Difference between revisions of "Voyage C/P Disputes"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | DMC/SandT/11/21 | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''England''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''English High Court: Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court): Field J.: [2011] EWHC 1165 (Comm: 12 May 2011: [[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Carboex_v_Louis_Dreyfus_Commodities]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''AMWELSH CHARTERPARTY: DEMURRAGE: EXCEPTION OF STRIKES: WHETHER DELAY IN DISCHARGE ARISING FROM CONGESTION CAUSED BY STRIKES EXCEPTED FROM LAYTIME''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
DMC/SandT/10/10 | DMC/SandT/10/10 | ||
Revision as of 17:45, 21 July 2011
DMC/SandT/11/21
England
Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA
English High Court: Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court): Field J.: [2011] EWHC 1165 (Comm: 12 May 2011: [[1]]
AMWELSH CHARTERPARTY: DEMURRAGE: EXCEPTION OF STRIKES: WHETHER DELAY IN DISCHARGE ARISING FROM CONGESTION CAUSED BY STRIKES EXCEPTED FROM LAYTIME
DMC/SandT/10/10
Singapore High Court
The “Asia Star”[2009] SGHC 91 [[2]]
Judgment delivered by Judith Prakash J, 17 April 2009 [2009] SGHC 91
BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO: WHETHER PLAINTIFF ACTED REASONABLY IN MITIGATION OF LOSS: PLAINTIFF NOT REQUIRED TO INCUR EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSE OR TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS IN ORDER TO MITIGATE LOSS: MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CARRY CARGO