Changes

From DMC
Jump to: navigation, search

Precious Shipping & Ors v OW Bunker Far East & Ors

125 bytes added, 17:08, 16 August 2015
no edit summary
DMC/SandT/15/11
'''Singapore'''
'''Summary'''
'''Interpleader relief was (Fn.1) could not be granted to parties (principally ship charterers) that had purchased bunkers from intermediate sellers – the OW companies - as (amongst other reasons) in Singapore the physical suppliers , who had sold the bunkers to the OW companies but not been paid for them, had no prima facie claim against those bunker purchasers. There wouldwere, therefore, be no competing claims on which interpleader jurisdiction could be founded.'''
This note has been contributed by Justin Gan Boon Eng, LLB (Hons) NUS, Advocate & Solicitor, Singapore (non-practising); Solicitor, Hong Kong.
After the collapse of OW Bunker, many of the purchasers received two competing claims: (a) the first was from ING for the sum owing under the seller-purchaser contract; (b) the second was from the physical supplier for the sum owing under the seller-physical supplier contract. With one exception, none of the purchasers before the Court was the owner of the vessel to which the bunkers were delivered.
The purchasers accepted that payments for the bunkers were due and owing but claimed that they were unable to decide which party to pay. Under these circumstances, the purchasers decided that it would be prudent to seek interpleader relief (Fn.1) from the court.
The two substantive issues which arose for determination were:
The Precious Shipping case confirms that the opposite applies in Singapore – interpleader relief is not available to purchasers. Purchasers may however take some comfort from the High Court’s finding that the physical suppliers have no prima facie claim against the purchasers in Singapore.
Fn.1 A procedure whereby a party holding property and facing competing claims does not know to which competing claimant the property should be released to, and seeks the Court’s aid in resolving the matter.
Fn.2 Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap.322), s.18(2) and First Schedule, paragraph 4; Rules of Supreme Court Order 17 rule 1.

Navigation menu