Changes

From DMC
Jump to: navigation, search

Carriage of Goods

12,048 bytes added, 23 February
no edit summary
DMC/SandT/24/04
 
'''England'''
 
'''JB Cocoa SDN BHD & Others v Maersk Line AS (The “Maersk Chennai”)'''
 
'''English Commercial Court: HHJ Keyser KC: [2023] EWHC 2203 (Comm): 5 September 2023: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/JB_Cocoa_Sdn_Bhd_v_Maersk_Line_AS_-_The_Maersk_Chennai]]
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/2203.html
 
'''CLAIM FOR CARGO DAMAGE ARISING AFTER DISCHARGE: LIABILITY OF CARRIER: WHETHER EXCLUSION CLAUSE IN BILL OF LADING VALID'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/24/03
 
'''England'''
 
'''Herculito Maritime Limited v Gunvor International BV (The “Polar”)'''
 
'''UK Supreme Court: Lord Hodge, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt, Lady Rose and Lord Richards: [2024] UKSC 2: 17 January 2024:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Herculito_Maritime_v_Gunvor_International_-_Supreme_Court_Decision_-_The_Polar]]
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2024/2.html/
 
'''BILL OF LADING: VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER BILLS OF LADING INCORPORATED CHARTERPARTY “CODE” BY WHICH CHARTERERS’ OBLIGATION TO PAY ADDITIONAL WAR RISKS INSURANCE PREMIA HAD ENTITLED THE BILL OF LADING HOLDERS TO THE BENEFIT OF THE WAR RISK INSURANCES: WHETHER BILL OF LADING HOLDERS LIABLE TO COMPENSATE OWNERS FOR CARGO’S PROPORTION OF GENERAL AVERAGE ARISING FROM PAYMENT OF RANSOM TO PIRATES: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON QUESTION OF LAW'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/23/10
 
'''England'''
 
'''Star Axe I LLC v Royal & Sun Alliance Luxembourg S.A. and Others (The “Star Antares”)'''
 
English Commercial Court: Butcher J: [2023] EWHC 2784 (Comm): 10 November 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Star_Axe_1_v_Royal_&_Sun_Alliance_and_Ors_-_The_Star_Antares]
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2023/2784.html
 
'''BILLS OF LADING: CONGENBILL 1994 FORM: GENERAL AVERAGE (“GA”): YORK-ANTWERP RULES (“YAR”): WHETHER YAR 1994 OR YAR 2016 APPLIED TO ADJUSTMENT, STATEMENT AND SETTLMENT IN LONDON OF GA INCIDENT ARISING IN 2021'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/23/09
 
'''England'''
 
'''FIMBank plc v KCH Shipping Co Ltd (The “Giant Ace”)'''
 
'''English Court of Appeal: Males, Popplewell and Nugee LJJ: [2023] EWCA Civ 569: 24 May 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/FIMBank_v_KCH_Shipping_-_The_Giant_Ace]]'''
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2023/569.html
 
'''BILLS OF LADING: MISDELIVERY OF CARGO: WHETHER TIME LIMIT FOR CLAIMS AGAINST THE CARRIER IN ARTICLE III, RULE 6 OF THE HAGUE VISBY RULES APPLIES TO CLAIMS FOR MISDELIVERY OF CARGO AFTER DISCHARGE FROM THE VESSEL: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON A POINT OF LAW'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/23/06
 
'''England'''
 
'''Unicredit Bank AG v Euronav NV (The “Sienna”)'''
 
'''English Court of Appeal: [2023] EWCA Civ 471: Asplin, Popplewell and Falk LJJ.: 4 May 2023:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Unicredit_Bank_AG_v_Euronav_NV_-_The_Sienna]]
 
'''CLAIM UNDER BILL OF LADING (“BL”) FOR DELIVERY OF CARGO WITHOUT PRODUCTION OF ORIGINAL BL: BL ‘MERE RECEIPT’ WHILE IN HANDS OF CHARTERER/SELLER: CHARTERER NOVATED CHARTERPARTY TO THE BUYER: BL SUBSEQUENTLY ENDORSED BY THE CHARTERER TO THE BANK, AFTER DISCHARGE OF CARGO: WHETHER BL WAS A CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE, GIVING THE BANK RIGHTS AGAINST THE OWNERS: WHETHER, IF SO, DELIVERY OF CARGO WITHOUT PRODUCTION OF THE BL WAS CAUSATIVE OF THE LOSS'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/23/03
 
'''England'''
 
'''UniCredit Bank AG v Euronav NV (“The Sienna”)'''
 
'''English Commercial Court: [2022] EWHC 957 (Comm) 28 April 2022: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/UniCredit_Bank_v_Euronav_-_The_Sienna]]
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/957.html
 
'''CARRIAGE OF FUEL OIL: VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: NOVATION OF CHARTERPARTY TO NEW CHARTERERS: FAILURE TO ENDORSE THE BILL OF LADING: TITLE TO SUE SHIPOWNERS FOR MISDELIVERY: NEW CHARTERERS HAVING “LIQUIDITY DISTRESS: WHETHER A NEW CONTRACT “SPRANG UP” WHERE THE BILL OF LADING AS A RECEIPT WAS NOT ENDORSED'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/23/01
 
'''England'''
 
'''FIMBank plc v KCH Shipping Co Ltd (The “Giant Ace”)'''
 
'''English Commercial Court: Sir William Blair: [2022] EWHC 2400 (Comm): 28 September 2022: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/FIMBank_Plc_v_KCH_Shipping_Co_-_The_Giant_Ace]
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/2400.html
 
'''BILLS OF LADING: MISDELIVERY OF CARGO: WHETHER TIME LIMIT FOR CLAIMS AGAINST THE CARRIER IN ARTICLE III, RULE 6 OF THE HAGUE VISBY RULES APPLIES TO CLAIMS FOR MISDELIVERY OF CARGO AFTER DISCHARGE FROM THE VESSEL: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON A POINT OF LAW'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/22/01
 
'''England'''
 
'''Herculito Maritime Limited v Gunvor International BV (The “Polar”)'''
 
'''Court of Appeal: Peter Jackson and Males LJJ and Sir Patrick Elias: [2021] EWCA Civ 1828: 1 December 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Herculito_Maritime_v_Gunvor_International_-_The_Polar]]
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/1828.html
 
'''BILL OF LADING: VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER BILLS OF LADING INCORPORATED CHARTERPARTY “CODE” BY WHICH CHARTERERS’ OBLIGATION TO PAY ADDITIONAL WAR RISKS INSURANCE PREMIUMS HAD BEEN ASSUMED TO ENTITLE THEM TO THE BENEFIT OF THE WAR RISK INSURANCES: WHETHER BILL OF LADING HOLDERS LIABLE TO COMPENSATE OWNERS FOR CARGO’S PROPORTION OF GENERAL AVERAGE ARISING FROM PAYMENT OF RANSOM TO PIRATES: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/21/17
 
'''England'''
 
'''Alize 1954 and CMA CGM SA v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG and Others (The “CMA CGM Libra”)'''
 
'''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lords Reed (President), Briggs, Hamblen, Leggatt and Lady Arden: [2021] UKSC 51: 10 November 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Alize_1954_and_CMA_CGM_SA_v_Allianz_Versicherungs_AG_and_Ors_-_the_CMA_CGM_Libra]] '''
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2021/51.html
 
'''OWNERS’ CLAIM FOR CONTRIBUTION IN GENERAL AVERAGE (“GA”): NEGLIGENT VOYAGE PLANNING BY MASTER CAUSED GROUNDING OF VESSEL LEADING TO GA EXPENDITURE TO REFLOAT THE VESSEL: WHETHER CARGO INTERESTS ENTITLED TO DEFEND CLAIM ON THE BASIS THAT OWNERS FAILED TO EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE TO MAKE THE VESSEL SEAWORTHY BEFORE AND AT THE BEGINNING OF THE VOYAGE: ARTICLE III, RULE 1 AND ARTICLE IV, RULE 2(A) OF THE HAGUE/HAGUE-VISBY RULES'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/21/10
 
'''England'''
 
'''Sea Tank Shipping AS v (1) Vinnlustodin HF & (2) Vatryggingafelag Islands FH – the “Aqasia”'''
 
'''England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), on appeal from the Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court: Lady Justice Gloster, David Richards and Flaux LJJ: [2018] EWCA Civ 276: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sea_Tank_Shipping_v_Vinnlustodin_HF_&_Or_-_the_Aquasia]]'''
 
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: PACKAGE LIMITATION: 1924 HAGUE RULES ARTICLE IV RULE 5: MEANING OF UNIT: WHETHER PACKAGE LIMITATION APPLIES TO BULK CARGO'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/21/08
 
'''England'''
 
'''Herculito Maritime Ltd v Gunvor International BV'''
 
'''English High Court: Teare J.: [2020] EWHC 3318 (Comm): 4 December 2020: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Herculito_Maritime_Ltd_v_Gunvor_International_BV]]'''
 
'''ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 69 APPEAL ON POINT OF LAW: VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER BILL OF LADING INCORPORATED CHARTERPARTY “CODE” REGARDING ADDITIONAL WAR RISKS PREMIUMS: WHETHER BILL OF LADING HOLDERS LIABLE TO COMPENSATE SHIPOWNERS FOR LOSSES COVERED BY INSURANCE AGAINST PIRACY RISKS'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/21/02
 
'''England'''
 
'''Priminds Shipping (HK) Co Ltd v Noble Chartering Inc, the “Tai Prize” [2020] EWHC 127 (Comm)'''
 
'''English Commercial Court (Queen’s Bench Division): HH Judge Pelling QC (sitting as a Judge of the High Court): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Priminds_Shipping_(HK)_v_Noble_Chartering_-_The_Tai_Prize]]
 
'''SHIPPERS ACTING AS AGENTS FOR THE CHARTERERS PRESENTED ‘CLEAN ON BOARD’ BILL OF LADING FOR MASTER’S SIGNATURE: CARGO DID APPEAR TO BE IN GOOD ORDER SO BILL OF LADING ISSUED STATING CARGO IN APPARENT GOOD ORDER AND CONDITION:: ON DISCHARGE CARGO FOUND TO BE DAMAGED: WHETHER CHARTERERS LIABLE TO OWNERS AS CARRIER FOR MISREPRESENTATION: EFFECT OF INCLUSION OF HAGUE RULES IN BILL OF LADING'''
 
DMC/SandT/20/09
 
'''England'''
 
'''Alize 1954 and CMA CGM SA v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG and Others (The “CMA CGM Libra”)'''
 
'''English Court of Appeal: Flaux, Haddon-Cave and Males LLJ: [2020] EWCA Civ 293: 4 March 2020:
[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Alize_1954_and_CMA_CGM_SA_v_Allianz_Elementar)Versicherungs_AB_-_The_CMA_CGM_Libra]]
 
Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2020/293.html
 
'''CLAIM FOR CONTRIBUTION IN GENERAL AVERAGE: NEGLIGENT VOYAGE PLANNING BY THE VESSEL’S OFFICERS CAUSED GROUNDING OF VESSEL LEADING TO EXPENDITURE IN THE NATURE OF GENERAL AVERAGE TO REFLOAT THE VESSEL: WHETHER CARGO INTERESTS ENTITLED TO DEFEND THE CLAIM ON THE BASIS THAT OWNERS HAD FAILED TO EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE TO MAKE THE VESSEL SEAWORTHY BEFORE AND AT THE BEGINNING OF THE VOYAGE: ARTICLE III, RULES 1 AND 2 AND ARTICLE IV, RULE 2(A) OF THE HAGUE/HAGUE-VISBY RULES'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/20/07
 
'''England'''
 
'''Globalink Transportation & Logistics Worldwide LLP v DHL Project & Chartering Ltd'''
 
'''English Commercial Court: Nicholas Vineall QC: 29 January; 19 February: [2019] EWHC 225 (Comm): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Globalink_Transportation_&_Logistics_v_DHL_Project_&_Chartering]]'''
 
'''CONTRACT FOR FREIGHT FORWARDING SERVICES: WHETHER CLAIM FOR CARGO DAMAGE COULD BE SET-OFF AGAINST CLAIM FOR FREIGHT'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/20/06
 
'''Singapore'''
 
'''Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation v Jiang Xin Shipping (“YUE YOU 902”)'''
 
'''Singapore High Court: Pang Khang Chau, Judicial Commissioner: [2019] SGHC 106:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Overseas_-_Chinese_Banking_Corporation_v_Jiang_Xin_Shipping_-_The_Yue_You_902]]'''
 
'''BILLS OF LADING: MISDELIVERY: WHETHER HOLDER’S KNOWLEDGE THAT CARGO HAD BEEN DISCHARGED BEFORE TAKING UP THE BILLS OF LADING DEFEATED A MISDELIVERY CLAIM: WHETHER HOLDER IN FACT HAD THAT KNOWLEDGE AT THAT TIME'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/20/04
 
'''England'''
 
'''Volcafe Ltd and Others v Cia Sud Americana de Vapores SA'''
 
'''Supreme Court: Lord Reed DPSC, Lords Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Kitchin JJSC; [2018] UKSC 61; 5 December 2018: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Volcafe_and_Ors_v_CSAV]]
'''
 
'''SHIPPING: BILL OF LADING: HAGUE RULES: WHETHER BURDEN ON CARRIER TO PROVE DAMAGE TO GOODS CAUSED WITHOUT NEGLIGENCE OR DUE TO INHERENT VICE: INHERENT VICE'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/20/01
 
'''England'''
 
'''Transgrain Shipping (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Yangtze Navigation (Hong Kong) Co Ltd'''
 
'''English Court of Appeal: Longmore, Hamblen, Henderson LJJ: [2017] EWCA Civ 2107:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Transgrain_Shipping_(Singapore)_v_Yangtze_Navigation_(Hong_Kong)_Court_of_Appeal]]'''
 
'''CHARTERPARTY (TIME): NYPE INTER-CLUB AGREEMENT 1996, CLAUSE 8(D): WHETHER “ACT” REQUIRES FAULT'''
 
 
DMC/SandT/19/07
 
'''England'''
 
'''Deep Sea Maritime Limited v Monjasa A/S (The “Alhani”)'''
 
'''English Commercial Court: David Foxton QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court): [2018] EWHC 1495 (Comm): 15 June 2018:'''
 
'''[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php?title=Deep_Sea_Maritime_v_Monjasa_-_The_Alhani]]'''
 
'''BILL OF LADING: CARGO MISDELIVERY WITHOUT PRESENTATION OF ORIGINAL BILL: CLAUSE 1 OF BILL INCORPORATING EXCLUSIVE ENGLISH JURISDICTION & LAW CLAUSE OF A CHARTERPARTY: CLAUSE 2 OF BILL INCORPORATING HAGUE RULES 1924: WHETHER ONE-YEAR TIME BAR IN ARTICLE III RULE 6 OF 1924 RULES APPLIES TO CARGO MISDELIVERY CLAIMS: WHETHER LEGAL PROCEEDINGS COMMENCED IN TIME IN WRONG (FOREIGN) FORUM CAN STOP TIME BAR EXPIRING IN CORRECT (ENGLISH) FORUM: WHETHER CARRIER (OWNERS) ENTITLED TO A DECLARATION OF NON-LIABILITY ON A SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASIS'''

Navigation menu