Changes

[[Royal '''DHL Project & Sun Alliance Chartering Ltd v. BAE Systems]]English High Court: Walker J: [2008] 743 Gemini Ocean Shipping Co Ltd (Comm): 15 April 2008ARBITRATION: DISPUTE RESOLUTION AGREEMENT GIVING EITHER PARTY THE RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE COURT ON A QUESTION OF LAW ARISING OUT OF THE AWARD: WHETHER THIS SUFFICIENT TO DISPENSE WITH NEED TO OBTAIN LEAVE OF THE COURT UNDER THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996 S.69(2)(BThe “Newcastle Express”)'''

[[Fiona Trust and Holding Corporation and Others v Yuri Privalov and Others under name of Premium Nafta Products Ltd (20th Defendant) & Others v. Fili Shipping Co Ltd (14th Claimant) & Others]]'''English House Court of LordsAppeal: Lords Hoffmann, Hope, ScottMales, Walker Birss and BrownSnowden LJJ: [20072022] UKHL 40EWCA Civ 1555: 17 October 2007TIME CHARTERPARTIES24 November 2022: RESCISSION[[https: EFFECT OF FRAUD AND BRIBERY ON VALIDITY OF JURISDICTION AND ARBITRATION CLAUSES: SHELLTIME 4 FORM, CLAUSE 41: DISPUTES "ARISING OUT OF" COMPARED TO DISPUTES "ARISING UNDER" THE CONTRACT: SEVERABILITY OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE: ARBITRATION ACT 1996, SECTION 7//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/DHL_Project_and_Chartering_v_Gemini_Ocean_Shipping_-_The_Newcastle_Express]]

[[ASM Shipping Ltd of India vJudgment Available on BAILII @ https://www. TTMI Ltd of England]]English Court of Appeal: Sir Anthony Clarke MR, Rix and Longmore LJJbailii.: [2006] org/ew/cases/EWCA /Civ 1341: 16 October 2006ARBITRATION: AWARD: APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE AWARD ON GROUNDS OF APPARENT BIAS UNDER S/2022/1555.68 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: FAILURE OF APPLICATION: PERMISSION TO APPEAL UNDER S.68.4 REFUSED: WHETHER REFUSAL OF APPEAL A BREACH OF EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, ART.6: WHETHER COURT OF APPEAL HAD RESIDUAL JURISDICTION TO PERMIT APPEALhtml

[[(1) Starlight Shipping Co (Marshall Islands) (2) Overseas Marine Enterprises Inc. (Liberia) v. (1) Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd, Hubei Branch (People’s Republic of China (2) International Economic & Trading Corporation, Wugang Group (People’s Republic of China)]]English High Court, Commercial Court'''VOYAGE CHARTER: Cooke J.: [2007] EWHC 1893 Civ: 1 August 2007SHIPPING: CARGO CLAIM BROUGHT BY CARGO INSURERS IN CHINA IN BREACH OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN B/L: ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTIONS: INTER-RELATIONSHIP OF S.37(1) SUPREME COURT ACT 1981 ("SCA") WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTER AND S.44 ARBITRATION ACT 1996AGREEMENT THEREIN CONCLUDED: WHETHER REQUIREMENT OF URGENCY UNDER S.44(3) MADE OUTARBITRATOR HAD SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION TO MAKE AWARD: WHETHER ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL "UNABLE FOR “SUBJECT SHIPPER/RECEIVERS APPROVAL” OF THE TIME BEING VESSEL PROVISION IN RECAP A CONDITION PRECEDENT AND SUBJECT TO “APPROVAL NOT TO ACT EFFECTIVELY" BE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD” TERM IN INCORPORATED PROFORMA CHARTER: APPLICATION UNDER S.44(5): WHETHER DISCRETIONARY ELEMENTS SECTIONS 67 OF S.37 SCA MADE OUTARBITRATION ACT 1996'''

DMC/Arbn/2022/04 '''England''' '''ENEMALTA PLC v. THE STANDARD CLUB ASIA LIMITED [["C" v "D"]2021]EWHC 1215 (COMM)''' '''English Commercial Court(QBD): Cooke JJudge Pelling QC: 26 April 2021:[[2007https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/ENEMALTA_PLC_v_Standard_Club_Asia] Judgment available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC 1541 (/Comm): 28 June 2007INSURANCE: LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE: NEW YORK GOVERNING LAW CLAUSE: RIGHT TO CHALLENGE A PARTIAL AWARD MADE IN LONDON BY APPLICATION TO NEW YORK COURT/2021/551.html

[[ASM Shipping Ltd of India v. Bruce Harris & Others (2007)]]English High Court: Andrew Smith J: [2007] EWHC 1513 (Comm); 28 June 2007ARBITRATORS: REMOVAL ON GROUNDS OF APPARENT BIAS UNDER s.24 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: ONE '''WHETHER THE HIGH COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO DECIDE THE VALIDITY OF THREE ARBITRATORS WITHDREW ON GROUND A LETTER OF APPARENT BIAS: APPLICATION TO REMOVE TWO REMAINING ARBITRATORS: WHETHER REMAINING ARBITRATORS ‘TAINTED’ UNDERTAKING ISSUED BY APPARENT BIAS OF OTHER ARBITRATOR: LOSS A P&I CLUB - CONTAINING AN ENGLISH HIGH COURT EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSE - IN RESPECT OF RIGHT THEIR OWNER MEMBERS’ ALLEGED LIABLITY FOR DAMAGE TO OBJECT UNDER s.73 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: MEANING OF ‘CONTINUES A SUBMARINE CABLE, IN CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE THE OWNERS HAD INSTITUTED PROCEEDINGS IN SINGAPORE SEEKING TO TAKE PART ESTABLISH A LIMITATION FUND THERE IN RESPECT OF THE INCIDENT UNDER THE PROCEEDINGSLIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS CONVENTION OF 1976'''

[[Fiona Trust & Holdings Corporation and Others '''ARI v Privalov and Others]]English Commercial Court: Morison J: [2006] EWHC 2583 (Comm): 20 October 2006Available on BAILII @ http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2006/2583.htmlFRAUD: BRIBERY: CHARTERPARTIES: ARBITRATION CLAUSES: ARBITRATORS’ JURISDICTION: RESCISSION: RESTITUTION: VITIATION OF CONTRACTS AND ARBITRATION AGREEMENTSWXJ'''

'''English Commercial Court: Foxton J: [2022] EWHC 1543 (Comm): 20 June 2022:[[Stena Bulk, as disponent owner of the Mhttps:/T "Goldmar", Claimant v/www.onlinedmc.co. Citgo Asphalt Refining Couk/index., as Charterer, Respondentphp/ARI_v_WXJ]]United States of America: Society of Maritime Arbitrators of New York, Inc.: David W. Martowski, Chairman, Manfred W. Arnold and Jack Berg, arbitrators: Award Number 3902: November 22, 2005WHETHER OWNERS, NOT A PARTY TO THE CHARTERPARTY BETWEEN DISPONENT OWNERS AND SUBCHARTERERS, COULD BE COMPELLED TO TAKE PART IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE SUBCHARTER: WHETHER AN AFFILIATE OF THE SUBCHARTERERS, NOT A PARTY TO THE SUBCHARTER, COULD BRING A CLAIM IN SUCH PROCEEDINGS

[[The Owners of Cargo lately laden Judgment Available on board the "Yaoki" vBAILII @ https://www. The Owners of the "Yaoki (The "Yaoki") ]]High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance: Waung J: Admiralty Action Nobailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2022/1543. 134 of 2005: [2006] HKCFI 411ADMIRALTY: STAY OF PROCEEDING: BILL OF LADING INCORPORATES CHARTERPARTY TERMS INCLUDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE: CHARTERPARTY NOT IDENTIFIED IN BILL OF LADING: WHETHER THE BILL OF LADING REFERRED TO THE TIME CHARTERPARTY OR THE VOYAGE CHARTERPARTYhtml

[[L J Korbetis v Transgrain Shipping BV (The “Alexia M”)]]English High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)'''ARBITRATION: Toulson JLMAA TERMS: [2005] EWHC 1345 ARBITRATION COMMENCED BY FIRST PARTY GIVING NOTICE NAMING ITS APPOINTED ARBITRATOR (QB“GGG”): 17 June 2005LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSENOTICE GAVE SECOND PARTY 14 DAYS TO APPOINT AND GIVE NOTICE OF ITS ARBITRATOR FAILING WHICH GGG WOULD BE APPOINTED AS SOLE ARBITRATOR: AMENDED CENTROCON FORM: APPOINTMENT SECOND PARTY RECEIVED CONFIRMATION OF WILLINGNESS OF ARBITRATOR: ARBITRATOR’S JURISDICTION (“JJJ”) TO HEAR CLAIM: RELIEF FOR LATE COMMENCEMENT OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: ARBITRATION ACT 1996ACCEPT APPOINTMENT, WITHOUT AGREEMENT ON TERMS OR REMUNERATION, S.32 AND S.12(3)1: OFFER GAVE NOTICE TO FIRST PARTY, WITH COPIES TO GGG AND ACCEPTANCE OF NOMINATED JJJ, STATING JJJ HAD BEEN APPOINTED AS ITS ARBITRATOR: COMMUNICATION OF ACCEPTANCE: EFFECT WHETHER APPOINTMENT OF JJJ AND NOTICE THEREOF WAS VALID TO CONSTITUTE TRIBUNAL WITHIN 14-DAY TIME BARLIMIT'''

[[Hackwood '''Ducat Maritime Ltd v Areen Design Services Ltd]]English High Court: Technology & Construction Court; Mr Justice Field; [2005] EWHC 2322 Lavender Shipmanagement Inc (TCCThe “Majestic”); 31 October 2005CONSTRUCTION Contract: what was the contract?: DID IT CONTAIN arbitration AGREEMENT: pERSON TAKING NO PART IN Arbitration PROCEEDINGS: RIGHTS UNDER S.72 ARBITRATION Act 1996: WHETHER PERSON DEBARRED FROM TAKING PART IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS IF APPLICATION FOR RELIEF UNDER S.72 FAILS'''

[[A.S.M Shipping Ltd of India v T.T.M.I Ltd of England]]'''English High Commercial Court: Commercial Division: Morison Butcher J.: [20052022] EWHC 2238 766 (Comm): 19 October 2005Charterparty; Arbitration; Arbitration Act 1996; possibility of bias14 March 2022: [[https: section 68; serious irregularity/SUBSTANTIAL INJUSTICE: SERIOUS allegations IN PREVIOUS CASE against witness REGARDING DISCLOSURE: ARBITRATOR’S KNOWLEDGE OF AND INVOLVEMENT IN PREVIOUS CASE; section 24; removal of arbitrator; WHETHER CLAIMANT HAD WAIVED ITS RIGHT TO OBJECT UNDER S/www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.73 php/Ducat_Maritime_v_Lavender_Shipmanagement_-_The_Majestic]]

[[Surefire Systems Limited vJudgment Available on BAILII @ https://www.bailii. Guardian ECL Limited]]English High Court, Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court; Mr Justice Jackson; [2005] org/ew/cases/EWHC 1860 (TCC); Case No: HT-05-183; 18 August 2005Arbitration: construction: disputes over final account: Arbitration Act 1996: leave to appeal ("LTA"): section 69: questions of law: whether requirements of section met: extensions of time: section 70(3): section 80(5)/Comm/2022/766.html

[[Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v'''ARBITRATION: LMAA SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE 2017: FINAL AWARD MADE IN OWNERS’ FAVOUR FOR USD37,831. Impregilo SpA and others]]English House of Lords83: Lords SteynARBITRATOR SHOULD HAVE AWARDED USD28, Hoffmann, Phillips MR, Scott and Rodger277.91:[2005] UKHL 43 on appeal from [2003] EWCA Civ 1159, itself on appeal from [2003] 1 All ER (Comm) 22; [2002] EWHC 2435 (Comm)ArbitrationARBITRATOR ADDED VALUE OF CHARTERERS’ COUNTERCLAIM TO OWNERS’ CLAIM BY MISTAKE: arbitration Act ARBITRATOR TWICE REFUSED APPLICATIONS TO CORRECT AWARD UNDER SECTION 57 OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996: currency of award: Award of interest: error of law: whether tribunal exceeded it powers: whether serious irregularity under section APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 68OF ARBITRATION ACT 1996 TO SET ASIDE PART OF AWARD FOR SERIOUS IRREGULARITY'''

'''England''' '''NWA & Anor v NVF & Ors [[Encyclopaedia Universalis S.A. v. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.,]2021]United States of America: Second Circuit Court of Appeals: No. 04-0288-cv, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5157: 31 March 2005Arbitration: Enforcement: effect of Procedural irregularities: effect of tribunal exceeding its powers: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards EWHC 2666 (New York ConventionComm): Federal Arbitration Act'''

[[Vee Networks Limited v Econet Wireless International Ltd]]Between (1) NWA (2) FSY and (1) NVF (2) RWX (3) KLB '''English High Court (EnglandCommercial Court), Queen’s Bench Division: Colman Calver J.: 8 October 2021: [2004[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/NWA_and_Anor_v_NVF_&_Ors]] EWHC 2909 (Comm): 14 December 2004Arbitration: Arbitration Act 1996: section 7 – Separability of arbitration agreement: section 30 – competence of tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction: section 67 – challenging the award, substantive jurisdiction: interrelationship of sections 7 and 67

[[Cetelem SA v Roust Holdings Ltd]]English High Court'''CONTRACTUAL TERM: Beatson J.DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE: [2004] EWHC 3175 QBARBITRATION CLAUSE REQUIRING MEDIATION BEFORE ARBITRATION: 29 December 2004Arbitration Act MEDIATION NEVER TOOK PLACE: REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION: AWARD ISSUED CONFIRMING TRIBUNAL’S JURISDICTION: CHALLENGE TO AWARD UNDER SECTION 67(1)(a) ARBITRATION ACT 1996 s.44: assistance of Court prior to commencement of arbitration: freezing ordersWHETHER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MEDIATION PROVISION VITIATED SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION OF THE TRIBUNAL: mandatory injunctionsWHETHER THAT NON-COMPLIANCE ONLY AFFECTED ADMISSIBILITY OF THE CLAIM'''

'''W v AW [[Prescott v. Northlake Christian School]2021]United States of America: US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals: Circuit Judge: Edith H. Jones, dissent by Circuit Judge Carl E. Stewart: 369 F.3d 491 4 May 2004EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT: MEDIATION/Arbitration CLAUSE: HANDWRITTEN AMENDMENT RESERVING PARTIES’ RIGHTS OF APPEAL: Scope of Judicial ReviewHKCFI 1707'''

[[Minermet SPA Milan v Luckyfield Shipping Corporation SA]]English Commercial '''High Courtof Hong Kong: Justice Mimmie Chan: Cooke J.Date of Hearing: 31 22 March 2004SHIPPING2021: CHARTERPARTYDate of Decision: ARBITRATION CLAUSE17 June 2021: APPOINTMENT OF CLAIMANT’S ARBITRATOR[[https: DEFENDANT’S ARBITRATOR TO BE APPOINTED WITHIN 14 DAYS: NO APPOINTMENT WITHIN THAT PERIOD: WHETHER CLAIMANT’S ARBITRATOR ENTITLED TO ACT AS SOLE ARBITRATOR//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/W_v_AW]]'''

[[Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corporation and Hyundai Merchant Marine Co Ltd]]Federal Court of AustraliaJudgment available on HKLII @ https: Allsop J//www.: 3 June 2004Dr A Bell, instructed by Middletons, for AlkimosMr G Nell, instructed by Sparke Helmore, for HyundaiSHIPPING: CHARTERPARTY: CARGO CLAIMS: ARBITRATION CLAUSE: EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION AGREEMENT: APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CLAIMS IN FEDERAL COURT CONTRARY TO EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION AGREEMENT: SCOPE OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE: STAY OF PROCEEDINGS: FUTILITY: RISK OF DIFFERENT COURTS REACHING INCONSISTENT FINDINGS ON SAME ISSUES: INCONVENIENCE TO THIRD PARTIEShklii.hk/cgi-bin/sinodisp/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2021/1707.html?stem=&synonyms=&query=title(%222021%20HKCFI%201707%22)

[[The Department of Economic Policy and Development of the City of Moscow and another v Bankers Trust Company and International Industrial Bank]]English Court of Appeal'''ARBITRATION: Sir Andrew Morritt VC, Mance and Carnwath LJJ.ISSUE ESTOPPEL: 25 March 2004ARBITRATION: APPLICATIONS TO TWO ARBITRATIONS BETWEEN THE SAME PARTIES ON THE COURT: PRIVACY OF HEARINGS: CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES 62.10SAME ISSUES WITH DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS: SUPERVISORY ROLE OF COURTWHETHER SECOND AWARD SHOULD BE SET ASIDE: PUBLIC INTERESTAPPARENT BIAS: PUBLICATION OF JUDGMENTSWHETHER SECURITY SHOULD BE ORDERED'''

[[Usinor Steel Corp. v. MDMC/V Koningsborg]]United States District Court for the Southern District of New York: District Judge: Alvin K. Hellerstein.:No. 03 Civ. 4301; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1615; 4 February 2004arbitration: charter party: arbitration clause: Whether mandatory or permissive: federal policy: final orderArbn/2021/07

[[Jurong Engineering Ltd v. Black & Veatch '''Singapore Pte Ltd]]Singapore High Court: Lai Kew Chai J: 26 November 2003: [2003] SGHC 292ARBITRATION: CONSTRUCTION OF AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE: ARBITRATION CLAUSE MADE GENERAL REFERENCE TO RULES PROMULGATED BY THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE: ARBITRATION WAS A DOMESTIC ARBITRATION:- ARBITRATION COMMENCED UNDER SIAC DOMESTIC ARBITRATION RULES: SIAC DOMESTIC ARBITRATION RULES NOT IN EXISTENCE AT THE TIME OF CONTRACT WHILST SIAC ARBITRATION RULES (WHICH GOVERNS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION) IN EXISTENCE AT THE TIME OF CONTRACT:- WHETHER SIAC DOMESTIC ARBITRATION RULES OR SIAC ARBITRATION RULES SHOULD APPLY'''

[[Hawk Shipping Ltd '''CAI v Cron Navigation Ltd]]CAJ & CAK''' English Commercial '''Singapore High Court: Toulson J.S Mohan JC: 11 July 2003ARBITRATION[2021] SGHC 21: TIMECHARTER29 January 2021: WRONGFUL WITHDRAWAL[[https: CALCULATION OF LOSS: availability of alternative vessel//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/CAI_v_CAJ_&_CAK]]'''

[[ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd]]Singapore High Court'''CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATION AWARD: Judith Prakash JEXTENSION OF TIME (EOT) DEFENCE: unreportedNATURAL JUSTICE: 8 May 2003)PROPER ARBITRATIONPROCEDURES: APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE AWARD UNDER ARTICLE 34 OF THE MODEL LAWARTICLE 18: ICC RULES ARTICLE 23(4): WHETHER APPLICANT MAY ADD NEW GROUNDS FOR SETTING ASIDE AFTER EXPIRY DOCTRINE OF THREE MONTHSAPPROBATION AND REPROBATION'''

[[Duferco International Steel Trading v. T. Klaveness Shipping ADMC/S]]United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit: Judges Feinberg, Cardamone, and Sack: 333 F.3d 383: June 24 2003time charter: voyage charter: safe-berth warranty: indemnity Arbitration: Manifest disregard of the law: arbitration award: vacaturArbn/set aside: vouching-in: collateral estoppel: plausible reading of the award: whether should also be ‘probable’21/06

[[Siboti K/'''Ulusoy Denizilik A.S . v BP France SA]]English Commercial Court: Gross JCOFCO Global Harvest (Zhangjiagang) Trading Co.: Ltd (The "Ulusoy-11 June 2003VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY: BILLS OF LADING TO INCORPORATE EXCLUSIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE OF CHARTERPARTY: ONLY GENERAL WORDS OF INCORPORATION IN BILLS OF LADING: CONSTRUCTION OF BILLS OF LADING: IRRELEVANCE OF CHARTERPARTY: ABSENCE OF CLEAR INTENTION TO INCORPORATE CHARTERPARTY DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE")

[[BLCT '''Queen’s Bench Division (13096Commercial Court) Ltd v J Sainsbury Plc]]English Court of Appeal: Lady Justice Arden, Lord Mr Justice LongmoreBryan: [20032020] EWCA Civ 884: 30 June 2003Appeal from arbitration: Arbitration Act 1996, section 69: application for leave to appeal the award under s.69EWHC 3645 (5Comm): no oral hearing under s.69(5)28 August 2020: refusal to grant an oral hearing[[https: leave to appeal refused under s//www.69(6): Court of Appeal's jurisdiction to give leave: Residual jurisdiction: right to a fair trial, Artonlinedmc.co. 6(1), European Convention on Human Rights: whether limitation on rights of appeal under Arbitration Act 1996 Suk/index.69php/Ulusoy_Denizilik_v_COFCO_Global_Harvest_(6Zhangjiagang) inconsistent with Art. 6: Whether Art. 6 required an oral hearing of appeal application_Trading_-_The_Ulusoy_11]]

[[Internaut Shipping GmbH and Sphinx Navigation Ltd (Liberia) v Fercometal SARL (‘The Elikon’)]]English Court of Appeal'''ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION: BILLS OF LADING EXPRESSLY INCORPORATING CHARTERPARTY LAW AND ARBITRATION CLAUSE: APPLICABLE LAW GOVERNING ISSUE OF INCORPORATION: Lord Justices Mummery, Sedley, RixIDENTITY OF GOVERNING CHARTERPARTY: [2003] EWCA Civ. 812WHETHER LAW AND ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED INTO BILLS OF LADING: 17 June 2003ArbitrationBILL OF LADING HOLDERS BRING CARGO CLAIM IN PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (“PRC”): Arbitration Acts 1950, 1979WHETHER THIS A BREACH OF LONDON ARBITRATION CLAUSE: demurrage claim under a voyage charterpartyWHETHER OWNERS ENTITLED TO ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION: whether the registered or the disponent ownerROME I REGULATION (REGULATION (EC) NO 593/2008), or bothARTICLE 10(1), was a party to the charter: whether an arbitral reference by the "owner" was valid and subsisting(2).'''

'''Republic of Sierra Leone v SL Mining Limited [[Aceros Prefabricados, S.A. v. TradeArbed, Inc.2021]]Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; MinerEWHC 286 Comm, Calabresi and Cabranes; 282 F.3d 92 (2d Cir. 2002); 15 February 13, 2002.confirmation: arbitration: material alteration: arbitration clause: arbitration provision: motion to stay: burden of proof2021'''

'''In the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court: Sir Michael Burton GBE, Sitting as Judge of the High Court:[[Welex AG vhttps://www. Rosa Maritime Limited onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Republic_of_Sierra_Leone_v_SL_Mining_Limited]]English Commercial Court: David Steel J.: April 2002 CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE: BILL OF LADING: CONGENBILL FORM: INCORPORATING ARBITRATION CLAUSE FROM RECAP TELEX: RECAP TELEX AS CHARTERPARTY'''

[[North Range Shipping Limited v Seatrans Shipping Corporation]]English Court of Appeal'''CONTRACTUAL DISPUTE BETWEEN PARTIES: Peter Gibson, Aldous, Tuckey LJJMULTI-TIER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISION: March 2002 PARTIES TO FILE FOR ARBITRATIONIF NO AMICABLE SETTLEMENT REACHED WITHIN 3 MONTHS: SHIPPINGNON-COMPLIANCE WITH MULTI-TIER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISION: ARBITRATI0N ACT 1996WHETHER NON-COMPLIANCE VITIATED TRIBUNAL’S JURISDICTION: REFUSAL WHETHER NON-COMPLIANCE A MATTER OF LEAVE TO APPEAL: GIVING REASONS: EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL: JURISDICTION TO HEAR APPEALS FROM REFUSAL TO GIVE LEAVE TO APPEALADMISSIBILITY: RESIDUAL JURISDICTION IN CASES CHALLENGING AN AWARD UNDER SECTION 67 OF MISCONDUCT OR UNFAIRNESSTHE ARBITRATION ACT 1996'''

[[Michael S Evryalos Maritime Ltd '''Lavender Shipmanagement Inc v. China Pacific Insurance Co Ltd - " Ibrahima Sory Affrètement Trading SA and Others (The Michael S" ]]English Commercial Court: Colman. J: December 2001ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION: DAMAGE TO CARGO: BILLS OF LADING: CHARTERPARTY: WHETHER ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED INTO BILLS OF LADING: CONFLICT BETWEEN CONGENBILL EDITIONS 1978 AND 1994: CONSTRUCTION: RECTIFICATION: EVIDENCE OF MUTUAL INTENTION IN WORDING OF BILLS: S.5(1)(A“Majesty”) CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1992: BILLS OF LADING ACT 1855: CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE ‘EVIDENCED BY B/L’: WHETHER CHANGE IN LAW INTENDED: LAW COMMISSION REPORT: LEDUC V WARD: POSITION OF INDORSEE: NOTICE'''

[[Cargo on Board MV'Delos' v. Delos Shipping]]'English High Commercial Court: Langley J.: January 2001Mr Justice Calver: [20012020] 1 AER 763VOYAGE CHARTERPARTYEWHC 3462 (Comm) – 16 December 2020: ARBITRATION CLAUSE[[https: INCORPORATION INTO BILLS OF LADING//www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Lavender_Shipmanagement_v_Ibrahima_Sory_Affretement_Trading_&_Ors_the_MV_Majesty]]

[[Louis Dreyfus Negoce SA v. Blystad Shipping & Trading Inc.]]US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit'''LETTER OF UNDERTAKING: June 2001Case Note prepared in co-operation with the New York law firm of Healy & Baillie, LLP, which represented Blystad Shipping & TradingNEW YORK ARBITRATION CLAUSEAGREEMENT: BROAD APPLICATIONS UNDER S67 AND NARROW S69 OF THE ARBITRATION CLAUSES: APPLICATION TO COLLATERAL AGREEMENTS: COLLATERAL AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR ENGLISH JURISDICTION: PRESUMPTION OF ARBITRABILITY UNDER BROAD CLAUSE WHERE CLAIM ACT 1996''IMPLICATES' ISSUES OF CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION

DMC/Arbn/21/03  '''Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd''' '''United Kingdom Supreme Court: Lord Justices Reed, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones, Lady Justices Black and Arden: [2020] UKSC 48:[[Transfield https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Halliburton_Company_v_Chubb_Bermuda_Insurance]] '''INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: IMPARTIALITY: LEGAL DUTY OF ARBITRATOR TO MAKE DISCLOSURE: MULTIPLE APPOINTMENTS IN DIFFERENT REFERENCES RELATING TO OVERLAPPING SUBJECT MATTER BUT INVOLVING A COMMON PARTY: WHETHER FAILURE TO DISCLOSE IS RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT OF APPARENT BIAS: WHETHER DUTY TO DISCLOSE OVERRIDES DUTY OF PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY: WHERE CONSENT TO DISCLOSURE MAY BE INFERRED: RECOGNITION OF SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARITIME AND OTHER INDUSTRY SPECIFIC ARBITRATION'''  DMC/Arbn/21/02 '''Singapore'''_ '''Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd v Avant Garde Maritime Services (Private) Limited:''' '''Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore [2019] SGCA 33, 9 May 2019: Decision of the Court of Appeal (delivered by Judge of Appeal Judith Prakash): [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Rakna_Arakshaka_Lanka_Ltd_v_Avant_Garde_Maritime_Services_(Private)_Limited]]''' '''PARTY DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS AGAINST IT: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING) SIGNED BY BOTH PARTIES: TRIBUNAL PROCEEDED WITH ARBITRATION DESPITE MOU: FINAL AWARD AGAINST PARTY: WHETHER NON-PARTICIPATING PARTY ENTITLED TO SET ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARD ON THE GROUNDS THAT TRIBUNAL HAD NO JURISDICTION'''  DMC/Arbn/21/01 '''England''' '''MVV Environment Devonport Ltd v NTO Shipping GMBH & Co KG MV Nortrader [2020] EWHC 1371 (Comm); Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Judge Pelling QC; 6 June 2020:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/MVV_Environment_Devonport_v_NTO_Shipping_The_MV_Nortrader]] '''CHALLENGE TO JURISDICTION OF ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL: CLAIMANT NAMED AS SHIPPER IN BILL OF LADING INCORPORATING CHARTERPARTY ARBITRATION CLAUSE: WHETHER CLAIMANT WRONGLY NAMED AS SHIPPER IN BILL OF LADING PREPARED BY AGENT: WHETHER AGENT HAD EXPRESS OR IMPLIED ACTUAL AUTHORITY OR OSTENSIBLE AUTHORITY TO ACT FOR CLAIMANT: EFFECT OF CLAIMANT’S SILENCE'''  DMC/Arbn/19/02 '''England''' '''Sea Master Shipping Inc vArab Bank (Switzerland) Limited''' '''English Commercial Court: Popplewell J.: 25 July 2018: [2018] EWHC 1902 (Comm):'''Sum[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sea_Master_Shipping_v_Arab_Bank_(Switzerland)]]''' '''CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATORS’ JURISDICTION UNDER S.67 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER BILL OF LADING HOLDER BOUND BY ARBITRATION CLAUSE INCORPORATED INTO THE BILL OF LADING: WHETHER STATUS OF LAWFUL HOLDER UNDER S.2 OF CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT (1992) SUFFICIENT: WHETHER IN ADDITION, HOLDER MUST HAVE ASSUMED LIABILITIES UNDER S.3 OF THAT ACT'''  DMC/Arbn/19/01 '''England''' '''Sonact Group Ltd v Premuda SpA (The “Four Island”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Males J: [2018] EWHC 3820 (Comm): 12 December 2018: [[https://www. Sinoonlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sonact_Group_Ltd_v_Premuda_SpA_-Add _The_Four_Island]]''' '''VOYAGE CHARTER: ASBATANKVOY FORM: DEMURRAGE & HEATING COSTS CLAIM: SETTLEMENT AGREED BY EMAIL WHICH DID NOT REFER TO ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN CHARTER: WHETHER ARBITRATORS HAD JURISDICTION TO DETERMINE CLAIM FOR THE AGREED SETTLEMENT SUM: CHALLENGE PURSUANT TO SECTION 67 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996'''  DMC/Arbn/16/01 '''England''' '''Shagang South-Asia Trading Co Ltd v Daewoo Logistics''' '''English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court); Mr Justice Hamblen; [2015] EWHC 194 (Comm); 5 February 2015: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Shagang_South-East_Asia_Trading_v_Daewoo_Logistics]]  '''ARBITRATION: WHETHER THERE WERE CLEAR INDICATORS THAT THE CURIAL LAW WAS NOT THE LAW OF THE VENUE OF THE ARBITRATION: WHETHER THE ARBITRATOR WAS VALIDLY APPOINTED'''  DMC/Arbn/15/02 '''Singapore''' '''Coal & Oil Co LLC v GHCL Ltd''' DMC/Arbn/15/01 '''England''' '''Transgrain Shipping BV v Deiulemar Shipping SpA and Eleni Shipping Ltd (The “Eleni P”) Pte ''' '''Commercial Court: Teare J: [2014] EWHC 4202 (Comm): 15 December 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Transgrain_Shipping_v_Deiulemar_Shipping_and_Eleni_Shipping_-_The_Eleni_P]]''' '''CHARTERPARTY: PARTIALLY CONFLICTING ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS: BESPOKE ARBITRATION CLAUSE AND STANDARD BIMCO ARBITRATION CLAUSES: CHALLENGE TO TRIBUNAL’S JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 67 ARBITRATION ACT 1996: PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS: PROPER CONSTITUTION OF TRIBUNAL'''   DMC/Arbn/14/07 '''England''' '''Viscous Global Investment Ltdv Palladium Navigation Corp (The “Quest”)''' '''English Commercial Court: Males J: [2014] EWHC 2654 (Comm): 30 July 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Viscous_Global_Investment_v_Palladium_Navigation_-_The_Quest]] '''ARBITRATION: BILLS OF LADING (“BLS”): P&I CLUB LETTER OF UNDERTAKING (“LOU”): WHETHER ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN LOU REPLACED ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN BLS: ARBITRATION ACT 1996 SECTION 32 APPLICATION'''  DMC/Arbn/14/06 '''England''' '''Emirates Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports Private Limited''' '''English High Court: Teare J.: [2014] EWHC 2104 (Comm): 1 July 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Emirates_Trading_v_Prime_Mineral_Exports]] '''CONTRACT: DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE REQUIRING PARTIES TO TRY TO RESOLVE DISPUTES BY FRIENDLY DISCUSSION WITHIN A CONTINUOUS PERIOD OF FOUR WEEKS BEFORE RESORTING TO ARBITRATION: WHETHER ARBITRATORS LACKED JURISDICTION BECAUSE THIS PROVISION NOT COMPLIED WITH: WHETHER PROVISION UNENFORCEABLE AS UNCERTAIN: WHETHER PROVISION HAD BEEN COMPLIED WITH'''  DMC/Arbn/14/05 '''England''' '''Caresse Navigation Ltd v Office National de l’Electricité (the "Channel Ranger"): [2013] EWHC 3081 (Comm): Males J.: 14 October 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Caresse_Navigation_v_Office_National_de_l'Electricité_-_the_Channel_Ranger]]''' '''BILL OF LADING: WHETHER WORDS OF INCORPORATION REFERRING TO ARBITRATION ARE SUFFICIENT TO INCORPORATE CHARTERPARTY JURISDICTION PROVISIONS'''  DMC/Arbn/14/04 '''England''' '''Cottonex Anstalt v Patriot Spinning Mills Ltd [2014] EWHC 236 (Comm)''' '''English High Court: Hamblen J.: 14 February 2014:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Cottonex_Anstalt_v_Patriot_Spinning_Mills]] '''SALE AND PURCHASE: WHETHER CONTRACT INCORPORATED ALL TERMS OF THE BY-LAWS AND RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL COTTON ASSOCIATION OR ONLY THE ARBITRATION PROVISIONS: GUIDANCE ON THE INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACTS ON APPEAL FROM AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL WITH EXPERIENCE OF THE RELEVANT TRADE'''  DMC/Arbn/14/03 '''England''' '''Beijing Jianlong Heavy Industry Group v Golden Ocean Group Ltd and Others''' '''English Commercial Court: HHJ Mackie QC: [2013] EWHC 1063 (Comm): 1 May 2013: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Beijing_Jianlong_Heavy_Industry_Group_v_Golden_Ocean_Group]] '''ARBITRATION: SECTION 67 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996: APPEAL AGAINST SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION OF TRIBUNALS: GUARANTEES ALLEGEDLY ILLEGAL AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER CHINESE LAW: VALIDITY OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS: PUBLIC POLICY'''  DMC/Arbn/14/02 '''The Netherlands''' '''Transport and Maritime Arbitration Rotterdam-Amsterdam ("Tamara") Arbitration''' '''Anonymous, Procedural Order of a Tamara arbitration tribunal, 10 December 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Tamara_Arbitration]]'''  '''ARBITRATION UNDER TAMARA RULES: WHAT THE LANGUAGE OF THE ARBITRATION SHOULD BE FAILING A CHOICE PREVIOUSLY MADE BY THE PARTIES'''  DMC/Arbn/14/01 '''England'''  '''AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v. Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC''' '''Supreme Court; Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Sumption, Toulson SCJJ; [2013] UKSC 35, 12 June 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/AES_Ust-Kamenogorsk_Hydropower__Plant_LLP_v_Ust-KamenogorsK_Hydropower_Plant_JSC]] '''WHETHER POWER TO INJUNCT COURT PROCEEDINGS IS MERELY ANCILLARY TO CURRENT OR INTENDED ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: WHETHER S.44 ARBITRATION ACT 1996 LIMITS THE COURT’S INJUNCTIVE POWERS UNDER S.37 SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981'''  DMC/Arbn/13/06 '''England'''  '''Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC (and others) v Blue Skye Special Opportunities Fund LLP (and others)''' '''English Court of Appeal; Pill, Toulson, Tomlinson LJJ; [2013] EWCA Civ 367; 31 January 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Fortress_Valley_Recovery__Fund_v_Blue_Skye_Special_Opportunities_Fund]] '''ARBITRATION CLAUSE: THIRD PARTIES: CONTRACTS (RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES) ACT 1999, SS 8(1) & 8(2)'''  DMC/Arbn/13/05 '''Hong Kong'''  '''Grand Pacific Holdings Ltd and Pacific China Holdings Ltd (in liq) (No 1)''' '''Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Tang VP, Kwan and Fok JJA: CACV No.136 of 2011, [2012] 4 HKLRD 1: 9 May 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Grand_Pacific_Holdings_v_Pacific_China_Holdings]]''' http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/2012/200.html '''ARBITRATION: APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARD: ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTS.34(2)(A)(II) AND (IV), UNCITRAL MODEL LAW: AWARD TO BE SET ASIDE ONLY IF VIOLATION SUFFICIENTLY SERIOUS: DISCRETION OF COURT TO REFUSE TO SET ASIDE DESPITE VIOLATION'''   DMC/SandT/13/04 '''Australia''' '''Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S v Gladstone Civil Pty Ltd''' '''Full Court, Federal Court of Australia: Mansfield, Rares and Buchanan JJ: [2013] FCFCA 107, 18 September 2013:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dampskibsselskabet_Norden_A/S_v_Gladstone_Civil_Pty_Ltd]] '''ENFORCEMENT IN AUSTRALIA OF FOREIGN ARBITRATION AWARD UNDER VOYAGE CHARTER: WHETHER VOYAGE CHARTER A “SEA CARRIAGE DOCUMENT” FOR THE PURPOSES OF S.11 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1991: WHETHER ARBITRATION AWARD UNENFORCEABLE BECAUSE NOT MADE IN AUSTRALIA'''  DMC/Arbn/13/03 '''Singapore''' '''Maldives Airports Co Ltd & Anor v. GMR Male International Airport Pte Ltd, [2013] SGCA 16: SingaporeCourt of Appeal: Judith Prakash Judgment delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ, Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA and Woo Bih Li Jon 6 December 2012:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Maldives_Airports_v_GMR_Male_International]]''' '''Arbitration: Interim Order for Injunction under Section 12A(4) of International Arbitration Act ("IAA"): UnreportedMeaning of “asset” under Section 12A(4) IAA: 27 August 2001Preservation of contractual rights and choses in action as “assets” under Section 12A(4) of IAA'''   DMC/Arbn/13/02 '''Singapore''' Case note prepared '''Astro Nusantara International BV and others v. PT Ayunda Prima Mitra and others [2012] SGHC 157: Singapore High Court: Judgment delivered by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J on 22 October 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Astro_Nusantara_International_&_Others_v_PT_Ayunda_Prima_Mitra_&_Others]]''' '''ARBITRATION: INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRAL AWARD MADE IN SAME TERRITORY AS FORUM IN WHICH RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT SOUGHT: PARTY NOT ENTITLED TO CHALLENGE JURISDICTION OF ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL AT SETTING-ASIDE OR ENFORCEMENT STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS: PARTY WHO FAILS TO CHALLENGE AWARD ON JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO ART. 16 OF MODEL LAW DEEMED TO ACCEPT FINALITY OF AWARD ON JURISDICTION'''  DMC/Arbn/13/01 '''England''' '''Chantiers de L’Atlantique SA v Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS''' '''English High Court (Commercial Court): Flaux J: [2011] EWHC 3383 (Comm): 20 December 2011: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Chantiers_de_L'Atlantique_v_Gaztransport_& Partners_Technigaz]]''' '''ARBITRATION: SETTING ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARD ON GROUND OF FRAUD: EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED, International Contributors for GIVEN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE ALLEGATIONS: FRAUD BY TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE OF WINNING PARTY IN EVIDENCE TO ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL: DELIBERATE CONCEALMENT OF TECHNICAL TEST RESUTLS: LACK OF CAUSAL LINK BETWEEN NON-DISCLOSURE AND DECISION OF TRIBUNAL'''  DMC/Arbn/12/03 '''Singapore''' '''Singapore High Court''' '''Daimler South East Asia Pte Ltd v. Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2012] SGHC 157 : Judgment delivered by Woo Bih Li J on 31 July 2012: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Daimler_South_East_Asia_v_Front_Row_Investments_(Singapore)]]''' '''ARBITRATION: WAIVER OF RIGHT OF RECOURSE UNDER ICC RULES OF ARBITRATION (1998): EXCLUSION OF APPEAL ON QUESTION OF LAW ARISING OUT OF ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO SECTION 49(2) ARBITRATION ACT'''   DMC/Arbn/12/02 '''Hong Kong''' '''Gao Haiyan v Keeneye Holdings Limited''' Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Tang VP, Fok JA and Sakharani J: CACV No.79 of 2011: 2 December 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gao_Haiyan_v_Keeneye_Holdings_-_Court_of_Appeal]] http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/2011/459.html '''ARBITRATION: ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARD OBTAINED IN CHINA: SETTING ASIDE: CONTRARY TO PUBLIC POLICY: WHETHER AWARD TAINTED BY APPARENT BIAS: MEDIATION CONDUCTED IN COURSE OF ARBITRATION: WAIVER'''  DMC/Arbn/12/01 '''England''' '''African Fertilizers and Chemicals NIG Ltd (Nigeria) v BD Shipsnavo GmbH & Co Reederei KG (The “Christian D”): English Commercial Court: Beatson J: [2011] EWHC 2452 (Comm): 29 September 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/African_Fertilisers_v_BD_Shipsnavo,_the_Christian_D]] '''ARBITRATION: JURISDICTION OF COURT: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT: SECTION 66 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996: ARTICLE 34(3) OF REGULATION 44/2001: WHETHER COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO MAKE PURELY DECLARATORY JUDGMENT UNDER SECTION 66: WHETHER SECTION 66 DECLARATORY JUDGMENT WAS A “JUDGMENT” FOR PURPOSE OF ARTICLE 34(3)'''  DMC/Arbn/11/12 '''England''' '''TTMI Sarl v Statoil ASA''' '''Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court): Beatson J: [2011] EWHC 1150 (Comm): 9 May 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/TTMI_v_Statoil]]''' GENCON '''ARBITRATION: JURISDICTION: PROPER PARTY TO CHARTERPARTY: DISPONENT OWNER WRONGLY IDENTIFIED IN RECAP EMAILS: UNDISCLOSED PRINCIPAL: RECTIFICATION: CHARTERPARTY CREATED BY CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES'''  DMC/Arbn/11/11 '''England''' '''Sovarex S.A. v. Romero Alvarez S.A.''' '''English High Court; Hamblen J; [2011] EWHC 1661 (Comm), 29 June 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Sovarex_v_Romero_Alvarez]]''' '''INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION: QUESTIONS OF FACT CAN BE DETERMINED IN PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 66 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996'''  DMC/Arbn/11/10 '''Hong Kong''' '''Democratic Republic of Congo and others v FG Hemisphere Associates LLC''' '''Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal: Bokhary, Chan and Riberio PJJ, Mortimer and Sir Anthony Mason NPJJ: FACV No.5, 6 and 7 of 2010: 8 June 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Democratic_Republic_of_Congo_v_FG_Hemisphere_Associates]]''' '''ARBITRATION: RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN AWARD OBTAINED AGAINST FOREIGN STATE: STATE IMMUNITY: WHETHER FOREIGN STATE CAN CLAIM ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY FROM SUIT IN HONG KONG AFTER 1997: WHETHER EXCEPTION FOR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES: WAIVER OF IMMUNITY'''  DMC/Arbn/11/09 '''England''' AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v. Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC '''English Court of Appeal (Civil Division); Rix, Wilson, & Stanley Burnton LJJ; [2011] EWCA Civ 647, 27 May 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/AES_Ust-Kamenogorsk_Hydropower_Plant_LLP_v_Ust- MAREVA Kamenogorsk_Hydropower_Plant_JSC]]''' '''INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION – : BASIS FOR SERVICE OUT OF JURISDICTION: EFFECT OF CIVIL JURISDICTION AND JUDGMENTS ACT 1982: PARTICIPATION IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS UNDER PROTEST NOT SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION'''  DMC/Arbn/11/08 '''England''' '''JSC BTA Bank v. Mukhtar Ablyazov & Ors''' '''English High Court; Clarke J; [2011] EWHC 587 (Comm), 28 March 2011;[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/JCT_BTA_Bank_v_Mukhtar_Ablyazov_&_Ors]]''' '''INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: STAY OF COURT PROCEEDINGS: AGREEMENT NULL AND VOID: SEPARABILITY: CASE MANAGEMENT GROUNDS'''   DMC/Arbn/11/07 '''Hong Kong''' '''Gao Haiyan v Keeneye Holdings Ltd''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J in Chambers: HCCT No.41 of 2010: 12 April 2011: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Gao_Haiyan_v_Keeneye_Holdings]]''' '''ARBITRATION: ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARD OBTAINED IN CHINA: SETTING ASIDE: CONTRARY TO PUBLIC POLICY: AWARD TAINTED BY ACTUAL OR APPARENT BIAS: MEDIATION CONDUCTED IN COURSE OF ARBITRATION: “MED-ARB”: ESTOPPEL'''  DMC/Arbn/11/06 '''England''' '''B v S''' English High Court: Flaux J.: [2011] EWHC 691 (Comm): 23 March 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/B_v_S]] '''COMMODITIES: FOSFA/GAFTA STANDARD FORM CONTRACTS: SCOTT V AVERY CLAUSE: WHETHER RIGHT TO INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF UNDER S.44 ARBITRATION ACT 1996 EXCLUDED'''  DMC/Arbn/11/05 '''England''' '''West Tankers Inc v Allianz SpA, Generali Assicurazione Generali SpA''' '''English High Court: Field J.; [2011] EWHC 829 (Comm): 6 April 2011:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/West_Tankers_v_Allianz]] '''ARBITRATION AWARDS: ENFORCEMENT: WHETHER A DECLARATORY AWARD MAY BE ENFORCED UNDER THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996, S.66'''  DMC/ARBn/11/04 '''United Kingdom''' '''Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v. The Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan:[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Dallah_Real_Estate_v_Government_of_Pakistan]] UK Supreme Court: Lord Hope, Deputy President Lord Saville, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke: [2010] UKSC 46: 3 November 2010''' '''ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS: CHALLENGE TO JURISDICTION: WHETHER RISK THIRD PARTY BOUND BY ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: COMPÉTENCE-COMPÉTENCE: SCOPE OF REVIEW BY ENFORCING COURT'''  DMC/Arbn/11/03 '''English Court of Appeal''' '''National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA (The “Wadi Sudr”)'''English Court of Appeal: Waller, Carnwath and Moore-Bick LJJ: [2009] EWCA Civ 1397, [2010] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 193: 17 December 2009[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/National_Navigation_v_Endesa]]''' '''CONFLICT OF LAWS: BILL OF LADING:SPANISH COURT JUDGMENT THAT ARBITRATION CLAUSE NOT INCORPORATED INTO BILL OF DISSIPATION LADING: WHETHER SPANISH COURT JUDGMENT FELL WITHIN ARBITRATION EXCEPTION IN ARTICLE 1(2)(D)OF ASSETS – EC REGULATION 44/2001: WHETHER RECOGNITION SHOULD BE REFUSED IN ENGLISH ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: WHETHER MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE – CONTRARY TO PUBLIC POLICY'''  DMC/Arbn/11/02 '''Singapore''' '''Singapore High Court''' '''Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Daimler South East Asia Pte Ltd [2010] SGHC 80: Singapore High Court; Judgment delivered by Andrew Ang J, 15 March 2010; [2010] SGHC 80: [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Front_Row_Investments_v_Daimler_South_East_Asia]]''' Rajah & Tann LLP for the Plaintiff, Front Row Chelliah & Kiang for the Defendant, Daimler '''ARBITRATION: RECOURSE AGAINST AWARD: WHETHER FAILURE TO CONSIDER A PARTY’S SUBMISSIONS ON AN ISSUE CONSTITUTES A BREACH OF NATURAL JUSTICE'''  DMC/Arbn/11/01 '''Singapore''' '''Singapore High Court'''  '''The “Engedi” [2010] SGHC 95: judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 25 March 2010: [2010] SGHC 95''' [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Engedi]] '''STAY OF ACTION IN FAVOUR REM PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION IN LONDON: WHETHER STAY OF PROCEEDINGS OUGHT TO BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 6 OF THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ACT WHERE CURRENT OWNER AND INTERVENER WAS NOT A PARTY TO ARBITRATION AGREEMENT'''  DMC/Arbn/10/5 England '''Stellar Shipping Co LLC v Hudson Shipping Lines[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Stellar_Shipping_v_Hudson_Shipping_Lines]]''' '''English Commercial Court: Hamblen J: [2010] EWHC 2985 (Comm): 18 November 2010''' Available on BAILII @ http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2010/2985.html '''ARBITRATION: CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT CONTAINING GUARANTEE AND ARBITRATION CLAUSE/AGREEMENT: TRIPARTITE CONTRACT: SUBSTANTIVE JURISDICTION OF ARBITRATORS: SECTION 67 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996: WHETHER THERE WAS A BINDING ARBITRATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN GUARANTORS AND GUARANTEED PARTY'''  DMC/Arbn/10/4 '''England''' '''Guangzhou Dockyards Co Ltd v ENE Aegiali I''' '''English Commercial Court: Blair J: [2010] EWHC 2826 (Comm): 5 November 2010 [[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Guangzhou_Dockyards_v_ENE_Aegiali_I]]''' '''ARBITRATION: TRUE CONSTRUCTION OF ARBITRATION – AGREEMENT: WHETHER PARTIES COULD AGREE TO APPEALS TO THE COURT ON QUESTIONS OF FACT: WHETHER PARTIES HAD AGREED TO APPEALS TO THE COURT ON QUESTIONS OF FACT'''  DMC/Arbn/10/3 '''England''' '''Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Isthisal Endustri AS v Sometal SAL''' '''English Commercial Court: Christopher Clarke J: [2010] EWHC 29 (Comm): 18 January 2010'''[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Habas_Sinai_v_Sometal]] Available on BAILII @ http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2010/29.html '''ARBITRATION: INCORPORATION OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT/CLAUSE WAS FOR INTO CONTRACT: GENERAL AVERAGE ONLYREFERENCE TO PRIOR CONTRACTS BETWEEN SAME PARTIES WHICH INCLUDED ARBITRATION AGREEMENT/CLAUSE: WHETHER WORDS USED SUFFICIENT TO INCORPORATE PRIOR ARBITRATION AGREEMENT/CLAUSE'''  DMC/Arbn/10/2 '''Hong Kong''' '''Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd v Jinhui Shipping and Transportation Ltd and others[[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Parakou_Shipping_v_Jinhui_Shipping]]  Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.184 of 2009: 30 September 2010''' http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000184_2009-73172.html '''STRIKING OUT: ABUSE OF PROCESS: COLLATERAL ATTACK ON PREVIOUS ARBITRATION DECISION: ‘RELATED PARTIES’'''  DMC/Arbn/10/1 '''The Netherlands''' '''Mr Van Wassenaer Van Catwijck, also acting in his capacity as the representative of Mr Saarberg and Mr Ariens (hereinafter called “the Arbitrators”) v Knowsley SK Limited, Manchester, United Kingdom (hereinafter called “KSK”)'''[https://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Arbitrators_v._Knowsley_SK] '''Dutch Supreme Court. D.H. Beukenhorst (chairman), A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, J.C. van Oven, F.B.Bakels and W.D.H. Asser, 29 January 2010, Case number 09/00505''', published on www.rechtspraak.nl, LJN: BK2007 '''ARBITRATION: DUTCH LAW: OBLIGATIONS OF ARBITRATORS TOWARDS PARTIES IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS'''