Difference between revisions of "Arbitration Issues"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Hong Kong''' | '''Hong Kong''' | ||
| − | '''Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd v Jinhui Shipping and Transportation Ltd and others | + | '''Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd v Jinhui Shipping and Transportation Ltd and others[[http://www.onlinedmc.co.uk/index.php/Parakou_Shipping_v_Jinhui_Shipping]] |
| + | |||
Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.184 of 2009: 30 September 2010''' | Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.184 of 2009: 30 September 2010''' | ||
Revision as of 13:07, 30 November 2010
DMC/SandT/10/2
Hong Kong
Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd v Jinhui Shipping and Transportation Ltd and others[[1]]
Hong Kong Court of First Instance: Reyes J: HCAJ No.184 of 2009: 30 September 2010
http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/eng/hkcfi/2010/HCAJ000184_2009-73172.html
STRIKING OUT: ABUSE OF PROCESS: COLLATERAL ATTACK ON PREVIOUS ARBITRATION DECISION: ‘RELATED PARTIES’
DMC/Arbn/10/1
The Netherlands
Mr Van Wassenaer Van Catwijck, also acting in his capacity as the representative of Mr Saarberg and Mr Ariens (hereinafter called “the Arbitrators”) v Knowsley SK Limited, Manchester, United Kingdom (hereinafter called “KSK”)[2]
Dutch Supreme Court. D.H. Beukenhorst (chairman), A.M.J. van Buchem-Spapens, J.C. van Oven, F.B.Bakels and W.D.H. Asser, 29 January 2010, Case number 09/00505, published on www.rechtspraak.nl, LJN: BK2007
ARBITRATION: DUTCH LAW: OBLIGATIONS OF ARBITRATORS TOWARDS PARTIES IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
