Shipping & Transport: Difference between revisions

From DMC
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Main Page]] - [[Admiralty]] - [[Carriage of Goods]] - [[Other Cases]] - [[Time C/P Disputes]] [[Voyage C/P Disputes]]
[[Main Page]] - [[Admiralty]] - [[Carriage of Goods]] - [[Other Cases]] - [[Time C/P Disputes]] -[[Voyage C/P Disputes]]


DMC/SandT/10/02  
DMC/SandT/10/02  

Revision as of 15:10, 19 February 2010

Main Page - Admiralty - Carriage of Goods - Other Cases - Time C/P Disputes -Voyage C/P Disputes

DMC/SandT/10/02

German Federal Supreme Court

Date of Judgement: 18 June 2009: Case Reference: 1 ZR 140/06 CARRIER’S LIABILITY: BREAKING THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: SUB-CONTRACTING


DMC/SandT/10/01

The Netherlands Supreme Court

Nile Dutch Africa Line B.V, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (“NDAL”) v. (1) Delta Lloyd Schadeverzekering N.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands (“Delta Lloyd”), (2) Premium Tobacco Investments N.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands (“Tobacco”), (3) M. Meerapfel Söhne A.G., Basel, Switzerland (“Meerapfel”) and (4) CETAC, Douala, Cameroon (“Cetac”) - The “NDS Provider”;;;

CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA UNDER BILL OF LADING: HAGUE VISBY RULES: LIABILITY FOR DEFECTIVE CONTAINERS SUPPLIED BY CARRIER: PACKAGING OR PART OF THE VESSEL? INTERPRETATION OF TREATIES UNDER DUTCH LAW