2,049
edits
Changes
From DMC
no edit summary
England '''Glencore International AG v MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.''' '''English Court of Appeal; Lewison and Henderson LJJ, Sir Christopher Clarke; [2017] EWCA Civ 365; 24 May 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_International_v_MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company]]''' '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY OF CARGO: MEANING OF “DELIVERY ORDER": ELECTRONIC RELEASE SYSTEMS IN OPERATION AT PORT OF DISCHARGE: WHETHER A RELEASE NOTE CONTAINING PIN CODES CONSTITUTED A DELIVERY ORDER: WHETHER CONSIGNEE ESTOPPED BY PREVIOUS USE OF ERS SYSTEM''' DMC/SandT/17/13 England '''Navalmare UK Limited v Kale Maden Hammaddeler Sanayi ve Ticart AS (The “Arundel Castle”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Knowles J: [2017] EWHC 116 (Comm): 31 January 2017: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Navalmare_UK_v_Kale_Maden_Hammaddeler_Sanayi_ve_Ticart_-_The_Arundel_Castle]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: MEANING OF “PORT LIMITS”: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL''' DMC/SandT/17/12 Singapore '''DSA Consultancy (FZC) v The “Eurohope”''' '''Singapore High Court; Chua Lee Ming J; [2017] SGHC 218: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSA_Consultancy_(FZC)_v_The_Eurohope]] '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: ARREST TO OBTAIN SECURITY IN AID OF FOREIGN COURT PROCEEDINGS''' DMC/SandT/17/11 Canada '''De Wolf Maritime Safety BV v Traffic-Tech International Inc. (The “Zagora”)''' '''Federal Court, Ontario: Madam Justice St-Louis; 2017 FC 23: 11 January 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/De_Wolf_Maritime_Safety_v_Traffic-Tech_International_-_The_Zagora]]''' '''HAGUE-VISBY RULES: WHETHER CARGO CARRIED ON-DECK UNDECLARED AMOUNTED TO “GOODS” AS DEFINED IN THE RULES: WHETHER A CARRIER COULD RELY ON THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO GOODS CARRIED ON-DECK WITHOUT AUTHORISATION''' DMC/SandT/17/10 England '''Transgrain Shipping (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Yangtze Navigation (Hong Kong) Co Ltd.''''''English Commercial Court: Teare J: (2016) EWHC 3122 (Comm): [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Transgrain_Shipping_(Singapore)_v_Yangtze_Navigation_(Hong_Kong)]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY (TIME): NYPE INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996, CLAUSE 8(D): WHETHER “ACT” REQUIRES FAULT''' DMC/SandT/17/09 Singapore '''The “Posidon” and another matter''' '''Singapore High Court; Belinda Ang Saw Ean J; [2017] SGHC 138:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Posidon]] '''CLAIMS AGAINST SHIP SALE PROCEEDS: PRIORITIES: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH ESTABLISHED ORDER OF PRIORITIES MAY BE DEPARTED FROM: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH NECESSARIES CLAIM MAY RANK ABOVE MORTGAGEE’S CLAIM: WHETHER REQUIREMENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF NATURE AND EXTENT OF EXPENDITURE DIFFERS FOR DIFFERENT KINDS OF NECESSARIES CLAIMS''' DMC/SandT/17/08 England '''Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The “New Flamenco”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hodge SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 43: 28 June 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-_The_New_Flamenco_-_Supreme_Court_Decision]]''' '''TIME CHARTER: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM: WHETHER CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL''' DMC/SandT/17/07 England '''Gard Marine & Energy Ltd v China National Chartering Co Ltd and another/China National Chartering Co Ltd v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another/Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine & Energy Ltd and another (The “Ocean Victory”)''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Hodge and Toulson SCJJ: [2017] UKSC 35: 10 May 2017:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gard_Marine_%26_Energy_v_China_National_Chartering_-_The_Ocean_Victory]] '''DEMISE CHARTERPARTY: TIME CHARTERPARTY: CONTACT WITH BREAKWATER AND GROUNDING AT PORT RESULTING IN CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS AND WRECK REMOVAL OF VESSEL: WHETHER LOSS CAUSED BY BREACH OF SAFE PORT UNDERTAKING OR BY AN ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE: WHETHER SUBROGATED RIGHTS OF HULL INSURERS AND INSURED LOSSES OF OWNERS AGAINST DEMISE CHARTERERS PRECLUDED BY DEMISE CHARTERPARTY TERMS: WHETHER TIME CHARTERERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY AGAINST HULL INSURERS AND OWNERS: BARECON 89 FORM: MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT 1995: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976 DMC/SandT/17/06 England '''Bahamas Oil Refining Company International Limited v Cape Bari Tankschiffahrts GmbH & Co KG (The “Cape Bari”)''' '''Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson SCJJ: [2016] UKPC 20: 19 July 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bahamas_Oil_Refining_Company_v_Cape_Bari_Tankschiffahrts_-_The_Cape_Bari]]''' '''CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH: COLLISION BETWEEN VESSEL AND BERTH: WHETHER – UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH - VESSEL CAN CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE STATUTORY RIGHT TO LIMIT LABILITY: WHETHER UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE VESSEL DID CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE RIGHT TO LIMIT: MERCHANT SHIPPING (MARITIME CLAIMS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY) ACT 1989 OF THE BAHAMAS: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976''' DMC/SandT/17/05 England '''Oldendorff GmbH & Co KG v Sea Powerful II Special Maritime Enterprises (The “Zagora”)''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Mr Justice Teare: [2016] EWHC 3212; 15 December 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oldendorff_GmbH_v_Sea_Powerful_II_Special_Maritime_Enterprises_The_Zagora]]''' '''LETTER OF INDEMNITY: WHETHER THE DISCHARGE PORT AGENT WAS ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE SHIPOWNERS OR THE PERSON NAMED IN THE LETTER OF INDEMNITY AS THE PERSON TO WHOM DELIVERY OF THE CARGO WAS TO BE MADE''' DMC/SandT/17/04 England '''MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Cottonex Anstalt''' '''Court of Appeal; Moore-Bick and Tomlinson LJJ, Keehan J.; [2016] EWCA Civ 789; 27 July 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company_v_Cottonex_Anstalt]] '''CONTAINER DEMURRAGE: FRUSTRATION: REPUDIATION AND LEGITIMATE INTEREST: GOOD FAITH: PENALTIES''' DMC/SandT/17/03 England '''SPAR SHIPPING AS v GRAND CHINA LOGISTICS HOLDING (GROUP) CO LTD (THE “SPAR CAPELLA”, “SPAR VEGA” AND “SPAR DRACO”)''' '''Court of Appeal; Sir Terence Etherton MR, Gross and Hamblen LJJ; [2016] EWCA Civ 982; 7 October 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Spar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics_Holding_Group]]''' '''NYPE 1993 FORM TIME CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ DUTY TO PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION OR AN INNOMINATE TERM: WHETHER THE CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY BREACH OF THE TIME CHARTER''' DMC/SandT/17/02 England '''Volcafe Ltd and Others v Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA (trading as “CSAV”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Gloster LJ, King LJ and Flaux J: (2016) EWCA Civ 1103: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/01Volcafe_&_Ors_v_Compania_Sud_Americana_de_Vapores_-_CSAV]]'''
'''The NetherlandsCARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: CONSIGNMENTS OF BAGGED COFFEE BEANS IN CONTAINERS CARRIED ON LCL/FCL TERMS: CARGO DAMAGED BY CONDENSATION: TEMPORAL SCOPE OF HAGUE RULES: BURDEN OF PROOF: WHETHER CARRIER FAILED PROPERLY AND CAREFULLY TO LOAD AND CARRY THE GOODS: WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO RELY ON “INHERENT VICE” EXCEPTION: WHETHER DAMAGE INEVITABLE: HAGUE RULES, ARTICLE III RULE 2 AND ARTICLE IV RULE 2(M)'''
England '''CONSTRUCTION OF ART. 3ST Shipping & Transport INC v Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA (4The “Kriti Filoxenia”) SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE ARREST OF SEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''
'''High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Mr Justice Walker; [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm); 14 May 2015'''
DMC/SandT/16/07 England '''Rainy Sky SA FSL-9 Pte Ltd and Nordic Tankers Trading A/S v Kookmin BankNorwegian Hull Club (The “FSL New York”)'''
'''UK Supreme English Commercial Court: Lord Phillips, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and Lord WilsonBlair J: [20112016] UKSC 50EWHC 1091 (Comm): 10 May 2016: 2 November 2011[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Rainy_Sky_v_Kookmin_BankFSL-9_Pte_&_Nordic_Tankers_Trading_v_Norwegian_Hull_Club_-_The_FSL_New_York]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING: LETTER OF GUARANTEEUNDERTAKING: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION BEING P&I CLUB: WHETHER CLAIMANT OWNERS COULD APPLY TO HIGH COURT TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT P&I CLUB TO INCREASE LEVEL OF SECURITY AVAILABLE UNDER A UNITARY PROCESSLETTER OF UNDERTAKING ISSUED BY THE CLUB TO OWNERS: ROLE MEANING OF COMMERCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: WEIGHT “LIBERTY TO BE GIVEN APPLY” IN LETTER OF UNDERTAKING SUBJECT TO VIEW ENGLISH LAW AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF COMMERCIAL JUDGEHIGH COURT IN LONDON'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2706
'''NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NY v Cargill International SA, The Sahand“Global Santosh”'''
'''ARRESTS OFF-HIRE CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF VESSELS IN SINGAPORE OWNED BY IRANIAN COMPANIESVESSEL: ASSETS FREEZE IMPOSED BY UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS 1737, 1747, 1803 WHETHER ACTS OF RECEIVERS AND 1929: WHETHER SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS REQUIRE IMPOUNDMENT OR DETENTION SUB-CHARTERERS WERE TO BE CONSIDERED “DEFAULT OF VESSELS OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY DESIGNATED PERSONS OR ENTITIES THE CHARTERERS OR THEIR SUBSIDIARIES: EFFECT OF ASSETS FREEZE ON ARREST OF SHIPS PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION OF COURTAGENTS”'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2605
'''England'''
'''National PST Energy 7 Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v BP Oil Supply CompanyOW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''English Supreme Court of Appeal: Ward and Tomlinson LJJ and Sir Mark Potter: 12 October 2011: ; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Hughes, Toulson; [20112016] EWCA Civ 1127UKSC 23, 11 May 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NSCSA_v_BP_Oil_SupplyPST_Energy_7__Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_-_The_Res_Cogitans]]'''
'''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: BPVOY4: DEMURRAGE CLAIMS RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE; GOODS CONTEMPLATED TO BE PRESENTED WITH FULL DOCUMENTATION WITHIN 90 DAYS CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED; SALE OF COMPLETION GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE; COMMENTS ON POSITION IF SALE OF DISCHARGE: FINAL SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM: WHETHER MIS-DESCRIBED FURTHER DEMURRAGE CLAIM TIME-BARRED: COST OF BUNKERS CONSUMED FOR RE-BERTHINGGOODS ACT 1979 APPLIED'''
DMC/11SandT/2516/04
'''England'''
'''Conarken Group Limited and Farrell Transport Limited Crescendo Maritime Co. & Alpha Bank AE vBank of Communications Co Ltd & Ors. Network Rail Infrastructure Limited'''
'''English High Court of Appeal; Pill, Moore-Bick, and Jackson LJJTeare J; [20112015] EWCA Civ 644EWHC 3364 (Comm), 27 May 201125 November 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Conarken_v_Network_RailCrescendo_Maritime_&_Alpha_Bank_v_Bank_of_Communications_&_Ors]]'''
'''TORTBACK-DATED SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: DAMAGESREFUND GUARANTEES: SUMS PAYABLE UNDER VICTIM’S CONTRACTS WITH THIRD PARTIESARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: FORESEEABILITY AND REMOTENESSACTION COMMENCED IN CHINESE COURTS BY A PARTY TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: REASONABLENESS BREACH OF CALCULATIONSARBITRATION AGREEMENT:WHETHER AN ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED:: WHETHER CHINESE PROCEEDINGS A COLLATERAL ATTACK ON ARBITRATION AWARD'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2403
'''England'''
'''Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Limited SBT Star Bulk & Tankers (Germany) GmbH & Co KG v Korea Line CorporationCosmotrade SA (The “Wehr Trave”)'''
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Blair Eder J: [20112016] EWHC 1819 583 (Comm): 22 June 2011March 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_Korea_Line_CorporationSBT_Bulk_&_Tankers_v_Cosmotrade_-_The_Wehr_Trave]]
'''TIME CHARTERPARTY: WRONGFUL TERMINATION BY CHARTERERS: ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGESCHARTER TRIP: NO AVAILABLE MARKET FOR BALANCE WHETHER THE PARTICULAR TERMS OF THE CHARTER PERIOD AT TIME OF TERMINATIONPERMITTED CHARTERERS TO ORDER THE VESSEL TO LOAD A FURTHER CARGO AFTER THE INITIAL CARGO HAD BEEN DISCHARGED: EFFECT OF REVIVAL OF MARKET AT A LATER STAGEARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2302
'''Hong KongEngland'''
'''Birnam Ltd Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The Owners of the Ship or Vessel “Hong Ming”, The “Hong Ming”“New Flamenco”)'''
'''Hong Kong English Court of First InstanceAppeal: Reyes JLongmore, Christopher Clarke and Sales LLJ: HCAJ No.105 of 2011[2015] EWCA Civ 1299: 26 August 201121 December 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Birnam_v_The_"Hong_Ming"]Fulton_Shipping_v_Globalia_Business_Travel_-the_New_Flamenco_-_Court_of_Appeal_Decision]'''
'''WARRANT OF ARRESTTIME CHARTER: SETTING ASIDEREPUDIATION: CLAIM FOR OWNERSHIP QUANTUM OF VESSEL PURSUANT DAMAGES: WHETHER CREDIT TO A TERMINATED CONTRACT BE GIVEN FOR SALE CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSELSOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN ITS VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE: MISUSE OF THE ARREST PROCESSARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/1116/2201
'''England'''
'''CARRIAGE CHARTERPARTY: QUANTIFICATION OF GOODSDAMAGES FOR REPUDIATION OF VOYAGE CHARTER: CIF CONTRACT: CONSTRUCTION: ENTITLEMENT DAMAGES FOR POSITIONAL LOSS IN ADDITION TO GIVE NOTICE OF READINESSUSUAL PROFIT LOSS: CONCURRENT CAUSES LEADING WHETHER DAMAGES LIMITED BY REFERENCE TO DELAY IN BERTHINGPERIOD WHEN CONTRACT VOYAGE WOULD HAVE ENDED: COMMENCEMENT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 69 OF LAYTIMETHE ARBITRATION ACT 1996'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2118
'''England'''
'''Carboex SA Société de Distribution de Toutes Marchandises en Côte D’Ivoire, trading as “SDTM-CI”, and others v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA. Continental Lines N.V. and another (the “Sea Miror”)'''
'''English High Court: Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court): Field Flaux J.; 18 June 2015: [20112015] EWHC 1165 1747 (Comm: 12 May 2011): [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_v_Louis_Dreyfus_CommoditiesSDTM-CI_and_others_v_Continental_Lines_amd_another_-_the_Sea_Miror]]'''
'''AMWELSH SYNACOMEX 90 CHARTERPARTY: DEMURRAGE: EXCEPTION LOADING AND DISCHARGING TO BE AT THE EXPENSE AND RISK OF STRIKESTHE SHIPPERS/CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS/CHARTERERS RESPECTIVELY: WHETHER DELAY IN OWNERS RESPONSIBLE FOR CARGO LOSS AND DAMAGE OCCURRING DURING LOADING AND DISCHARGE ARISING FROM CONGESTION CAUSED BY STRIKES EXCEPTED FROM LAYTIME'''
DMC/SandT/1115/2017
'''England'''
'''Great Eastern PST Energy 7 Shipping Co Ltd LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA vOW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”''' '''Court of Appeal; Moore-Bick, Longmore, McCombe LJJ; [2015] EWCA Civ 1058, 22 October 2015: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. (1) Far East Chartering Ltd (2) Binani Cement Ltdphp/PST_Energy_7_Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_-_the_RES_COGITANS''']]
'''English High Court, Queen’s Bench DivisionARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: Judge Mackie QCSUPPLY OF BUNKERS: [2011] EWHC 1372 (Comm)RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE: 27 May 2011CONTEMPLATED THAT GOODS WOULD BE CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED:[[httpNO PASSING OF PROPERTY INTENDED://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Great_Eastern_Shipping_v_Far_East_Chartering]]SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE'''
DMC/SandT/15/16 '''WHETHER SHIPOWNER ENTITLED TO ENFORCE LETTER OF INDEMNITY GIVEN BY RECEIVER TO CHARTERER FOR DELIVERY OF CARGO WITHOUT PRESENTATION OF BILLS OF LADINGSingapore''' '''Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services Pte Ltd v MISC Berhad, the “BUNGA MELATI 5”''' '''High Court; Prakash J; [2015] SGHC 190, 22 July 2015: CONTRACTS (RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES) ACT 1999[[http: WHETHER LETTER GIVEN TO CHARTERER//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Equatorial_Marine_Fuel_Management_Services_v_MISC_Bhd_-_The_Bunga_Melati_5]] '''BUNKER BROKERS: WHETHER CARGO “DELIVERED”AGENCY: WHETHER LETTER OF INDEMNITY UNENFORCEABLE ON GROUNDS OF PUBLIC POLICYACTUAL AUTHORITY, APPARENT AUTHORITY, AND ESTOPPEL: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED NO GENERAL ‘DUTY TO RECOVER UNDER A UNILATERAL CONTRACTSPEAK’'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1915
'''The NetherlandsEngland'''
'''Pianura Armatori SpA Arnold v Ferrari Shipping Agency G.A. The "Halcyon Star”Britton'''
'''UK Supreme Court : Lord Neuberger of Rotterdam (summary proceedings) : Mr A.F.L. GeerdesAbbotsbury PSC, LJN:BQ5031Lord Sumption, October 7Lord Carnwath, 2010 (published May 19Lord Hughes, 2011)Lord Hodge JJSC: [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] 2 WLR 1593: 10 June 2015: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pianura_Armatori_v_Ferrari_ShippingArnold_v_Britton]]'''
'''ARREST CONVENTION 1952 ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPHLANDLORD AND TENANT: ARREST LONG RESIDENTIAL LEASES: INCREASE OF SERVICE CHARGE AT YEARLY RATE OF VESSEL OWNED BY A VESSEL MANAGER 10% ON COMPOUND BASIS: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: CONTROL OF PARTIES OVER LANGUAGE USED IN CONTRACT: THAT CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT WORKED OUT BADLY FOR ONE PARTY NO REASON FOR MARITIME CLAIMS AGAINST THE VESSEL MANAGER RELATING TO OTHER VESSELS NOT OWNED BY THE MANAGERDEPARTING FROM NATURAL LANGUAGE'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1814
'''England'''
'''The Owner of the Vessel “The Ocean Crown” and others Bunge SA v Five Oceans Salvage Consultants Ltd, “The Ocean Crown”Nidera BV'''
'''English High UK Supreme Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Admiralty Court): Gross JLords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson: [2009] EWHC 3040 (Admlty), [20102015] UKSC 437: 1 Lloyd’s Rep 468: 26 November 2009July 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Ocean_CrownBunge_SA_v_Nidera_BV]]'''
'''SALVAGEINTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: DAMAGES: SALE OF GRAIN BASED ON GAFTA FORM 49: EMBARGO ON EXPORTS: ASSESSMENT PREMATURE TERMINATION OF REMUNERATIONCONTRACT BY SELLERS BEFORE EMBARGO TOOK EFFECT: WHETHER RISK ASSESSMENT OF FUTURE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN APPLYING PRINCIPLE DAMAGES TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT EFFECT OF ENCOURAGEMENTEMBARGO: SCOPE OF THE PRINCIPLE IN THE AMERIQUENO LOSS SUFFERED BY BUYERS'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1713
'''The Netherlands'''
'''HDIThe Kingdom of The Netherlands v Owners of the yacht Qubio – “The Qubio”''' '''Supreme Court of the Netherlands: Vice-Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG et al v APM Terminals Rotterdam President F.B. Bakels as chairman and judges G. Snijders, G. de Groot, M.V.Polak and T.H. Tanja-van den Broek'; 10 July 2015, Case no. ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1836:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Kingdom_of_The_Netherlands_v_Owners_of_Yacht_Qubio]]''' '''WRECK OF VESSEL: EXTENSION OF LIABILITY OF THE OWNER OF A SUNKEN VESSEL TO PAY FOR COSTS OF MARKING THE WRECK AS A TEMPORARY OR PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE''' DMC/SandT/15/12 '''Singapore'''The ‘Pretoria’'''Precious Shipping Public Company Ltd & Ors v OW Bunker Far East (Singapore) Pte Ltd & Ors and other matters''' '''Singapore High Court of Rotterdam; Chong J; [2015] SGHC 187, 21 July 2015: [[http: Ms P//www.onlinedmc.co.Auk/index.M van Schouwenburg –Laanphp/Precious_Shipping_&_Ors_v_OW_Bunker_Far_East_&_Ors]] '''WHETHER INTERPLEADER RELIEF AVAILABLE TO ULTIMATE PURCHASERS OF BUNKERS: WHETHER POTENTIAL CLAIMS BY PHYSICAL SUPPLIERS (WHO SOLD THOSE BUNKERS TO INTERMEDIATE BUYERS) WERE SUFFICIENT TO FOUND THE COURT’S INTERPLEADER JURISDICTION''' DMC/SandT/15/11 '''England''' '''Glencore Energy UK Ltd v Cirrus Oil Services Ltd''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Cooke J: [2014] EWHC 87 (Comm), LJN[2014] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 24 January 2014:BO0063, September 29, 2010:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/HDI-Gerling_v_APM_TerminalsGlencore_Energy_UK_v_Cirrus_Oil_Services]] '''CONTRACT FOR SALE OF OIL BLEND: WHETHER A BINDING CONTRACT EXISTED: FIRM OFFER WITH ESSENTIAL TERMS ACCEPTED: NAME OF SELLER INFERRED FROM PREVIOUS DEALINGS BETWEEN PARTIES: DAMAGES FOR NON-ACCEPTANCE UNDER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979, SECTIONS 50(2) AND (3) NOT EXCLUDED BY CLAUSE 32.1 OF BP 2007 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CFR SALES'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1610
'''United Kingdom Supreme CourtEngland'''
'''Jones Maestro Bulk Ltd v. KaneyCosco Bulk Carrier Ltd, the “Great Creation”'''
'''UK Supreme English High Court; Lords Philips, Hope, Brown, Collins, Kerr, Dyson, Lady HaleCooke J; [20112014] UKSC 13; 30 March 2011EWHC 3978 (Comm), 15 December 2014:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Jones_v_KaneyMaestro_Bulk_v_Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_-_The_Great_Creation]]
'''REMOVAL OF EXPERT WITNESS IMMUNITY IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGSTIME CHARTERPARTY: UNTIMELY REDELIVERY NOTICES: “BELOW MARKET” FOLLOW-ON FIXTURE: HOW DAMAGES TO BE CALCULATED: MITIGATION'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1509
'''CanadaEngland'''
'''Société Telus Communications, Hydro-Québec and Bell Canada Metall Market OOO v Peracomo Inc., Réal Vallée and the fishing vessel RealiceVitorio Shipping Co Ltd (The “Lehmann Timber”)'''
'''Federal English Court of CanadaAppeal: Harrington J.Arden, Patten LLJ andSir Bernard Rix: 2011 FC 494[2013] EWCA Civ 650: 27 April 2011[2014] QB 760, [2013] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 541:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Telus_Communications_v_Peracomo_Inc_and_Réal_ValléeMetall_Market_v_vitorio_Shipping_the_Lehmann_Timber]]'''
'''SHIPPINGCARRIAGE OF GOODS: SUBMARINE CABLE CUT GENERAL AVERAGE: REQUEST BY SHIPOWNER FOR SECURITY IN THE FORM OF GENERAL AVERAGE BOND SUPPORTED BY SKIPPER GENERAL AVERAGE GUARANTEE: WHETHER TERMS OF FISHING VESSELREQUEST REASONABLE: WHETHER DAMAGE CAUSED INTENTIONALLY OR RECKLESSLY AND WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT 'SUCH LOSS' WOULD PROBABLY RESULTACCEPTANCE OF PART SECURITY A WAIVER OF SHIPOWNER’S LIEN: WHETHER DEFENDANTS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY UNDER THE 1976 LIMITATION CONVENTION, AS INCORPORATED INTO CANADIAN LAWEXPENSES OF STORING CARGO ASHORE IN EXERCISE OF LIEN RECOVERABLE'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1408
'''The NetherlandsEngland'''
'''DSV Road B.V. PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and Amlin Corporate Insurance N.V. Trading SA v Sneltransport “Heidenend” Tegelen B.V.OW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''Amsterdam English High Court of Appeal: A.S. Arnold, W.H.F.M. Cortenraad and H.M. ten Haaft, LJN BL9955, April 2, 2010; Males J; [2015] EWHC 2022 (Comm) 14 July 2015: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSV_Road_v_Sneltransport_HeidenendPST_Energy_7_Shipping_&_Product_Shipping_and_Trading_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_the_Res_Cognitans]]
'''CARRIAGE ARBITRATION ACT 1996 S.69 APPEAL: BUNKER SUPPLY CONTRACT ON CREDIT TERMS: RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE: PARTIES CONTEMPLATED BUNKERS WOULD LIKELY BE CONSUMED BEFORE PAYMENT MADE AND TITLE PASSED: WHETHER SALE OF GOODS BY ROAD: CMR CONVENTIONACT 1979 APPLICABLE: WHETHER SHIPPER-PACKED TRAILER CAN BE CONSIDERED ‘GOODS’ WITHIN ART.17REQUIREMENTS OF S.249 MET'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1307
'''England'''
'''Shell Egypt West Manzala GmbH and another Spar Shipping AS v Dana Gas Egypt LimitedGrand China Logistics Holding (Group) Co., Ltd''' '''English High Court: Queen'Queen’s s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Tomlinson J: [20102015] EWHC 465 718 (Comm): 10 Popplewell J.: 18 March 2010:2015[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Shell_Egypt_v_Dana_GasSpar_Shipping_v_Grand_China_Logistics]]'''
'''CONTRACTNYPE 1993 FORM TIMECHARTER: JOINT VENTURE FOR GAS EXPLORATIONFAILURE TO PAY HIRE ON TIME: WHETHER BREACH OF CONDITION: REPUDIATORY WHETHER BREACH COMMITTED BY ONE PARTYOF AN INNOMINATE TERM: INNOCENT PARTY TERMINATED CONTRACT BASED ON WRONG BELIEF THAT CONTRACTUAL TERMINATION CLAUSE WAS TRIGGEREDRIGHT TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF BARGAIN: WHETHER INNOCENT PARTY COULD JUSTIFY TERMINATION CHARTERER’S CONDUCT AMOUNTED TO REPUDIATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT'''
DMC/SandT/1115/1206
'''England'''
'''Choil Trading SA Gard Marine & Energy Ltd (Respondents/Claimants) v Sahara Energy Resources Limited China National Chartering Co. Ltd (The “Prem Mala”Intermediate Charterers)'''v China National'''English Commercial Court: Christopher Clarke J: [2010] EWHC 374 Chartering Co. Ltd v Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha (CommCharterers/Appellants): 26 February 2010, - The “Ocean Victory”: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Choil_Trading_v_Sahara_EnergyGard_Marine_&_Energy_v_China_National_Chartering_-_The_Ocean_Victory_-Resources_Court_of_Appeal]]'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEAEnglish Court of Appeal: FOB SALE CONTRACTLongmore, Gloster and Underhill LJJ: CIF ON-SALE CONTRACTS[2015] EWCA Civ 16: QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES FOR DELIVERY OF CONTAMINATED GOODS IN BREACH OF FOB CONTRACT22 January 2015: RECOVERABILITY OF HEDGING LOSSES INCURRED IN MITIGATION IN RELATION TO CIF CONTRACTS: WHETHER TRUE CONSTRUCTION OF FOB CONTRACT EXEMPTION CLAUSE EXCLUDED RECOVERY OF HEDGING AND ADDITIONAL EXPENSES/COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT'''
'''SAFE PORT: WHETHER COMBINATION OF ‘LONG WAVE’ SWELL AND A SEVERE GALE AN ‘ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE’: SUBROGATION: WHETHER INSURER OF BOTH PARTIES TO A BARECON CHARTERPARTY MAY SUE AN ASSURED FOR BREACH OF CHARTER'''
'''Azimut–Benetti SpA v. HealeyEngland'''
'''English High Court: Blair J.: [2010] EWHC 2234 Standard Chartered Bank v Dorchester LNG (Comm2) Limited (The “Erin Schulte”): 3 September 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Azimut_Benetti_v_Healey]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACTEnglish Court of Appeal: LIQUIDATED DAMAGESSir Bernard Rix, Moore-Bick and Briggs LJJ: GUARANTEE[2014] EWCA Civ 1382: WHETHER LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CONSTITUTE A PENALTY22 October 2014: WHETHER A PRE[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Standard_Chartered_Bank_v_Dorchester_LNG_(2)_-ESTIMATE OF LOSS IN THE CASE OF BREACH: WHETHER A DETERRENT: WHETHER GUARANTEE REMAINS ENFORCEABLE WHERE A PROVISION IN THE UNDERLYING CONTRACT CONSTITUTES A PENALTY: PUBLIC POLICY'''_The_Erin_Schulte]]
'''BILL OF LADING: LETTER OF CREDIT: INITIAL REJECTION OF THE PRESENTATION: MEANING OF “INDORSEMENT” OF BILL OF LADING: TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF SUIT: CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1992 SECTIONS 2(2)(A) AND 5(2)(B)'''
'''CONTRACTS: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT: INTERPRETATION: ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ COMMUNICATIONS: WHETHER FACTS DISCLOSED DURING ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ NEGOTIATIONS ADMISSIBLE AS AN AID TO CONSTRUCTION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTHong Kong'''
'''The Alas renamed The Kombos: Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Ng J: HCAJ 241/2009: [2014] 4 HKLRD 160: 21 July 2014:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Alas_renamed_The_Kombos]]'''
'''English Court of Appeal (Civil Division); Hughes LJ, Aikens LJ, Chancellor Morritt; [2010] EWCA Civ 1444, 16 December 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thomas_Crema_v_Cenkos_Securities]]Hong Kong'''
'''CONTRACT PARTLY WRITTEN AND PARTLY ORAL: WHETHER TERM SHOULD BE IMPLIED: RELEVANT PRINCIPLES: RELEVANCE OF MARKET PRACTICE: EXPERT EVIDENCE: LIMITATIONS OF EXPERT EVIDENCEAntwerp Diamond Bank NV v Brink’s Inc'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Lam and Lunn VPP and Barman JA: CACV No.282 of 2012: [2014] 4 HKLRD 158: 17 July 2014: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Antwerp_Diamond_Bank-v-Brink's_Inc]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING: LETTER OF GUARANTEE: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: EXTREME CONSEQUENCES REQUIRED TO DEPART FROM MEANING OF WORDS AS CONVEYED TO REASONABLE PERSON: NO DEPARTURE SIMPLY BECAUSE COURT WOULD REACH DIFFERENT BALANCE OF PARTIES’ INTERESTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER CONTRACTEngland'''
'''E D & F Man Sugar Ltd v Unicargo Transportgesellschaft GmbH (Polska Zegluga Morska PP, interested party), The “Ladytramp”
'''English Court of AppealSUGAR CHARTERPARTY 1999: DESTRUCTION BY FIRE OF FACILITIES AT LOADING TERMINAL NOT WITHIN CLAUSE 28 EXCEPTION TO LAYTIME OF “MECHANICAL BREAKDOWNS”'''
'''England'''
'''English Commercial Courtof Appeal; Gross LJ, Gloster LJ, Sir Burnton; [2014] EWCA Civ 403, 8 April 2014:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Global_Santosh_-_Court_of_Appeal]]'''
'''Dalwood Marine v Nordana Line A/S, The “Elbrus”; Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court)OFF-HIRE CLAUSE RE DELAY ARISING FROM ARREST OF VESSEL: Teare JWHETHER SUB-CHARTERERS AND RECEIVERS WERE ‘AGENTS’ OF THE CHARTERERS: [2009] EWHC 3394 (Comm)WHETHER THE PERSONAL ACT, [2010] 2 All ER (Comm) 802: 21 December 2009:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dalwood_Marine_v_Nordana_Line]]OMISSION OR DEFAULT TO WHICH CLAUSE REFERRED MUST HAVE OCCURRED DURING PROVISION OF RELEVANT SERVICES'''
DMC/SandT/14/17
'''English Commercial Singapore Courtof Appeal'''
'''Glencore Energy UK Limited Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Transworld Oil Limited (The “Narmada Spirit”): English Commercial Court: Blair J: Wanin Industries Pte Ltd [20102013] EWHC 141 (Comm)SGCA 15: 3 February 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_v_Transworld_Oil]]'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEASundaresh Menon CJ, Chao Hick Tin JA and Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA: FOB CONTRACT6 February 2013: CORRECT QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES FOR NON-DELIVERY OF CRUDE OIL CARGO FOR WHICH THERE WAS NO AVAILABLE MARKET[2013] 2 SLR 363: NEED TO ACCOUNT IN DAMAGES FOR REDUCED LOSS SUFFERED FOLLOWING EARLY CLOSING OUT OF HEDGED POSITION OF BUYER FOLLOWING ACCEPTANCE OF SELLER’S REPUDIATION[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Out_of_the_Box_v_Wanin_Industries]]'''
'''CONTRACT: REMOTENESS OF DAMAGE: BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTOR ENGAGING MANUFACTURER TO PRODUCE NEW SPORTS DRINK: MANUFACTURER UNAWARE OF DISTRIBUTOR’S PLAN TO PROMOTE POPULAR DEMAND FOR GENERIC DRINK THROUGH AGGRESSIVE ADVERTISING: MANUFACTURER SUPPLYING DEFECTIVE SHIPMENT OF DRINKS IN BREACH OF CONTRACT: ABANDONMENT OF PROMOTION: WHETHER WASTED ADVERTISING EXPENSES CLAIMED BY DISTRIBUTOR TOO REMOTE'''
'''Röhlig (UK) Ltd v Rock Unique Ltd: Court of Appeal, Sedley, Moore-Bick and Aikens LJJ.: 20 January 2011: [2011] EWCA Civ 18:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Röhlig_(UK)_v_Rock_Unique]]England'''
'''INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE OF GOODS: BIFA CONDITIONS: WHETHER NO SET-OFF AND TIME BAR PROVISIONS REASONABLE UNDER UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS ACT 1977Great Elephant Corporation v Trafigura Beheer BV v Vitol SA & Vitol Asia Pte Ltd v China Offshore Oil (Singapore) International Pte Ltd (The “Crudesky”)'''
'''English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Tomlin and Underhill LJJ: [2013] EWCA Civ 1547, [2014] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1: 25 July 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Great_Elephant_Corp_v_Trafigura_Beheer_-_The_Crudesky]]'''
'''SALE OF GOODS CARRIED BY SEA: FOB ANTWERP SALE OF EU GASOIL WITH FREE DESTINATION: “SPECIAL” COMMON LAW IMPLIED TERM/CONDITION: STATUTORILY IMPLIED CONDITIONS: WHETHER CARGO TO REMAIN ON-SPECIFICATION FOR A REASONABLE TIME FOLLOWING SHIPMENT: EFFECT OF EXCLUSION CLAUSE ON IMPLIED CONDITIONS: SECTION 14(2) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979England'''
'''Fulton Shipping Inc v Globalia Business Travel SAU (The “New Flamenco”)'''
'''SingaporeTIME CHARTER: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM: WHETHER CREDIT TO BE GIVEN FOR CAPITAL VALUE OF VESSEL SOLD ON REPUDIATION FOR A GREATER SUM THAN VALUE ON CONTRACTUAL REDELIVERY DATE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
'''BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGOEnglish Commercial Court: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSSPopplewell J: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO[2014] EWHC 885 (Comm): REQUIREMENT TO NOTIFY THE DEFAULTING PARTY OF INTENDED MEASURES IN MITIGATION'''28 March 2014[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Geden_Operations_v_Dry_Bulk_Handy_Holdings_-_the_Bulk_Uruguay]]
'''TIME CHARTER: ANTICIPATORY REPUDIATORY BREACH: RIGHT TO GIVE VOYAGE ORDERS TO TRANSIT GULF OF ADEN: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL'''
DMC/SandT/14/13 '''GermanyEngland'''
'''German Federal Supreme Proton Energy Group SA v Orlen Lietuva''' '''English Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court – Assessment of Damages under the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road ): HH Judge Mackie QC: [2013] EWHC 2872 (‘CMR’Comm): Date of Judgment: 30 September 2010'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Germany_CMR_DamagesProton_Energy_Group_v_Orlen_Lietuva]]
'''CMR TRANSPORTCONTRACT: WILFUL MISCONDUCTCONTRACT FOR SALE OF OIL BLEND: ASSESSMENT EXISTENCE OF BINDING CONTRACT: PARTIES REGARDED THEMSELVES AS BEING BOUND AFTER DEAL WAS CONFIRMED: SPECIFICATION OF OIL BLEND NOT FORMING PART OF DAMAGESSALE BY DESCRIPTION'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2512
'''England'''
'''Angara Maritime Ltd Falkonera Shipping Company v Oceanconnect UK Arcadia Energy Pte Ltd and Oceanconnect.com Inc (The “Fesco Angara”“Falkonera”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Angara_Maritime_v_Oceanconnect_UK]]'''
'''Queen’s Bench English Court of Appeal (Civil Division); Floyd and Christopher Clarke LJJ, London Mercantile CourtSir Stanley Burnton; [2014] EWCA Civ 713; 5 June 2014: HHJ Mackie QC[[http: [2010//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Falkonera_Shipping_v_Arcadia_Energy_-_The_Falkonera]] EWHC 619 (QB): 29 March 2010'''
'''SALE OF GOODSSHIPPING: BUNKERS/MARINE FUELSTANKER TRANSHIPMENT: S.25SHIP-TO-SHIP (1“STS”) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979TRANSFERS: SALE OF BUNKERS CHARTERPARTY PROVIDING FOR STS TRANSFERS TO BE SUBJECT TO TIME CHARTERERS: BUNKERS DELIVERED OWNERS’ APPROVAL WHICH NOT TO VESSELBE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD: FAILURE BY TIME CHARTERERS TO PAY SUPPLIERS OWNERS WITHHOLD CONSENT FOR BUNKERSA STS TRANSFER BETWEEN TWO VLCCs: RIGHT WHETHER OWNERS’ WITHHOLDING OF SUPPLIERS TO SUE OWNERS IN CONVERSION AND/OR BAILMENT FOLLOWING PREMATURE REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY TIME CHARTERERS TO OWNERSAPPROVAL REASONABLE'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2611
'''England'''
'''Soufflet Negoce British American Tobacco Switzerland SA v Bunge SAExel Europe Ltd; British American Tobacco Denmark A/S v Exel Europe Ltd''' '''Court of Appeal: McFarlane L.J.; Sir Bernard Rix; Sir Timothy Lloyd: [2013] EWCA Civ 1319: 30 October 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/British_American_Tobacco_&_Ors_v_Exel_Europe]] '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY ROAD: CMR CONVENTION: CARGO LOSS: ESTABLISHING JURISDICTION AGAINST SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS: WHETHER CLAIMANT THAT HAS ESTABLISHED JURISDICTION UNDER ART.31.1 AGAINST ONE CARRIER CAN RELY ON THAT JURISDICTION TO JOIN SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS''' DMC/SandT/14/10 '''England'''
'''English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Wilson and Toulson LJJ: Trafigura Beheer BV v Navigazione Montanari SPA [2010] EWCA 1102: 13 October 2010[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Soufflet_Negoce_v_Bunge_SA]2014]EWHC 129 Comm'''
'''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Andrew Smith J.: 30 January 2014:[[http://www.bailiionlinedmc.co.orguk/ew/cases/EWCA/Civindex.php/2010/1102.htmlTrafigura_Beheer_v_Navigazione_Montanari_-_the_Valle_de_Cordoba]]
'''FOB CONTRACTCHARTERPARTY: GAFTA 49 FORMCARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: “IN READINESS TO LOAD”VESSEL CARRYING CONSIGNMENT OF MOTOR OIL ATTACKED BY PIRATES: WHETHER THIS MEANS THAT VESSEL MUST BE “READY” TO LOAD QUANTITY OF OIL TAKEN BY PIRATES CONSTITUTED "IN A LAYTIME SENSE: RISK -TRANSIT LOSS" OR "LOST CARGO" FOR PURPOSES OF GOODS DAMAGED BY UNCLEAN HOLDS ON BUYERIN-TRANSIT LOSS CLAUSE IN CHARTERPARTY'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2409
'''England'''
'''Zodiac Maritime Agencies Limited Yuzhny Zavod Metall Profil LLC v Fortescue Metals Group Limited'''Eems Beheerder B.V. (“the M/V EEMS SOLAR”):
'''English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial , Admiralty Court): David Steel JJervis K, Q.C, the Admiralty Registrar: [2010] EWHC 903 (Comm)5 June 2013: 28 April 2010'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Zodiac_Maritime_v_Fortescue_MetalsYuzhny_Zavod_Metall_Profil_v_Emms_Beheerder_-_the_M/V_Eems_Solar]]'''
'''CONSECUTIVE VOYAGE CHARTERPARTYBILLS OF LADING: WRONGFUL EARLY TERMINATION BY CHARTERER: DAMAGES: WHETHER “AVAILABLE MARKET” WHEN INCORPORATION OF CHARTERPARTY TERMINATEDTERMS PROVIDING THAT CHARTERERS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR STOWAGE: WHETHER SUBSEQUENT EMERGENCE OF MARKET DURING THE BALANCE OF CHARTER PERIOD RELEVANT OWNERS COULD RELY ON THAT CLAUSE AS DEFENCE TO THE ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGESCLAIM BY RECEIVERS FOR CARGO DAMAGE CAUSED BY BAD STOWAGE'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2308
'''England'''
'''ENE 1 Kos Limited v Petroleo Brasileiro SA'''Martrade Shipping & Transport GmbH V United Enterprises Corporation (The “Wisdom C”):[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/ENE_1_Kos_Limited_v_PetrobasMartrade_Shipping_and_Transport_v_United_Entreprises_-_The_Wisdom_C]]''' English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Popplewell J; [2014] EWHC 1884 (Comm); 12 June 2014 '''TIMECHARTER PROVIDING FOR ENGLISH LAW AND LONDON ARBITRATION: ARBITRATORS AWARDING PENAL RATE OF INTEREST: WHETHER “SIGNIFICANT CONNECTION” BETWEEN CHARTERPARTY AND ENGLAND: WHETHER “APPLICABLE LAW” A FOREIGN LAW: LATE PAYMENT OF COMMERCIAL DEBTS (INTEREST) ACT 1998: ARTICLES 3 AND 4 – CONTRACTS (APPLICABLE LAW) ACT 1990''' DMC/SandT/14/07 '''Hong Kong''' '''Darby International Investment Ltd v Rong Tai International Shipping Ltd'''
'''English Hong Kong Court of Appeal (Civil)First Instance: Longmore and Smith LJJ and Sir Mark WallerDeputy High Court Judge B Chu: HCMP1438 of 2013: 2 December 2013: [2010[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Darby_International_Investments_v_Rong_Tai_International_Shipping]] EWCA Civ 772: 6 July 2010'''
'''MARITIME LAW: REGISTRATION OF VESSELS: VESSEL APPARENTLY REGISTERED IN MORE THAN ONE JURISDICTION: DECLARATION AS TO VALIDITY OF REGISTRATION IN HONG KONG: PURPOSE OF GRANTING DECLARATION'''
DMC/SandT/1014/2206
'''England'''
'''Compania Sud Americana de Vapores Flame SA v Sinochem Tianjin Import & Export Corp – the « Aconcagua»Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd''' '''English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2013] EWHC 3153 (Comm): 22 October 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CSAV_v_Sinochem_the_AconcaguaFlame_SA_v_Glory_Wealth_Shipping]]''' '''CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT: REPUDIATION: QUANTUM OF DAMAGES: COMPENSATORY PRINCIPLE: WHETHER INNOCENT PARTY MUST PROVE ABILITY TO PERFORM OBLIGATIONS, HAD CONTRACT CONTINUED, TO RECOVER SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGES FROM CONTRACT BREAKER''' DMC/SandT/14/05 '''England''' '''Bulk Ship Union SA v Clipper Bulk Shipping Limited (The "Pearl C")'''
'''English High Court: Christopher Clarke Popplewell J.: 26 June 2012 [20092012] EWHC 1880 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 533:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bulk_Ship_Union_v_Clipper_Bulk_Shipping_-_The_Pearl_C]] '''TIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM: SLOW STEAMING: WHETHER A BREACH OF ‘UTMOST DESPATCH’ OBLIGATION: WHETHER VESSEL OFF-HIRE BY REASON OF DEFAULT OF MASTER: WHETHER PARTIAL INTERRUPTION IN SERVICE SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER OFF-HIRE CLAUSE''' DMC/SandT/14/04 '''Hong Kong''' '''Maintek Computer (CommSuzhou); 24 July 2009Co Ltd v Blue Anchor Line''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: To J: HCAJ No.106 of 2008: 2 April 013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maintek_Computer_(Suzhou)_v_Blue_Anchor_Line''']] http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2013/506.html '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: MISDELIVERY BY OCEAN TERMINAL: CLAIM FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST CARRIER: MEANING OF “DELIVERY” FOR PURPOSE OF TIME LIMITATION: WHETEHR EXEMPTION CLAUSE FOR ANY CAUSE OR EVENT WHICH CARRIER COULD NOT AVOID APPLICABLE: WHETHER LIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY REFERENCE TO WEIGHT OF CARGO APPLICABLE''' DMC/SandT/14/03 '''England''' '''Sea-Cargo Skips AS v State Bank of India'''
'''BILLS OF LADING English High Court: SHIPMENT OF CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE IN CONTAINERQueen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): EXPLOSION AND FIRETeare J: DANGEROUS GOODS[2013] EWHC 177 (Comm): WHETHER CARRIER ENTITLED TO INDEMNITY UNDER ART.IV RULE 6 OF HAGUE RULES26 June 2013: STOWAGE OF CONTAINER IN PROXIMITY TO HEATED BUNKER TANK[[http: WHETHER THIS CAUSED THE EXPLOSION: WHETHER THIS RENDERED VESSEL UNSEAWORTHY AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE VOYAGE: WHETHER CARRIER COULD RELY ON DEFENCE OF ERROR IN MANAGEMENT OF THE SHIP//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sea-Cargo_Skips_AS_v_State_Bank_of_India]]'''
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: REFUND GUARANTEE: QUESTION OF CONSTRUCTION: WHETHER DEMAND WAS SUFFICIENT TO TRIGGER BANK’S LIABILITY: AMBIGUOUS DEMAND NOT COMPLIANT'''
'''Cosco Bulk Carrier Co Ltd v Team-Up Owning Co Ltd – The “Saldanha”[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cosco_Bulk_Carrier_v_Team-Up_Owning]]Singapore'''
'''English Singapore High Court: Gross J.: 11 June 2010 [2010] EWHC 1340 (Comm)'''
'''NYPE FORM CHARTERPARTYThe “Turtle Bay” [2013] SGHC 165 : PIRACYJudgment delivered by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J, 30 August 2013: WHETHER SHIP OFF-HIRE DURING DETENTION BY PIRATES[[http: AVERAGE ACCIDENTS TO SHIP OR CARGO: DEFAULT OR DEFICIENCY OF MEN: ANY OTHER CAUSE PREVENTING THE FULL WORKING OF THE VESSEL'''//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Turtle_Bay]]
'''SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST: WHEN DIRECT PRIVATE SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST CONSTITUTES CONTEMPT OF COURT: PRINCIPLES AND EFFECT OF ADMIRALTY JUDICIAL SALE: WHEN COURT WILL SANCTION A DIRECT PRIVATE SALE'''
'''Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd v North China Shipping Limited (M/V “North Prince”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glory_Wealth_Shipping_v_North_China_Shipping]]England'''
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: [2010] EWHC 1692 (Comm): 8 July 2010Minerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping AG; Oceana Shipping AG v Transatlantica Commodities S.A. The MV “Athena”'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYCourt of Appeal; Tomlinson, Lewison and Underhill LJJ; [2013] EWCA Civ 1723; 17 July 2013[[http: WRONGFUL EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL BY SUB//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Minerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-CHARTERER: DAMAGES AS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MARKET RATE OF HIRE AND CONTRACT RATE OF HIRE: DISPONENT SHIPOWNER’S EARLY REDELIVERY OF VESSEL UNDER HEAD CHARTER IRRELEVANT UNLESS CAUSED BY SUB-CHARTERER’S REPUDIATION'''_the_Athena]]
'''TIME CHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: OFF-HIRE CLAUSE 15: WHETHER “LOSS OF TIME” MEANS NET LOSS OF TIME IN THE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR IN THE OVERALL CHARTER SERVICE'''
'''Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping CoEngland'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Omak_Maritime_v_Mamola_Challenger_Shipping]]
'''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2010] EWHC 2026 (Comm): 4 August 2010MRI Trading AG v Erdenet Mining Corporation LLC'''
'''TIME CHARTERPARTYEnglish Court of Appeal: BREACH OF CONTRACT BY CHARTERERPill, Tomlinson, McCombe LJJ: MARKET RATE OF HIRE HIGHER THAN CONTRACT RATE OF HIRE[2013] EWCA Civ 156: SHIPOWNER’S CLAIM FOR WASTED EXPENDITURE08 Mar 2013: RELATION WITH PRINCIPLE IN ROBINSON V HARMAN[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MRI_Trading_v_Erdenet_Mining_Corporation]]'''
'''SALE OF GOODS: CERTAINTY OF CONTRACT TERMS: WHETHER TERMS AMOUNTED TO 'AGREEMENTS TO AGREE': PROPER APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTION AND IMPLICATION OF TERMS WITHIN A CONTRACT WHICH CONTAINS TERMS LEAVING MATTERS TO BE SUBSEQUENTLY AGREED'''
DMC/SandT/13/16 '''The “Hua Tian Long”England'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Hua_Tian_Long]]
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Stone J in Chambers: HCAJ NoNYK Bulkship (Atlantic) N. 59/2008: 23 April 2010V. v Cargill International S.A., The “Global Santosh”'''
'''English High Court; Field J; [2013] EWHC 30 (Comm); 1 February 2013:[[http://www.hkliionlinedmc.co.orguk/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010index.php/HCAJ000059_2008NYK_Bulkship_(Atlantic)_v_Cargill_International_-70707.html_The_Global_Santosh]]
'''BREACH PERIOD OFF-HIRE CLAUSE COVERING DELAY ARISING FROM DETENTION OR ARREST OF CONTRACTVESSEL: WHETHER SUB-CHARTERERS OR RECEIVERS WERE AGENTS OF THE CHARTERERS: DEFENDANT SHIPOWNER’S WHETHER DELAY TO VESSEL “OCCASIONED BY” RECEIVERS’ FAILURE TO PROVIDE VESSEL: CHINESE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT AS SHIPOWNER: CLAIM FOR SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND CROWN IMMUNITY: WAIVER DISCHARGE WITHIN THE LAYTIME AND SUBMISSION /OR TO JURISDICTIONSECURE SELLERS’ DEMURRAGE CLAIM'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1715
'''South AfricaEngland'''
'''Greatship (India) Limited v Oceanografia SA de CV (The MV “Ioannis NK”“Greatship Driti”)'''[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ioannis_N_K]]
'''The owner of the cargo lately laden on board the MV “Ioannis NK” v The Master and Crew & Others English Commercial Court: Gloster J: [2012] EWHC 3468 (AC 66Comm): 5 December 2012:[[http:/2009/www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Greatship_(India)'''_Limited_v_Oceanografia_SA_de_CV_-_The_Greatship_Driti]]
'''High Court of South Africa TIME CHARTER: BIMCO SUPPLYTIME 89 FORM: CLAUSE 10(Western Cape High Court, Cape TownE) exercising its admiralty jurisdiction: Cleaver J.; 26 August 2009RIGHT TO SUSPEND PERFORMANCE FOR FAILURE TO PAY HIRE PUNCTUALLY: WHETHER GRACE PERIOD (ANTI-TECHNICALITY) NOTICE REQUIRED BEFORE EXERCISING RIGHT'''
DMC/SandT/13/14
'''England and WalesMinerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping AG; Oceana Shipping AG v Transatlantica Commodities S.A. The MV “Athena”'''
'''Kolmar Group AG v Traxpo Enterprises Pvt Limited''' English High Court; Walker J; [2012] EWHC 3608 (Comm); 13 December 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kolmar_v_TraxpoMinerva_Navigation_v_Oceana_Shipping_-__The_Athena]]
'''English High CourtTIMECHARTER ON NYPE FORM 1946: [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm)OFF-HIRE CLAUSE 15: WHETHER “LOSS OF TIME” MEANS NET LOSS OF TIME IN THE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY REQUIRED OR IN THE OVERALL CHARTER SERVICE'''
DMC/SandT/13/13
'''New ZealandGriffon Shipping LLC v Firodi Shipping Limited – The “MV Griffon”''' '''High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court: Teare J.: [2013] EWHC 593 (Comm): 21 March 2013:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Griffon_Shipping_v_Firodi_Shipping_-_The_Griffon ]]
'''Tasman Orient Line CV v New Zealand China Clays Limited and others'''[[httpSHIPSALE AGREEMENT ON NORWEGIAN SALE FORM 1993://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_%22Tasman_Pioneer%22]]'''Supreme Court of New Zealand (Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath and Wilson JJ)[2010] NZSC 37 (16 April 2010)WHETHER SELLER CAN RECOVER UNPAID DEPOSIT WHERE BUYER IN REPUDIATORY BREACH'''
DMC/SandT/13/12
'''English High CourtWuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Ltd & Anor v Emporiki Bank of Greece SA'''
'''Sylvia Shipping Co Limited v Progress Bulk Carriers Limited English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Rimer and Tomlinson, LJJ.: [2012] EWCA Civ 1629:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sylvia_Shipping_v._Progress_Bulk_CarriersWuhan_Guoyu_Logistics_v_Emporiki_Bank]] [2010] EWHC 542 (Comm): English High Court of Justice - Commercial Court; Hamblen J.; 18 March 2010'''
'''ARBITRATION APPEALSHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: TIMECHARTERPARTY: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR OWNERS’ BREACHPAYMENT GUARANTEE: WHETHER OWNERS LIABLE FOR TIMECHARTERERS’ LOSS OF PROFIT PAYMENT GUARANTEE A TRUE GUARANTEE OR AN ON CANCELLED SUB-CHARTERDEMAND BOND'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1311
'''Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionEngland'''
'''Maintek Computer (Suzhou) Co Dalmare SpA v Union Maritime Ltd and others v Blue Anchor Line and others& Anor''''''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Commercial Court; Flaux J; [2012] EWHC 3537; 13 Dec 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maintek_Computer_v_ECT_Delta_TerminalDalmare_v_Union_Maritime_-_The_Union_Power]]
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First InstanceSALE OF VESSEL "AS SHE WAS AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION": Reyes J in ChambersSTATUTORY IMPLIED TERM AS TO QUALITY UNDER SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979: HCAJ No. 106/2008: 25 February 2010[http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000106_2008-69910.html]WHETHER SELLERS HAD EXCLUDED APPLICATION OF STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM; WHETHER SELLERS IN BREACH OF STATUTORY IMPLIED TERM'''
DMC/SandT/13/10/12
'''The Netherlands'''
'''Maersk Dana Petroleum Netherlands B.V., formerly “P&O Nedlloyd” and before that called Nedlloyd Lijnen v Vos Sympathy B.V.The “Vos Sympathy”''' '''Court of Appeal of The Hague: Judges: M.M. Olthof, Rotterdam, the Netherlands vA.A. Rijperman and R. Irano European Covan der Vlist: 11 December 2012: Case no. Ireco S200.A079., Luxembourg - The “Dolphin I”897/01:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Dolphin_1Dana_Petroleum_Netherlands_v_Vos_Sympathy_-_The_Vos_Sympathy]]'''
'''Court of Appeal of The Hague (The Netherlands)SUPPLYTIME 2005 CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER HIMLAYA AND KNOCK FOR KNOCK CLAUSES 'REASONABLE AND FAIR' UNDER DUTCH CIVIL CODE ART. J6:248.M. van der Klooster, J.E.H.M. Pickaers, J.H.J. Teunissen, 29 September 2009, Case number 105.002.543/01 (unpublished)2'''
DMC/SandT/1013/1109
'''High Court of England and Wales'''
'''Sotrade Denizcilik Sanayi Ve Ticaret AS White Rosebay Shipping SA v Amadou LO and others (The “Duden”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Duden_2008_EWHC_2762_Comm]]Hong Kong Chain Glory Shipping Limited'''
'''Queen's English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (: Commercial Court): Jonathan Hirst, Q.C.: ; Teare J; [20082013] EWHC 2762 1355 (Comm); 23 May 2013:[[2009http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/White_Rosebay_Shipping_v_Hong_Kong_Chain_Glory_Shipping] 1 Lloyd]'s Rep. 145''TIME-CHARTERPARTY: CHARTERERS EVINCING INTENTION NOT TO PERFORM: OWNERS AFFIRMED CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ REPUDIATORY CONDUCT CONTINUED: 19 November 2008WHETHER OWNERS SUBSEQUENTLY ENTITLED TO TERMINATE'''
DMC/SandT/13/08
'''Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash JCOLLISION: OFFENCE OF ENDANGERING THE SAFETY OF OTHERS: STATE OF MIND REQUIRED FOR THE OFFENCE OF ENDANGERMENT: NARROW CHANNEL AS QUESTION OF FACT: SHIPPING AND PORT CONTROL ORDINANCE (CAP.313, 17 April 2009 '''[2009] SGHC 91LAWS OF HONG KONG)'''
DMC/SandT/13/07
'''English High Court''']]'''Kallang Shipping Bunge SA Panama v AXA Assurances Senegal and Comptoir Commercial Mandiaye Ndiaya (Kyla Shipping Company Limited - The “Kallang”)[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Kallang]]"Kyla"'''
'''Queen's Bench Division (Commercial English High Court): Jonathan Hirst, Q.C.: ; Flaux J; [20082012] EWHC 2761 3522 (Comm); 10 December 2012:[[2009http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bunge_SA_v_Kyla_Shipping_Company_-_The_Athena]] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 124: 19 November 2008'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: NYPE 1946 CHARTERPARTY: LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED IN BILLS OF LADINGH&M INSURANCE REQUIRED FOR AGREED FIGURE: IMPLIED TERMSCASUALTY REPAIRS EXCEED SHIP’S MARKET VALUE BUT NOT AGREED HULL VALUE: ARREST BY CARGO OWNER AND INSURER: SECURITY: JURISDICTION: WRONGFUL INDUCEMENT OR PROCUREMENT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT: PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY CLUB: LETTERS OF UNDERTAKINGWHETHER CHARTERPARTY FRUSTRATED'''
'''Singapore Court of Appeal: Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA, Chao Hick Tin JA, V K Rajah JA: 11 September 2009Kuwait Rocks Co v AMN Bulkcarriers Inc (The “Astra”)'''
'''BAILMENT – BAILOR’S RIGHT TO IMMEDIATE RIGHT TO POSSESSION IF BAILEE’S BEHAVIOUR REPUGNANT TO TERMS OF BAILMENT – WHETHER CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS RESTRICTED BAILOR’S RIGHTS UNDER COMMON LAW'''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2013] EWHC 865 (Comm): 18 April 2013: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Kuwait_Rocks_Co_v_AMN_Bulkcarriers_The_Astra]]
'''TORT – CONVERSION – TIME CHARTER: WHETHER ACT OF REMOVING MACHINE FROM PREMISES AND DELIVERING IT AS INSTRUCTED AMOUNTED CHARTERERS’ CONDUCT REPUDIATORY: WHETHER OBLIGATION TO CONVERSION OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF STORING MACHINE AT WAREHOUSE AMOUNTED PAY HIRE IS A CONDITION: RIGHT TO CONVERSION CLAIM LOSS OF MACHINE – WHETHER ACT OF REDELIVERING MACHINE TO PURPORTED OWNER AMOUNTED TO CONVERSION PROFIT FOR REPUDIATION OR BREACH OF MACHINEHIRE PAYMENT OBLIGATION'''
DMC/SandT/13/05
'''Hong Kong'''
'''The “Blue Bridge” Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Fok, Chu JJA and McWalters J: CACV No.97 of 2012: 12 May 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Decurion_on_Appeal]]''' http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/2013/180.html '''ADMIRALTY: IN REM JURISDICTION: CLAIM AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT: WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR IN CONTROL” OF CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 12B(formerly known as The “Great Power”4)OF HIGH COURT ORDINANCE''' DMC/SandT/13/04 '''Germany''' '''German Federal Supreme Court: Date of Judgement: 13 June 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CMR_Art.29_and_Contributory_Negligence]]''' '''CMR TRANSPORT: APPLICATION OF ART. 29 CMR: BURDEN OF PROOF: REDUCTION OF UNLIMITED LIABILITY DUE TO CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE SENDER IF THE CARRIER IS NOT NOTIFIED OF AN UNEXPECTEDLY HIGH VALUE OF THE TRANSPORT GOODS''' DMC/SandT/13/03 '''England''' '''Dry Bulk Handy Holding Inc and Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Fayette International Holdings Ltd and Metinvest International SA (The “Bulk Chile”): English Commercial Court: Andrew Smith J: [2012] EWHC 2107 (Comm): 24 July 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Blue_BridgeDry_Bulk_Handling_&_CSAV_v_Fayette_International_&_Metinvest_-_The_Bulk_Chile]]''' '''CHAIN OF CHARTERPARTIES: HEAD TIME CHARTER, SUB-TIME CHARTER, TIME TRIP CHARTER AND VOYAGE CHARTER: OWNERS’ BILLS OF LADING: RIGHT TO INTERVENE IN COLLECTION OF FREIGHT: RIGHT TO LIEN SUB-FREIGHT AND SUB-HIRE: RIGHT TO HIRE OR REASONABLE REMUNERATION FOR COMPLETION OF VOYAGE FOLLOWING TERMINATION OF TIME CHARTER''' DMC/SandT/13/02
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Reyes J in Chambers: HCAJ No. 136/1999: 1 February 2010England'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEAEnglish Queen’s Bench (Commercial Court): SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED INTO AGAINST A SHIPOWNING COMPANY THAT HAD BEEN DISSOLVEDCooke J: APPLICATION BY RE-INSURER TO INTERVENE[2012] EWHC 3104 (Comm): AUTHORITY TO ACT FOR PRINCIPAL IN LITIGATION6 November 2012: DELAY IN APPLICATION TO INTERVENE[[http: REAL PROSPECT OF SUCCESS//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Wuhan_Ocean_v_Hansa_Murcia]]'''
'''CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF VESSEL: ADDENDUM FOR SELLERS TO OBTAIN EXTENSION OF REFUND GUARANTEE: IMPLIED TERM TO OBTAIN EXTENSION WITHIN REASONABLE TIME BEFORE EXPIRY OF ORIGINAL GUARANTEE: INNOMINATE TERM: BUT BREACH OF IMPLIED TERM NOT A REPUDIATORY BREACH AS, UNDER THE TERMS OF THE GUARANTEE, BUYERS COULD MAINTAIN THE SECURITY BY COMMENCING ARBITRATION'''
DMC/SandT/1013/0601 '''Germany''' '''German Federal Supreme Court''' '''"Und Adryatik"; Date of Judgement: 15 December 2011: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Und_Adryatik]]''' '''CMR TRANSPORT: APPLICATION OF ART. 2 CMR: FIRE ON RO-RO-CARRIER: HAGUE RULES AS ‘CONDITIONS PRESCRIBED BY LAW’: FIRE AS AN EVENT WHICH COULD ONLY HAVE OCCURRED BY REASON OF CARRIAGE BY SEA''' DMC/SandT/12/25 '''England''' '''E.D. & F. Man Sugar Ltd v Unicargo Transportgesellschaft mBh''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Eder J: [2012] EWHC 2879 (Comm): 23 October 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/E_D_and_F_Man_v_Unicargo_Transport]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY: LAYTIME AND DEMURRAGE: DESTRUCTION OF CONVEYOR-BELT SYSTEM AT LOADING PORT BEFORE FIXTURE: DELAY IN BERTHING: NO OBLIGATION ON CHARTERERS TO NOMINATE A SECOND BERTH: DESTRUCTION DID NOT CONSTITUTE MECHANICAL BREAKDOWN: ACT OF STATE-SPONSORED PORT AUTHORITY IN ORDINARY COURSE OF CARRYING OUT PORT OR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS DID NOT FALL WITHIN EXCEPTION OF GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE''' DMC/SandT/12/24 '''England''' '''Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA''' '''English Court of Appeal: Lord Neuberger MR, Moore-Bick and Toulson LJJ: [2012] EWCA Civ 838: 19 June 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_SA_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]] '''DEMURRAGE: CALCULATION OF LAYTIME: STRIKE EXCEPTION: STRIKE CAUSING CONGESTION AT PORT AND CHARTERED VESSELS DELAYED FROM BERTHING AS A RESULT: PERIOD OF DELAY TO BE DISCOUNTED FROM CALCULATION OF LAYTIME SO LONG AS STRIKE WAS THE EFFECTIVE CAUSE OF DELAY''' DMC/SandT/12/23
'''Singapore'''
'''The “Catur Samudra”Singapore Court of Appeal''' [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Catur_Samudra]]
'''Singapore High CourtThe “Bunga Melati 5” [2012] SGCA 46: Judgment delivered by Steven Chong JCVK Rajah JA, 15 January 201021st August 2012: [2010[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Bunga_Melati_5]] SGHC 18'''
'''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION : WHETHER CLAIM UNDER GUARANTEE IS A CLAIM “ARISING OUT OF AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO GOOD ARGUABLE CASE ON THE USE OR HIRE” OF A VESSEL MERITS REQUIRED: SECTION 3(1)(H) HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACTTHE VASILIY GOLOVNIN EXPLAINED'''
DMC/SandT/1012/0422 '''Australia''' '''1. Jebsens International (Australia) Pty Ltd and Anor v Interfert Australia Pty Ltd and Ors (2011) 112 SASR 297, 25 August 2011 (Anderson J)''' '''2. Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S v Beach Building & Civil Group Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 696, 29 June 2012 (Foster J):[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/_1._Jebsens_International_(Australia)_v_Interfert_Australia:_2._Norden_A/S_v_Beach_Building_&_Civil_Group]]''' '''WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY A "SEA CARRIAGE DOCUMENT" FOR PURPOSES OF S.11 AUSTRALIAN CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1991''' DMC/SandT/12/21 '''England''' '''TAOKAS NAVIGATION SA v. KOMROWSKI BULK SHIPPING KG (GMBH & CO); KENT LINE INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. SOLYM CARRIERS LTDTHE MV “PAIWAN WISDOM”''' '''English High Court; Teare J; [2012] EWHC 1888 (Comm); 11 July 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Toakas_Navigation_v_Komrowski_Bulk_Shipping:_Kent_Line_v_Solym_Carriers_-_The_Paiwan_Wisdom]]''' '''CONWARTIME 2004: OWNERS’ LIBERTY TO REJECT VOYAGE ORDERS: MATERIAL INCREASE IN RISK BETWEEN CHARTERPARTY DATE AND DATE OF ORDER NOT REQUIRED: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION''' DMC/SandT/12/20 '''England''' '''Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Sumption: [2012] UKSC 17, [2012] 2 WLR 976: 2 May 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Petroleo_Brasiliero_v_ENE_Kos_1]]''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: SHELLTIME 3 FORM: VESSEL WITHDRAWN FOR NON-PAYMENT OF HIRE WHILST LOADING: LOSS OF USE OF VESSEL: EXPENSES INCURRED IN DISCHARGING CARGO BACK TO SHORE: WHETHER LOSS AND EXPENSE RECOVERABLE UNDER INDEMNITY CLAUSE: WHETHER RECOVERABLE AS RIGHT CORRELATIVE TO DUTY AS BAILEE TO LOOK AFTER GOODS: WHETHER CHARTERERS’ ORDER TO LOAD AN EFFECTIVE CAUSE... DMC/SandT/12/19
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc v The Owners and/or Demise Charterers “Decurion”''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.141 of the Ship or Vessel “Asian Atlas” (2010: 4 May 2012: [[The “Asian Atlas”)http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Decurion]] '''ADMIRALTY: IN REM JURISDICTION: CLAIM AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT: WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR IN CONTROL” OF CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 12B(4) OF HIGH COURT ORDINANCE''' DMC/SandT/12/18 '''England''' '''EITZEN BULK A/S v. TTMI SARL - THE “BONNIE SMITHWICK”'''
'''Hong Kong SAR English High Court of Appeal: Ma CJHC, Stone and Reyes JJ: CACV No. 257 of 2007: 23 April 2008 (; Eder J; [20082012] 3 HKLRD 604EWHC 202 (Comm); 14 February 2012:[[http://www.hkliionlinedmc.orgco.uk/hkindex.php/jud/eng/hkca/2008/CACV000257_2007Eitzen_Bulk_v_TTMI_-60848.html_The_Bonnie_Smithwick]]'''
'''ACTION IN REM UNDER HK HIGH COURT ORDINANCE, S.12A(2)(e)SHELLTIME 4: WARRANT OF ARREST: FOR “ANY CLAIM FOR DAMAGE DONE BY A SHIP”CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION: SETTING ASIDE“BUNKERS ON DELIVERY/REDELIVERY” CLAUSE: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE MEANING OF FACTS RELATING TO JURISDICTION‘PRICE ACTUALLY PAID’'''
DMC/SandT/1012/0317
'''Hong Kong'''
'''Cheong Yuk Fai and another v China International Freight Forwarders (HK) LtdThe “Marcatania”'''
'''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.138 of 2008: 2 December 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cheong_Yuk_Fai_and_another_v_China_International_Freight_Forwarders_(HK)_LtdThe_Marcatania]]'''
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of Appeal'''CONTRACT: AGREEMENT TO EXCHANGE SLOTS FOR USE: SLOTS ON VESSEL CHARTERED BY THIRD PARTY: Cheung and Yuen JJA and A Chung JFAILURE TO PAY HIRE: CACV No. 463 of 2002VESSEL WITHDRAWN BY SHIPOWNER: 26 January 2005WHETHER SHIPOWNER OBLIGED TO ON-CARRY CARGO UNDER BAILMENT: [2005] 4 HKLRD 544 (English translation; judgment handed down in Chinese)WHETHER LIABLE IN CONVERSION FOR DELAY IN RELEASING CARGO'''
'''England'''
'''German Federal Supreme English Queen’s Court''' (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2011] EWHC 3083 (Comm), [2012] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 222: 28 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/M_H_Progress_Lines_v_Orient_Shipping_-_The_Genius_Star_1]]
'''Date of JudgementTIME CHARTERPARTY: 18 June 2009SUB-CHARTER: Case Reference 1ZR 140/06CARGO CLAIM AGAINST SUB-CHARTERER:[httpAPPORTIONMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST CHARTERER AND SHIPOWNER UNDER INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Case_ReferenceDIFFERENT TIME BARS PROVIDED IN HEAD CHARTER AND INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT:_1_ZR_140/06]APPLICABLE TIME BAR'''
DMC/SandT/12/15
'''The Netherlands Supreme CourtSideridraulic Systems SpA v BBC Chartering & Logistics GmbH & Co KG'''
'''Nile Dutch Africa Line B.V, Rotterdam, the Netherlands English Queen’s Bench (“NDAL”Commercial Court) v. : Andrew Smith J: [2011] EWHC 3106 (1Comm) Delta Lloyd Schadeverzekering N.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands (“Delta Lloyd”), (2) Premium Tobacco Investments N.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands (“Tobacco”), (3) M. Meerapfel Söhne A.G., Basel, Switzerland (“Meerapfel”) and (4) CETAC, Douala, Cameroon (“Cetac”) - The “NDS Provider” ''' ''': 30 November 2011: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_%E2%80%9CNDS_Provider%E2%80%9D]Sideridraulic_Systems_v_BBC_Chartering_&_Logistics]'''
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA UNDER : INTERPRETATION OF MASTER’S REMARK IN BILL OF LADING: WHETHER CARGO WAS DECK CARGO UNDER HAGUE -VISBY RULES: IF DECK CARGO, WHETHER PARTIES AGREED THAT HAGUE-VISBY RULES NEVERTHELESS APPLIED: WHETHER US COURTS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSE APPLIED''' DMC/SandT/12/14 '''England''' '''Isabella Shipowner SA v Shagang Shipping Co Ltd (The “Aquafaith”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 1077 (Comm): 26 April 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Isabella_Shipowner_v_Shagang_Shipping_The_Aquafaith]]''' '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE FORM: RULE IN WHITE AND CARTER V MCGREGOR: WHETHER OWNERS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT PREMATURE RE-DELIVERY OF VESSEL BY CHARTERERS''' DMC/SandT/12/13 '''Hong Kong''' '''A O Smith Electrical Products (Changzhou) Co Ltd v Blue Anchor Line & Ors''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: [2012] 1 HKLRD 301: 18 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/A_O_Smith_Electrical_Products_v_Blue_Anchor_Line_&_Ors]] '''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: WAYBILL: LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: INTERPRETATION: GOVERNING LAW OF CARRIAGE: APPLICABLE LIMIT OF LIABILITY FOR DEFECTIVE CONTAINERS SUPPLIED ''' DMC/SandT/12/12 '''Malaysia''' '''Sarawak Shell Berhad v South Sumatra Richfield Marine Pte Ltd (The “Red Gold”)''' '''Malaysian Court of Appeal: Sulaiman Bin Daud JCA, Syed Ahmad Helmy Bin Syed Ahmad JCA and Anantham Kasinather JCA: 19 March 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sarawak_Shell_v_South_Sumatra_Richfield_Marine_-_The_Red_Gold]]''' '''ADMIRALTY: COLLISION BETWEEN OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSEL AND FIXED OFFSHORE OIL PLATFORM: RIGHT OF VESSEL OWNERS TO LIMIT LIABILITY: WHETHER COLLISION CAUSED BY CARRIERNEGLIGENCE OF OWNERS IN THE NAVIGATION OR MANAGEMENT OF VESSEL: PACKAGING WHETHER VESSEL OWNERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY DUE TO ABSENCE OF ACTUAL FAULT OR PART PRIVITY: MERCHANT SHIPPING ORDINANCE 1952 SECTION 360 VIZ. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CONVENTION 1957''' DMC/SandT/12/11 '''England''' '''Osmium Shipping Corporation v Cargill International SA (The “Captain Stefanos”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 571 (Comm): 13 March 2012: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Osmium_Shipping_v_Cargill_International_-_The_Captain_Stefanos]] '''TIME CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: AMENDED NYPE (1946) FORM INCORPORATING CONWARTIME 2004: WHETHER VESSEL WAS OFF-HIRE DURING PERIOD OF HIJACKING BY SOMALI PIRATES: WHETHER RIDER CLAUSE PROVIDING FOR OFF-HIRE DURING “CAPTURE/SEIZURE” WAS QUALIFIED BY THE PHRASE “BY ANY AUTHORITY”: WHETHER CONWARTIME 2004 CLAUSE QUALIFIED OFF-HIRE RIDER CLAUSE''' DMC/SandT/12/10 '''England''' '''Progress Bulk Carriers Limited v Tube City IMS LLC (The “Cenk Kaptanoglu”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Cooke J: [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm): 17 February 2012:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Progress_Bulk_Carriers_v_Tube_City_IMS_-_The_Cenk_Kaptanoglu]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: WHETHER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT VOIDABLE FOR DURESS: WHETHER OWNERS’ CONDUCT, ALTHOUGH NOT ILLEGAL, AMOUNTED TO “ILLEGITIMATE PRESSURE”''' DMC/SandT/12/09 '''England''' '''Acergy Shipping Ltd v. Société Bretonne De Réparation Navale SAS''' '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): David Steel J: [2011] EWHC 2490 (Comm): 5 October 2011: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Acergy_Shipping_v_Société_Bretonne_de_Réparation_Navale]] '''CONTRACT FOR PROVISION OF REPAIR SERVICES TO VESSEL? : FIRE CAUSING DAMAGE BEYOND REPAIR WORK UNDERTAKEN: INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT: SCOPE OF INDEMNITY CONTAINED THEREIN''' DMC/SandT/12/08 '''England''' '''Geofizika DD v. MMB International Limited and Greenshields Cowie & Co Ltd: “The Green Island”''' '''English Court of Appeal; Lord Neuberger, Thomas LJ, and Sir Nicholas Wall; [2010] EWCA Civ 459, [2010] 2 Lloyds Rep 1; 28 April 2010: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Geofizika_v_MMB_International_-_The_Green_Island]] '''INCOTERMS 2000 CIP: CARRIAGE ON DECK: OBLIGATIONS OF FREIGHT FORWARDER: CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION : CAUSATION''' DMC/SandT/12/07 '''England''' '''Hyundai Merchant Marine Company Limited v Trafigura Beheer BV (The “Gaz Energy”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Flaux J: [2011] EWHC 3108 (Comm): 29 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Hyundai_Merchant_Marine_v_Trafigura_-_the_Gas_Energy]] '''TIME CHARTER: SPEED AND PERFORMANCE WARRANTY: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF TREATIES CHARTER: WHETHER SPEED AND PERFORMANCE AN “ALL WEATHERS” WARRANTY OR LIMITED TO “MAXIMUM WIND FORCE 4 ON BEAUFORT SCALE”''' DMC/SandT/12/06 '''The “Oriental Baltic”''' '''Singapore High Court: Tan Lee Meng J : [2011] 3 SGHC 75: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Oriental_Baltic]] '''OWNERS OF VESSEL UNDER VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION: IN REM PROCEEDINGS AGAINST VESSEL COMMENCED AFTER LIQUIDATION: PLAINTIFF FILED CAVEAT AGAINST RELEASE AGAINST VESSEL PRIOR TO LIQUIDATION: ACTION AGAINST COMPANY UNDER LIQUIDATION ORDINARILY STAYED UNDER DUTCH LAWTHE COMPANIES ACT: WHETHER LEAVE SHOULD BE GRANTED TO PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE WITH ITS ACTION''' DMC/SandT/12/05 '''England''' '''Thai Maparn Trading Co Ltd v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd (The “Med Salvador” and “Goa”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Beatson J: [2011] EWHC 2494 (Comm): 4 October 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Thai_Maparn_Trading_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]]''' '''INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS: FOB CONTRACT: WHETHER BUYERS IN BREACH OF CONDITION PRECEDENT IN CONTRACT BY FAILING TO ISSUE 7 DAY ETA OF VESSEL: WHETHER SELLERS IN REPUDIATORY/RENUNCIATORY BREACH BY REJECTING BUYERS’ NOTICE AND STATING THAT CARGO WOULD NOT BE READY IN TIME''' DMC/SandT/12/04 '''England''' '''Pacific Basin IHX Limited v Bulkhandling Handymax AS (The “Triton Lark”): English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2011] EWHC 2868 (Comm): 8 November 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pacific_Basin_v_Bulkhandling_Handymax,_the_Triton_Lark]]''' '''TIME CHARTER: PIRACY RISKS IN GULF OF ADEN IN 2008: CONWARTIME 1993/2004 CLAUSE: ARBITRATION APPEAL: SECTION 69 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996: CORRECT TEST FOR ASSESSING RISK OF PIRACY INCIDENT OCCURING FOR PURPOSE OF 1993/2004 CLAUSE: WHETHER OWNERS DEVIATED BY REROUTING VESSEL VIA CAPE OF GOOD HOPE INSTEAD OF GULF OF ADEN''' DMC/SandT/12/03 '''England''' '''Emeraldian Limited Partnership v Wellmix Shipping Limited and Guangzhou Iron & Steel Corporation Limited (The “Vine”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2010] EWHC 1411 (Comm): 17 June 2010:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Emeraldian_Limited_v_Wellmix_Shipping,_the_Vine]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER VESSEL’S OBLIGATION TO OBTAIN CLEARANCE BY PORT AUTHORITIES BEFORE GIVING NOTICE OF READINESS WAIVED FOR PURPOSE OF COMMENCEMENT OF LAYTIME: WHETHER CHARTERERS COULD RELY ON EXCEPTIONS TO RUNNING OF LAYTIME: WHETHER CHARTERERS IN BREACH OF SAFE PORT WARRANTY: WHETHER DEMURRAGE RECOVERABLE FOR DETENTION OF VESSEL''' DMC/12/02 '''England''' '''ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED v. ALBEMARLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and ALBEMARLE CORPORATION''' '''English High Court; Flaux J; [2011] EWHC 1574 (Comm); 21 June 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Astrazeneca_UK_v_Albemarle_International]]''' '''CONTRACT: CLAUSES GRANTING THE RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL: EXCLUSION CLAUSES AND DELIBERATE BREACH''' DMC/SandT/12/01 '''The Netherlands''' '''Furtrans Denzilick Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS (“Furtrans”) v Augusta Due Srl (“Augusta”): The "Constanza M”''' '''Supreme Court of the Netherlands (“SCN”) (summary proceedings): Vice-President J.B. Fleers as Chairman and the judges A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, F.B. Bakels, C.E. Drion and G. Snijders LJN:BT2708, December 9, 2011:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Furtrans_v_Augusta,_the_Constanza_M]]''' '''CONSTRUCTION OF ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE ARREST OF SEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''
