Changes

From DMC
Jump to: navigation, search

Carriage of Goods

2,678 bytes added, 23 February
no edit summary
DMC/SandT/24/04
 
'''England'''
 
'''JB Cocoa SDN BHD & Others v Maersk Line AS (The “Maersk Chennai”)'''
 
'''English Commercial Court: HHJ Keyser KC: [2023] EWHC 2203 (Comm): 5 September 2023: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/JB_Cocoa_Sdn_Bhd_v_Maersk_Line_AS_-_The_Maersk_Chennai]]
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/2203.html
 
'''CLAIM FOR CARGO DAMAGE ARISING AFTER DISCHARGE: LIABILITY OF CARRIER: WHETHER EXCLUSION CLAUSE IN BILL OF LADING VALID'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/24/03
 
'''England'''
 
'''Herculito Maritime Limited v Gunvor International BV (The “Polar”)'''
 
'''UK Supreme Court: Lord Hodge, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt, Lady Rose and Lord Richards: [2024] UKSC 2: 17 January 2024:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Herculito_Maritime_v_Gunvor_International_-_Supreme_Court_Decision_-_The_Polar]]
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2024/2.html/
 
'''BILL OF LADING: VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER BILLS OF LADING INCORPORATED CHARTERPARTY “CODE” BY WHICH CHARTERERS’ OBLIGATION TO PAY ADDITIONAL WAR RISKS INSURANCE PREMIA HAD ENTITLED THE BILL OF LADING HOLDERS TO THE BENEFIT OF THE WAR RISK INSURANCES: WHETHER BILL OF LADING HOLDERS LIABLE TO COMPENSATE OWNERS FOR CARGO’S PROPORTION OF GENERAL AVERAGE ARISING FROM PAYMENT OF RANSOM TO PIRATES: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON QUESTION OF LAW'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/23/10
 
'''England'''
 
'''Star Axe I LLC v Royal & Sun Alliance Luxembourg S.A. and Others (The “Star Antares”)'''
 
English Commercial Court: Butcher J: [2023] EWHC 2784 (Comm): 10 November 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Star_Axe_1_v_Royal_&_Sun_Alliance_and_Ors_-_The_Star_Antares]
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/2784.html
 
'''BILLS OF LADING: CONGENBILL 1994 FORM: GENERAL AVERAGE (“GA”): YORK-ANTWERP RULES (“YAR”): WHETHER YAR 1994 OR YAR 2016 APPLIED TO ADJUSTMENT, STATEMENT AND SETTLMENT IN LONDON OF GA INCIDENT ARISING IN 2021'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/23/09
 
'''England'''
 
'''FIMBank plc v KCH Shipping Co Ltd (The “Giant Ace”)'''
 
'''English Court of Appeal: Males, Popplewell and Nugee LJJ: [2023] EWCA Civ 569: 24 May 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/FIMBank_v_KCH_Shipping_-_The_Giant_Ace]]'''
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2023/569.html
 
'''BILLS OF LADING: MISDELIVERY OF CARGO: WHETHER TIME LIMIT FOR CLAIMS AGAINST THE CARRIER IN ARTICLE III, RULE 6 OF THE HAGUE VISBY RULES APPLIES TO CLAIMS FOR MISDELIVERY OF CARGO AFTER DISCHARGE FROM THE VESSEL: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON A POINT OF LAW'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/23/06
'''Unicredit Bank AG v Euronav NV (The “Sienna”)'''
'''English Court of Appeal: [2023] EWCA Civ 471: Asplin, Popplewell and Falk LJJ.: 4 May 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Unicredit_Bank_AG_v_Euronav_NV_-_The_Sienna]]
'''CLAIM UNDER BILL OF LADING (“BL”) FOR DELIVERY OF CARGO WITHOUT PRODUCTION OF ORIGINAL BL: BL ‘MERE RECEIPT’ WHILE IN HANDS OF CHARTERER/SELLER: CHARTERER NOVATED CHARTERPARTY TO THE BUYER: BL SUBSEQUENTLY ENDORSED BY THE CHARTERER TO THE BANK, AFTER DISCHARGE OF CARGO: WHETHER BL WAS A CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE, GIVING THE BANK RIGHTS AGAINST THE OWNERS: WHETHER, IF SO, DELIVERY OF CARGO WITHOUT PRODUCTION OF THE BL WAS CAUSATIVE OF THE LOSS'''

Navigation menu