Changes

Guangzhou Dockyards v ENE Aegiali I

24 bytes removed, 21:43, 19 December 2010
no edit summary
'''Summary'''
'''On the true construction of the arbitration agreement, the terms of the arbitration agreement between the parties did not provide for appeals to be made to the court on questions of fact. In Further, the Court thought it very doubtful in any event, that it was neither permissible under the Arbitration Act 1996 nor by agreement of the parties for appeals had jurisdiction to hear an appeal from arbitrators on questions of fact to be made to the court (though it was not strictly necessary to decide the latter point given the conclusion on the true construction of the arbitration agreement)'''
By Jim Leighton, BSc (Hons), LLB (Hons), LLM (Maritime Law), Solicitor of England & Wales at Kennedys Singapore LLP and International Contributor to DMC’s CaseNotes