Difference between revisions of "Admiralty"

From DMC
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
DMC/SandT/10/06
 
DMC/SandT/10/06
  
[['''The “Catur Samudra”''']]  
+
'''The “Catur Samudra”''' [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Catur_Samudra]]  
  
 
'''Singapore High Court: Judgment delivered by Steven Chong JC, 15 January 2010: [2010] SGHC 18'''
 
'''Singapore High Court: Judgment delivered by Steven Chong JC, 15 January 2010: [2010] SGHC 18'''

Revision as of 18:40, 10 March 2010

DMC/SandT/10/06

The “Catur Samudra” [[1]]

Singapore High Court: Judgment delivered by Steven Chong JC, 15 January 2010: [2010] SGHC 18

ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION : WHETHER CLAIM UNDER GUARANTEE IS A CLAIM “ARISING OUT OF AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE USE OR HIRE” OF A VESSEL : SECTION 3(1)(H) HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACT


DMC/SandT/10/04

Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc v The Owners and/or Demise Charterers of the Ship or Vessel “Asian Atlas” ; [2]

Hong Kong SAR Court of Appeal: Ma CJHC, Stone and Reyes JJ: CACV No. 257 of 2007: 23 April 2008 ([2008] 3 HKLRD 604

[3]

ACTION IN REM UNDER HK HIGH COURT ORDINANCE, S.12A(2)(e): WARRANT OF ARREST: FOR “ANY CLAIM FOR DAMAGE DONE BY A SHIP”: SETTING ASIDE: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE OF FACTS RELATING TO JURISDICTION