2,051
edits
Changes
From DMC
no edit summary
DMC/SandTArbn/23/01 '''England''' '''DHL Project & Chartering Ltd v Gemini Ocean Shipping Co Ltd (The “Newcastle Express”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Males, Birss and Snowden LJJ: [2022] EWCA Civ 1555: 24 November 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DHL_Project_and_Chartering_v_Gemini_Ocean_Shipping_-_The_Newcastle_Express]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2022/1555.html '''VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTER AND ARBITRATION AGREEMENT THEREIN CONCLUDED: WHETHER ARBITRATOR HAD SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION TO MAKE AWARD: WHETHER “SUBJECT SHIPPER/RECEIVERS APPROVAL” OF THE VESSEL PROVISION IN RECAP A CONDITION PRECEDENT AND SUBJECT TO “APPROVAL NOT TO BE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD” TERM IN INCORPORATED PROFORMA CHARTER: APPLICATION UNDER SECTIONS 67 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/Arbn/2022/04 '''England''' '''ENEMALTA PLC v. THE STANDARD CLUB ASIA LIMITED [2021] EWHC 1215 (COMM)''' '''English Commercial Court (QBD): Judge Pelling QC: 26 April 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/ENEMALTA_PLC_v_Standard_Club_Asia] Judgment available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2021/551.html '''WHETHER THE HIGH COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO DECIDE THE VALIDITY OF A LETTER OF UNDERTAKING ISSUED BY A P&I CLUB - CONTAINING AN ENGLISH HIGH COURT EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSE - IN RESPECT OF THEIR OWNER MEMBERS’ ALLEGED LIABLITY FOR DAMAGE TO A SUBMARINE CABLE, IN CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE THE OWNERS HAD INSTITUTED PROCEEDINGS IN SINGAPORE SEEKING TO ESTABLISH A LIMITATION FUND THERE IN RESPECT OF THE INCIDENT UNDER THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS CONVENTION OF 1976''' DMC/Arbn/22/03 '''England''' '''ARI v WXJ''' '''English Commercial Court: Foxton J: [2022] EWHC 1543 (Comm): 20 June 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/ARI_v_WXJ]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/1543.html '''ARBITRATION: LMAA TERMS: ARBITRATION COMMENCED BY FIRST PARTY GIVING NOTICE NAMING ITS APPOINTED ARBITRATOR (“GGG”): NOTICE GAVE SECOND PARTY 14 DAYS TO APPOINT AND GIVE NOTICE OF ITS ARBITRATOR FAILING WHICH GGG WOULD BE APPOINTED AS SOLE ARBITRATOR: SECOND PARTY RECEIVED CONFIRMATION OF WILLINGNESS OF ARBITRATOR (“JJJ”) TO ACCEPT APPOINTMENT, WITHOUT AGREEMENT ON TERMS OR REMUNERATION, AND GAVE NOTICE TO FIRST PARTY, WITH COPIES TO GGG AND JJJ, STATING JJJ HAD BEEN APPOINTED AS ITS ARBITRATOR: WHETHER APPOINTMENT OF JJJ AND NOTICE THEREOF WAS VALID TO CONSTITUTE TRIBUNAL WITHIN 14-DAY TIME LIMIT''' DMC/Arbn/22/02 '''England''' '''Ducat Maritime Ltd v Lavender Shipmanagement Inc (The “Majestic”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Butcher J: [2022] EWHC 766 (Comm): 14 March 2022: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ducat_Maritime_v_Lavender_Shipmanagement_-_The_Majestic]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/766.html '''ARBITRATION: LMAA SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE 2017: FINAL AWARD MADE IN OWNERS’ FAVOUR FOR USD37,831.83: ARBITRATOR SHOULD HAVE AWARDED USD28,277.91: ARBITRATOR ADDED VALUE OF CHARTERERS’ COUNTERCLAIM TO OWNERS’ CLAIM BY MISTAKE: ARBITRATOR TWICE REFUSED APPLICATIONS TO CORRECT AWARD UNDER SECTION 57 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996: APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 68 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996 TO SET ASIDE PART OF AWARD FOR SERIOUS IRREGULARITY''' DMC/Arbn/22/01 '''England''' '''NWA & Anor v NVF & Ors [2021] EWHC 2666 (Comm)''' Between (1) NWA (2) FSY and (1) NVF (2) RWX (3) KLB '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Calver J.: 8 October 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NWA_and_Anor_v_NVF_&_Ors]] '''CONTRACTUAL TERM: DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE: ARBITRATION CLAUSE REQUIRING MEDIATION BEFORE ARBITRATION: MEDIATION NEVER TOOK PLACE: REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION: AWARD ISSUED CONFIRMING TRIBUNAL’S JURISDICTION: CHALLENGE TO AWARD UNDER SECTION 67(1)(a) ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MEDIATION PROVISION VITIATED SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION OF THE TRIBUNAL: WHETHER THAT NON-COMPLIANCE ONLY AFFECTED ADMISSIBILITY OF THE CLAIM''' DMC/Arbn/21/08 '''Hong Kong''' '''W v AW [2021] HKCFI 1707''' '''High Court of Hong Kong: Justice Mimmie Chan: Date of Hearing: 22 March 2021: Date of Decision: 17 June 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/W_v_AW]]''' Judgment available on HKLII @ https://www.hklii.hk/cgi-bin/sinodisp/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2021/1707.html?stem=&synonyms=&query=title(%222021%20HKCFI%201707%22) '''ARBITRATION: ISSUE ESTOPPEL: TWO ARBITRATIONS BETWEEN THE SAME PARTIES ON THE SAME ISSUES WITH DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS: WHETHER SECOND AWARD SHOULD BE SET ASIDE: APPARENT BIAS: WHETHER SECURITY SHOULD BE ORDERED''' DMC/Arbn/2021/07 '''Singapore''' '''CAI v CAJ & CAK''' '''Singapore High Court: S Mohan JC: [2021] SGHC 21: 29 January 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CAI_v_CAJ_&_CAK]]''' '''CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATION AWARD: EXTENSION OF TIME (EOT) DEFENCE: NATURAL JUSTICE: PROPER ARBITRATION PROCEDURES: MODEL LAW ARTICLE 18: ICC RULES ARTICLE 23(4): DOCTRINE OF APPROBATION AND REPROBATION''' DMC/Arbn/21/06 '''England''' '''Ulusoy Denizilik A.S. v COFCO Global Harvest (Zhangjiagang) Trading Co. Ltd (The "Ulusoy-11") '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Mr Justice Bryan: [2020] EWHC 3645 (Comm): 28 August 2020:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ulusoy_Denizilik_v_COFCO_Global_Harvest_(Zhangjiagang)_Trading_-_The_Ulusoy_11]] '''ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION: BILLS OF LADING EXPRESSLY INCORPORATING CHARTERPARTY LAW AND ARBITRATION CLAUSE: APPLICABLE LAW GOVERNING ISSUE OF INCORPORATION: IDENTITY OF GOVERNING CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER LAW AND ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED INTO BILLS OF LADING: BILL OF LADING HOLDERS BRING CARGO CLAIM IN PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (“PRC”): WHETHER THIS A BREACH OF LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION: ROME I REGULATION (REGULATION (EC) NO 593/2008), ARTICLE 10(1), (2).''' DMC/Arbn/21/05 '''England''' '''Republic of Sierra Leone v SL Mining Limited [2021] EWHC 286 Comm, 15 February 2021''' '''In the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court: Sir Michael Burton GBE, Sitting as Judge of the High Court:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Republic_of_Sierra_Leone_v_SL_Mining_Limited]]''' '''CONTRACTUAL DISPUTE BETWEEN PARTIES: MULTI-TIER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISION: PARTIES TO FILE FOR ARBITRATION IF NO AMICABLE SETTLEMENT REACHED WITHIN 3 MONTHS: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MULTI-TIER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISION: WHETHER NON-COMPLIANCE VITIATED TRIBUNAL’S JURISDICTION: WHETHER NON-COMPLIANCE A MATTER OF ADMISSIBILITY: CHALLENGING AN AWARD UNDER SECTION 67 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/Arbn/21/04 '''England''' '''Lavender Shipmanagement Inc v Ibrahima Sory Affrètement Trading SA and Others (The “Majesty”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Mr Justice Calver: [2020] EWHC 3462 (Comm) – 16December 2020: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Lavender_Shipmanagement_v_Ibrahima_Sory_Affretement_Trading_&_Ors_the_MV_Majesty]] '''LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: APPLICATIONS UNDER S67 AND S69 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/Arbn/21/03 '''Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lord Justices Reed, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones, Lady Justices Black and Arden: [2020] UKSC 48:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Halliburton_Company_v_Chubb_Bermuda_Insurance]] '''INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: IMPARTIALITY: LEGAL DUTY OF ARBITRATOR TO MAKE DISCLOSURE: MULTIPLE APPOINTMENTS IN DIFFERENT REFERENCES RELATING TO OVERLAPPING SUBJECT MATTER BUT INVOLVING A COMMON PARTY: WHETHER FAILURE TO DISCLOSE IS RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT OF APPARENT BIAS: WHETHER DUTY TO DISCLOSE OVERRIDES DUTY OF PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY: WHERE CONSENT TO DISCLOSURE MAY BE INFERRED: RECOGNITION OF SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARITIME AND OTHER INDUSTRY SPECIFIC ARBITRATION''' DMC/Arbn/21/02 '''Singapore'''_ '''Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd v Avant Garde Maritime Services (Private) Limited:''' '''Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore [2019] SGCA 33, 9 May 2019: Decision of the Court of Appeal (delivered by Judge of Appeal Judith Prakash): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Rakna_Arakshaka_Lanka_Ltd_v_Avant_Garde_Maritime_Services_(Private)_Limited]]''' '''PARTY DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS AGAINST IT: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING) SIGNED BY BOTH PARTIES: TRIBUNAL PROCEEDED WITH ARBITRATION DESPITE MOU: FINAL AWARD AGAINST PARTY: WHETHER NON-PARTICIPATING PARTY ENTITLED TO SET ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARD ON THE GROUNDS THAT TRIBUNAL HAD NO JURISDICTION''' DMC/Arbn/21/01 '''England''' '''MVV Environment Devonport Ltd v NTO Shipping GMBH & Co KG MV Nortrader [2020] EWHC 1371 (Comm); Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Judge Pelling QC; 6 June 2020:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MVV_Environment_Devonport_v_NTO_Shipping_The_MV_Nortrader]] '''CHALLENGE TO JURISDICTION OF ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL: CLAIMANT NAMED AS SHIPPER IN BILL OF LADING INCORPORATING CHARTERPARTY ARBITRATION CLAUSE: WHETHER CLAIMANT WRONGLY NAMED AS SHIPPER IN BILL OF LADING PREPARED BY AGENT: WHETHER AGENT HAD EXPRESS OR IMPLIED ACTUAL AUTHORITY OR OSTENSIBLE AUTHORITY TO ACT FOR CLAIMANT: EFFECT OF CLAIMANT’S SILENCE''' DMC/Arbn/19/02 '''England''' '''Sea Master Shipping Inc v Arab Bank (Switzerland) Limited''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J.: 25 July 2018: [2018] EWHC 1902 (Comm):'''Sum[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sea_Master_Shipping_v_Arab_Bank_(Switzerland)]]''' '''CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATORS’ JURISDICTION UNDER S.67 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER BILL OF LADING HOLDER BOUND BY ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED INTO THE BILL OF LADING: WHETHER STATUS OF LAWFUL HOLDER UNDER S.2 OF CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT (1992) SUFFICIENT: WHETHER IN ADDITION, HOLDER MUST HAVE ASSUMED LIABILITIES UNDER S.3 OF THAT ACT''' DMC/Arbn/19/01 '''England''' '''Sonact Group Ltd v Premuda SpA (The “Four Island”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Males J: [2018] EWHC 3820 (Comm): 12 December 2018: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sonact_Group_Ltd_v_Premuda_SpA_-_The_Four_Island]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: ASBATANKVOY FORM: DEMURRAGE & HEATING COSTS CLAIM: SETTLEMENT AGREED BY EMAIL WHICH DID NOT REFER TO ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN CHARTER: WHETHER ARBITRATORS HAD JURISDICTION TO DETERMINE CLAIM FOR THE AGREED SETTLEMENT SUM: CHALLENGE PURSUANT TO SECTION 67 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/Arbn/16/01 '''England''' '''Shagang South-Asia Trading Co Ltd v Daewoo Logistics''' '''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Mr Justice Hamblen; [2015] EWHC 194 (Comm); 5 February 2015: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Shagang_South-East_Asia_Trading_v_Daewoo_Logistics]] '''ARBITRATION: WHETHER THERE WERE CLEAR INDICATORS THAT THE CURIAL LAW WAS NOT THE LAW OF THE VENUE OF THE ARBITRATION: WHETHER THE ARBITRATOR WAS VALIDLY APPOINTED''' DMC/Arbn/15/02 '''Singapore''' '''Coal & Oil Co LLC v GHCL Ltd''' DMC/Arbn/15/01 '''England''' '''Transgrain Shipping BV v Deiulemar Shipping SpA and Eleni Shipping Ltd (The “Eleni P”)''' '''Commercial Court: Teare J: [2014] EWHC 4202 (Comm): 15 December 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Transgrain_Shipping_v_Deiulemar_Shipping_and_Eleni_Shipping_-_The_Eleni_P]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY: PARTIALLY CONFLICTING ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS: BESPOKE ARBITRATION CLAUSE AND STANDARD BIMCO ARBITRATION CLAUSES: CHALLENGE TO TRIBUNAL’S JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 67 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS: PROPER CONSTITUTION OF TRIBUNAL''' DMC/Arbn/14/07 '''England''' '''Viscous Global Investment Ltd v Palladium Navigation Corp (The “Quest”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Males J: [2014] EWHC 2654 (Comm): 30 July 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Viscous_Global_Investment_v_Palladium_Navigation_-_The_Quest]] '''ARBITRATION: BILLS OF LADING (“BLS”): P&I CLUB LETTER OF UNDERTAKING (“LOU”): WHETHER ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN LOU REPLACED ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN BLS: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 32 APPLICATION''' DMC/Arbn/14/06 '''England''' '''Emirates Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports Private Limited''' '''English High Court: Teare J.: [2014] EWHC 2104 (Comm): 1 July 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Emirates_Trading_v_Prime_Mineral_Exports]] '''CONTRACT: DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE REQUIRING PARTIES TO TRY TO RESOLVE DISPUTES BY FRIENDLY DISCUSSION WITHIN A CONTINUOUS PERIOD OF FOUR WEEKS BEFORE RESORTING TO ARBITRATION: WHETHER ARBITRATORS LACKED JURISDICTION BECAUSE THIS PROVISION NOT COMPLIED WITH: WHETHER PROVISION UNENFORCEABLE AS UNCERTAIN: WHETHER PROVISION HAD BEEN COMPLIED WITH''' DMC/Arbn/14/05 '''England''' '''Caresse Navigation Ltd v Office National de l’Electricité (the "Channel Ranger"): [2013] EWHC 3081 (Comm): Males J.: 14 October 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Caresse_Navigation_v_Office_National_de_l'Electricité_-_the_Channel_Ranger]]''' '''BILL OF LADING: WHETHER WORDS OF INCORPORATION REFERRING TO ARBITRATION ARE SUFFICIENT TO INCORPORATE CHARTERPARTY JURISDICTION PROVISIONS''' DMC/Arbn/14/04 '''England''' '''Cottonex Anstalt v Patriot Spinning Mills Ltd [2014] EWHC 236 (Comm)''' '''English High Court: Hamblen J.: 14 February 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cottonex_Anstalt_v_Patriot_Spinning_Mills]] '''SALE AND PURCHASE: WHETHER CONTRACT INCORPORATED ALL TERMS OF THE BY-LAWS AND RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL COTTON ASSOCIATION OR ONLY THE ARBITRATION PROVISIONS: GUIDANCE ON THE INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACTS ON APPEAL FROM AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL WITH EXPERIENCE OF THE RELEVANT TRADE''' DMC/Arbn/14/03 '''England''' '''Beijing Jianlong Heavy Industry Group v Golden Ocean Group Ltd and Others''' '''English Commercial Court: HHJ Mackie QC: [2013] EWHC 1063 (Comm): 1 May 2013: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Beijing_Jianlong_Heavy_Industry_Group_v_Golden_Ocean_Group]] '''ARBITRATION: SECTION 67 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996: APPEAL AGAINST SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION OF TRIBUNALS: GUARANTEES ALLEGEDLY ILLEGAL AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER CHINESE LAW: VALIDITY OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS: PUBLIC POLICY''' DMC/Arbn/14/02
'''The Netherlands'''
'''Mr Van Wassenaer Van CatwijckTransport and Maritime Arbitration Rotterdam-Amsterdam ("Tamara") Arbitration''' '''Anonymous, also acting in his capacity as the representative Procedural Order of Mr Saarberg a Tamara arbitration tribunal, 10 December 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Tamara_Arbitration]]''' '''ARBITRATION UNDER TAMARA RULES: WHAT THE LANGUAGE OF THE ARBITRATION SHOULD BE FAILING A CHOICE PREVIOUSLY MADE BY THE PARTIES''' DMC/Arbn/14/01 '''England''' '''AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v. Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC''' '''Supreme Court; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Toulson SCJJ; [2013] UKSC 35, 12 June 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/AES_Ust-Kamenogorsk_Hydropower__Plant_LLP_v_Ust-KamenogorsK_Hydropower_Plant_JSC]] '''WHETHER POWER TO INJUNCT COURT PROCEEDINGS IS MERELY ANCILLARY TO CURRENT OR INTENDED ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: WHETHER S.44 ARBITRATION ACT 1996 LIMITS THE COURT’S INJUNCTIVE POWERS UNDER S.37 SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981''' DMC/Arbn/13/06 '''England''' '''Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC (and Mr Ariens others) v Blue Skye Special Opportunities Fund LLP (hereinafter called “the Arbitrators”and others) v Knowsley SK Limited''' '''English Court of Appeal; Pill, ManchesterToulson, United Kingdom Tomlinson LJJ; [2013] EWCA Civ 367; 31 January 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fortress_Valley_Recovery__Fund_v_Blue_Skye_Special_Opportunities_Fund]] '''ARBITRATION CLAUSE: THIRD PARTIES: CONTRACTS (RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES) ACT 1999, SS 8(1) & 8(2)''' DMC/Arbn/13/05 '''Hong Kong''' '''Grand Pacific Holdings Ltd and Pacific China Holdings Ltd (in liq) (hereinafter called “KSK”No 1)''' '''Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Tang VP, Kwan and Fok JJA: CACV No.136 of 2011, [2012] 4 HKLRD 1: 9 May 2012:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Arbitrators_v._Knowsley_SKGrand_Pacific_Holdings_v_Pacific_China_Holdings]]'''
http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/2012/200.html '''Dutch Supreme CourtARBITRATION: APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARD: ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTS. D.H. Beukenhorst 34(2)(A)(II) AND (chairmanIV), UNCITRAL MODEL LAW: AWARD TO BE SET ASIDE ONLY IF VIOLATION SUFFICIENTLY SERIOUS: DISCRETION OF COURT TO REFUSE TO SET ASIDE DESPITE VIOLATION''' DMC/SandT/13/04 '''Australia''' '''Dampskibsselskabet Norden A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens/S v Gladstone Civil Pty Ltd''' '''Full Court, J.C. van OvenFederal Court of Australia: Mansfield, F.B.Bakels Rares and WBuchanan JJ: [2013] FCFCA 107, 18 September 2013:[[https://www.Donlinedmc.Hco. Asser, 29 January 2010, Case number 09uk/00505''', published on wwwindex.rechtspraak.nl, LJN: BK2007php/Dampskibsselskabet_Norden_A/S_v_Gladstone_Civil_Pty_Ltd]]
'''ENFORCEMENT IN AUSTRALIA OF FOREIGN ARBITRATION AWARD UNDER VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTER A “SEA CARRIAGE DOCUMENT” FOR THE PURPOSES OF S.11 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1991: WHETHER ARBITRATIONAWARD UNENFORCEABLE BECAUSE NOT MADE IN AUSTRALIA''' DMC/Arbn/13/03 '''Singapore''' '''Maldives Airports Co Ltd & Anor v. GMR Male International Airport Pte Ltd, [2013] SGCA 16: Singapore Court of Appeal: Judgment delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ, Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA and Woo Bih Li J on 6 December 2012:[[https: DUTCH //www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maldives_Airports_v_GMR_Male_International]]''' '''Arbitration: Interim Order for Injunction under Section 12A(4) of International Arbitration Act ("IAA"): Meaning of “asset” under Section 12A(4) IAA: Preservation of contractual rights and choses in action as “assets” under Section 12A(4) of IAA''' DMC/Arbn/13/02 '''Singapore''' '''Astro Nusantara International BV and others v. PT Ayunda Prima Mitra and others [2012] SGHC 157: Singapore High Court: Judgment delivered by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J on 22 October 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Astro_Nusantara_International_&_Others_v_PT_Ayunda_Prima_Mitra_&_Others]]''' '''ARBITRATION: INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRAL AWARD MADE IN SAME TERRITORY AS FORUM IN WHICH RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT SOUGHT: PARTY NOT ENTITLED TO CHALLENGE JURISDICTION OF ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL AT SETTING-ASIDE OR ENFORCEMENT STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS: PARTY WHO FAILS TO CHALLENGE AWARD ON JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO ART. 16 OF MODEL LAWDEEMED TO ACCEPT FINALITY OF AWARD ON JURISDICTION''' DMC/Arbn/13/01 '''England''' '''Chantiers de L’Atlantique SA v Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Flaux J: OBLIGATIONS [2011] EWHC 3383 (Comm): 20 December 2011: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Chantiers_de_L'Atlantique_v_Gaztransport_&_Technigaz]]''' '''ARBITRATION: SETTING ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARD ON GROUND OF FRAUD: EXTENSION OF ARBITRATORS TOWARDS PARTIES TIME GRANTED, GIVEN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE ALLEGATIONS: FRAUD BY TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE OF WINNING PARTY IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGSEVIDENCE TO ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL: DELIBERATE CONCEALMENT OF TECHNICAL TEST RESUTLS: LACK OF CAUSAL LINK BETWEEN NON-DISCLOSURE AND DECISION OF TRIBUNAL'''
DMC/Arbn/12/03
'''Singapore'''
'''Singapore High Court''' '''Daimler South East Asia Pte Ltd v. Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2012] SGHC 157 : Judgment delivered by Woo Bih Li J on 31 July 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Daimler_South_East_Asia_v_Front_Row_Investments_(Singapore)]]''' '''ARBITRATION: WAIVER OF RIGHT OF RECOURSE UNDER ICC RULES OF ARBITRATION (1998): EXCLUSION OF APPEAL ON QUESTION OF LAW ARISING OUT OF ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO SECTION 49(2) ARBITRATION ACT''' DMC/Arbn/12/02 '''Hong Kong''' '''Gao Haiyan v Keeneye Holdings Limited''' Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Tang VP, Fok JA and Sakharani J: CACV No.79 of 2011: 2 December 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gao_Haiyan_v_Keeneye_Holdings_-_Court_of_Appeal]] http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/2011/459.html '''ARBITRATION: ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARD OBTAINED IN CHINA: SETTING ASIDE: CONTRARY TO PUBLIC POLICY: WHETHER AWARD TAINTED BY APPARENT BIAS: MEDIATION CONDUCTED IN COURSE OF ARBITRATION: WAIVER''' DMC/Arbn/12/01 '''England''' '''African Fertilizers and Chemicals NIG Ltd (Nigeria) v BD Shipsnavo GmbH & Co Reederei KG (The Duden“Christian D”): English Commercial Court: Beatson J: [2011] EWHC 2452 (Comm): 29 September 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/African_Fertilisers_v_BD_Shipsnavo,_the_Christian_D]] '''ARBITRATION: JURISDICTION OF COURT: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT: SECTION 66 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996: ARTICLE 34(3) OF REGULATION 44/2001: WHETHER COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO MAKE PURELY DECLARATORY JUDGMENT UNDER SECTION 66: WHETHER SECTION 66 DECLARATORY JUDGMENT WAS A “JUDGMENT” FOR PURPOSE OF ARTICLE 34(3)''' DMC/Arbn/11/12 '''England''' '''TTMI Sarl v Statoil ASA''' '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Beatson J: [2011] EWHC 1150 (Comm): 9 May 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/TTMI_v_Statoil]]''' '''ARBITRATION: JURISDICTION: PROPER PARTY TO CHARTERPARTY: DISPONENT OWNER WRONGLY IDENTIFIED IN RECAP EMAILS: UNDISCLOSED PRINCIPAL: RECTIFICATION: CHARTERPARTY CREATED BY CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES''' DMC/Arbn/11/11 '''England''' '''Sovarex S.A. v. Romero Alvarez S.A.''' '''English High Court; Hamblen J; [2011] EWHC 1661 (Comm), 29 June 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sovarex_v_Romero_Alvarez]]''' '''INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION: QUESTIONS OF FACT CAN BE DETERMINED IN PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 66 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/Arbn/11/10 '''Hong Kong''' '''Democratic Republic of Congo and others v FG Hemisphere Associates LLC''' '''Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal: Bokhary, Chan and Riberio PJJ, Mortimer and Sir Anthony Mason NPJJ: FACV No.5, 6 and 7 of 2010: 8 June 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Democratic_Republic_of_Congo_v_FG_Hemisphere_Associates]]'''
'''Singapore High CourtARBITRATION: Andrew Ang, J.RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN AWARD OBTAINED AGAINST FOREIGN STATE: 9 September 2008STATE IMMUNITY: [2008] SGHC 149Admiralty and ShippingWHETHER FOREIGN STATE CAN CLAIM ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY FROM SUIT IN HONG KONG AFTER 1997: claim for cargo damage under bill of lading incorporating arbitration clause of charterparty but charterparty not identifiedWHETHER EXCEPTION FOR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES: application for Stay of court proceedings in favour of arbitration: claim in Arbitration time barred under Hague-Visby Rules: Whether court should grant stay on condition that time bar be waived: singapore International Arbitration Act s 6(2): Principles underlying court's discretion to grant terms or conditions for stay: Whether justice of the case called for court to impose terms or conditionsWAIVER OF IMMUNITY'''
DMC/Arbn/11/09
'''The “Engedi” [[Sonatrach Petroleum Co (BVI) v Ferrell International ltd]2010]English High Court: Commercial CourtSGHC 95: Colman judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 25 March 2010: October 2001ARBITRATION[2010] SGHC 95''' [[https: SHIPPING: BACK-TO-BACK TIME CHARTERPARTIES: ARBITRATION AND JURISDICTION CLAUSES: FLOATING PROPER LAW CLAUSE: UNCERTAINTY: FORUM SELECTION: SEPARABILITY//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Engedi]]
'''Stellar Shipping Co LLC v Hudson Shipping Lines[[PT Garuda Indonesia vhttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. Birgen Airphp/Stellar_Shipping_v_Hudson_Shipping_Lines]]High Court of Singapore: Woo Bih Li, Judicial Commissioner: Unreported: September 2001Case Note provided by Ang & Partners, International Contributors for SingaporeSEAT OF ARBITRATION – CURIAL LAW – WHETHER INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ACT 1994 OR THE MODEL LAW APPLIES – SERVICE OUT OF JURISDICTION OF ORIGINATING PROCESS UNDER O.69A, R.4 OF THE RULES OF COURT – SUBSTITUTED SERVICE INSIDE SINGAPORE'''
'''English Commercial Court: Hamblen J: [2010] EWHC 2985 (Comm): 18 November 2010''' Available on BAILII @ http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2010/2985.html '''ARBITRATION: CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT CONTAINING GUARANTEE AND ARBITRATION CLAUSE/AGREEMENT: TRIPARTITE CONTRACT: SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION OF ARBITRATORS: SECTION 67 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER THERE WAS A BINDING ARBITRATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN GUARANTORS AND GUARANTEED PARTY''' DMC/Arbn/10/4 '''England''' '''Guangzhou Dockyards Co Ltd v ENE Aegiali I''' '''English Commercial Court: Blair J: [2010] EWHC 2826 (Comm): 5 November 2010 [[Transfield Shipping Inc https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Guangzhou_Dockyards_v_ENE_Aegiali_I]]''' '''ARBITRATION: TRUE CONSTRUCTION OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: WHETHER PARTIES COULD AGREE TO APPEALS TO THE COURT ON QUESTIONS OF FACT: WHETHER PARTIES HAD AGREED TO APPEALS TO THE COURT ON QUESTIONS OF FACT''' DMC/Arbn/10/3 '''England''' '''Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Isthisal Endustri AS v. Sino-Add Sometal SAL''' '''English Commercial Court: Christopher Clarke J: [2010] EWHC 29 (SingaporeComm) : 18 January 2010'''[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Habas_Sinai_v_Sometal]] Available on BAILII @ http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2010/29.html '''ARBITRATION: INCORPORATION OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT/CLAUSE INTO CONTRACT: GENERAL REFERENCE TO PRIOR CONTRACTS BETWEEN SAME PARTIES WHICH INCLUDED ARBITRATION AGREEMENT/CLAUSE: WHETHER WORDS USED SUFFICIENT TO INCORPORATE PRIOR ARBITRATION AGREEMENT/CLAUSE''' DMC/Arbn/10/2 '''Hong Kong''' '''Parakou Shipping Pte Ltdv Jinhui Shipping and Transportation Ltd and others[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Parakou_Shipping_v_Jinhui_Shipping]]High Hong Kong Court of SingaporeFirst Instance: Judith Prakash Reyes J: UnreportedHCAJ No.184 of 2009: 27 August 200130 September 2010'''Case note prepared by Ang & Partners, International Contributors for SingaporeGENCON CHARTERPARTY http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000184_2009- MAREVA INJUNCTION – WHETHER RISK 73172.html '''STRIKING OUT: ABUSE OF DISSIPATION OF ASSETS – WHETHER MATERIAL NONPROCESS: COLLATERAL ATTACK ON PREVIOUS ARBITRATION DECISION: ‘RELATED PARTIES’''' DMC/Arbn/10/1 '''The Netherlands''' '''Mr Van Wassenaer Van Catwijck, also acting in his capacity as the representative of Mr Saarberg and Mr Ariens (hereinafter called “the Arbitrators”) v Knowsley SK Limited, Manchester, United Kingdom (hereinafter called “KSK”)'''[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Arbitrators_v._Knowsley_SK] '''Dutch Supreme Court. D.H. Beukenhorst (chairman), A.M.J. van Buchem-DISCLOSURE – WHETHER STAY Spapens, J.C. van Oven, F.B.Bakels and W.D.H. Asser, 29 January 2010, Case number 09/00505''', published on www.rechtspraak.nl, LJN: BK2007 '''ARBITRATION: DUTCH LAW: OBLIGATIONS OF ACTION ARBITRATORS TOWARDS PARTIES IN FAVOUR OF ARBITRATION – WHETHER ARBITRATION CLAUSE WAS FOR GENERAL AVERAGE ONLYPROCEEDINGS'''