Changes

DMC/SandT/19/04 '''England''' '''NatWest Markets plc v Stallion Eight Shipping Co SA '''English Commercial Court: Teare J: [2018] EWHC 2033 (Admlty): 31 July 2018:[Home]] [[Uphttps://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Natwest_Markets_v_Stallion_Eight_Shipping_Co_-_The_Alkyon]] [[Admiral Shipping v. "Rainbow Spring" CofA]] [[Amarantos Shp v '''SHIP ARREST: ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: APPLICATION FOR RELEASE FROM ARREST UNDER CPR RULE 61. State 8(4)(B): WHETHER DEFENDANT ENTITLED TO CROSS-UNDERTAKING IN RESPECT OF POTENTIAL DAMAGES'''  DMC/SandT/15/04 '''Hong Kong''' '''The Alas renamed The Kombos: Hong Kong Court of SA]First Instance: Ng J: HCAJ 241/2009: [2014] 4 HKLRD 160: 21 July 2014:[[Antara Koh vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. Eng Tou Offshorephp/The_Alas_renamed_The_Kombos]] ''' '''ADMIRALTY: WARRANT OF ARREST: SHIPOWNERS’ CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AND UNPAID HIRE: FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD NOT SATISFIED: NO BAR TO ACTION IN REM FOR CLAIM ARISING OUT OF AGREEMENT FOR USE OR HIRE OF THE SHIP'''  DMC/SandT/14/07 '''Hong Kong''' '''Darby International Investment Ltd v Rong Tai International Shipping Ltd''' '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Deputy High Court Judge B Chu: HCMP1438 of 2013: 2 December 2013:[[Anton Durbeck vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. DNBphp/Darby_International_Investments_v_Rong_Tai_International_Shipping]] ''' http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2013/2031.html '''MARITIME LAW: REGISTRATION OF VESSELS: VESSEL APPARENTLY REGISTERED IN MORE THAN ONE JURISDICTION: DECLARATION AS TO VALIDITY OF REGISTRATION IN HONG KONG: PURPOSE OF GRANTING DECLARATION'''  DMC/SandT/14/02 '''Singapore''' '''Singapore High Court''' '''The “Turtle Bay” [[Blue Nile v. Iguana Shipping]2013] SGHC 165 : Judgment delivered by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J, 30 August 2013: [[Borvigilant vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. Romina Gphp/The _Turtle_Bay]] [[Central Hudson  '''SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST: WHEN DIRECT PRIVATE SALE OF VESSEL UNDER ARREST CONSTITUTES CONTEMPT OF COURT: PRINCIPLES AND EFFECT OF ADMIRALTY JUDICIAL SALE: WHEN COURT WILL SANCTION A DIRECT PRIVATE SALE'''  DMC/SandT/13/08 '''Hong Kong''' '''Kulemesin Yuriy v. Tug HKSAR - The Neftegaz67''' ''Scott Turecamo']] [[Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal: Ma CJ, Chan Kwai Ha v, Riberio and Tang PJJ and Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony NPJ: FACV No. Wong Chick Bun (HK CofA)]] 6 and 7 of 2012: 22 February 2013:[[City of Chicago vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. Mphp/V MorganKulemesin_Yuriy_v_HKSAR_-_The_Neftegaz67]] ''' http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfa/2013/15.html '''COLLISION: OFFENCE OF ENDANGERING THE SAFETY OF OTHERS: STATE OF MIND REQUIRED FOR THE OFFENCE OF ENDANGERMENT: NARROW CHANNEL AS QUESTION OF FACT: SHIPPING AND PORT CONTROL ORDINANCE (CAP.313, LAWS OF HONG KONG)'''  DMC/SandT/13/05 '''The “Decurion”'''  '''Hong Kong''' '''Hong Kong Court of Appeal: Fok, Chu JJA and McWalters J: CACV No.97 of 2012: 12 May 2012:[[Crowley Marine vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. Maritransphp/The_Decurion_on_Appeal]] ''' http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkca/2013/180.html '''ADMIRALTY: IN REM JURISDICTION: CLAIM AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT: WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR IN CONTROL” OF CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 12B(4) OF HIGH COURT ORDINANCE'''  DMC/SandT/12/23 '''Singapore''' '''Singapore Court of Appeal''' '''The “Bunga Melati 5” [["Eleftheria" Collision with "Hakki Deval"]2012] SGCA 46: Judgment delivered by VK Rajah JA, 21st August 2012: [[Freret vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. Harris Trustphp/The_Bunga_Melati_5]]  '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: WHETHER A GOOD ARGUABLE CASE ON THE MERITS REQUIRED: THE VASILIY GOLOVNIN EXPLAINED'''  DMC/SandT/12/19 '''Hong Kong''' '''The “Decurion”'''  '''Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.141 of 2010: 4 May 2012: [[mhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/v Mr DeanThe_Decurion]] [[Hyundai  '''ADMIRALTY: IN REM JURISDICTION: CLAIM AGAINST VESSEL OWNED BY DEFENDANT: PAYMENT OUTSTANDING FOR BUNKERS SUPPLIED TO DEFENDANT FOR VESSELS CHARTERED BY RELATED COMPANY: STRIKING OUT: WHETHER DEFENDANT “IN POSSESSION OR IN CONTROL” OF CHARTERED VESSELS WITHIN SECTION 12B(4) OF HIGH COURT ORDINANCE'''  DMC/SandT/12/12 '''Malaysia''' '''Sarawak Shell Berhad v. South Sumatra Richfield Marine Pte Ltd (The “Red Gold”)''' ''Saibos']] Malaysian Court of Appeal: Sulaiman Bin Daud JCA, Syed Ahmad Helmy Bin Syed Ahmad JCA and Anantham Kasinather JCA: 19 March 2012: [[ICL Shipping vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. Chin Tai Steelphp/Sarawak_Shell_v_South_Sumatra_Richfield_Marine_-_The_Red_Gold]] [["Jutha Rajpruek" v''' '''ADMIRALTY: COLLISION BETWEEN OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSEL AND FIXED OFFSHORE OIL PLATFORM: RIGHT OF VESSEL OWNERS TO LIMIT LIABILITY: WHETHER COLLISION CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE OF OWNERS IN THE NAVIGATION OR MANAGEMENT OF VESSEL: WHETHER VESSEL OWNERS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY DUE TO ABSENCE OF ACTUAL FAULT OR PRIVITY: MERCHANT SHIPPING ORDINANCE 1952 SECTION 360 VIZ. SSM]] [[Re LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CONVENTION 1957'''   DMC/SandT/12/06 '''The “Oriental Baltic”'''Kuzma Gnidash ']] [["Lady B Gone"]] [['Mara'Singapore High Court: Tan Lee Meng J : [2011]] 3 SGHC 75: [[Margolle vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co. Delta Maritime]] [[Moore vuk/index. MV "Angela"php/The_Oriental_Baltic]] [[In re Otal Investments - m '''OWNERS OF VESSEL UNDER VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION: IN REM PROCEEDINGS AGAINST VESSEL COMMENCED AFTER LIQUIDATION: PLAINTIFF FILED CAVEAT AGAINST RELEASE AGAINST VESSEL PRIOR TO LIQUIDATION: ACTION AGAINST COMPANY UNDER LIQUIDATION ORDINARILY STAYED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT: WHETHER LEAVE SHOULD BE GRANTED TO PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE WITH ITS ACTION'''  DMC/SandT/v "Kariba"]] [[F12/V 01 '''The Netherlands''' '' Quality One']] [[Safezone Furtrans Denzilick Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS (“Furtrans”) v. Augusta Due Srl (“Augusta”): The "Island Sun"]] Constanza M”'''  '''Supreme Court of the Netherlands (“SCN”) (summary proceedings): Vice-President J.B. Fleers as Chairman and the judges A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, F.B. Bakels, C.E. Drion and G. Snijders LJN:BT2708, December 9, 2011:[[Sander vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. Richardsonphp/Furtrans_v_Augusta,_the_Constanza_M]] [[Schoeller Holdings]] [[Seismic Shipping v'''  '''CONSTRUCTION OF ART. Total E&P UK 3(CofA4)SECOND PARAGRAPH, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION RELATING TO THE ARREST OF SEA-GOING SHIPS 1952'''  DMC/SandT/11/27 '''Singapore''' '''The Sahand'''  '''Singapore High Court : Quentin Loh J : [2011]] SGHC 27:[[Sumitomo vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. Alexandreaphp/The_Sahand]] [[Sweet '''  '''ARRESTS OF VESSELS IN SINGAPORE OWNED BY IRANIAN COMPANIES: ASSETS FREEZE IMPOSED BY UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS 1737, 1747, 1803 AND 1929: WHETHER SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS REQUIRE IMPOUNDMENT OR DETENTION OF VESSELS OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY DESIGNATED PERSONS OR ENTITIES OR THEIR SUBSIDIARIES: EFFECT OF ASSETS FREEZE ON ARREST OF SHIPS PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION OF COURT'''  DMC/SandT/11/23 '''Hong Kong''' '''Birnam Ltd vThe Owners of the Ship or Vessel “Hong Ming”, The “Hong Ming”Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No. RNLI]] 105 of 2011: 26 August 2011:[[The "Anangel Endeavour"http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Birnam_v_The Hong_Ming]] [[ '''WARRANT OF ARREST: SETTING ASIDE: CLAIM FOR OWNERSHIP OF VESSEL PURSUANT TO A TERMINATED CONTRACT FOR SALE OF VESSEL: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE: MISUSE OF THE ARREST PROCESS'''  DMC/SandT/11/19 '''The "Cape Moreton"]] [[Netherlands''' '''Pianura Armatori SpA v Ferrari Shipping Agency G.A.The "Convenience Container" Halcyon Star”'''  '''Court of Rotterdam (summary proceedings) : Mr A.F.L. Geerdes, LJN:BQ5031, October 7, 2010 (CofApublished May 19, 2011)]] : [[The "Dilmun Filmar"http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Pianura_Armatori_v_Ferrari_Shipping]] [[''' '''ARREST CONVENTION 1952 ART. 3(4) SECOND PARAGRAPH: ARREST OF VESSEL OWNED BY A VESSEL MANAGER FOR MARITIME CLAIMS AGAINST THE VESSEL MANAGER RELATING TO OTHER VESSELS NOT OWNED BY THE MANAGER'''   '''DMC/SandT/11/18 '''England''' '''The Owner of the Vessel “The Ocean Crown” and others v Five Oceans Salvage Consultants Ltd, “The Ocean Crown”'''Ever Glory ']] [[The "Inai Selasih"]] [[The "Lian Shun"]] [[The 'Mezen']] [English High Court: Queen’s Bench Division (Admiralty Court): Gross J: [The "Peng Yan"2009]] [EWHC 3040 (Admlty), [The "Seaway" CofA]2010] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 468: 26 November 2009:[[The "Sunrise Crane"http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/The_Ocean_Crown]] ''' '''SALVAGE: ASSESSMENT OF REMUNERATION: WHETHER RISK OF FUTURE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN APPLYING PRINCIPLE OF ENCOURAGEMENT: SCOPE OF THE PRINCIPLE IN THE AMERIQUE'''   DMC/SandT/11/15 '''Canada''' '''Société Telus Communications, Hydro-Québec and Bell Canada v Peracomo Inc., Réal Vallée and the fishing vessel Realice'''  '''Federal Court of Canada: Harrington J.: 2011 FC 494: 27 April 2011:[[The "Vicky 1"]] [[Tasman Orient Line vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. Alliance Groupphp/Telus_Communications_v_Peracomo_Inc_and_Réal_Vallée]] [[''' '''SHIPPING: SUBMARINE CABLE CUT BY SKIPPER OF FISHING VESSEL: WHETHER DAMAGE CAUSED INTENTIONALLY OR RECKLESSLY AND WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT 'SUCH LOSS' WOULD PROBABLY RESULT: WHETHER DEFENDANTS ENTITLED TO LIMIT LIABILITY UNDER THE 1976 LIMITATION CONVENTION, AS INCORPORATED INTO CANADIAN LAW'''  DMC/SandT/10/18  Hong Kong  The "Voutakos"]] “Hua Tian Long”[[Tilbury vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. IOPCF CofAphp/Hua_Tian_Long]] [[Titanic]] [[Trans Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance: Stone J in Chambers: HCAJ No. 59/2008: 23 April 2010  http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000059_2008-Tec Asia v70707. Mhtml  BREACH OF CONTRACT: DEFENDANT SHIPOWNER’S FAILURE TO PROVIDE VESSEL: CHINESE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT AS SHIPOWNER: CLAIM FOR SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND CROWN IMMUNITY: WAIVER AND SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION   DMC/SandT/10/V Harmony Container]] 06 '''The “Catur Samudra”''' [[Treasure Valley vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index. Saputra Teddyphp/The_Catur_Samudra]] [[Tug  ''Allie-B']] [Singapore High Court: Judgment delivered by Steven Chong JC, 15 January 2010: [Ultimate Lady]2010] SGHC 18''' '''ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION : WHETHER CLAIM UNDER GUARANTEE IS A CLAIM “ARISING OUT OF AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE USE OR HIRE” OF A VESSEL : SECTION 3(1)(H) HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACT'''  DMC/SandT/10/04 '''Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc v The Owners and/or Demise Charterers of the Ship or Vessel “Asian Atlas” ; [[Vestoil vhttp://www.onlinedmc.co. Muk/V "M Pioneer"]] [[World Fuel vindex. Florens Containerphp/The_%E2%80%9CAsian_Atlas%E2%80%9D)]] [["CSAV Tokyo" v "KMTC  '''Hong Kong"SAR Court of Appeal: Ma CJHC, Stone and Reyes JJ: CACV No. 257 of 2007: 23 April 2008 ([2008]3 HKLRD 604''' [http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkca/2008/CACV000257_2007-60848.html)] '''ACTION IN REM UNDER HK HIGH COURT ORDINANCE, S.12A(2)(e): WARRANT OF ARREST: FOR “ANY CLAIM FOR DAMAGE DONE BY A SHIP”: SETTING ASIDE: MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE OF FACTS RELATING TO JURISDICTION'''