2,051
edits
Changes
From DMC
no edit summary
DMC/SandT/24/05
'''England'''
'''MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Conti 11. Container Schiffahrts – GmbH & Co KG MS & Others (The “MSC Flaminia” (No. 2))'''
English Court of Appeal: Males and Falk LJJ and Sir Launcelot Henderson: [2023] EWCA Civ 1007: 1 September 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_S.A._v_Conti_11_Container_Schiffarhts_GmbH_KG_MS_&_Others_-_The_MSC_Flaminia_No.2]]
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2023/1007.html
'''TIME CHARTER: 1976 CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS: WHETHER TIME CHARTERERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT THEIR LIABILITY UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF 1976 CONVENTION AGAINST HEAD OWNERS FOR CONSEQUENCES OF EXPLOSION LEADING TO FIRE ON BOARD VESSEL, DESTROYING HUNDREDS OF CONTAINERS, CAUSING EXTENSIVE DAMAGE TO VESSEL AND INCURRING SUBSTANTIAL EXPENSES RELATED TO REPAIRS TO VESSEL: APPEAL ON A QUESTION OF LAW''''
DMC/SandT/24/02
'''England'''
'''Litasco SA v Der Mond Oil & Gas Africa SA'''
'''English Commercial Court: Foxton J: [2023] EWHC 2866 (Comm): 15 November 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Litasco_SA_v_Der_Mond_Oil_and_Gas_SA]]
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/2866.html
'''APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON CLAIM FOR UNPAID PART OF PURCHASE PRICE FOR CRUDE OIL: TRADE SANCTIONS: WHETHER APPLICABLE UNDER RELEVANT CONTRACT: WHETHER 2019 REGULATIONS APPLIED: WHETHER PRESIDENT PUTIN'S POSITION AS HEAD OF A COMMAND ECONOMY MEANT THAT HE WAS IN "CONTROL" OF ANY PARTY TO THESE PROCEEDINGS: WHETHER THERE WAS ANY COMPELLING REASON WHY THE DISPUTE SHOULD GO TO TRIAL'''
'''DMC/SandT/22/13
'''England'''
'''NKD Maritime Ltd v Bart Maritime (No. 2) Inc (The “Shagang Giant”)'''
'''English Commercial Court: Butcher J: [2022] EWHC 1615 (Comm): 24 June 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NKD_Maritime_v_Bart_Maritime_No.2_-_The_Shagang_Giant]]
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/1615.html
'''VESSEL SALE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT (“MOA”): SHIPBREAKING: BUYER PAID INITIAL PAYMENT DUE TO SELLER UNDER MOA: BUYER LATER TERMINATED THE MOA AND CLAIMED BACK THE INITIAL PAYMENT: SELLER ACCEPTED TERMINATION AS REPUDIATION OF MOA AND CLAIMED DAMAGES FOR BREACH: WHETHER TERMINATION OF MOA VALID: WHETHER LOCKDOWN MEASURES OR RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY INDIAN GOVERMENT AS A RESULT OF THE ONSET OF COVID-19 CONSTITUTED OR GAVE RISE TO A RELEVANT FORCE MAJEURE EVENT'''
DMC/SandT/22/12
'''England'''
'''Pacific Pearl Co Ltd v Osios David Shipping Ltd (The “Panamax Alexander” and “Osios David”)'''
'''English Court of Appeal: Lewison, Males and Snowden LLJ: [2022] EWCA Civ 798: 14 June 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pacific_Pearl_Co_v_Osios_David_Shipping_-_The_Panamax_Alexander_and_Osios_David)]]
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2022/798.html
'''COLLISION BETWEEN SHIPS: SECURITY AND JURISDICTION: STANDARD FORM WORDINGS OF ADMIRALTY SOLICITORS’ GROUP: ASG 1 – LETTER OF UNDERTAKING (“LOU”): ASG 2 – COLLISION JURISDICTION AGREEMENT: FORMS DESIGNED TO BE USED TOGETHER: PER ASG 2, SECURITY TO BE PROVIDED “IN A REASONABLY SATISFACTORY FORM TO THE OTHER [PARTY]”: WHETHER ADDITION OF INTERNATIONAL GROUP OF P&I CLUBS’ APPROVED SANCTIONS CLAUSE TO ASG 1 LOU WORDING RENDERED IT UNSATISFACTORY: WHETHER A PARTY IS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT REASONABLY SATISFACTORY SECURITY'''
DMC/SandT/22/11
'''England'''
'''Nautical Challenge Ltd v Evergreen Marine (UK) Limited [2022] EWHC 206 (Admlty)'''
High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Admiralty Court: Sir Nigel Teare, with Commodore Walworth and Captain Barker, Elder Brethren of Trinity House, as Nautical Assessors: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Nautical_Challenge_v_Evergreen_Marine_UK_-_The_Alexandra_1_and_the_Ever_Smart]]
'''COLLISION: APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY: CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA 1972 (COLREGS): CROSSING RULE (RULE 15): NARROW CHANNEL RULE (RULE 9): ACTION BY GIVE-WAY VESSEL (RULE 16): ACTION BY STAND-ON VESSEL (RULE 17): CAUSATIVE POTENCY: RELATIVE BLAMEWORHTINESS: COMPELLING NECESSITY'''
DMC/SandT/22/08
'''England'''
'''A v B [2021] EWHC 793 (Comm)'''
'''English High Court, Queen's Bench Division: Henshaw J: 31 March 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/A_v_B]]
Judgment available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2021/793.html&query=(.2021.)+AND+(EWHC)+AND+(793)+AND+((Comm))
'''SALE OF GOODS: BUYERS MAKING INVALID NOMINATION OF VESSEL AND SELLERS PURPORTING TO TERMINATE CONTRACT: WHETHER INVALID NOMINATION A BREACH OF CONDITION: WHETHER NOMINATED VESSEL HAD TO HAVE BEEN ALREADY CHARTERED BY BUYERS: WHETHER BUYERS’ OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE COPY OF CHARTERPARTY AT "SELLERS' FIRST REQUEST" WAS A CONDITION'''
DMC/SandT/22/06
'''England'''
'''CVLC THREE CARRIER CORP & ANOR v. ARAB MARITIME PETROLEUM TRANSPORT COMPANY [2021] EWHC 551 (Comm)'''
'''English High Court: Commercial Court: Mrs Justice Cockerill DBE: 11 March 2021: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CVLC_Three_Carrier_Corp_v_Arab_Maritime_Petroleum_Transport_Company]]
Judgment available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2021/551.html
'''CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATION AWARD FOR ERROR OF LAW UNDER S.69 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER TRIBUNAL ERRED IN LAW IN IMPLYING A TERM PRECLUDING CREDITORS’ RIGHT TO SEEK ADDITIONAL SECURITY FOR ALLEGED BREACH BY PERFORMANCE GUARANTOR UNDER THE CONTRACT OF GUARANTEE.'''
DMC/SandT/22/04
'''England'''
'''Stema Shipping (UK) Limited & Others v RTE, Réseau de Transport d’Electricité SA & Others (The “Stema Barge II”)'''
'''Court of Appeal: Phillips LJ, Sir David Richards and Sir Launcelot Henderson: [2021] EWCA Civ 1880: 15 December 2021: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Stema_Shipping_(UK)_v_RTE_-_The_Stema_Barge_II]]
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/1880.html
'''LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976: INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 1(2): MEANING OF “MANAGER OR OPERATOR OF A SEAGOING SHIP”: ANCHOR OF UNMANNED BARGE CAUSING DAMAGE TO ELECTRICITY CABLE'''
DMC/SandT/22/02
'''England'''
'''M/V Pacific Pearl Co. Limited v Osios David Shipping Inc.'''
'''High Court, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court: Sir Nigel Teare: [2021] EWHC 2808 (Comm), 21 October 2021:
[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/M/V_Pacific_Pearl_Co._Limited_v_Osios_David_Shipping_Inv]]
'''COLLISION BETWEEN SHIPS: SECURITY AND JURISDICTION: STANDARD FORM WORDINGS OF ADMIRALTY SOLICITORS GROUP: ASG 1 - LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: ASG 2 - COLLISION JURISDICTION AGREEMENT: FORMS DESIGNED TO BE USED TOGETHER: UNDER ASG 2, SECURITY TO BE PROVIDED “IN A REASONABLY SATISFACTORY FORM”: WHETHER PRESENCE OF SANCTIONS CLAUSE IN ASG 1 RENDERS IT NOT REASONABLY SATISFACTORY SECURITY UNDER ASG 2: RISK OF NON-PAYMENT: WHETHER A PARTY IS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT SECURITY THAT IS IN REASONABLY SATISFACTORY FORM'''
DMC/SandT/21/19
'''Singapore'''
'''Charles Lim Teng Siang and another v Hong Choon Hau and another [2021] SGCA 43'''
'''In the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore: Civil Appeal No 49 of 2020 in the matter of Suit 920 of 2018: Decision of the Court of Appeal (delivered by Steven Chong JCA), 1 March 2021: Sundaresh Menon CJ, Judith Prakash JCA, Belinda Ang Saw Ean JAD, Andrew Phang Boon Leong JCA, Steven Chong JCA:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.phpCharles_Lim_Teng_Siang_v_Hong_Choon_Hau]]
'''CONTRACT: NO-ORAL MODIFCIATION (NOM) CLAUSE: PREVENTION OF VARIATION, SUPPLEMENT, DELETION AND REPLACEMENT OF TERMS OF CONTRACT UNLESS BY WRITING AND SIGNED BY OR ON BEHALF OF ALL PARTIES: WHETHER APPLICABLE TO RESCISSION: EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INTENTION TO DEPART FROM NOM CLAUSE'''
DMC/SandT/21/13
'''England'''
'''Jiangsu Guoxin Corporation Ltd v Precious Shipping Public Co. Ltd [2020] EWHC 1030 (Comm)'''
'''English Commercial Court: Mr Justice Butcher:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Jiangsu_Guoxin_Corporation_v_Precious_Shipping_Public_Co.]]
'''SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT ON AMENDED SAJ FORM: SELLER CONTENDED UNLAWFUL REJECTION BY BUYER: REPUDIATORY BREACH: PARTIAL FINAL AWARDS: APPEAL UNDER S69 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996: APPLICATION OF THE PREVENTION PRINCIPLE: DEFINITION OF PERMISSBILE DELAYS UNDER ARTICLE VIII.1: NOTICE PROVISIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME UNDER ARTICLE VIII.2'''
DMC/SandT/21/11
'''England'''
'''Alpha Marine Corp v Minmetals Logistics Zhejiang Co Ltd (The “Smart”)'''
'''English Commercial Court: Butcher J: [2021] EWHC 1157 (Comm): 5 May 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Alpha_Marine_v_Minmetals_Logistics_Zhejiang_-_The_Smart]]
'''TIMECHARTER: OWNERS’ BILLS OF LADING ISSUED INCORPORATING (SUB) VOYAGE CHARTER TERMS: FREIGHT DEEMED EARNED ON LOADING CARGO AND TO BE PAID WITH 45 DAYS AND AFTER RECEIPT OF FREIGHT INVOICE: WHETHER IMPLIED TERM THAT OWNERS WOULD NOT DIRECT PAYMENT TO THEMSELVES OF FREIGHT DUE UNDER BILLS OF LADING WHERE NOTHING WAS DUE TO THEM UNDER THE TIMECHARTER: SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW UNDER ARBITRATION ACT 1996'''
DMC/SandT/21/07
'''Singapore'''
'''(1) POS Maritime NX S.A. & (2) Pan Ocean Co. Ltd. v. The Owners/bareboat Charterers of MV Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11 - The Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11'''
'''High Court of Singapore: Decision delivered by Judicial Commissioner S Mohan: [2021] SGHC 43: 22 February 2021: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Caraka_Jaya_Niaga_III_11]'''
'''COLLISION: BOTH VESSELS TO BLAME: PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM ISSUED IN TIME: DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIM ISSUED OUT OF TIME: MARITIME CONVENTIONS ACT OF SINGAPORE: WHETHER COUNTERCLAIM STILL QUALIFIED FOR APPLICATION OF ADMIRALTY SINGLE LIABILITY PRINCIPLE'''
DMC/SandT/21/03
'''England'''
'''Palmali Shipping SA v Litasco SA'''
'''English Commercial Court: Foxton J: [2020] EWHC 2581 (Comm): 1 October 2020:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Palmali_Shipping_v_Litasco]]
'''CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT (“COA”): OWNERS CLAIMING FOR LOSS OF PROFIT DUE TO CHARTERERS’ FAILURE TO PERFORM SHIPMENTS: OWNERS HAD OPTION TO USE OWN COMPANY GROUP FLEET VESSELS OR THIRD PARTY CHARTERED IN VESSELS TO PERFORM SHIPMENTS: WHETHER OWNERS HAD TO ACCOUNT FOR EXPENSES OF OWN FLEET TO PERFORM SHIPMENTS WHEN QUANTIFYING DAMAGES TO REFLECT NET LOSS OF PROFIT IN SAME WAY AS WHEN INCURRING FREIGHT, DEMURRAGE AND PORT CHARGES WHEN USING THIRD PARTY VESSELS TO PERFORM SHIPMENTS: CHARTERERS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION'''
DMC/SandT/21/01
'''England'''
'''English Admiralty Court'''
'''1) Splitt Chartering APS (2) Stema Shipping A/S (3) Stema Shipping (UK) Limted & Ors v SAGA Shipholding Norway AS and RTE Reseau de Transport d’Electricité SA & Ors: [2020] EWHC 1294 (Admlty) Queen’s Bench Division (Admiralty Court); Teare J; 22 May 2020;[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Splitt_Chartering_&_Ors_v_SAGA_Shipholding_&_Ors]]'''
'''LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976: INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 1(2): MEANING OF “MANAGER OR OPERATOR OF A SEAGOING SHIP”: ANCHOR OF UNMANNED BARGE CAUSING DAMAGE TO ELECTRICITY CABLE'''
DMC/SandT/20/14
'''Singapore'''
'''China Coal Solution (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Avra Commodities Pte Ltd'''
'''Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore [2020] SGCA 81, 20 August 2020: Decision of the Court of Appeal delivered by Judith Prakash, JA: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/China_Coal_Solution_(Singapore)_v_Avra_Commodities]]
'''ALLEGED BREACH OF TRADING CONTRACT: WHETHER CONTRACT HAD BEEN FINALLY CONCLUDED: RELEVANCE OF STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS: RELEVANCE OF PREVIOUS DEALINGS BETWEEN THE PARTIES'''
DMC/SandT/20/11
'''England'''
'''Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd v Uttam Galva Steels Limited (Commercial Court): Bryan J: [2019] EWHC 476 (Comm): 28 February 2019: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cargill_International_Trading_v_Uttam_Galva_Steels]]
'''SUMMARY JUDGMENT: CONTRACT TERM: DEFAULT COMPENSATION CLAUSE: INTEREST RATE: WHETHER UNENFORCEABLE AS A PENALTY: WHETHER INCORPORATED INTO RELEVANT CONTRACT: WHETHER ONEROUS OR UNUSUAL TERM: ILLEGALITY UNDER INDIAN LAW'''
DMC/SandT/20/10
'''England'''
'''Ocean Perfect Shipping Limited v Dampskibsselskabet Norden AS'''
'''English Queen’s Bench (Commercial Court): Teare J: [2019] EWHC 3368 (Comm): 6 December 2019: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ocean_Perfect_Shipping_v_Dampskibsselskabet_Norden_AS]'''
'''BRITISH REGISTERED VESSEL: GROUNDING WHILST ON CHARTER: MARITIME CASUALTY: MARINE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BRANCH (MAIB) SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT: MERCHANT SHIPPING (ACCIDENT REPORT AND INVESTIGATION) REGULATIONS 2012: WHETHER ARBITRATION JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS: WHETHER REPORT TO BE ADMITTED: COURT’S PERMISSION: DISCRETION'''
DMC/SandT/18/04
England
'''Glencore Energy UK Ltd v OMV Supply & Trading Ltd (The “Seagrace”)'''/
English Commercial Court: Sir Ross Cranston: [2018] EWHC 895 (Comm): 23 April 2018: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Glencore_Energy_v_OMV_Supply_and_Trading_-_The_Seagrace]
'''CFR SALES CONTRACT: BP CFR SALES TERMS: BPVOY4 FORM: VESSEL WAITING OFFSHORE EN ROUTE TO PORT OF DISCHARGE AT REQUEST OF BUYERS: SELLERS CLAIM FOR DETENTION BASED ON IMPLIED CONTRACT: WHETHER CLAIM FOR WAITING OFFSHORE WAS A DEMURRAGE CLAIM: WHETHER CLAIM TIME-BARRED DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DEMURRAGE CLAIMS PRESENTATION CLAUSE DEADLINE'''
DMC/SandT/17/12
Singapore
'''DSA Consultancy (FZC) v The “Eurohope”'''
'''Singapore High Court; Chua Lee Ming J; [2017] SGHC 218: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DSA_Consultancy_(FZC)_v_The_Eurohope]]
'''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: ARREST TO OBTAIN SECURITY IN AID OF FOREIGN COURT PROCEEDINGS'''
DMC/SandT/17/09
Singapore
'''The “Posidon” and another matter'''
'''Singapore High Court; Belinda Ang Saw Ean J; [2017] SGHC 138:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Posidon]]
'''CLAIMS AGAINST SHIP SALE PROCEEDS: PRIORITIES: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH ESTABLISHED ORDER OF PRIORITIES MAY BE DEPARTED FROM: CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH NECESSARIES CLAIM MAY RANK ABOVE MORTGAGEE’S CLAIM: WHETHER REQUIREMENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF NATURE AND EXTENT OF EXPENDITURE DIFFERS FOR DIFFERENT KINDS OF NECESSARIES CLAIMS'''
DMC/SandT/17/06
England
'''Bahamas Oil Refining Company International Limited v Cape Bari Tankschiffahrts GmbH & Co KG (The “Cape Bari”)'''
'''Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Toulson SCJJ: [2016] UKPC 20: 19 July 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Bahamas_Oil_Refining_Company_v_Cape_Bari_Tankschiffahrts_-_The_Cape_Bari]]'''
'''CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH: COLLISION BETWEEN VESSEL AND BERTH: WHETHER – UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE OF BERTH - VESSEL CAN CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE STATUTORY RIGHT TO LIMIT LABILITY: WHETHER UNDER CONDITIONS OF USE VESSEL DID CONTRACT OUT OF OR WAIVE RIGHT TO LIMIT: MERCHANT SHIPPING (MARITIME CLAIMS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY) ACT 1989 OF THE BAHAMAS: CONVENTION ON LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS 1976'''
DMC/SandT/17/05
England
'''Oldendorff GmbH & Co KG v Sea Powerful II Special Maritime Enterprises (The “Zagora”)'''
'''English High Court (Commercial Court): Mr Justice Teare: [2016] EWHC 3212; 15 December 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Oldendorff_GmbH_v_Sea_Powerful_II_Special_Maritime_Enterprises_The_Zagora]]'''
'''LETTER OF INDEMNITY: WHETHER THE DISCHARGE PORT AGENT WAS ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE SHIPOWNERS OR THE PERSON NAMED IN THE LETTER OF INDEMNITY AS THE PERSON TO WHOM DELIVERY OF THE CARGO WAS TO BE MADE'''
DMC/SandT/17/04
England
'''MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Cottonex Anstalt'''
'''Court of Appeal; Moore-Bick and Tomlinson LJJ, Keehan J.; [2016] EWCA Civ 789; 27 July 2016:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MSC_Mediterranean_Shipping_Company_v_Cottonex_Anstalt]]
'''CONTAINER DEMURRAGE: FRUSTRATION: REPUDIATION AND LEGITIMATE INTEREST: GOOD FAITH: PENALTIES'''
DMC/SandT/16/07
England
'''FSL-9 Pte Ltd and Nordic Tankers Trading A/S v Norwegian Hull Club (The “FSL New York”)'''
'''English Commercial Court: Blair J: [2016] EWHC 1091 (Comm): 10 May 2016: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/FSL-9_Pte_&_Nordic_Tankers_Trading_v_Norwegian_Hull_Club_-_The_FSL_New_York]]
'''LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: P&I CLUB: WHETHER CLAIMANT OWNERS COULD APPLY TO HIGH COURT TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT P&I CLUB TO INCREASE LEVEL OF SECURITY AVAILABLE UNDER A LETTER OF UNDERTAKING ISSUED BY THE CLUB TO OWNERS: MEANING OF “LIBERTY TO APPLY” IN LETTER OF UNDERTAKING SUBJECT TO ENGLISH LAW AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF HIGH COURT IN LONDON'''
DMC/SandT/16/05
'''England'''
'''PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v OW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''Supreme Court; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Hughes, Toulson; [2016] UKSC 23, 11 May 2016: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/PST_Energy_7__Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_-_The_Res_Cogitans]]
'''RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE; GOODS CONTEMPLATED TO BE CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED; SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE; COMMENTS ON POSITION IF SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 APPLIED'''
DMC/SandT/16/04
'''England'''
'''Crescendo Maritime Co. & Alpha Bank AE v Bank of Communications Co Ltd & Ors.'''
'''English High Court; Teare J; [2015] EWHC 3364 (Comm), 25 November 2015: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Crescendo_Maritime_&_Alpha_Bank_v_Bank_of_Communications_&_Ors]]'''
'''BACK-DATED SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT: REFUND GUARANTEES: ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: ACTION COMMENCED IN CHINESE COURTS BY A PARTY TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: BREACH OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT:WHETHER AN ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED:: WHETHER CHINESE PROCEEDINGS A COLLATERAL ATTACK ON ARBITRATION AWARD'''
DMC/SandT/15/17
'''England'''
'''PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Product Shipping and Trading SA v OW Bunker Malta Limited & ING Bank NV, the “RES COGITANS”'''
'''Court of Appeal; Moore-Bick, Longmore, McCombe LJJ; [2015] EWCA Civ 1058, 22 October 2015: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/PST_Energy_7_Shipping_v_OW_Bunker_Malta_&_ING_Bank_-_the_RES_COGITANS''']]
'''ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL: SUPPLY OF BUNKERS: RETENTION OF TITLE CLAUSE: CONTEMPLATED THAT GOODS WOULD BE CONSUMED BEFORE TITLE PASSED: NO PASSING OF PROPERTY INTENDED: SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 INAPPLICABLE'''
DMC/SandT/15/16
'''Singapore'''
'''Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services Pte Ltd v MISC Berhad, the “BUNGA MELATI 5”'''
'''High Court; Prakash J; [2015] SGHC 190, 22 July 2015:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Equatorial_Marine_Fuel_Management_Services_v_MISC_Bhd_-_The_Bunga_Melati_5]]
'''BUNKER BROKERS: AGENCY: ACTUAL AUTHORITY, APPARENT AUTHORITY, AND ESTOPPEL: NO GENERAL ‘DUTY TO SPEAK’'''
DMC/SandT/15/15
