Island”''' '''English Court of Appeal; Lord Neuberger, Thomas LJ, and Sir Nicholas Wall; [2010] EWCA Civ 459, [2010] 2 Lloyds Rep 1; 28 April 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Geofizika_v_MMB_International_-_The_Green_Island]] '''INCOTERMS 2000 CIP: CARRIAGE ON DECK: OBLIGATIONS OF FREIGHT FORWARDER: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: CAUSATION''' DMC/SandT/12/07 '''England''' '''Hyundai Merchant Marine Company Limited v Trafigura Beheer BV (The “Gaz Energy”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2011] EWHC 3108 (HKComm) : 29 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Hyundai_Merchant_Marine_v_Trafigura_-_the_Gas_Energy]] '''TIME CHARTER: SPEED AND PERFORMANCE WARRANTY: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF CHARTER: WHETHER SPEED AND PERFORMANCE AN “ALL WEATHERS” WARRANTY OR LIMITED TO “MAXIMUM WIND FORCE 4 ON BEAUFORT SCALE”''' DMC/SandT/12/06 '''The “Oriental Baltic”''' '''Singapore High Court: Tan Lee Meng J : [2011] 3 SGHC 75: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Oriental_Baltic]] '''OWNERS OF VESSEL UNDER VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION: IN REM PROCEEDINGS AGAINST VESSEL COMMENCED AFTER LIQUIDATION: PLAINTIFF FILED CAVEAT AGAINST RELEASE AGAINST VESSEL PRIOR TO LIQUIDATION: ACTION AGAINST COMPANY UNDER LIQUIDATION ORDINARILY STAYED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT: WHETHER LEAVE SHOULD BE GRANTED TO PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE WITH ITS ACTION''' DMC/SandT/12/05 '''England''' '''Thai Maparn Trading Co Ltd v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd(The “Med Salvador” and “Goa”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Beatson J: [2011] EWHC 2494 (Comm): 4 October 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thai_Maparn_Trading_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]]''' '''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: FOB CONTRACT: WHETHER BUYERS IN BREACH OF CONDITION PRECEDENT IN CONTRACT BY FAILING TO ISSUE 7 DAY ETA OF VESSEL: WHETHER SELLERS IN REPUDIATORY/RENUNCIATORY BREACH BY REJECTING BUYERS’ NOTICE AND STATING THAT CARGO WOULD NOT BE READY IN TIME'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of AppealEngland''': Cheung and Yuen JJA and A Chung J: CACV No. 463 of 2002: 26 January 2005: [2005] 4 HKLRD 544 (English translation; judgment handed down in Chinese)
'''Pacific Basin IHX Limited v Bulkhandling Handymax AS (The “Triton Lark”): English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2011] EWHC 2868 (Comm): 8 November 2011:[[http://www.hkliionlinedmc.co.orguk/hk/jud/eng/hkcaindex.php/2005/CACV000463X_2002-47015.htmlPacific_Basin_v_Bulkhandling_Handymax,_the_Triton_Lark]]'''
'''CARRIAGE TIME CHARTER: PIRACY RISKS IN GULF OF ADEN IN 2008: CONWARTIME 1993/2004 CLAUSE: ARBITRATION APPEAL: SECTION 69 OF GOODSARBITRATION ACT 1996: CLAIM AGAINST CARRIER CORRECT TEST FOR ASSESSING RISK OF PIRACY INCIDENT OCCURING FOR WRONGFUL DELIVERY PURPOSE OF GOODS1993/2004 CLAUSE: CONVERSION: LIMITATION UNDER HAGUE-VISBY RULES AND BILL WHETHER OWNERS DEVIATED BY REROUTING VESSEL VIA CAPE OF GOOD HOPE INSTEAD OF GULF OF LADINGADEN'''
DMC/SandT/1012/02 03
'''German Federal Supreme CourtEngland'''
'''Date of Judgement: 18 June 2009: Case Reference 1ZR 140/06:[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Case_Reference:_1_ZR_140/06]Emeraldian Limited Partnership v Wellmix Shipping Limited and Guangzhou Iron & Steel Corporation Limited (The “Vine”)'''
'''CARRIER’S LIABILITYEnglish Commercial Court: BREAKING THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITYTeare J: SUB-CONTRACTING[2010] EWHC 1411 (Comm): 17 June 2010:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Emeraldian_Limited_v_Wellmix_Shipping,_the_Vine]]'''
'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER VESSEL’S OBLIGATION TO OBTAIN CLEARANCE BY PORT AUTHORITIES BEFORE GIVING NOTICE OF READINESS WAIVED FOR PURPOSE OF COMMENCEMENT OF LAYTIME: WHETHER CHARTERERS COULD RELY ON EXCEPTIONS TO RUNNING OF LAYTIME: WHETHER CHARTERERS IN BREACH OF SAFE PORT WARRANTY: WHETHER DEMURRAGE RECOVERABLE FOR DETENTION OF VESSEL'''
DMC/12/02 '''England''' '''ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED v. ALBEMARLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and ALBEMARLE CORPORATION''' '''English High Court; Flaux J; [2011] EWHC 1574 (Comm); 21 June 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Astrazeneca_UK_v_Albemarle_International]]''' '''CONTRACT: CLAUSES GRANTING THE RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL: EXCLUSION CLAUSES AND DELIBERATE BREACH''' DMC/SandT/12/01 '''The Netherlands Supreme Court''' '''Furtrans Denzilick Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS (“Furtrans”) v Augusta Due Srl (“Augusta”): The "Constanza M”'''
'''Nile Dutch Africa Line B.V, Rotterdam, Supreme Court of the Netherlands (“NDAL”“SCN”) v. (1summary proceedings) Delta Lloyd Schadeverzekering N: Vice-President J.VB., Rotterdam, Fleers as Chairman and the Netherlands (“Delta Lloyd”)judges A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, (2) Premium Tobacco Investments NF.VB.Bakels, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (“Tobacco”), (3) MC. Meerapfel Söhne AE.Drion and G.Snijders LJN:BT2708, BaselDecember 9, Switzerland (“Meerapfel”) and (4) CETAC, Douala, Cameroon (“Cetac”) - The “NDS Provider” ''' '''2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_%E2%80%9CNDS_Provider%E2%80%9DFurtrans_v_Augusta,_the_Constanza_M]]'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA UNDER BILL OF LADING: HAGUE VISBY RULES: LIABILITY FOR DEFECTIVE CONTAINERS SUPPLIED BY CARRIER: PACKAGING OR PART CONSTRUCTION OF ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE VESSEL? INTERPRETATION ARREST OF TREATIES UNDER DUTCH LAWSEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''
