DMC/SandTArbn/23/01 '''England''' '''DHL Project & Chartering Ltd v Gemini Ocean Shipping Co Ltd (The “Newcastle Express”)''' '''English Court of Appeal: Males, Birss and Snowden LJJ: [2022] EWCA Civ 1555: 24 November 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DHL_Project_and_Chartering_v_Gemini_Ocean_Shipping_-_The_Newcastle_Express]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2022/1555.html '''VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTER AND ARBITRATION AGREEMENT THEREIN CONCLUDED: WHETHER ARBITRATOR HAD SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION TO MAKE AWARD: WHETHER “SUBJECT SHIPPER/RECEIVERS APPROVAL” OF THE VESSEL PROVISION IN RECAP A CONDITION PRECEDENT AND SUBJECT TO “APPROVAL NOT TO BE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD” TERM IN INCORPORATED PROFORMA CHARTER: APPLICATION UNDER SECTIONS 67 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/Arbn/2022/04 '''England''' '''ENEMALTA PLC v. THE STANDARD CLUB ASIA LIMITED [2021] EWHC 1215 (COMM)''' '''English Commercial Court (QBD): Judge Pelling QC: 26 April 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/ENEMALTA_PLC_v_Standard_Club_Asia] Judgment available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2021/551.html '''WHETHER THE HIGH COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO DECIDE THE VALIDITY OF A LETTER OF UNDERTAKING ISSUED BY A P&I CLUB - CONTAINING AN ENGLISH HIGH COURT EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSE - IN RESPECT OF THEIR OWNER MEMBERS’ ALLEGED LIABLITY FOR DAMAGE TO A SUBMARINE CABLE, IN CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE THE OWNERS HAD INSTITUTED PROCEEDINGS IN SINGAPORE SEEKING TO ESTABLISH A LIMITATION FUND THERE IN RESPECT OF THE INCIDENT UNDER THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS CONVENTION OF 1976''' DMC/Arbn/22/03 '''England''' '''ARI v WXJ''' '''English Commercial Court: Foxton J: [2022] EWHC 1543 (Comm): 20 June 2022:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/ARI_v_WXJ]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/1543.html '''ARBITRATION: LMAA TERMS: ARBITRATION COMMENCED BY FIRST PARTY GIVING NOTICE NAMING ITS APPOINTED ARBITRATOR (“GGG”): NOTICE GAVE SECOND PARTY 14 DAYS TO APPOINT AND GIVE NOTICE OF ITS ARBITRATOR FAILING WHICH GGG WOULD BE APPOINTED AS SOLE ARBITRATOR: SECOND PARTY RECEIVED CONFIRMATION OF WILLINGNESS OF ARBITRATOR (“JJJ”) TO ACCEPT APPOINTMENT, WITHOUT AGREEMENT ON TERMS OR REMUNERATION, AND GAVE NOTICE TO FIRST PARTY, WITH COPIES TO GGG AND JJJ, STATING JJJ HAD BEEN APPOINTED AS ITS ARBITRATOR: WHETHER APPOINTMENT OF JJJ AND NOTICE THEREOF WAS VALID TO CONSTITUTE TRIBUNAL WITHIN 14-DAY TIME LIMIT''' DMC/Arbn/22/02 '''England''' '''Ducat Maritime Ltd v Lavender Shipmanagement Inc (The “Majestic”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Butcher J: [2022] EWHC 766 (Comm): 14 March 2022: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ducat_Maritime_v_Lavender_Shipmanagement_-_The_Majestic]] Judgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/766.html '''ARBITRATION: LMAA SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE 2017: FINAL AWARD MADE IN OWNERS’ FAVOUR FOR USD37,831.83: ARBITRATOR SHOULD HAVE AWARDED USD28,277.91: ARBITRATOR ADDED VALUE OF CHARTERERS’ COUNTERCLAIM TO OWNERS’ CLAIM BY MISTAKE: ARBITRATOR TWICE REFUSED APPLICATIONS TO CORRECT AWARD UNDER SECTION 57 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996: APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 68 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996 TO SET ASIDE PART OF AWARD FOR SERIOUS IRREGULARITY''' DMC/Arbn/22/01 '''England''' '''NWA & Anor v NVF & Ors [2021] EWHC 2666 (Comm)''' Between (1) NWA (2) FSY and (1) NVF (2) RWX (3) KLB '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Calver J.: 8 October 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NWA_and_Anor_v_NVF_&_Ors]] '''CONTRACTUAL TERM: DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE: ARBITRATION CLAUSE REQUIRING MEDIATION BEFORE ARBITRATION: MEDIATION NEVER TOOK PLACE: REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION: AWARD ISSUED CONFIRMING TRIBUNAL’S JURISDICTION: CHALLENGE TO AWARD UNDER SECTION 67(1)(a) ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MEDIATION PROVISION VITIATED SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION OF THE TRIBUNAL: WHETHER THAT NON-COMPLIANCE ONLY AFFECTED ADMISSIBILITY OF THE CLAIM''' DMC/Arbn/21/08 '''Hong Kong''' '''W v AW [2021] HKCFI 1707''' '''High Court of Hong Kong: Justice Mimmie Chan: Date of Hearing: 22 March 2021: Date of Decision: 17 June 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/W_v_AW]]''' Judgment available on HKLII @ https://www.hklii.hk/cgi-bin/sinodisp/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2021/1707.html?stem=&synonyms=&query=title(%222021%20HKCFI%201707%22) '''ARBITRATION: ISSUE ESTOPPEL: TWO ARBITRATIONS BETWEEN THE SAME PARTIES ON THE SAME ISSUES WITH DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS: WHETHER SECOND AWARD SHOULD BE SET ASIDE: APPARENT BIAS: WHETHER SECURITY SHOULD BE ORDERED''' DMC/Arbn/2021/07 '''Singapore''' '''CAI v CAJ & CAK''' '''Singapore High Court: S Mohan JC: [2021] SGHC 21: 29 January 2021:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CAI_v_CAJ_&_CAK]]''' '''CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATION AWARD: EXTENSION OF TIME (EOT) DEFENCE: NATURAL JUSTICE: PROPER ARBITRATION PROCEDURES: MODEL LAW ARTICLE 18: ICC RULES ARTICLE 23(4): DOCTRINE OF APPROBATION AND REPROBATION''' DMC/Arbn/21/06 '''England''' '''Ulusoy Denizilik A.S. v COFCO Global Harvest (Zhangjiagang) Trading Co. Ltd (The "Ulusoy-11") '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Mr Justice Bryan: [2020] EWHC 3645 (Comm): 28 August 2020:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Ulusoy_Denizilik_v_COFCO_Global_Harvest_(Zhangjiagang)_Trading_-_The_Ulusoy_11]] '''ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION: BILLS OF LADING EXPRESSLY INCORPORATING CHARTERPARTY LAW AND ARBITRATION CLAUSE: APPLICABLE LAW GOVERNING ISSUE OF INCORPORATION: IDENTITY OF GOVERNING CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER LAW AND ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED INTO BILLS OF LADING: BILL OF LADING HOLDERS BRING CARGO CLAIM IN PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (“PRC”): WHETHER THIS A BREACH OF LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE: WHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION: ROME I REGULATION (REGULATION (EC) NO 593/2008), ARTICLE 10(1), (2).''' DMC/Arbn/21/05 '''England''' '''Republic of Sierra Leone v SL Mining Limited [2021] EWHC 286 Comm, 15 February 2021''' '''In the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court: Sir Michael Burton GBE, Sitting as Judge of the High Court:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Republic_of_Sierra_Leone_v_SL_Mining_Limited]]''' '''CONTRACTUAL DISPUTE BETWEEN PARTIES: MULTI-TIER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISION: PARTIES TO FILE FOR ARBITRATION IF NO AMICABLE SETTLEMENT REACHED WITHIN 3 MONTHS: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MULTI-TIER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISION: WHETHER NON-COMPLIANCE VITIATED TRIBUNAL’S JURISDICTION: WHETHER NON-COMPLIANCE A MATTER OF ADMISSIBILITY: CHALLENGING AN AWARD UNDER SECTION 67 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/Arbn/21/04 '''England''' '''Lavender Shipmanagement Inc v Ibrahima Sory Affrètement Trading SA and Others (The “Majesty”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Mr Justice Calver: [2020] EWHC 3462 (Comm) – 16December 2020: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Lavender_Shipmanagement_v_Ibrahima_Sory_Affretement_Trading_&_Ors_the_MV_Majesty]] '''LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: APPLICATIONS UNDER S67 AND S69 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/Arbn/21/03 '''Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lord Justices Reed, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones, Lady Justices Black and Arden: [2020] UKSC 48:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Halliburton_Company_v_Chubb_Bermuda_Insurance]] '''INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: IMPARTIALITY: LEGAL DUTY OF ARBITRATOR TO MAKE DISCLOSURE: MULTIPLE APPOINTMENTS IN DIFFERENT REFERENCES RELATING TO OVERLAPPING SUBJECT MATTER BUT INVOLVING A COMMON PARTY: WHETHER FAILURE TO DISCLOSE IS RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT OF APPARENT BIAS: WHETHER DUTY TO DISCLOSE OVERRIDES DUTY OF PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY: WHERE CONSENT TO DISCLOSURE MAY BE INFERRED: RECOGNITION OF SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARITIME AND OTHER INDUSTRY SPECIFIC ARBITRATION''' DMC/Arbn/21/02 '''Singapore'''_ '''Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd v Avant Garde Maritime Services (Private) Limited:''' '''Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore [2019] SGCA 33, 9 May 2019: Decision of the Court of Appeal (delivered by Judge of Appeal Judith Prakash): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Rakna_Arakshaka_Lanka_Ltd_v_Avant_Garde_Maritime_Services_(Private)_Limited]]''' '''PARTY DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS AGAINST IT: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING) SIGNED BY BOTH PARTIES: TRIBUNAL PROCEEDED WITH ARBITRATION DESPITE MOU: FINAL AWARD AGAINST PARTY: WHETHER NON-PARTICIPATING PARTY ENTITLED TO SET ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARD ON THE GROUNDS THAT TRIBUNAL HAD NO JURISDICTION''' DMC/Arbn/21/01 '''England''' '''MVV Environment Devonport Ltd v NTO Shipping GMBH & Co KG MV Nortrader [2020] EWHC 1371 (Comm); Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Judge Pelling QC; 6 June 2020:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MVV_Environment_Devonport_v_NTO_Shipping_The_MV_Nortrader]] '''CHALLENGE TO JURISDICTION OF ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL: CLAIMANT NAMED AS SHIPPER IN BILL OF LADING INCORPORATING CHARTERPARTY ARBITRATION CLAUSE: WHETHER CLAIMANT WRONGLY NAMED AS SHIPPER IN BILL OF LADING PREPARED BY AGENT: WHETHER AGENT HAD EXPRESS OR IMPLIED ACTUAL AUTHORITY OR OSTENSIBLE AUTHORITY TO ACT FOR CLAIMANT: EFFECT OF CLAIMANT’S SILENCE''' DMC/Arbn/19/02 '''England''' '''Sea Master Shipping Inc v Arab Bank (Switzerland) Limited''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J.: 25 July 2018: [2018] EWHC 1902 (Comm):'''Sum[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sea_Master_Shipping_v_Arab_Bank_(Switzerland)]]''' '''CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATORS’ JURISDICTION UNDER S.67 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER BILL OF LADING HOLDER BOUND BY ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED INTO THE BILL OF LADING: WHETHER STATUS OF LAWFUL HOLDER UNDER S.2 OF CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT (1992) SUFFICIENT: WHETHER IN ADDITION, HOLDER MUST HAVE ASSUMED LIABILITIES UNDER S.3 OF THAT ACT''' DMC/Arbn/19/01 '''England''' '''Sonact Group Ltd v Premuda SpA (The “Four Island”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Males J: [2018] EWHC 3820 (Comm): 12 December 2018: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sonact_Group_Ltd_v_Premuda_SpA_-_The_Four_Island]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: ASBATANKVOY FORM: DEMURRAGE & HEATING COSTS CLAIM: SETTLEMENT AGREED BY EMAIL WHICH DID NOT REFER TO ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN CHARTER: WHETHER ARBITRATORS HAD JURISDICTION TO DETERMINE CLAIM FOR THE AGREED SETTLEMENT SUM: CHALLENGE PURSUANT TO SECTION 67 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/Arbn/16/01 '''England''' '''Shagang South-Asia Trading Co Ltd v Daewoo Logistics''' '''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Mr Justice Hamblen; [2015] EWHC 194 (Comm); 5 February 2015: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Shagang_South-East_Asia_Trading_v_Daewoo_Logistics]] '''ARBITRATION: WHETHER THERE WERE CLEAR INDICATORS THAT THE CURIAL LAW WAS NOT THE LAW OF THE VENUE OF THE ARBITRATION: WHETHER THE ARBITRATOR WAS VALIDLY APPOINTED''' DMC/Arbn/15/02 '''Singapore''' '''Coal & Oil Co LLC v GHCL Ltd''' DMC/Arbn/15/01 '''England''' '''Transgrain Shipping BV v Deiulemar Shipping SpA and Eleni Shipping Ltd (The “Eleni P”)''' '''Commercial Court: Teare J: [2014] EWHC 4202 (Comm): 15 December 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Transgrain_Shipping_v_Deiulemar_Shipping_and_Eleni_Shipping_-_The_Eleni_P]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY: PARTIALLY CONFLICTING ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS: BESPOKE ARBITRATION CLAUSE AND STANDARD BIMCO ARBITRATION CLAUSES: CHALLENGE TO TRIBUNAL’S JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 67 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS: PROPER CONSTITUTION OF TRIBUNAL''' DMC/Arbn/14/07 '''England''' '''Viscous Global Investment Ltd v Palladium Navigation Corp (The “Quest”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Males J: [2014] EWHC 2654 (Comm): 30 July 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Viscous_Global_Investment_v_Palladium_Navigation_-_The_Quest]] '''ARBITRATION: BILLS OF LADING (“BLS”): P&I CLUB LETTER OF UNDERTAKING (“LOU”): WHETHER ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN LOU REPLACED ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN BLS: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 32 APPLICATION''' DMC/Arbn/14/06 '''England''' '''Emirates Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports Private Limited''' '''English High Court: Teare J.: [2014] EWHC 2104 (Comm): 1 July 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Emirates_Trading_v_Prime_Mineral_Exports]] '''CONTRACT: DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE REQUIRING PARTIES TO TRY TO RESOLVE DISPUTES BY FRIENDLY DISCUSSION WITHIN A CONTINUOUS PERIOD OF FOUR WEEKS BEFORE RESORTING TO ARBITRATION: WHETHER ARBITRATORS LACKED JURISDICTION BECAUSE THIS PROVISION NOT COMPLIED WITH: WHETHER PROVISION UNENFORCEABLE AS UNCERTAIN: WHETHER PROVISION HAD BEEN COMPLIED WITH''' DMC/Arbn/14/05 '''England''' '''Caresse Navigation Ltd v Office National de l’Electricité (the "Channel Ranger"): [2013] EWHC 3081 (Comm): Males J.: 14 October 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Caresse_Navigation_v_Office_National_de_l'Electricité_-_the_Channel_Ranger]]''' '''BILL OF LADING: WHETHER WORDS OF INCORPORATION REFERRING TO ARBITRATION ARE SUFFICIENT TO INCORPORATE CHARTERPARTY JURISDICTION PROVISIONS''' DMC/Arbn/14/04 '''England''' '''Cottonex Anstalt v Patriot Spinning Mills Ltd [2014] EWHC 236 (Comm)''' '''English High Court: Hamblen J.: 14 February 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cottonex_Anstalt_v_Patriot_Spinning_Mills]] '''SALE AND PURCHASE: WHETHER CONTRACT INCORPORATED ALL TERMS OF THE BY-LAWS AND RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL COTTON ASSOCIATION OR ONLY THE ARBITRATION PROVISIONS: GUIDANCE ON THE INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACTS ON APPEAL FROM AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL WITH EXPERIENCE OF THE RELEVANT TRADE''' DMC/Arbn/14/03 '''England''' '''Beijing Jianlong Heavy Industry Group v Golden Ocean Group Ltd and Others''' '''English Commercial Court: HHJ Mackie QC: [2013] EWHC 1063 (Comm): 1 May 2013: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Beijing_Jianlong_Heavy_Industry_Group_v_Golden_Ocean_Group]] '''ARBITRATION: SECTION 67 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996: APPEAL AGAINST SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION OF TRIBUNALS: GUARANTEES ALLEGEDLY ILLEGAL AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER CHINESE LAW: VALIDITY OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS: PUBLIC POLICY''' DMC/Arbn/14/02
'''The Netherlands'''
'''Mr Van Wassenaer Van CatwijckTransport and Maritime Arbitration Rotterdam-Amsterdam ("Tamara") Arbitration''' '''Anonymous, also acting in his capacity as the representative Procedural Order of Mr Saarberg a Tamara arbitration tribunal, 10 December 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Tamara_Arbitration]]''' '''ARBITRATION UNDER TAMARA RULES: WHAT THE LANGUAGE OF THE ARBITRATION SHOULD BE FAILING A CHOICE PREVIOUSLY MADE BY THE PARTIES''' DMC/Arbn/14/01 '''England''' '''AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v. Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC''' '''Supreme Court; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Toulson SCJJ; [2013] UKSC 35, 12 June 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/AES_Ust-Kamenogorsk_Hydropower__Plant_LLP_v_Ust-KamenogorsK_Hydropower_Plant_JSC]] '''WHETHER POWER TO INJUNCT COURT PROCEEDINGS IS MERELY ANCILLARY TO CURRENT OR INTENDED ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: WHETHER S.44 ARBITRATION ACT 1996 LIMITS THE COURT’S INJUNCTIVE POWERS UNDER S.37 SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981''' DMC/Arbn/13/06 '''England''' '''Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC (and Mr Ariens others) v Blue Skye Special Opportunities Fund LLP (hereinafter called “the Arbitrators”and others) v Knowsley SK Limited''' '''English Court of Appeal; Pill, ManchesterToulson, United Kingdom Tomlinson LJJ; [2013] EWCA Civ 367; 31 January 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fortress_Valley_Recovery__Fund_v_Blue_Skye_Special_Opportunities_Fund]] '''ARBITRATION CLAUSE: THIRD PARTIES: CONTRACTS (RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES) ACT 1999, SS 8(1) & 8(2)''' DMC/Arbn/13/05 '''Hong Kong''' '''Grand Pacific Holdings Ltd and Pacific China Holdings Ltd (in liq) (hereinafter called “KSK”No 1)''' '''Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Tang VP, Kwan and Fok JJA: CACV No.136 of 2011, [2012] 4 HKLRD 1: 9 May 2012:[[httphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Arbitrators_v._Knowsley_SKGrand_Pacific_Holdings_v_Pacific_China_Holdings]]'''
http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/2012/200.html '''Dutch Supreme CourtARBITRATION: APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARD: ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTS. D.H. Beukenhorst 34(2)(A)(II) AND (chairmanIV), UNCITRAL MODEL LAW: AWARD TO BE SET ASIDE ONLY IF VIOLATION SUFFICIENTLY SERIOUS: DISCRETION OF COURT TO REFUSE TO SET ASIDE DESPITE VIOLATION''' DMC/SandT/13/04 '''Australia''' '''Dampskibsselskabet Norden A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens/S v Gladstone Civil Pty Ltd''' '''Full Court, J.C. van OvenFederal Court of Australia: Mansfield, F.B.Bakels Rares and WBuchanan JJ: [2013] FCFCA 107, 18 September 2013:[[https://www.Donlinedmc.Hco. Asser, 29 January 2010, Case number 09uk/00505''', published on wwwindex.rechtspraak.nl, LJN: BK2007php/Dampskibsselskabet_Norden_A/S_v_Gladstone_Civil_Pty_Ltd]]
'''ENFORCEMENT IN AUSTRALIA OF FOREIGN ARBITRATION AWARD UNDER VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTER A “SEA CARRIAGE DOCUMENT” FOR THE PURPOSES OF S.11 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1991: WHETHER ARBITRATION AWARD UNENFORCEABLE BECAUSE NOT MADE IN AUSTRALIA''' DMC/Arbn/13/03 '''Singapore''' '''Maldives Airports Co Ltd & Anor v. GMR Male International Airport Pte Ltd, [2013] SGCA 16: Singapore Court of Appeal: Judgment delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ, Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA and Woo Bih Li J on 6 December 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maldives_Airports_v_GMR_Male_International]]''' '''Arbitration: Interim Order for Injunction under Section 12A(4) of International Arbitration Act ("IAA"): Meaning of “asset” under Section 12A(4) IAA: Preservation of contractual rights and choses in action as “assets” under Section 12A(4) of IAA''' DMC/Arbn/13/02 '''Singapore''' '''Astro Nusantara International BV and others v. PT Ayunda Prima Mitra and others [2012] SGHC 157: Singapore High Court: Judgment delivered by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J on 22 October 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Astro_Nusantara_International_&_Others_v_PT_Ayunda_Prima_Mitra_&_Others]]''' '''ARBITRATION: DUTCH INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRAL AWARD MADE IN SAME TERRITORY AS FORUM IN WHICH RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT SOUGHT: PARTY NOT ENTITLED TO CHALLENGE JURISDICTION OF ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL AT SETTING-ASIDE OR ENFORCEMENT STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS: PARTY WHO FAILS TO CHALLENGE AWARD ON JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO ART. 16 OF MODEL LAWDEEMED TO ACCEPT FINALITY OF AWARD ON JURISDICTION''' DMC/Arbn/13/01 '''England''' '''Chantiers de L’Atlantique SA v Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Flaux J: [2011] EWHC 3383 (Comm): 20 December 2011: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Chantiers_de_L'Atlantique_v_Gaztransport_&_Technigaz]]''' '''ARBITRATION: SETTING ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARD ON GROUND OF FRAUD: EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED, GIVEN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE ALLEGATIONS: FRAUD BY TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE OF WINNING PARTY IN EVIDENCE TO ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL: DELIBERATE CONCEALMENT OF TECHNICAL TEST RESUTLS: LACK OF CAUSAL LINK BETWEEN NON-DISCLOSURE AND DECISION OF TRIBUNAL''' DMC/Arbn/12/03 '''Singapore''' '''Singapore High Court''' '''Daimler South East Asia Pte Ltd v. Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2012] SGHC 157 : Judgment delivered by Woo Bih Li J on 31 July 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Daimler_South_East_Asia_v_Front_Row_Investments_(Singapore)]]''' '''ARBITRATION: WAIVER OF RIGHT OF RECOURSE UNDER ICC RULES OF ARBITRATION (1998): EXCLUSION OF APPEAL ON QUESTION OF LAW ARISING OUT OF ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO SECTION 49(2) ARBITRATION ACT''' DMC/Arbn/12/02 '''Hong Kong''' '''Gao Haiyan v Keeneye Holdings Limited''' Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Tang VP, Fok JA and Sakharani J: CACV No.79 of 2011: 2 December 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gao_Haiyan_v_Keeneye_Holdings_-_Court_of_Appeal]] http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/2011/459.html '''ARBITRATION: ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARD OBTAINED IN CHINA: SETTING ASIDE: CONTRARY TO PUBLIC POLICY: WHETHER AWARD TAINTED BY APPARENT BIAS: MEDIATION CONDUCTED IN COURSE OF ARBITRATION: WAIVER''' DMC/Arbn/12/01 '''England''' '''African Fertilizers and Chemicals NIG Ltd (Nigeria) v BD Shipsnavo GmbH & Co Reederei KG (The “Christian D”): English Commercial Court: Beatson J: [2011] EWHC 2452 (Comm): 29 September 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/African_Fertilisers_v_BD_Shipsnavo,_the_Christian_D]] '''ARBITRATION: JURISDICTION OF COURT: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT: SECTION 66 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996: ARTICLE 34(3) OF REGULATION 44/2001: WHETHER COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO MAKE PURELY DECLARATORY JUDGMENT UNDER SECTION 66: WHETHER SECTION 66 DECLARATORY JUDGMENT WAS A “JUDGMENT” FOR PURPOSE OF ARTICLE 34(3)''' DMC/Arbn/11/12 '''England''' '''TTMI Sarl v Statoil ASA''' '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Beatson J: OBLIGATIONS [2011] EWHC 1150 (Comm): 9 May 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/TTMI_v_Statoil]]''' '''ARBITRATION: JURISDICTION: PROPER PARTY TO CHARTERPARTY: DISPONENT OWNER WRONGLY IDENTIFIED IN RECAP EMAILS: UNDISCLOSED PRINCIPAL: RECTIFICATION: CHARTERPARTY CREATED BY CONDUCT OF ARBITRATORS TOWARDS THE PARTIES ''' DMC/Arbn/11/11 '''England''' '''Sovarex S.A. v. Romero Alvarez S.A.''' '''English High Court; Hamblen J; [2011] EWHC 1661 (Comm), 29 June 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sovarex_v_Romero_Alvarez]]''' '''INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION: QUESTIONS OF FACT CAN BE DETERMINED IN PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 66 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996''' DMC/Arbn/11/10 '''Hong Kong''' '''Democratic Republic of Congo and others v FG Hemisphere Associates LLC''' '''Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal: Bokhary, Chan and Riberio PJJ, Mortimer and Sir Anthony Mason NPJJ: FACV No.5, 6 and 7 of 2010: 8 June 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Democratic_Republic_of_Congo_v_FG_Hemisphere_Associates]]''' '''ARBITRATION: RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN AWARD OBTAINED AGAINST FOREIGN STATE: STATE IMMUNITY: WHETHER FOREIGN STATE CAN CLAIM ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY FROM SUIT IN HONG KONG AFTER 1997: WHETHER EXCEPTION FOR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES: WAIVER OF IMMUNITY''' DMC/Arbn/11/09 '''England''' AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v. Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC '''English Court of Appeal (Civil Division); Rix, Wilson, & Stanley Burnton LJJ; [2011] EWCA Civ 647, 27 May 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/AES_Ust-Kamenogorsk_Hydropower_Plant_LLP_v_Ust-Kamenogorsk_Hydropower_Plant_JSC]]''' '''INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION: BASIS FOR SERVICE OUT OF JURISDICTION: EFFECT OF CIVIL JURISDICTION AND JUDGMENTS ACT 1982: PARTICIPATION IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGSUNDER PROTEST NOT SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION''' DMC/Arbn/11/08 '''England''' '''JSC BTA Bank v. Mukhtar Ablyazov & Ors''' '''English High Court; Clarke J; [2011] EWHC 587 (Comm), 28 March 2011;[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/JCT_BTA_Bank_v_Mukhtar_Ablyazov_&_Ors]]''' '''INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: STAY OF COURT PROCEEDINGS: AGREEMENT NULL AND VOID: SEPARABILITY: CASE MANAGEMENT GROUNDS''' DMC/Arbn/11/07 '''Hong Kong''' '''Gao Haiyan v Keeneye Holdings Ltd''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J in Chambers: HCCT No.41 of 2010: 12 April 2011: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gao_Haiyan_v_Keeneye_Holdings]]''' '''ARBITRATION: ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARD OBTAINED IN CHINA: SETTING ASIDE: CONTRARY TO PUBLIC POLICY: AWARD TAINTED BY ACTUAL OR APPARENT BIAS: MEDIATION CONDUCTED IN COURSE OF ARBITRATION: “MED-ARB”: ESTOPPEL''' DMC/Arbn/11/06 '''England''' '''B v S''' English High Court: Flaux J.: [2011] EWHC 691 (Comm): 23 March 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/B_v_S]] '''COMMODITIES: FOSFA/GAFTA STANDARD FORM CONTRACTS: SCOTT V AVERY CLAUSE: WHETHER RIGHT TO INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF UNDER S.44 ARBITRATION ACT 1996 EXCLUDED'''
SingaporeDMC/Arbn/11/05
[[The Duden]]'''England'''
Singapore '''West Tankers Inc v Allianz SpA, Generali Assicurazione Generali SpA''' '''English High Court: Andrew Ang, Field J.: 9 September 2008: ; [20082011] SGHC 149Admiralty and Shipping: claim for cargo damage under bill of lading incorporating arbitration clause of charterparty but charterparty not identified: application for Stay of court proceedings in favour of arbitration: claim in Arbitration time barred under Hague-Visby Rules: Whether court should grant stay on condition that time bar be waivedEWHC 829 (Comm): singapore International Arbitration Act s 6(2)April 2011: Principles underlying court's discretion to grant terms or conditions for stay[[https: Whether justice of the case called for court to impose terms or conditions//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/West_Tankers_v_Allianz]]
[[New case]]'''ARBITRATION AWARDS: ENFORCEMENT: WHETHER A DECLARATORY AWARD MAY BE ENFORCED UNDER THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996, S.66'''
[[Royal & Sun Alliance v. BAE Systems]]
English High Court: Walker J: [2008] 743 (Comm): 15 April 2008
ARBITRATION: DISPUTE RESOLUTION AGREEMENT GIVING EITHER PARTY THE RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE COURT ON A QUESTION OF LAW ARISING OUT OF THE AWARD: WHETHER THIS SUFFICIENT TO DISPENSE WITH NEED TO OBTAIN LEAVE OF THE COURT UNDER THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996 S.69(2)(B)
[[Fiona Trust and Holding Corporation and Others v Yuri Privalov and Others under name of Premium Nafta Products Ltd (20th Defendant) & Others v. Fili Shipping Co Ltd (14th Claimant) & Others]]English House of Lords: Lords Hoffmann, Hope, Scott, Walker and Brown: [2007] UKHL 40: 17 October 2007TIME CHARTERPARTIES: RESCISSION: EFFECT OF FRAUD AND BRIBERY ON VALIDITY OF JURISDICTION AND ARBITRATION CLAUSES: SHELLTIME 4 FORM, CLAUSE 41: DISPUTES "ARISING OUT OF" COMPARED TO DISPUTES "ARISING UNDER" THE CONTRACT: SEVERABILITY OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996, SECTION 7DMC/ARBn/11/04
[[ASM Shipping Ltd of India v. TTMI Ltd of England]]English Court of Appeal: Sir Anthony Clarke MR, Rix and Longmore LJJ.: [2006] EWCA Civ 1341: 16 October 2006ARBITRATION: AWARD: APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE AWARD ON GROUNDS OF APPARENT BIAS UNDER S.68 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: FAILURE OF APPLICATION: PERMISSION TO APPEAL UNDER S.68.4 REFUSED: WHETHER REFUSAL OF APPEAL A BREACH OF EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, ART.6: WHETHER COURT OF APPEAL HAD RESIDUAL JURISDICTION TO PERMIT APPEAL'''United Kingdom'''
[[(1) Starlight Shipping Co (Marshall Islands) (2) Overseas Marine Enterprises Inc. (Liberia) '''Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v. (1) Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd, Hubei Branch (People’s Republic The Ministry of China (2) International Economic & Trading CorporationReligious Affairs, Wugang Group (People’s Republic Government of China)]]English High Court, Commercial Court: Cooke J.Pakistan: [2007] EWHC 1893 Civ[https: 1 August 2007SHIPPING: CARGO CLAIM BROUGHT BY CARGO INSURERS IN CHINA IN BREACH OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN B/L: ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTIONS: INTER-RELATIONSHIP OF S/www.37(1) SUPREME COURT ACT 1981 ("SCA") AND Sonlinedmc.44 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER REQUIREMENT OF URGENCY UNDER Sco.44(3) MADE OUT: WHETHER ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL "UNABLE FOR THE TIME BEING TO ACT EFFECTIVELY" UNDER Suk/index.44(5): WHETHER DISCRETIONARY ELEMENTS OF S.37 SCA MADE OUTphp/Dallah_Real_Estate_v_Government_of_Pakistan]]
[["C" v "D"]]English Commercial UK Supreme Court: Cooke JLord Hope, Deputy President Lord Saville, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke: [20072010] EWHC 1541 (Comm): 28 June 2007INSURANCE: LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE: NEW YORK GOVERNING LAW CLAUSEUKSC 46: RIGHT TO CHALLENGE A PARTIAL AWARD MADE IN LONDON BY APPLICATION TO NEW YORK COURT3 November 2010'''
[[ASM Shipping Ltd of India v. Bruce Harris & Others (2007)]]English High Court: Andrew Smith J: [2007] EWHC 1513 (Comm); 28 June 2007ARBITRATORS: REMOVAL ON GROUNDS OF APPARENT BIAS UNDER s.24 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: ONE OF THREE ARBITRATORS WITHDREW ON GROUND '''ENFORCEMENT OF APPARENT BIASARBITRAL AWARDS: APPLICATION CHALLENGE TO REMOVE TWO REMAINING ARBITRATORSJURISDICTION: WHETHER REMAINING ARBITRATORS ‘TAINTED’ THIRD PARTY BOUND BY APPARENT BIAS OF OTHER ARBITRATORARBITRATION AGREEMENT: LOSS OF RIGHT TO OBJECT UNDER s.73 ARBITRATION ACT 1996COMPÉTENCE-COMPÉTENCE: MEANING SCOPE OF ‘CONTINUES TO TAKE PART IN THE PROCEEDINGSREVIEW BY ENFORCING COURT'''
[[West Tankers Inc v RAS Riunione Adriatica di Sicurta SpA (The "Front Comor")]]
English House of Lords: Lords Nicholls, Steyn, Hoffmann, Rodger and Mance: [2007] UKHL 4: 21 February 2007
Available on BAILII @ http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2007/4.html
ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTIONS: WHETHER ENGLISH COURT CAN ISSUE ORDER TO DISCONTINUE EC MEMBER STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS: CHARTERPARTY: LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE: INSURERS’ SUBROGATED RIGHTS: EC REGULATION 44/2001, REGS. 1(2)(D), 5(3): SUPREME COURT ACT 1981, S. 37(1)
[[Fiona Trust and Holding Corporation and Others v Yuri Privalov and Others]]English Court of Appeal: Tuckey, Arden and Longmore LJ: [2007] EWCA CIV 20: 24 January 2007TIME CHARTERPARTIES: SHELLTIME 4 FORM, CLAUSE 41: EFFECT OF FRAUD AND BRIBERY ON VALIDITY OF JURISDICTION AND ARBITRATION CLAUSES: "ARISING OUT OF" COMPARED TO "ARISING UNDER": ARBITRATION ACT 1996, SECTIONS 9 AND 72DMC/Arbn/11/03
[[Sea Trade Maritime Corporation v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd (The "Athena")]]'''English Commercial Court: Langley J: [2006] EWHC 2530 (Comm): 18 October 2006Available on BAILII @ http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2006/2530.htmlINSURANCE: WAR RISKS: WAR RISKS MUUTAL INSURANCE ASSOCIATION RULES CONTAINING ARBITRATION CLAUSE: INCORPORATION OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE INTO CONTRACT OF INSURANCE: BROKER AS AGENT FOR INSURED: WHETHER ENGLISH JURISDICTION CLAUSE EXCLUSIVEof Appeal'''
[[Fiona Trust & Holdings Corporation and Others '''National Navigation Co v Privalov and Others]]Endesa Generacion SA (The “Wadi Sudr”)'''English Commercial Courtof Appeal: Morison JWaller, Carnwath and Moore-Bick LJJ: [20062009] EWHC 2583 (Comm)EWCA Civ 1397, [2010] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 193: 20 October 2006Available on BAILII @ http17 December 2009[[https://www.bailiionlinedmc.orgco.uk/ewindex.php/cases/EWHC/Comm/2006/2583.htmlFRAUD: BRIBERY: CHARTERPARTIES: ARBITRATION CLAUSES: ARBITRATORS’ JURISDICTION: RESCISSION: RESTITUTION: VITIATION OF CONTRACTS AND ARBITRATION AGREEMENTSNational_Navigation_v_Endesa]]'''
[[Stena Bulk, as disponent owner of the M/T "Goldmar", Claimant v. Citgo Asphalt Refining Co., as Charterer, Respondent]]United States of America'''CONFLICT OF LAWS: Society of Maritime Arbitrators of New York, Inc.BILL OF LADING: David W. Martowski, Chairman, Manfred W. Arnold and Jack Berg, arbitratorsSPANISH COURT JUDGMENT THAT ARBITRATION CLAUSE NOT INCORPORATED INTO BILL OF LADING: Award Number 3902WHETHER SPANISH COURT JUDGMENT FELL WITHIN ARBITRATION EXCEPTION IN ARTICLE 1(2)(D)OF EC REGULATION 44/2001: November 22, 2005WHETHER OWNERS, NOT A PARTY TO THE CHARTERPARTY BETWEEN DISPONENT OWNERS AND SUBCHARTERERS, COULD RECOGNITION SHOULD BE COMPELLED TO TAKE PART REFUSED IN ENGLISH ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE SUBCHARTER: WHETHER AN AFFILIATE OF THE SUBCHARTERERS, NOT A PARTY CONTRARY TO THE SUBCHARTER, COULD BRING A CLAIM IN SUCH PROCEEDINGSPUBLIC POLICY'''
[[The Owners of Cargo lately laden on board the "Yaoki" v. The Owners of the "Yaoki (The "Yaoki") ]]
High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance: Waung J: Admiralty Action No. 134 of 2005: [2006] HKCFI 411
ADMIRALTY: STAY OF PROCEEDING: BILL OF LADING INCORPORATES CHARTERPARTY TERMS INCLUDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE: CHARTERPARTY NOT IDENTIFIED IN BILL OF LADING: WHETHER THE BILL OF LADING REFERRED TO THE TIME CHARTERPARTY OR THE VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY
[[L J Korbetis v Transgrain Shipping BV (The “Alexia M”)]]English High Court (Queen’s Bench Division): Toulson J: [2005] EWHC 1345 (QB): 17 June 2005LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE: AMENDED CENTROCON FORM: APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR: ARBITRATOR’S JURISDICTION TO HEAR CLAIM: RELIEF FOR LATE COMMENCEMENT OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: ARBITRATION ACT 1996, S.32 AND S.12(3)1: OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE OF NOMINATED ARBITRATOR: COMMUNICATION OF ACCEPTANCE: EFFECT OF TIME BARDMC/Arbn/11/02
[[Stolt-Nielsen SA v. Animalfeeds International Corp.]]United States of America: District Court for the Southern District of New York: District Judge: Jed S. Rakoff: No. 06 Civ. 420 (JSR): 26 June 2006Arbitration: class arbitration: Whether class arbitration permitted where charterparty arbitration clause silent on the point: manifest disregard of the law: federal maritime law: new york state law'''Singapore'''
[[Exfin Shipping (India) Ltd Mumbai v Tolani Shipping Co Ltd Mumbai]]English Commercial '''Singapore High Court: Langley J: [2006] EWHC (Comm): 17 May 2006APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE ARBITRATION AWARD: ARBITRATION ACT 1996, S. 67(1): JURISDICTION OF ARBITRATOR TO HEAR CLAIM: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE: MEANING OF "ANY DISPUTE": WHETHER REFUSAL TO PAY A SUM ADMITTED AS DUE IS A "DISPUTE"'''
[[Bernuth Lines '''Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd v High Seas Shipping Daimler South East Asia Pte Ltd[2010]]SGHC 80: English Singapore High Court; Judgment delivered by Andrew Ang J, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court: Christopher Clarke J.: 15 March 2010; [20052010] EWHC 3020 CommSGHC 80: 21 December 2005ARBITRATION[[https: ARBITRATION ACT 1996, S//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.76(4): SERVICE BY ANY EFFECTIVE MEANS: WHETHER SERVICE BY EMAIL AN "EFFECTIVE MEANS": LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATORS ASSOCIATION’S SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE ("SCP"): CLAIM BELOW US$50,000 BUT COUNTERCLAIM ABOVE US$50,000:WHETHER SCP APPROPRIATEphp/Front_Row_Investments_v_Daimler_South_East_Asia]]'''
[[Hackwood Ltd v Areen Design Services Ltd]]English High Court: Technology Rajah & Construction Court; Mr Justice Field; [2005] EWHC 2322 (TCC); 31 October 2005CONSTRUCTION Contract: what was Tann LLP for the contract?: DID IT CONTAIN arbitration AGREEMENT: pERSON TAKING NO PART IN Arbitration PROCEEDINGS: RIGHTS UNDER S.72 ARBITRATION Act 1996: WHETHER PERSON DEBARRED FROM TAKING PART IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS IF APPLICATION FOR RELIEF UNDER S.72 FAILSPlaintiff, Front Row
[[A.S.M Shipping Ltd of India v T.T.M.I Ltd of England]]English High Court: Commercial Division: Morison J.: [2005] EWHC 2238 (Comm): 19 October 2005Charterparty; Arbitration; Arbitration Act 1996; possibility of bias: section 68; serious irregularity/SUBSTANTIAL INJUSTICE: SERIOUS allegations IN PREVIOUS CASE against witness REGARDING DISCLOSURE: ARBITRATOR’S KNOWLEDGE OF AND INVOLVEMENT IN PREVIOUS CASE; section 24; removal of arbitrator; WHETHER CLAIMANT HAD WAIVED ITS RIGHT TO OBJECT UNDER S.73 Chelliah & Kiang for the Defendant, Daimler
[[Surefire Systems Limited v. Guardian ECL Limited]]English High Court, Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court; Mr Justice Jackson; [2005] EWHC 1860 (TCC); Case No''ARBITRATION: HT-05-183; 18 August 2005ArbitrationRECOURSE AGAINST AWARD: construction: disputes over final account: Arbitration Act 1996: leave to appeal ("LTA"): section 69: questions of law: whether requirements of section met: extensions of time: section 70(3): section 80(5)WHETHER FAILURE TO CONSIDER A PARTY’S SUBMISSIONS ON AN ISSUE CONSTITUTES A BREACH OF NATURAL JUSTICE'''
[[Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v. Impregilo SpA and others]]
English House of Lords: Lords Steyn, Hoffmann, Phillips MR, Scott and Rodger:
[2005] UKHL 43 on appeal from [2003] EWCA Civ 1159, itself on appeal from [2003] 1 All ER (Comm) 22; [2002] EWHC 2435 (Comm)
Arbitration: arbitration Act 1996: currency of award: Award of interest: error of law: whether tribunal exceeded it powers: whether serious irregularity under section 68
[[Pan Liberty Navigation Co Ltd v World Link (HK) Resources Ltd (2005) BCCA 206]]Canada: Court of Appeal of British Columbia: Court Docket: CA032234: Esson, Oppal and Madam Saunders, JJA: 8 April 2005Model Law Article 8: LMAA Award (London): enforcement: arrest of bunkers : identity of respondentDMC/award debtor: jurisdiction of arbitrator: public policy: Whether arbitrator’s jurisdiction exhaustedArbn/11/01
[[Thyssen Canada Limited v Mariana Maritime SA and another]]English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division: Commercial Court: Cooke J.: 23 February 2005: [2005] EWHC 219 (Comm)ARBITRATION: APPEAL UNDER S.68 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER AWARD OBTAINED BY FRAUD OR CONTRARY TO PUBLIC POLICY: WHETHER RIGHT TO OBJECT LOST UNDER S.73(1): TAKING PART IN THE PROCEEDINGS: TIME LIMIT FOR APPEAL UNDER S.70(3): WHETHER GROUNDS FOR EXTENSION UNDER S.80(5)'''Singapore'''
[[Encyclopaedia Universalis S.A. v. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.,]]United States of America: Second Circuit '''Singapore High Court of Appeals: No. 04-0288-cv, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5157: 31 March 2005Arbitration: Enforcement: effect of Procedural irregularities: effect of tribunal exceeding its powers: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention): Federal Arbitration Act'''
'''The “Engedi” [[Vee Networks Limited v Econet Wireless International Ltd2010]]High Court (England), Queen’s Bench DivisionSGHC 95: Colman judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J., 25 March 2010: [20042010] EWHC 2909 (Comm)SGHC 95''' [[https: 14 December 2004Arbitration: Arbitration Act 1996: section 7 – Separability of arbitration agreement: section 30 – competence of tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction: section 67 – challenging the award, substantive jurisdiction: interrelationship of sections 7 and 67//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Engedi]]
[[Cetelem SA v Roust Holdings Ltd]]English High Court'''STAY OF IN REM PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION IN LONDON: Beatson J.: [2004] EWHC 3175 QB: 29 December 2004Arbitration Act 1996 s.44: assistance of Court prior to commencement of arbitration: freezing orders: mandatory injunctionsWHETHER STAY OF PROCEEDINGS OUGHT TO BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 6 OF THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ACT WHERE CURRENT OWNER AND INTERVENER WAS NOT A PARTY TO ARBITRATION AGREEMENT'''
[[World Trade Corporation Ltd v C Czarnikow Sugar Ltd]]
English High Court, Commercial Division: Colman J.: 18 October 2004
ARBITRATION: AWARD: FAILURE TO DEAL WITH ISSUES OF FACT: WHETHER REMEDIABLE UNDER S.57 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER A SERIOUS IRREGULARITY UNDER S. 68
[[Tame Shipping Ltd v Easy Navigation Ltd]]English High Court: Moore-Bick J.: 28 July 2004ARBITRATION: LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATORS SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURES: REASONS PUBLISHED SEPARATELY FROM AWARD ON TERMS NOT TO BE USED IN CHALLENGING AWARD: SERIOUS IRREGULARITY UNDER S.68(2)(d) ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER COURT COULD EXAMINE REASONSDMC/Arbn/10/5
[[The "Hyundai Fortune"]]Singapore Court of Appeal: Chao Hick Tin JA and Tan Lee Meng J: [2004] SGCA 41: 9 September 2004EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSE IN BILL OF LADING REFERRED ALL CLAIMS TO THE SEOUL DISTRICT COURT IN KOREA: ACTION COMMENCED IN SINGAPORE BY CARGO OWNERS FOR DAMAGE TO CARGO: APPLICATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS IN SINGAPORE: FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED WHERE THERE WAS EFFECTIVELY NO DEFENCE TO THE CLAIMEngland
'''Stellar Shipping Co LLC v Hudson Shipping Lines[[Prescott vhttps://www. Northlake Christian School]]United States of America: US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals: Circuit Judge: Edith Honlinedmc. Jones, dissent by Circuit Judge Carl Eco. Stewart: 369 Fuk/index.3d 491 4 May 2004EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT: MEDIATIONphp/Arbitration CLAUSE: HANDWRITTEN AMENDMENT RESERVING PARTIES’ RIGHTS OF APPEAL: Scope of Judicial ReviewStellar_Shipping_v_Hudson_Shipping_Lines]]'''
[[Minermet SPA Milan v Luckyfield Shipping Corporation SA]]'''English Commercial Court: Cooke Hamblen J.: 31 March 2004SHIPPING: CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION CLAUSE: APPOINTMENT OF CLAIMANT’S ARBITRATOR: DEFENDANT’S ARBITRATOR TO BE APPOINTED WITHIN 14 DAYS: NO APPOINTMENT WITHIN THAT PERIOD[2010] EWHC 2985 (Comm): WHETHER CLAIMANT’S ARBITRATOR ENTITLED TO ACT AS SOLE ARBITRATOR18 November 2010'''
[[Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corporation and Hyundai Merchant Marine Co Ltd]]Federal Court of AustraliaAvailable on BAILII @ http: Allsop J//www.: 3 June 2004Dr A Bell, instructed by Middletons, for AlkimosMr G Nell, instructed by Sparke Helmore, for HyundaiSHIPPING: CHARTERPARTY: CARGO CLAIMS: ARBITRATION CLAUSE: EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION AGREEMENT: APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CLAIMS IN FEDERAL COURT CONTRARY TO EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION AGREEMENT: SCOPE OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE: STAY OF PROCEEDINGS: FUTILITY: RISK OF DIFFERENT COURTS REACHING INCONSISTENT FINDINGS ON SAME ISSUES: INCONVENIENCE TO THIRD PARTIESbailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2010/2985.html
[[The Department of Economic Policy and Development of the City of Moscow and another v Bankers Trust Company and International Industrial Bank]]English Court of Appeal'''ARBITRATION: Sir Andrew Morritt VC, Mance and Carnwath LJJ.: 25 March 2004CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT CONTAINING GUARANTEE AND ARBITRATIONCLAUSE/AGREEMENT: APPLICATIONS TO THE COURTTRIPARTITE CONTRACT: PRIVACY SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION OF HEARINGS: CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES 62.10ARBITRATORS: SUPERVISORY ROLE SECTION 67 OF COURTTHE ARBITRATION ACT 1996: PUBLIC INTEREST: PUBLICATION OF JUDGMENTSWHETHER THERE WAS A BINDING ARBITRATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN GUARANTORS AND GUARANTEED PARTY'''
[[The "HYUNDAI FORTUNE"]]
Singapore High Court: Belinda Ang J: [2004] SGHC 45: 1 March 2004
CONFLICT OF LAWS: ADMIRALTY ACTION IN SINGAPORE: JURISDICTION CLAUSE IN BILL OF LADING: WHETHER TO STAY SINGAPORE ACTION FOR KOREA
[[Usinor Steel Corp. v. MDMC/Arbn/10/V Koningsborg]]United States District Court for the Southern District of New York: District Judge: Alvin K. Hellerstein.:No. 03 Civ. 4301; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1615; 4 February 2004arbitration: charter party: arbitration clause: Whether mandatory or permissive: federal policy: final order
[[Jurong Engineering Ltd v. Black & Veatch Singapore Pte Ltd]]Singapore High Court: Lai Kew Chai J: 26 November 2003: [2003] SGHC 292ARBITRATION: CONSTRUCTION OF AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE: ARBITRATION CLAUSE MADE GENERAL REFERENCE TO RULES PROMULGATED BY THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE: ARBITRATION WAS A DOMESTIC ARBITRATION:- ARBITRATION COMMENCED UNDER SIAC DOMESTIC ARBITRATION RULES: SIAC DOMESTIC ARBITRATION RULES NOT IN EXISTENCE AT THE TIME OF CONTRACT WHILST SIAC ARBITRATION RULES (WHICH GOVERNS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION) IN EXISTENCE AT THE TIME OF CONTRACT:- WHETHER SIAC DOMESTIC ARBITRATION RULES OR SIAC ARBITRATION RULES SHOULD APPLY'''England'''
[[Hawk Shipping '''Guangzhou Dockyards Co Ltd v Cron Navigation Ltd]]English Commercial Court: Toulson J.: 11 July 2003ARBITRATION: TIMECHARTER: WRONGFUL WITHDRAWAL: CALCULATION OF LOSS: availability of alternative vesselENE Aegiali I'''
[[ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd]]Singapore High '''English Commercial Court: Judith Prakash Blair J: unreported: 8 May 2003[2010] EWHC 2826 (Comm)ARBITRATION: APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE AWARD UNDER ARTICLE 34 OF THE MODEL LAW5 November 2010 [[https: WHETHER APPLICANT MAY ADD NEW GROUNDS FOR SETTING ASIDE AFTER EXPIRY OF THREE MONTHS//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Guangzhou_Dockyards_v_ENE_Aegiali_I]]'''
[[Astra Oil Company, Inc. v. Rover Navigation, Ltd.]]United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit'''ARBITRATION: Jacobs and Sotomayor, JudgesTRUE CONSTRUCTION OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: No. 02-9388WHETHER PARTIES COULD AGREE TO APPEALS TO THE COURT ON QUESTIONS OF FACT: 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19670 (2d Cir. September 2003) (not yet officially reported): 22 September 2003Shipping: Charter party: Arbitration: When May A Non-Party Compel Arbitration?WHETHER PARTIES HAD AGREED TO APPEALS TO THE COURT ON QUESTIONS OF FACT'''
[[Duferco International Steel Trading v. T. Klaveness Shipping A/S]]
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit: Judges Feinberg, Cardamone, and Sack: 333 F.3d 383: June 24 2003
time charter: voyage charter: safe-berth warranty: indemnity Arbitration: Manifest disregard of the law: arbitration award: vacatur/set aside: vouching-in: collateral estoppel: plausible reading of the award: whether should also be ‘probable’
[[Welex AG v Rosa Maritime Limited]]English Court of Appeal: Brooke, May and Tuckey LJJ.: DMC/Arbn/10/3 July 2003VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: BILLS OF LADING ON CONGENBILL FORM: WHETHER CHARTERPARTY LAW AND JURISDICTION CLAUSE INCORPORATED: SPECIFIC WORDS OF INCORPORATION: WHETHER CHARTERPARTY EXISTED
[[Siboti K/S v BP France SA]]English Commercial Court: Gross J.: 11 June 2003VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: BILLS OF LADING TO INCORPORATE EXCLUSIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE OF CHARTERPARTY: ONLY GENERAL WORDS OF INCORPORATION IN BILLS OF LADING: CONSTRUCTION OF BILLS OF LADING: IRRELEVANCE OF CHARTERPARTY: ABSENCE OF CLEAR INTENTION TO INCORPORATE CHARTERPARTY DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE'''England'''
[[BLCT (13096) Ltd '''Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Isthisal Endustri AS v J Sainsbury Plc]]English Court of Appeal: Lady Justice Arden, Lord Justice Longmore: [2003] EWCA Civ 884: 30 June 2003Appeal from arbitration: Arbitration Act 1996, section 69: application for leave to appeal the award under s.69(5): no oral hearing under s.69(5): refusal to grant an oral hearing: leave to appeal refused under s.69(6): Court of AppealSometal SAL'''s jurisdiction to give leave: Residual jurisdiction: right to a fair trial, Art. 6(1), European Convention on Human Rights: whether limitation on rights of appeal under Arbitration Act 1996 S.69(6) inconsistent with Art. 6: Whether Art. 6 required an oral hearing of appeal application
[[Internaut Shipping GmbH and Sphinx Navigation Ltd (Liberia) v Fercometal SARL (‘The Elikon’)]]'''English Commercial Court of Appeal: Lord Justices Mummery, Sedley, RixChristopher Clarke J: [20032010] EWCA Civ. 812EWHC 29 (Comm): 17 June 200318 January 2010'''Arbitration[[https: Arbitration Acts 1950, 1979: demurrage claim under a voyage charterparty: whether the registered or the disponent owner, or both, was a party to the charter: whether an arbitral reference by the "owner" was valid and subsisting//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Habas_Sinai_v_Sometal]]
[[Glyphics Media, Inc. v. M.V. Conti Singapore, and others]]United States District Court, Southern District of New York: Hon. Naomi Reice BuchwaldAvailable on BAILII @ http: Docket No//www. 02 Civbailii. 4398 (NRB): March 21, 2003org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2010/29.BILL OF LADING: FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE: CARRIER: AGENCYhtml
[[Associated Electric and Gas Insurance Services Limited v European Reinsurance Company of Zurich]]English Privy Council: Lords Bingham, Hobhouse, Hoffmann and Millett and Sir Christopher Staughton'''ARBITRATION: 29 January 2003INCORPORATION OF ARBITRATIONAGREEMENT/CLAUSE INTO CONTRACT: TWO ARBITRATIONS GENERAL REFERENCE TO PRIOR CONTRACTS BETWEEN SAME PARTIES: CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE IN FIRST WHICH INCLUDED ARBITRATION AGREEMENT/CLAUSE: WHETHER CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE PREVENTED REFERENCE WORDS USED SUFFICIENT TO FIRST ARBITRATION IN SECOND INCORPORATE PRIOR ARBITRATIONAGREEMENT/CLAUSE'''
[[Newspeed International Limited v. Citus Trading Pte Ltd]]
High Court of Singapore: Woo Bih Li JC: 4 June 2001
ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN AWARD UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ACT (CAP. 143A): WHETHER RESPONDENT UNABLE TO PRESENT ITS CASE IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
[[Aceros Prefabricados, S.A. v. TradeArbed, Inc.]]Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; Miner, Calabresi and Cabranes; 282 F.3d 92 (2d Cir. 2002); February 13, 2002.confirmation: arbitration: material alteration: arbitration clause: arbitration provision: motion to stay: burden of proofDMC/Arbn/10/2
[[Welex AG v. Rosa Maritime Limited ]]English Commercial Court: David Steel J.: April 2002 CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE: BILL OF LADING: CONGENBILL FORM: INCORPORATING ARBITRATION CLAUSE FROM RECAP TELEX: RECAP TELEX AS CHARTERPARTY'''Hong Kong'''
[[North Range '''Parakou Shipping Limited Pte Ltd v Seatrans Jinhui Shipping Corporationand Transportation Ltd and others[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Parakou_Shipping_v_Jinhui_Shipping]]English Court of Appeal: Peter Gibson, Aldous, Tuckey LJJ: March 2002 ARBITRATION: SHIPPING: ARBITRATI0N ACT 1996: REFUSAL OF LEAVE TO APPEAL: GIVING REASONS: EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL: JURISDICTION TO HEAR APPEALS FROM REFUSAL TO GIVE LEAVE TO APPEAL: RESIDUAL JURISDICTION IN CASES OF MISCONDUCT OR UNFAIRNESS
[[PT Garuda Indonesia v Birgen Air]]Singapore Hong Kong Court of AppealFirst Instance: [2002] 1 SLR 393WHETHER AGREEMENT TO CHANGE SEAT OF ARBITRATIONReyes J: WHETHER INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ACT 1994 OR THE MODEL LAW APPLIESHCAJ No.184 of 2009: SERVICE OUT OF JURISDICTION OF ORIGINATING PROCESS UNDER O.69A, R.4 OF THE RULES OF COURTThis case note has been supplied by Ang and Partners, the International Contributors for Singapore30 September 2010'''
[[Sonatrach Petroleum Co (BVI) v Ferrell International ltd]]English High Courthttp: Commercial Court: Colman J: October 2001ARBITRATION: SHIPPING: BACK-TO//www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000184_2009-BACK TIME CHARTERPARTIES: ARBITRATION AND JURISDICTION CLAUSES: FLOATING PROPER LAW CLAUSE: UNCERTAINTY: FORUM SELECTION: SEPARABILITY73172.html
[[BFC Aircraft Sales and Leasing Ltd v. The AGES Group]]English High Court'''STRIKING OUT: Morison J.: December 2001CONFLICT OF LAWS: JURISDICTION: FORUM NON CONVENIENS: AIRCRAFT BROKERS: CONSULTANT CONTRACT: CHOICE ABUSE OF ENGLISH LAWPROCESS: AIRCRAFT LEASES SUBJECT TO FLORIDA LAWCOLLATERAL ATTACK ON PREVIOUS ARBITRATION DECISION: INTENTION OF THE PARTIES‘RELATED PARTIES’'''
[[Michael S Evryalos Maritime Ltd v. China Pacific Insurance Co Ltd - " The Michael S" ]]
English Commercial Court: Colman. J: December 2001
ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION: DAMAGE TO CARGO: BILLS OF LADING: CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED INTO BILLS OF LADING: CONFLICT BETWEEN CONGENBILL EDITIONS 1978 AND 1994: CONSTRUCTION: RECTIFICATION: EVIDENCE OF MUTUAL INTENTION IN WORDING OF BILLS: S.5(1)(A) CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1992: BILLS OF LADING ACT 1855: CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE ‘EVIDENCED BY B/L’: WHETHER CHANGE IN LAW INTENDED: LAW COMMISSION REPORT: LEDUC V WARD: POSITION OF INDORSEE: NOTICE
[[Cargo on Board MV'Delos' v. Delos Shipping]]English High Court: Langley J.: January 2001: [2001] DMC/Arbn/10/1 AER 763VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: ARBITRATION CLAUSE: INCORPORATION INTO BILLS OF LADING.
[[Louis Dreyfus Negoce SA v. Blystad Shipping & Trading Inc.]]US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit: June 2001Case Note prepared in co-operation with the New York law firm of Healy & Baillie, LLP, which represented Blystad Shipping & TradingNEW YORK ARBITRATION CLAUSE: BROAD AND NARROW ARBITRATION CLAUSES: APPLICATION TO COLLATERAL AGREEMENTS: COLLATERAL AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR ENGLISH JURISDICTION: PRESUMPTION OF ARBITRABILITY UNDER BROAD CLAUSE WHERE CLAIM 'IMPLICATES' ISSUES OF CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION'The Netherlands'''
[[PT Garuda Indonesia '''Mr Van Wassenaer Van Catwijck, also acting in his capacity as the representative of Mr Saarberg and Mr Ariens (hereinafter called “the Arbitrators”) v. Birgen Air]]High Court of Singapore: Woo Bih LiKnowsley SK Limited, Manchester, Judicial CommissionerUnited Kingdom (hereinafter called “KSK”)'''[https: Unreported: September 2001Case Note provided by Ang & Partners, International Contributors for SingaporeSEAT OF ARBITRATION – CURIAL LAW – WHETHER INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ACT 1994 OR THE MODEL LAW APPLIES – SERVICE OUT OF JURISDICTION OF ORIGINATING PROCESS UNDER O//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.69A, Rphp/The_Arbitrators_v.4 OF THE RULES OF COURT – SUBSTITUTED SERVICE INSIDE SINGAPORE_Knowsley_SK]
[[Transfield Shipping Inc v'''Dutch Supreme Court. D.H. Sino-Add Beukenhorst (Singaporechairman) Pte Ltd]]High Court of Singapore: Judith Prakash , A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, J.C. van Oven, F.B.Bakels and W.D.H. Asser, 29 January 2010, Case number 09/00505''', published on www.rechtspraak.nl, LJN: Unreported: 27 August 2001BK2007Case note prepared by Ang & Partners, International Contributors for Singapore GENCON CHARTERPARTY - MAREVA INJUNCTION – WHETHER RISK OF DISSIPATION '''ARBITRATION: DUTCH LAW: OBLIGATIONS OF ASSETS – WHETHER MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE – WHETHER STAY OF ACTION ARBITRATORS TOWARDS PARTIES IN FAVOUR OF ARBITRATION – WHETHER ARBITRATION CLAUSE WAS FOR GENERAL AVERAGE ONLYPROCEEDINGS'''
