Search results

Create the page "$1" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

• Sylvia Shipping v. Progress Bulk Carriers
  ...section 19 of SOLAS, recording “Main Structure wasted in cargo holds Nos 1, 3 and 4”. Repairs were commenced on 22 April 2004. ...xendale (1854) 9 Ex 341 and Czarnikow v Koufos (The “Heron II”) [1969] 1 AC 350 summarising the accepted test for remoteness as being “whether the
  12 KB (1,951 words) - 21:30, 21 April 2010
• Time C/P Disputes
  ...o v Olam Global Agri Pte Ltd and Sinco Shipping Pte Ltd (The “Maria Theo 1”)''' ...R ELIGIBILITY CLAUSE (“OMEC”) BY WHICH VESSEL GUARANTEED AT ALL TIMES (1) TO HAVE A VALID SHIP INSPECTION REPORT (“SIRE”) PROGRAMME REPORT REGIS
  37 KB (5,214 words) - 13:17, 16 April 2024
• The "Tasman Pioneer"
  ...e speed of some 16 knots. The ship left Yokohama, Japan, in the evening of 1 May 2001, bound for Pusan in South Korea, intending to sail west along Japa ...was discovered in the forward ballast tanks and in the forward cargo holds 1 and 2. On the orders of the master, the ship’s pumps were activated. Howe
  13 KB (2,224 words) - 14:34, 12 May 2010
• List of Archive Entries
  [http://archive.onlinedmc.co.uk/'michael_s'1.htm 'michael s'1] [http://archive.onlinedmc.co.uk/agapitos_v__agnew(1).htm agapitos v agnew(1)]
  55 KB (9,143 words) - 18:42, 12 May 2010
• The Arbitrators v. Knowsley SK
  (1) Under Dutch law, an arbitral tribunal is only obliged to inform the Partie
  9 KB (1,494 words) - 15:11, 28 June 2010
• Glory Wealth Shipping v North China Shipping
  The Court, following The Elena d’Amico [1980] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 75, held that damages for wrongful redelivery of the vessel s ...n order to bring that into account in calculating damages: The Fani [1994] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 633. Therefore, the disponent shipowner’s early redelivery
  5 KB (761 words) - 20:51, 6 September 2010
• Ioannis N K
  ...erred that a claimant must first meet the requirements of the Anton Piller(1) order or that an application under section 5(5)(a)(iv) should be equated w (1) An Anton Piller order is a court order that provides the right to search
  8 KB (1,343 words) - 15:30, 3 August 2010
• Hua Tian Long
  ...y owned by the Central People’s Government (CPG) of the PRC, which after 1 July 1997 exercised sovereign power over the Special Administrative Region
  10 KB (1,714 words) - 17:53, 7 December 2010
• Shipping & Transport 2011
  '''Great Eastern Shipping Co Ltd v. (1) Far East Chartering Ltd (2) Binani Cement Ltd''' ...nch Division (Admiralty Court): Gross J: [2009] EWHC 3040 (Admlty), [2010] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 468: 26 November 2009:[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/
  14 KB (1,981 words) - 18:03, 22 June 2012
• Omak Maritime v Mamola Challenger Shipping
  '''The Court held that reliance damages(1) should rationally be explained as a species of expectation damages(2), an ...or breach of contract” enunciated by Parke B in Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Exch 850 was that the innocent party to a breach of contract is to be place
  8 KB (1,273 words) - 21:38, 29 August 2010
• ENE 1 Kos Limited v Petrobras
  '''ENE 1 Kos Limited v Petroleo Brasileiro SA''' ...e charterparty on the Shelltime 3 form between the claimant shipowner, ENE 1 Kos Ltd (“the Shipowner”), and the defendant charterer, Petroleo Brasil
  10 KB (1,744 words) - 13:32, 9 October 2017
• Zodiac Maritime v Fortescue Metals
  ...t would not be able to honour their freight commitments under the CVC from 1 December 2008. ...or “sufficiently closely connected with the breach” (The Fanis [1994] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 633). Therefore, Zodiac’s earnings under the Guofeng charte
  10 KB (1,593 words) - 22:34, 4 November 2010
• Habas Sinai v Sometal
  (1) A and B make a contract in which they incorporate standard terms; ...ms under various headings and then agreed with the same counterparty terms 1-5 under the same headings as before and, as to the rest, that all the terms
  11 KB (1,826 words) - 18:42, 7 December 2010
• Parakou Shipping v Jinhui Shipping
  ...277; departing from Megarry VC’s test in Gleeson v J Wippell & Co [1977] 1 WLR 510). ...e Company of Canada and others v Lincoln National Life Insurance Co [2005] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 606, paras. 63-69. Although Sun Life concerned whether a stra
  12 KB (1,969 words) - 22:02, 19 December 2010
• Angara Maritime v Oceanconnect UK
  '''SALE OF GOODS: BUNKERS/MARINE FUELS: S.25(1) OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979: SALE OF BUNKERS TO TIME CHARTERERS: BUNKERS '''Conversion: the effect of s.25(1) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 was to exclude a claim by bunker suppliers a
  11 KB (1,744 words) - 19:52, 7 December 2010
• Guangzhou Dockyards v ENE Aegiali I
  22.1 The Contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with English ...ration in London, England before a tribunal of three (3) arbitrators. One (1) arbitrator shall be appointed by each Party to this Contract and the third
  10 KB (1,718 words) - 21:43, 19 December 2010
• Stellar Shipping v Hudson Shipping Lines
  To determine this required consideration of (1) whether a contract of guarantee was agreed between Stellar and Hudson, and Footnote 1:
  8 KB (1,294 words) - 12:24, 20 December 2010
• Germany CMR Damages
  ...arriage of Goods by Road (‘CMR’): date of Judgment: 30 September 2010: 1 ZR 39/09''' ...nt domestic law or of claiming the market price according to Art. 23 para. 1 and 2 CMR. In the latter case, the limitation of 8.33 SDR/kg according to A
  6 KB (1,076 words) - 00:13, 25 January 2011
• Engedi
  6. —(1) Notwithstanding Article 8 of the Model Law, where any party to an arbitr ...court to which an application has been made in accordance with subsection (1) shall make an order, upon such terms or conditions as it may think fit, st
  9 KB (1,456 words) - 18:41, 24 January 2011
• Asia Star
  1. The Court of Appeal set out the basic rules relating to mitigation, namely ...s of US$10,137,500.00, and Pacific’s expected profit of approximately US$1,553,800.00.
  14 KB (2,247 words) - 21:26, 19 February 2011

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)