Difference between revisions of "Shipping & Transport"

From DMC
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Main Page]] - [[Admiralty]] - [[Carriage of Goods]] - [[Other Cases]] - [[Time C/P Disputes]] - [[Voyage C/P Disputes]]
 
[[Main Page]] - [[Admiralty]] - [[Carriage of Goods]] - [[Other Cases]] - [[Time C/P Disputes]] - [[Voyage C/P Disputes]]
 +
 +
DMC/SandT/10/03
 +
 +
'''Hong Kong'''
 +
 +
'''Cheong Yuk Fai and another v China International Freight Forwarders (HK) Ltd''' [['''Cheong Yuk Fai and another v China International Freight Forwarders (HK) Ltd''' ]]
 +
 +
'''Hong Kong SAR Court of Appeal''': Cheung and Yuen JJA and A Chung J: CACV No. 463 of 2002: 26 January 2005: [2005] 4 HKLRD 544 (English translation; judgment handed down in Chinese)
 +
 +
http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkca/2005/CACV000463X_2002-47015.html
 +
 +
'''CARRIAGE OF GOODS: CLAIM AGAINST CARRIER FOR WRONGFUL DELIVERY OF GOODS: CONVERSION: LIMITATION UNDER HAGUE-VISBY RULES AND BILL OF LADING'''
 +
  
 
DMC/SandT/10/02  
 
DMC/SandT/10/02  

Revision as of 21:22, 21 February 2010

Main Page - Admiralty - Carriage of Goods - Other Cases - Time C/P Disputes - Voyage C/P Disputes

DMC/SandT/10/03

Hong Kong

Cheong Yuk Fai and another v China International Freight Forwarders (HK) Ltd '''Cheong Yuk Fai and another v China International Freight Forwarders (HK) Ltd'''

Hong Kong SAR Court of Appeal: Cheung and Yuen JJA and A Chung J: CACV No. 463 of 2002: 26 January 2005: [2005] 4 HKLRD 544 (English translation; judgment handed down in Chinese)

http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkca/2005/CACV000463X_2002-47015.html

CARRIAGE OF GOODS: CLAIM AGAINST CARRIER FOR WRONGFUL DELIVERY OF GOODS: CONVERSION: LIMITATION UNDER HAGUE-VISBY RULES AND BILL OF LADING


DMC/SandT/10/02

German Federal Supreme Court

Date of Judgement: 18 June 2009: Case Reference 1ZR 140/06:[1]

CARRIER’S LIABILITY: BREAKING THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: SUB-CONTRACTING


DMC/SandT/10/01

The Netherlands Supreme Court

Nile Dutch Africa Line B.V, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (“NDAL”) v. (1) Delta Lloyd Schadeverzekering N.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands (“Delta Lloyd”), (2) Premium Tobacco Investments N.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands (“Tobacco”), (3) M. Meerapfel Söhne A.G., Basel, Switzerland (“Meerapfel”) and (4) CETAC, Douala, Cameroon (“Cetac”) - The “NDS Provider” [[2]]

CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA UNDER BILL OF LADING: HAGUE VISBY RULES: LIABILITY FOR DEFECTIVE CONTAINERS SUPPLIED BY CARRIER: PACKAGING OR PART OF THE VESSEL? INTERPRETATION OF TREATIES UNDER DUTCH LAW