2,049
edits
Changes
From DMC
no edit summary
Of the remaining points raised by the parties, the judge further concluded that:
a) while the owners said that the port authority had accepted the vessel as arrived, even if that was the case,
that was not a conclusion reached under the terms of the fixture recap;
b) the definition of "port" in the Laytime Definitions for Charterparties 2013/The Baltic Code 2014 cannot be
taken to provide a definition of "port limits", save where the parties deliberately choose it as their definition (which they did not do in this case);
c) having regard to the treatment of the subject matter by the authorities, the court was not at liberty to hold
